Humanitarian doctrine of responsibility to protect
Critically evaluate the political and ethical implications of the humanitarian doctrine of responsibility to protect
1- Includes footnotes and excludes bibliography
2- The essay should demonstrate an understanding of the theoretical literature on war and security studies, the relevant concepts, and an ability to
integrate theory with references to contemporary examples.
Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Essay in Conflict Manager
Using Chapter 2 and 3 from textbook, using your own life situation, past, present, or future. The Objectives and Key Terms at the top of Chapters 2 and 3
identify the key concepts in the chapters. Address the following in your essay:
• Define and explain two key concepts from each chapter that stood out to you; please include page numbers, cite from the textbook, and end the essay with a
reference to the textbook (citations/ references should be in APA style).
• Include suggestions the authors make for each chapter that would help you better manage conflicts (again include page numbers and references to the
textbook)
• Then explain how you could use the concepts that you identified to better manage a conflict in the past, present, or future (it may be one conflict for
both chapters or a separate conflict for each chapter).
Your essay must meet the following criteria:
• Identified 2 key concepts per chapter, defined, and explained them (key concepts are printed in bold in the text).
• Identified at least one suggestion from each chapter.
• Cited the text (with page numbers) and referenced it at the end of the essay.
• Written in the APA style using the correct grammar and spelling.
Note that this essay should be based on two chapters, equally. In some cases you can integrate the two chapters as you write, but in other cases you may
first want to discuss one chapter and then the other. In either case, you must treat both chapters equally.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
This reflection paper is about a service-learning site. My service site is Saint James Cathedral Kitchen. The kitchen prepares and serves approximately 150
guests in need of a warm meal from Monday to Friday. I will attach my six journals and the guideline so that you can know what I mainly to do every week.
As the guide said, it is not necessary to answer all the questions in the guide,but it should include a reflection on each of the elements(personal experience, group/class learning, and texts studied). The text we used is “The Christian vision of humanity: Basic Christian anthropology” by Sachs and “The Principle of Mercy” by Jon Sobrino. Please see my attachment for more details.If you have any questions, you can send emails to me and I will response as soon as possible.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Read Philip K Dick’s 1968 novella Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? and make an argument about the significance of some element of it that is a minor or ignored aspect of Ridley Scott’s adaptation, Blade Runner, but is crucial to the meaning of the novella.
Your paper should identify this element and tell me why it is important, and then mobilize and analyze textual evidence to explain why and how this element/idea is crucial for an understanding of the text in its moment and for our own. This assignment is also an opportunity for you to reflect on some of the questions in the prompt above about what literature does that films do not and vice versa.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Book Review of John Lindsay-Poland’s Emperors in the Jungle
Book Review of John Lindsay-Poland’s Emperors in the Jungle.
Write a 4-5 page, double-spaced, and typed book review of John Lindsay-Poland’s Emperors in the Jungle. The essay is to be a minimum of 4 full pages and a maximum of 5 full pages. Use 12 point font. Start at the top of the first page without putting
information such as course number. I recommend that you use Time New Roman for your font.
Your review needs to address the following items.
[1] Inform the reader what the author’s central question is.
[2] Identify 3-4 central themes that the author deploys in answering the question.
[3] Explain what the author’s central argument is.
[4] Advance an argument about the significance of the book for understanding Modern Latin American history. These elements of the essay do not necessarily have to be addressed in the sequential order presented above.
Note that a book review essay is not a book report. The latter normally provides a descriptive summary of the book, while the former is an analytical essay. The best review interrogates the book using ideas, questions, themes, arguments, and debates at play within our consideration of Modern Latin American history. Use parenthetical citations for the material.
You do not need a sources cited list.
Put your name on the back of the last page along with the course number. Staple your essay. You are responsible for keeping an electronic copy of the essay in a secure place until you have received your assignment grade.
You are responsible for producing an essay free of typographical errors and grammatical flaws. Please consult the handouts on writing that have been provided throughout the semester as tools for revising your essays toward a quality product.
Grading criteria
substance and clarity of central question identified
substance and clarity of themes analyzed
clarity of presentation of the author’s argument
strength of argument about the book’s significance
errors of omission and commission
clarity and substance of the writing
quality of writing.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Every bit of information must be cited
must also write a treatment plan with 2 long term goals and 2 short term goals for each of the long term goals and 2 interventions for each short term goal.
USE PEER REVIEWED SOURCES AND SCHOLARLY SOURCES FOR ACCURATE INFORMATION AND WELL RESEARCHED ASSIGNMENTS FOR VALIDITY.
Review the grading rubric on turntin to avoid penalization which will lead to low grades.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
The report should be divided into the following sections:
1. Introduction – Should include a clear statement regarding the purpose of the experiment.
2. Methods – Refer to the experiment/procedure available on the NUTR 1102 Laboratory
Moodle sit
3. Results – Include data tables as completed in lab. Means and standard deviations should be calculated and correct. Tables and figures should be numbered and labelled and appear in the order that they are referred to in the text. The reader should be able to look at the table and understand its contents without reading the report.
4. Discussion – A discussion of the results and what they mean. This section will probably be longer than other sections of the report; however, be as concise as possible. Marks will be taken off for irrelevant information. It is not necessary to repeat information
provided in the tables. You will need to refer to the tables and graphs in the Results section. Be sure to specify which table or graph you are referring to, i.e. (Table 2) or (Figure 1), etc. Try to discuss in experimental blocks. Integrate objective and subjective data. In the discussion, try to explain why you got the results that you did, especially if they differed from the expected. Does literature support or negate findings? Was there something about the samples or testing environment that could have caused the deviation from the expected, i.e. fluctuations in oven temperature, personal element, untrained panel, sensory fatigue. Were any trends evident? Discussion should be supported with
theory and referenced accordingly. References should be listed numerically in the order they appear in the report. Numbers should appear in brackets following the citation. The full reference should be listed at the end of the report under the References section.
5. Conclusions – A brief summary of what the experiment has shown and possible implications or applications (food service, food industry, domestic, consumer retail level, etc.). This section should give the reader an idea of the purpose and usefulness of the tests without reading the rest of the lab report.
6. References – A list of only those references cited in the report should be included. Full references should be listed numerically in the order they appear in the report. In addition.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
This is scientific reports about (ultra heat treatment of milk) have to be Your 2500 word report, prepared using the Template file from should be structured as follows:
Appropriate illustrative mater use intent referencing (name and date),, EMBO Journal references in references list if you can use 6 or 8 journals or more, and 3 or 5 books that should be fine so there are no specific number of references.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Write a 2- to 3-page paper describing your company’s intranet.
Include how the information is laid out and what security measures are in place to protect your company’s information. If your company does not have an intranet, describe how an intranet could be used in your company.
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
In 1965, Sir Austin Bradford Hill proposed guidelines for assessing causality. His intention was not for these to be used in a rigid manner but rather to be used as a guide.
For this Application Assignment, review your resources on Hill’s guidelines for causality. Then find a review journal article dealing with an association where causality is hypothesized based on an assessment of the body of literature on a topic. Analyze this article using Hill’s guidelines. Then respond to the following questions:
•Does the article use Hill’s guidelines to determine causality?
•If so, are they each addressed thoroughly?
•If not, describe the alternative means used for assessing causality.
•How well do you believe Hill’s guidelines work as a tool for determining causality for the association your review article addresses?
SAMPLE ANSWER
Assessing Causality
Hill’s Criteria of Causation basically delineates the minimal condition that is required to ascertain a causal relationship between 2 items. Sir Austin Bradford Hill originally presented these criteria as a method that can be utilized to determine the causal link between a given factor, for instance tobacco use, and an ill health, like lung cancer or emphysema (Doll, 2010). The criteria forms the starting point of contemporary epidemiological research that tries to find out scientifically valid causal links between possible disease agents and the multiple sicknesses which afflict people (Crislip, 2010). The criteria are nine. (i) Strength of the association: undoubtedly, if condition Y brings about outcome Z, then it has to be that Y and Z can be demonstrably related with each other. Simply put, the association should be sufficiently strong to be considered as clinically significant by the person reading the argument (Van Reekum, Streiner & Conn, 2009). (ii) Consistency of the evidence: if Y causes Z, then one should expect that evidence that supports this relationship would actually be found consistently (Crislip, 2010).
(iii) Specificity: given that illnesses could have different etiologies as well as therapies, this criteria is weaker. (iv) Temporal sequence: without a doubt, if Y causes Z, then Y must necessarily occur before Z. This is an essential criterion used to establish a causation argument (Crislip, 2010). (v) Biological gradient or dose-response: a large exposure has to result in a large effect, and a little exposure has to cause little effect. (vi) Biological rationale or plausibility: there is a higher chance of a causative relationship being present if it actually makes biological sense that Y results in Z. The association is in agreement with presently accepted understanding of pathological processes (Susser, 2008). (vii) Coherence: there is a higher probability that Y results in Z if this assumed causal relationship is similar to what is already known regarding the disorder or sickness. (viii) Experimental evidence: the health condition could be improved or prevented by a suitable experimental regimen. (ix) Analogous evidence: this criterion basically takes the form of supposing that if some condition which is the same as Y brings about an outcome the same as Z, then this is evidence that Z is caused by Y (Crislip, 2010; Doll, 2010).
Van Reekum, R., Cohen, T., & Wong, J. (2000). Can Traumatic Brain Injury Cause Psychiatric Disorders? The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 12:316-327. https://www.doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.12.2.316
Van Reekum et al. (2000) reviewed the evidence in supporting the argument that Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) might result in psychiatric disorders and they employed the structure presented by some of Hill’s most pertinent criteria with the aim of critically examining the strength of this argument. The article uses some of Hill’s guidelines in determining causality. Not all of the criteria are addressed thoroughly.
In the article, Van Reekum et al. (2000) presented consistent evidence of an association between traumatic brain injury and several disorders from many studies. Nonetheless, most of this research was in fact narrowed to naturalistic follow-up studies. Not any of the studies used pre-TBI – prospective – psychiatric evaluations, so that the evidence for the apt temporal sequence was limited. Retrospective psychiatric evaluations suggested that nearly all of the psychiatric disorders start for the first time after traumatic brain injury. There is little evidence in the article of biological gradient for psychiatric disorders after traumatic brain injury in adults. This suggests either that presently available approaches to measuring the severity of traumatic brain injury are insufficient or, on the other hand, that traumatic brain injury increases the risk of psychiatric disorders notwithstanding the TBI severity (Van Reekum et al., 2000). There was substantial evidence supporting a biologic rationale that is in fact cohesive with the existing, modern knowledge; it has been found that traumatic brain injury actually disrupts neuronal systems that underlie behavior and mood (Van Reekum, Streiner & Conn, 2009). The other causal factors to psychiatric disorders post traumatic brain injury were also preliminarily recognized, for instance the existence of pre-TBI psychiatric disorders in some instances.
Hill’s guidelines are very effective as a tool for determining causality for the association that the article review addresses. In essence, Hill’s guidelines in reviewing the evidence for the argument of causation presented by Van Reekum et al. (2000) was useful for several reasons. The structure provided by the guidelines allowed for systematic review of every available evidence and to find its place within the argument. It is of note that where the data were not consistent with the causation argument, this served to encourage the creation of new hypotheses, for instance the lack of a biological gradient indicated that traumatic brain injury of even mild seriousness can be able to disrupt neuronal circuits that underlie psychiatric disorders. Using the guidelines emphasized the methodological drawbacks in future research. Moreover, using the guideline permitted the review to move further than the ascertainment of a simple connection between psychiatric disorders and TBI by encouraging consideration of extra criteria which support the argument.
References
Crislip, M. (2010). Causation and Hill’s Criteria. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press.
Doll, R. (2010). Sir Austin Bradford Hill and the Progress of Medical Science. British Medical Journal, 305: 1521-1526
Susser, M. (2008). Judgment and Causal Inference: Criteria in Epidemiologic Studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 105:1-15
Van Reekum, R., Cohen, T., & Wong, J. (2000). Can Traumatic Brain Injury Cause Psychiatric Disorders? The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 12:316-327. http://www.doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.12.2.316
Van Reekum, R., Streiner, D. L., & Conn, D. K. (2009). Applying Bradford Hill’s Criteria for Causation to Neuropsychiatry: Challenges and Opportunities. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci,13(3).
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
