Machiavelli View of Creon from Antigoneis as Good Prince

Machiavelli View of Creon from Antigoneis as Good Prince Would Machiavelli say that Creon from Antigoneis a good prince? Why, or why not?

Machiavelli View of Creon from Antigoneis as Good Prince
Machiavelli View of Creon from Antigoneis as Good Prince

Please make sure that you look at the essay guidelines and follow them accordingly

Winter Essay Assignment

**Final assignment due March 21 by 11:10 a.m.**

POL 200Y Political Theory

Prof. Emily Nacol

Winter 2019

Machiavelli View of Creon from Antigoneis as Good Prince Instructions

Please choose one of the following questions and write a response to it. Your response should take the form of an argument, with a thesis statement. You should support your argument with evidence chosen from our course texts. Be sure to engage a good counterargument as part of constructing your own argument!

  1. Would Machiavelli say that Creon from Antigone is a good prince? Why, or why not?
  2. Does Antigone belong in the City of Ladies that Christine de Pizan is building? Using Christine’s account of the core virtues—reason, rectitude, and justice—explain why you think Antigone does or does not belong in Christine’s allegorical city.
  1. How does Machiavelli’s account of political virtue in The Prince compare to that of the classical thinkers we have studied? Why does he think his account of political virtue is superior to the ones they offer? How might they respond to him? Which account is more convincing to you, and why? To answer this question, please choose one of these classical thinkers and compare him to Machiavelli: Plato, Aristotle, or Confucius.
  1. In The Prince, Machiavelli famously argues that princes should cultivate and maintain a certain image or appearance in the eyes of their people—even if this requires some hypocrisy or deceit. Explain how and why Machiavelli makes this argument. Would Socrates agree with this argument about political leadership? Do you agree with it?

Why, or why not?

  1. Many political theorists suggest that the family is our first ‘school,’ where we learn the virtues and habits that can make us into good citizens. This year we have read and discussed texts that give some attention to the household and its place in the just political order: Sophocles’ Antigone, Plato’s Republic, Aristotle’s Politics, Confucius’ The Analects, and Christine de Pizan’s Book of the City of Ladies.

Machiavelli View of Creon from Antigoneis as Good Prince

Choose two texts from this list and compare their ideas about the structure and purpose of family life. How do your chosen thinkers’ accounts of the family or household shape their respective arguments about a just political community? And, what do you find of value /or concern when you compare their ideas on the family and politics?

  1. In Aristotle’s Politics, he argues that “the relation of male to female is that of natural superior to natural inferior, and that of the ruler to ruled” (1254b13-14). This year, we have 2 read two texts that challenge this idea of gender-based hierarchy: Plato’s Republic and Christine de Pizan’s Book of the City of Ladies. Choose one of these texts and explain how they understand gender relations. How does your chosen author’s view on the “natural” relation between men and women shape his or her views on the capacity of women to govern /or participate in political life? Do they present a convincing argument against more traditional views like the one Aristotle embraces?
  1. In the Discourses, Machiavelli argues that people can rule themselves and that there are certain advantages to putting political power in their hands. What are his arguments in favor of popular rule? How does his account compare to the criticisms of popular rule that Socrates makes in Apology and Republic, in reflections on democracy as a corrupt form of government? Who’s right, in your view?

Machiavelli View of Creon from Antigoneis as Good Prince Guidelines

The final draft of this assignment should be 2400-3000 words (roughly 8-10 pages). Your paper should be written in 12-point font and double-spaced. Please number your pages.

For this assignment, we ask that you use only our course readings. We do not expect or require any additional source materials. The purpose of this assignment is for you to engage with our course readings.

Please cite your sources using the Chicago author-date format, with in-text citations. Here is a link to an online guide to Chicago citations:

https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide/citation-guide-2.html

Special office hours

In addition to the normal office hours that Dr. Nacol and your TA have, there will be two special drop-in sessions to help you with the final draft of your assignment:

Machiavelli View of Creon from Antigoneis as Good Prince Assignment steps

February 18-25: Sign up for meetings with a TA /or Prof. Nacol. We will send you an online tool to sign up for a 10-minute meeting by email. When you receive the email, please sign up for one slot. The meetings will be throughout the week of February 25, so you can sign up for a time slot that works well for you. Week of February 25-March 1: Thesis statement and outline due in your meeting with a TA or Prof. Nacol—bring a hard copy or have it pulled up on your computer. (3% credit/no credit, no late work accepted). Please attend the meeting you signed up for; if you come by at a different time, we won’t be able to accommodate you.

March 7 by midnight: Submit a complete rough draft to Quercus at the designated link. (5% credit/no credit, no late work accepted). You will get your draft back by March 14.

March 21 by 11:10 a.m.: Submit final assignment to Quercus at the designated link (15%)

March 21 by 11:10 a.m.: Submit your revisions memo to Quercus at the designated link (2%

credit/no credit)

Late Paper Policy:

Regarding late writing assignments, we will deduct 3% from your assignment mark for each. 24 hours the final assignment is late. No final assignments will be accepted more than one week after the due date (March 28).

We do not grant extensions except in cases of emergency, and then only to students who present official documentation that we can verify. Acceptable documentation includes a note from your doctor, a note from the registrar’s office, or a note from your Access Ability advisor. Without official documentation from you, we will not grant an extension request.

Machiavelli View of Creon from Antigoneis as Good Prince

Attached to this assignment are two documents that will help you with your essay: the rubric we will use to mark your final assignment, and a checklist.

  1. Marking Rubric for Winter Essay Assignment1

These are the standards we will use to mark your essay. We suggest you evaluate your own work using this chart as you work on your drafts of the assignment.

Criteria Excellent Work

Grade: A Range

Good Work

Grade: B Range

Needs More Work

Grade: C Range

Unacceptable

Writing

Mechanics

No errors in

grammar or

punctuation (give

or take a typo)

Very few errors in

grammar or

punctuation

Many errors in

grammar and

punctuation

Unacceptable

errors in

grammar and

punctuation

Writing style Clear, energetic

expression of

ideas; good

active-voice prose

Very readable for the

most part

Awkward or

unclear phrasing or

sentencing; too

much passive voice

construction

Almost

unreadable, such

that the writer’s

ideas are

obscured

Organization Argument unfolds

in a logical

sequence; sources

well integrated

throughout

Argument has mostly

logical sequence of

points; some

paragraphs weak on

source integration

Hard to follow,

with poor

integration of

source material

No train of

logic, with no

real use of

source material

Argument Insightful! Uses

source materials

effectively to

make a

convincing

argument.

Some very good

insights here and

there, but no overall

argument or narrative

linking these good

points

Sketches general

description of the

chosen figure, but

offers no deeper

insights or

argument to answer

the question

No real insights,

no coherent

argument in

response to the

question

Thesis

Statement

Clearly stated and

supported well

throughout

Stated and supported

fairly well

Stated less clearly

/or supported fairly

weakly

No thesis

Critical Skills Seriously

considers and

addresses a good

counterargument

Briefly sketches

counterargument(s)

Barely

acknowledges

counterarguments

Ignores

alternative

arguments

altogether

Use of

Evidence

Supports all

claims strongly

using evidence

from sources,

either directly or

in paraphrase

Supports most claims

with evidence

Rarely supports

claims with

evidence

Claims have no

support

Documentation Thorough and

complete citation

of sources in text,

and a

bibliography

Some missing

information

(incomplete citations

or bibliography)

Major pieces of

information

missing (no

bibliography,

missing citations,

etc.)

No

documentation

of sources

1 Adapted from a rubric by Marshall Eakin, Dept. of History, Vanderbilt University.

  1. Before you turn in your final assignment, a checklist:
  2. Does your paper have a thesis statement? Do you tell us straight away what you plan to argue and why, in a concise introductory paragraph?
  1. Do you have a clear argument that flows from and supports your thesis?
  2. Does each paragraph serve a purpose? Does it have a topic sentence that lays out what you plan to show in the paragraph?
Machiavelli View of Creon from Antigoneis as Good Prince
  1. Do you support the different pieces of your argument with evidence from our course materials?
  1. Do you cite evidence from the texts to back up your claims?
  2. Do you explain why this evidence supports what you are arguing?
  3. Do you consider a good counterargument and address it?
  4. Do you cite your sources properly using the (Author-Date Page #) format?
  5. Do you have a bibliography that includes all of your sources?
  6. Have you proofread your paper for spelling and grammar mistakes?
  7. Is your paper formatted properly?
  8. Double-spaced?
  9. 12-point font?
  10. Pages numbered?
  11. Your name is on the paper?
  12. In your one-page revisions memo, do you acknowledge in your own words the major the feedback you received, and do you explain how you used that feedback to improve your paper?

Unlike most other websites we deliver what we promise;

  • Our Support Staff are online 24/7
  • Our Writers are available 24/7
  • Most Urgent order is delivered with 6 Hrs
  • 100% Original Assignment Plagiarism report can be sent to you upon request.

GET 15 % DISCOUNT TODAY use the discount code PAPER15 at the order form.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total: