Proposed Solutions for Selecting Sources of Literature

Proposed Solutions for Selecting Sources of Literature Order Instructions: Selecting Sources of Literature
Due Date: Jul 10, 2016 23:59:59 Max Points: 100

Details:
Locate a minimum of 15 peer-reviewed articles that describe the problem or issue and that support the proposed solution. Eight of the 15 articles must be research-based (e.g., a study which is qualitative, quantitative, descriptive, or longitudinal).

Proposed Solutions for Selecting Sources of Literature
Proposed Solutions for Selecting Sources of Literature

Hint: Begin your search for literature by utilizing the databases located in the GCU Library. Contact your faculty member, the librarian, or library staff for additional researching tips and keyword suggestions.

Preview each of the 15 articles chosen by reading the article abstracts and summaries.

Hint: Article abstracts and summaries provide a concise description of the topic, research outcomes, and significance of findings.

Hint: Refer to “RefWorks” and “Topic 1: Checklist.”

Perform a rapid appraisal of each article by answering the following questions (one to two sentences are sufficient to answer each question):

How does each article describe the nature of the problem, issue, or deficit you have identified?
Does each article provide statistical information to demonstrate the gravity of the issue, problem, or deficit?
What is an example(s) of morbidity, mortality, and rate of incidence or rate of occurrence in the general population?
Does each article support your proposed change?
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

1 NRS441v.10.0R RefWorks.docx 2 NRS 441v.11R.Module1_Checklist.docx

Proposed Solutions for Selecting Sources of Literature Sample Answer

Selecting Sources of Literature

Introduction

Social fairness in clinical mental health is just as important as any other human right to the community and the state. The clinical mental health department has been ignored for quite some time with social justice being advocated only through writing. This means that having mental problems should necessitate social inclusion and participation in addressing the problem.

Proposed Solutions for Selecting Sources of Literature and Article Appraisal

According to Johanna and Christa, individual professions should provide not only clinical mental health to patients but also include social justice to their patients. For that reason, the article gives a clear explanation in a descriptive manner through lessons with no statistical information. The article proposes that bringing students together through education to foster positive change is necessary.

Corrigan’s 2003 article describes the problem in a descriptive and explanatory manner with no statistical evidence. According to Corrigan, many people who require mental treatment shy away from hospitals due to the perception of being branded as mentally ill. The article proposes that stigma-care can be developed and offered to stigmatized patients, and that could be changed effectively through education.

In the same regard, Lisa and others from Boston College give a descriptive explanation of social advocacy in clinical mental health by having a better understanding of the patient’s culture and beliefs. There are no statistical descriptions, but they suggest that empowerment could help as a model for patients who have had the threat of domestic violence.

In Vera’s article, there is no descriptive statistics, but there is an exploratory discussion on how multicultural competency goes helps in clinical psychology. According to the article, the rate of occurrence in internalizing past discrimination is high in patients with mental health problems. Therefore, the report suggests that psychologists need to understand the past prejudices of the patients before offering help.

The article of Kiselica and Robinson does not provide descriptive statistics but gives a clear explanation through the review of literature from other sources. The article states that most of the counseling practices do not provide social justice work to their clients. For that reason, the article proposes that counselors should also focus on environmental problems that may affect their clients.

Glidewell’s article does not provide any statistical information but uses explanatory methods in explaining how advocacy could be utilized in psychology. The article states that psychologists associate advocacy with lawyers and do not see the necessity of using it. Therefore, the article provides information on how analysts could learn on advocating for their client’s rights.

Watkins et al. article uses descriptive methods through literature reviews from other studies and does not include descriptive statistics. The article states that there has been limited social inclusion in the mental health of black men in recent years. Therefore, it suggests that there should be social work research to improve mental health for black men.

Similarly, Wright’s article uses qualitative methods through review literature in identifying the relationship between social inclusion and mental health but has no statistical information. It also states that mentally-ill patients are becoming the focus of social inclusion initiatives. It suggests that there should be more research on the on the concept of social integration in mental policies.

In Michelle’s et al. article, there is statistical information and the study uses descriptive statistics in its analysis. The report shows that the majority of the evaluations bring definite conclusion on the use of social media in mental health. The report supports the proposed change of having social inclusion in solving mental problems which in this case is through social media.

In a similar manner, Brynmor’s et al. article provides a systematic review through a meta-analysis and used descriptive statistics in analyzing the information. The report further suggests that little is known about the effectiveness of social peer support groups in mental health cases. All in all, it supports the idea of having social advocacy in clinical mental health.

Grajales et al. article conducted a narrative review to explain social factors such as media being used in medical sectors. The article uses descriptive statistics and states that mental health care institutions are unaware of the importance of social media. The report supports the idea of social advocacy through social media in mental health cases.

Snape et al. article uses the Delphi technique in its qualitative analysis but does not use statistical information. It states that social care research is gaining importance in mental health care settings, but little is known about it. However, it supports the importance of having social advocacy in mental health treatment.

Corrigan et al. article of 2012 use systematic literature reviews and descriptive statistics in addressing the problem of stigmatization of mental health patients. The article states that public stigmatization has pernicious effects on the lives of mentally-ill patients. It supports the idea of having social advocacy in mental health.

In Brett’s et al. article, there is the use of descriptive statistics and the use of literature reviews. It states that there is a rapid increase in patient and public involvement in patients’ health. The article supports the notion of social advocacy in mental health clinical settings.

Additionally, in Webber et al. article, the majority of the mentally-ill patients are socially excluded. The article uses descriptive statistics and literature reviews in addressing the problem. As such, the report supports social inclusion practices in mental health cases.

Proposed Solutions for Selecting Sources of Literature References

Brett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Herron‐Marx, S., Hughes, J., Tysall, C., & Suleman, R. (2014). Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expectations, 17(5), 637-650.

Cattaneo, L. B., & Goodman, L. A. (2015). What is empowerment anyway? A model for

domestic violence practice, research, and evaluation. Psychology of Violence, 5(1), 84.

Corrigan, P., & Matthews, A. (2003). Stigma and disclosure: Implications for coming out of the

closet. Journal of mental health, 12(3), 235-248.

Corrigan, P. W., Morris, S. B., Michaels, P. J., Rafacz, J. D., & Rüsch, N. (2012). Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: a meta-analysis of outcome studies. Psychiatric Services.

Glidewell, J. C. (1984). Training for the role of advocate. American journal of community

            psychology, 12(2), 193-198.

Grajales III, F. J., Sheps, S., Ho, K., Novak-Lauscher, H., & Eysenbach, G. (2014). Social media: a review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. Journal of medical Internet research, 16(2), e13.

Hamm, M. P., Chisholm, A., Shulhan, J., Milne, A., Scott, S. D., Given, L. M., & Hartling, L. (2013). Social media use among patients and caregivers: a scoping review. BMJ Open, 3(5), e002819.

Kiselica, M. S., & Robinson, M. (2001). Bringing advocacy counseling to life: The history,

issues, and human dramas of social justice work in counseling. Journal of Counseling &

            Development, 79(4), 387-397.

Lloyd-Evans, B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Harrison, B., Instead, H., Brown, E., Pilling, S., … & Kendall, T. (2014). A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of peer support for people with severe mental illness. BMC Psychiatry, 14(1), 1.

Nilsson, J. E., & Schmidt, C. K. (2005). Social justice advocacy among graduate students in counseling: An initial exploration. Journal of College Student Development, 46(3), 267-279.

Snape, D., Kirkham, J., Preston, J., Popay, J., Britten, N., Collins, M., … & Jacoby, A. (2014). Exploring areas of consensus and conflict around values underpinning public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open, 4(1), e004217.

Snape, D., Kirkham, J., Britten, N., Froggatt, K., Gradinger, F., Lobban, F., … & Jacoby, A. (2014). Exploring perceived barriers, drivers, impacts and the need for evaluation of public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open, 4(6), e004943.

Vera, E. M., & Speight, S. L. (2003). Multicultural competence, social justice, and counseling

psychology: Expanding our roles. The Counseling Psychologist, 31(3), 253-272.

Watkins, D. C., Hawkins, J., & Mitchell, J. A. (2015). The Discipline’s Escalating Whisper Social Work and Black Men’s Mental Health. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(2), 240-250.

Wright, N., & Stickley, T. (2013). Concepts of social inclusion, exclusion, and mental health: a review of the international literature. Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 20(1), 71-81.

Unlike most other websites we deliver what we promise;

  • Our Support Staff are online 24/7
  • Our Writers are available 24/7
  • Most Urgent order is delivered with 6 Hrs
  • 100% Original Assignment Plagiarism report can be sent to you upon request.

GET 15 % DISCOUNT TODAY use the discount code PAPER15 at the order form.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total: