Racial Profiling Is Morally Justified
Make an argumentative essay explaining why racial profiling is justifiable, using the the references and outline as possible arguments.
You must apply Utilitarianism as the ethical theory to analyze the research question and thesis.
Research Question: Is racial profiling morally justifiable in law enforcement?
Thesis: Racial profiling is justified in law enforcement.
You Must Have:
1. A clear research question, stated in the introduction
2. A clearly stated thesis and a well crafted argument in favor of it.
3. A clear problem or case that forms a focal point for discussion.
4. An applied moral theory used in a way that makes it clear how that applying the theory to the facts of the case helps lead to your conclusion. Use the theory along with the method and the approached outline.
5. An objection to at least one element of your argument, and a reply to this objection (this maybe combined with number 2).
6. Effective and well-applied research.
7. Proper format, including correct margins, spacing, cover page, MLA format for bibliography and references and so on.
Racial Profiling Is Morally Justified References
Must also include: References (footnotes or parenthetical references) showing how you have used your research and a properly formatted bibliography.
This was the outline I did for the essay.
1. Racial profiling is morally justified.
a. For utilitarianism case, shows that to the fact that crime prevention increases the quality of life for almost everyone. It suggests that “the primary contributor’ to the harm involved in racial profiling” (Risse, 3).
b. Utilitarian and deontological considerations are as followed, the utilitarian belief regards profiling as contributing to the public good of crime control, as for the deontological line of argument aims to deny claims that profiling is objectified to discriminatory and unfair to persons whom its harm (Altman, 5-3).
2. Racial profiling and police abuse do not relate.
a. The majority of people’s attitudes towards profiling seem to rely on the on the way we view how much abuse occurs, police abuse and profiling “as we define it are different problems that must be assessed independently and that have different remedies” (Zeckhauser and Risse, 10).
Racial Profiling Is Morally Justified and Police Abuse
b. Profiling includes obvious circumstances of police abuse, or of overuse of race, so any reflection on any conditions under which race might be used legitimately in police tactics. It may be true that, given current conditions, it is impossible to use race as an information carrier without encountering massive problems of police abuse (Risse, 1).
3. Racial profiling benefits us more than it costs.
a. The cost-benefit argument is the benefit gained from racial profiling against what it cost in order to get the benefit. In this case the benefit here would be that it reduces crimes and the cost is the inconvenience of those screened.
b. Utilitarian considerations must certainly include the incremental harm inflicted by profiling. It would substantially small if most of the overall level of harm that seems to be caused by profiling is possibly described to be underlying causes. So, in a range of plausible cases, utilitarian considerations will support profiling (Risse, 16).
