Why Clinton Health Reform Plan in 1990s Never Passed Order Instructions: Consider why the Clinton Health Reform Plan in the 1990s never passed.
Include the following:
1. How does Obama’s Affordable Care Act of 2010 compare with the Clinton Health Reform Plan?
2. Discuss the pros and cons of the Affordable Care Act.
3. Discuss three changes would you recommend to improve on the legislation?
Your paper should have a word count of 800-1,200 words and a minimum of three scholarly sources must be cited.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
No Plagiarism!!
Why Clinton Health Reform Plan in 1990s Never Passed Sample Answer
There are two comparable health reforms which result from the proposals developed by Obama and Clinton. Hillary reforms were initiated in the early 1990s when President Clinton proposed that Hillary lead the efforts that could lead to the enactment of major legislation regarding the health reforms. However, despite the initiation of these efforts they failed infamously. The sketchy reforms plans contributed to the failure of the Clintons’ reform. The Obama care, on the other hand, saw the need to reform the federal health law and came up with the enactment of patient protection and affordable care to its citizens (Rudnicki et al, 2016). According to Obama, the health reforms developing process would involve complete transparency and open negotiations which are different to Clinton’s proposals as these factors were major issues of procedural criticism of his reforms. The Obama care act was consistently lobbied by the president as compared to Clinton’s reforms. There emerged a difference where a health insurer identified as a scape goat was present during the enactment of the Obama care as compared to Clinton’s act. The Democratic congressional leaders and major interest groups benefited the Obama care act leading to its massive success as compared to Clinton’s reforms which failed.
The Obama care act focused on reconfiguring regulations relating to health insurance reforms with the objective of fixing the problems in health care (Rudnicki et al, 2016). On the other hand, Clinton’s care was far more reaching focusing on changing the management, financing and regulation of care and also called for more involvement of the government in these reforms. During the development of the Obama care act, the lawmakers were continually pushed to keep at it against the long odds. On the other hand, Clinton reforms did not emphasize on the same where the transparency was compromised making which was a factor contributing to failure since the reforms were seen to be sketched out inappropriately. Obama care act capitalized on the mistakes made during forming Clinton’s reforms to ensure the regulation and affordable care act succeeded effectively (Stapletown et al, 2015).
The Affordable care act had its advantages and disadvantaged since the development of its reforms. The affordable care act has made it possible for more citizens to have health insurance obtaining coverage and insured. The act has enhanced the affordability of insurance by eliminating unreasonable rate increases and enhancing lower premiums. A wider coverage of options is provided to the American citizens. No time limits on care have been made possible where the coverage issues have been minimized. Through the Obama care act, there is lower prescription to drug costs making medication easily affordable for all people. More screening is covered courtesy of Obama care act. There are also cons associated with the Affordable Act which includes payment of higher premiums in the name of wider coverage and a range of benefits (Stapletown et al, 2015). The possibility of been fined due to failure to possess an insurance cover as the government argues that it is mandatory for one to have insurance to cover their healthcare cost. The Affordable Act has resulted in increasing the tax rates, e.g., on the pharmaceutical sales and medical devices. The affordable care acts have made enrollment be complicated due to delays and lower number of signups resulting from website problems (Kriner et al, 2014). Addressing the cons effectively would ensure the problems are converted into pros and benefits of the act. The first change I would make on the legislation is ensuring sufficient funds are provided to finance the insurance adequately amending the high costs and affordability problems. The budgeting and financing would influence the implementation of the reforms to the letter. Changes in the healthcare field such as having more qualified administrators and improving the technology used in the implementation of the act are essential. The changes would address problems such as complications during enrollment and other inefficiencies. Enacting reforms that control the high premiums and also restricting unnecessary fines on the uninsured rather than having measures to have them covered is a crucial change in the legislation (Kriner et al, 2014).In a nutshell, the adherence and implementation of the right reforms would enhance full coverage of all people.
Why Clinton Health Reform Plan in 1990s Never Passed References
Kriner, D. L., & Reeves, A. (2014). Responsive Partisanship: Public Support for the Clinton and Obama Health Care Plans. Journal Of Health Politics, Policy & Law, 39(4), 717-749. doi:10.1215/03616878-2743015
Rudnicki, M., Armstrong, J., Clark, C., Marcus, S., Sacks, L., Moser, A., & … Public Policy and Advocacy Committee of the, S. (2016). Expected and Unexpected Consequences of the Affordable Care Act: The Impact on Patients and Surgeons-Pro and Con Arguments. Journal Of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 20(2), 351-360. doi:10.1007/s11605-015-3032-8
Stapletonw, P., & Skinner, D. (2015). The Affordable Care Act and assisted reproductive technology use. Politics & The Life Sciences, 34(2), 71-90. doi:10.1017/pls.2015.13
