Analysis and evaluation of Leaders
Order Instructions:
Dear Admin,
Type of document: Annotated outline of the Final Project
IMPORTANT NOTE: Please follow the following instructions exactly one by one as each point is very important. And please don’t deviate from these points.
1)Prepare an annotated outline of your Final Project, briefly indicating :
2)The content you plan to include in each section of the report.
3)The concepts and techniques you plan to apply for analyzing any data and developing your argument.
4)The outline should not include detailed sections of the Final Project. Instead, it should be a specific and crisp overview of the contents that will comprise the final report, which will provide a detailed account of the six tasks listed below. In the other words, Ideally you should base your outline on the basis of the six tasks listed below:
1.Analysis and evaluation of Leader #1
2.Analysis and evaluation of Leader #2
3.Comparison of the leaders
4.Summary of significant findings and perspectives from journal entries
5.Analysis and evaluation of journal entries to chosen leaders
6.Conclusion
5)The annotated outline should address each of the tasks outlined above. You need to briefly describe what information you will include in each section of the report that will work to satisfying these requirements.
6)The report that will work to satisfying these requirements. The work that will be carried out in the outline should represent a higher-level view than the contents of the Final Project. As such, you must remain at this level to avoid reusing the same wording in the final document.
7)Your outline should be no longer than 1,000 words and in essence you should briefly give details of content you plan to include in the final submission.
8)Please remember to annotate your outline by making a detailed and structured list of elements you plan to include.
9)The following points is talking about the (attached proposal file) that need to be reviewed in the annotated outline as well:
10)There would need to be a little more detail in terms of how you may apply the theories you have selected which are not listed in your list of references. I presume they are cited in the references you have stated.
11)Your own situation would need to be defined more specifically in relation to both leaders and you would need to focus on this aspect in your upcoming journal entries.
12)Structure is good but in your outline please try to ensure you indicate how insights gained from theory and study of both leaders relate to your own experience.
13)The following sources MUST be used in the annotated outline and if you want to use extra sources you are most welcome:
The following are the data sources that I intend to use in this study.
Bass, BM 2009, From Transactional to Transformational Leadership. Albany, NY: Free Press.
Pasmore, W. (2014) Developing a Leadership Strategy: A Critical Ingredient for Organizational Success. White Paper, Centre for Creative Leadership
Marx, T 2013, ‘Teaching Leadership and Strategy’, Business Education Innovation Journal, Vol. 5 no. 2, pp. 12-19.
Lang, R, & Rybnikova, I. (2012). Leadership is Going Global.
Malcolm, G. (2002). The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston: Back Bay Books.
SAMPLE ANSWER
Sir Richard Branson, CEO of the Virgin Group and Sir Akbar Al Baker who is the current CEO of Qatar Airways has outstanding personalities that have propelled them to higher grounds throughout their entire careers. Their personalities can be explained based on various theories, which include Allport’s Trait Theory, Eysenck’s Personality Theory and Freud’s Tripartite Theory of Personality (Bass, 2009, p. 5). This annotated outline of my final project, therefore, tries to analyze and evaluate the personality of these two outstanding international leaders using these theories.
The personality of Sir Richard Branson can be assessed based on Freud’s Tripartite theory of personality into three main components namely the id, the ego and thirdly the superego. This is because these traits develop at different rates, and an individual’s overall personality can be defined as one of these depending on the most visible aspect of the person (Brain, 2002, p. 203).
Sir Richard Branson has a Healthy Psyche. Despite the fact that he faced so many challenges in life, he never gave up on his struggle for success. Throughout his career life, he is well known for having taken so many risks like setting a record using the balloon and the boat, he encountered so many challenges did not stop him from pursuing his goal in life. In fact, he took his challenges as stepping stones in his career. As a result, his failures led to his success. In some instances, the Virgin shop ran out of cash. He used tricks to evade paying taxes that eventually resulted in his arrest and faced criminal charges. While at school, he was arrested for violating laws after launching a student magazine. Luckily, he managed to get a good lawyer who secured his release. Despite his criminal record, Branson decided to reform and came up with a very successful airline.
In addition, his personality is explained by Eysenck’s personality theory. This theory adopts two dimensions namely extroverted and introverted as a means of categorizing the various possible personalities that an individual may present. Despite his dirty background, he came up with a new business new business strategy that he called branded venture capitalism. This enabled him to have control over so many businesses without having to risk his money. As a result, the Virgin Group is a well-established and fast growing company with so many shareholders (Beycioglu & Pashiardis, 2015, p. 300).
Furthermore, Allport’s Trait Theory analyzes individuals subjectively based on their in-born traits combined with the environmental dynamics that they have been exposed to as they were developing. Sir Richard Branson exhibited patience and creativity in order to ensure success. This is mainly associated with his family that cultivated in him the character of hard work and independence. This is specifically what he adopted in his business management hence success (Thomas & Segal, 2006, p. 120).
Sir Akbar Al Baker, who is the current CEO of Qatar Airways personality, is well explained based on Freud’s Tripartite Theory of Personality the man is so detailed about everything that he does. He ensures that all the activities that take place in the company are inspected including every plane that leaves the airport. In spite of being the boss and could delegate such duty, he does the job. In addition, his personality is explained by Eysenck’s personality theory. He does not believe in holding himself accountable to anything. However, he is very strict and keeps every person to the highest standards of accountability. He is a very straight man and always comments on everything the way he sees it. This has actually helped in growing the business to these heights (Malcolm, 2002, p. 9).
According to Allport’s Trait Theory, Sir Akbar Al Baker subjectively based on their in-born traits combined with the environmental dynamics that they have been exposed to as they were developing. This is simply because he is proud and enthusiastic beyond words. This is shown with the passion with which he loves Qatar Airways. Some people relate this airline to his life. The man is zealousness about the airline. This passion has therefore translated to his success in the company (Lang, & Rybnikova, 2012, p. 11).
There are significant similarities between the two leaders. The leaders exhibit authoritative style of leadership. This is seen especially in how they bring together their people towards achieving the set down goals. The authoritative style of leadership yields good results especially when the institution is after having a new vision especially when things have changed completely. Both leaders inspire business-working condition in the workers leading to vibrant enthusiasm for a particular goal (Marx, 2013, p. 4).
In addition, the leaders are affiliative since they work with the intention of uniting all the workers in the institution. Thus, the leaders value their subjects first before anything else. This form of leadership enhances healing and bonding especially when under stress. However, the leaders vary in their leadership style to some extent with Sir Richard Branson having the will to coach his subjects. This style of leadership empowers the subjects by ensuring that they are confident in everything that they do. This is unlike Sir Akbar Al Baker, who is the current CEO of Qatar Airways who is a pacesetter. He mostly concentrates on ensuring that people work very hard to achieve self-direction. This form of leadership is therefore very essential when the team being led is well experienced with the necessary skills and motivated (Pasmore, 2014, p. 6). In conclusion, a good leader ought to possess more than one trait in terms of leadership competencies. This is because there is more that leadership demands than just understanding the technicalities of sound leadership on how to manage people. Sound leadership therefore entails someone who is determined to deliver, a person who is very innovative by coming up with new ideas, focused on everything that they do and confident about it besides being trustworthy to both the workers and the clients. Furthermore, good leaders should be able to communicate well both orally and in written form.
Reference
Bass, BM 2009, From Transactional To Transformational Leadership. Albany, NY, Free Press.
Beycioglu, K., & Pashiardis, P 2015. Multidimensional Perspectives On Principal Leadership Effectiveness. Available from: <http://Search.Ebscohost.Com/Login.Aspx?Direct=True&Scope=Site&Db=Nlebk&Db=Nlabk&AN=937773> [16 February 2015]
Brain, C 2002. Advanced Psychology: Applications, Issues And Perspectives. Cheltenham, Nelson Thornes.
Lang, R, & Rybnikova, I 2012 Leadership is Going Global, in The Encyclopedia of Human Resource Management: Thematic Essays (eds W. J. Rothwell and G. M. (Bud). Benscoter), Pfeiffer, A Wiley Imprint, San Francisco, CA.
Malcolm, G 2002. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make A Big Difference. Boston, Back Bay Books.
Marx, T 2013, ‘Teaching Leadership And Strategy’, Business Education Innovation Journal, Vol. 5 No. 2, Pp. 12-19.
Pasmore, W 2014. Developing A Leadership Strategy: A Critical Ingredient For Organizational Success. White Paper, Centre For Creative Leadership
Thomas, J. C., & Segal, DL 2006. Comprehensive Handbook Of Personality And Psychopathology Volume 1. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
