Annotated Bibliography on Psychopathic Personalities Order Instructions: Details:
Synthesis is the process of creating a new idea by analyzing multiple disparate concepts or notions to discern the common thematic or connecting principles among them.
Synthesis of research is not a single innate skill. Rather, it is a process learned through time and practice. In this assignment, you will engage in the first parts of the synthesis process: annotating and outlining.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
• Read Lilienfeld, S. O., Waldman, I. D., Landfield, K., Watts, A. L., Rubenzer, S., & Faschingbauer, T. R. (2012). Fearless dominance and the U.S. presidency: Implications of psychopathic personality traits for successful and unsuccessful political leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 489-505.http://library.gcu.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.library.gcu.edu:2048/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=79301650&site=ehost-live&scope=site
• Read van Eeden, R., Cilliers, F., & van Deventer, V. (2008). Leadership styles and associated personality traits: Support for the conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. South African Journal of Psychology, 38(2), 253-267.http://library.gcu.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.library.gcu.edu:2048/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=33720593&site=ehost-live&scope=site
• Read Odom, S. F., Boyd, B. L., & Williams, J. (2012). Impact of Personal Growth Projects on Leadership Identity Development. Journal of Leadership Education, 11(1), 49-63. http://library.gcu.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.library.gcu.edu:2048/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ980968&site=ehost-live&scope=site
• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• Refer to the resource, “Preparing Annotated Bibliographies,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
• You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Annotated Bibliography on Psychopathic Personalities Directions
Provide an annotated bibliography (750-1,000 words total) of the articles listed above. Including the following for each article:
1. The article citation and persistent link. These are provided above for you to paste into the assignment and are not included in the total word count.
2. A written summary of the key concept(s) of the article. Why was the study done? What was the population studied? What did the researcher(s) conclude? What other information about this study do you believe is unique or important to recall? Are there specific statements made by the author that you wish to retain?
Construct an outline for a paper that will explain and synthesize the articles you read for this assignment. The paper will require identification of themes common to the articles as well as a statement of the conclusions that can be drawn when the articles are taken together as a single entity You will be writing the paper in the next assignment.
Annotated Bibliography on Psychopathic Personalities Sample Answer
Annotated Bibliography and Outline
Lilienfeld, S., Waldman, I., Landfield, K., Watts, A., Rubenzer, S., & Faschingbauer, T.(2012). Fearless dominance and the U.S. presidency: Implications of psychopathic personality traits for successful and unsuccessful political leadership. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 103(3), 489-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029392
Psychopathic personalities have been always marked by some maladaptive traits such as lack of guilt and poor impulse control. Another feature that has been observed in the psychopathic personality is fearlessness or what is commonly referred to as fearless dominance. The first two characteristics are not associated with any form of leadership. In fact, a leader who shows maladaptive traits should not occupy public office. Lilienfeld and Co. attempted to link some of the psychopathic personality with leadership positions. The authors came to the conclusion that some of the characteristic psychopathic personality traits such as fearlessness and social dominance were adaptive in some leadership positions. The hypothesis was tested among the forty-two presidents of the United States including President George W. Bush. The data to be researched was collected in three ways. Psychopathy traits estimates of each president were obtained from historical experts. Another important data source used was independent historical surveys of the various executive leadership styles. Lastly, data was collected basing on the performance of President. Fearless dominance, a characteristic trait associated with showing boldness in psychopathy was associated with better leadership performance, persuasiveness, congressional relations, crisis management, allied variables, and leadership. Additionally, fearless dominance has been associated with the identification of indicators of dominant performance like being viewed as a word figure and initiating new projects. Impulsive and antisocial psychopathic characteristics were unassociated with presidential performance. Such features were depicted as indicators of poor job performance such as impeachment resolutions, contrary character, and tolerating of unethical behavior shown by subordinates. The findings showed that boldness that is associated with psychopathy can be used to indicate or predict the performance of a given president. Additionally, it suggested that some characteristics were tied with interpersonal behavior. The characteristics that were associated with fearless dominance survive statistical control of covariates such as the need for power, five model personality traits, and intellectual brilliance. The article relates some personal traits that can be used to define success in leadership.
Van Eeden, R., Cilliers, F., & van Deventer, V. (2008). Leadership Styles and Associated Personality Traits: Support for the Conceptualization of Transactional and Transformational Leadership. South African Journal Of Psychology, 38(2), 253-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/008124630803800201
Van Eeden, Cilliers, and Van Deventer begin the article with a description of the various types of leadership. Systematically, they manage to identify three leadership styles, which are delegation or laissez-faire behavior, transactional and transformational leadership. The three authors relate a given leadership style with the associated behavior or the personality trait. The study looked at the personality traits of various managers as well as their leadership style. Data was collected through the use of questionnaires, interviews, and surveys. The management teams was then asked the type of leadership they preferred. The results revealed their leadership style could be classified under two standard practices, transactional leadership, and transformational leadership. Some managers relied on both the use of transformational and transactional behaviors depending on the situation while others strictly relied on either of the two types of leadership behaviors. The results of each manager were then compiled, and the trends were analyzed. The results revealed that transformational leadership was being defined more by a social role than in a visionary aspect. Much emphasis on the transformational leadership had been placed on interpersonal styles and worked ethics. Behaviors associated with interpersonal styles were classified as passive. The results depict certain characteristics that are required for success in a given organization. Transformational leadership resulted in managers associating more with people. Transactional leadership is concerned with the task ahead of people and, therefore, more likely to have less good results as compared to transformational leadership.
Odom, S., Boyd, B., & Williams, J. (2012). Impact of Personal Growth Projects on Leadership Identity Development. Journal Of Leadership Education, 11(1), 49-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.12806/v11/i1/rf3
Odom, Boyd, and Williams encourage educational educators to introduce courses that help students identify the skills they possess. To do this, the authors used the personal growth project to assist in the identification of traits related to leadership. Personal growth projects such as self-awareness, self-confidence were identified as two critical characteristics that when developed at a young age incultivate leadership skills. The authors encouraged educational training and development in the building of these skills. Self-awareness was described as a key component for the development of authenticity in leadership. The continued emphasis on self- awareness ultimately resulted in an increase of other aspects such as self-confidence. Another important aspect that related to personal growth included the development of new skills, establishing personal efficiency and expanding motivation. The use of personal growth projects has assisted in the development of leadership characteristics in children from small age.
Annotated Bibliography on Psychopathic Personalities Outline
Introduction
Importance of psychopathic personality traits in leadership
- Fearless dominance
- Leadership
- Congressional variables
- Persuasiveness
- Crisis management
Leadership Styles and Associated Personality Traits
- Distinction between transformational and transactional leadership
- Personal traits associated with transformational leadership
- Personal traits associated with transactional leadership
Leadership identity through personal growth projects
- Leadership skills impacted by personal growth projects
- Self confidence
- Self-awareness
- Personal efficiency
- New skill
- Importance of developing new skill at a young age
Conclusion
Main theme – relationship between personal traits and leadership
