Existing Qualitative Studies
Order Instructions:
For this paper, the writer will have to reference to 113193, 113242 and also 113153 and other past papers in the past 4 weeks which pattern to this topic as the are all continuations in one way or the other. The writer will have to pay very close attention to all instructions as he write this paper, making sure that he fully understand what is require . Take note of the doc that is require to be attach together with the paper, so please read the instructions carefully before responding to the questions. the writer must also attached the brief synopsis of the quantitative studies he found as a “.doc” or “.rtf” attachment to the paper that he will be writing.
I will send you a sample of the synopsis that I corrected for last week so that the writer can follow the model and write for this week. and please acknowledge my emails of this document that I send via email so that I can be assure you have them.
Existing Qualitative Studies
Return to your Literature Review and peruse the qualitative studies you found for additional resources that pertain to your topic (Employee job satisfaction and productivity). Conduct additional searches through the reliable sources for relevant studies that either pertain directly to your topic or that pertain to related topics and could inform a qualitative study of your topic mentioned above. Perhaps these studies provide a model, research instrument, framework, or hypothesis that inform your own evolving thinking.
Post a brief synopsis of the qualitative studies you found as a “.doc” or “.rtf” attachment. For each entry, provide the full APA citation, as well as a brief paragraph explaining the contribution the study makes to your own topic, either directly or tangentially. In the text of your paper (to which you will attach your synopsis), introduce and summarize the quantitative studies as a collection, and post at least two questions that will elicit suggestions and further responses from your colleagues.
SAMPLE ANSWER
The model of evaluation in institutions of learning both junior and senior has always been that the faculty always evaluates the students. However, perhaps it has never crossed the mind of many in management of learning institutions that even faculty needs evaluation. More often, evaluation for faculty is done in s hallow way by those in management (Peterson, 2010). However, it is not possible for the management to fully vet and evaluate the performance of faculty. The only way to effectively do so is engage the students who have direct interactions with faculty.
One most effective way of evaluating faculty is through student surveys. Student surveys involve setting questions to students which they are expected to answer. Depending on the answers they give, it becomes possible to monitor and assess the performance of faculty (Buller, 2012). Some of the questions that are often included in student surveys may be, the effectiveness of a faulty in dissemination information, punctuality, relevance of lectures, notes and quizzes among others. Often, these questions have ratings attached to them with the aim being to rate the performance of faculty.
Students have been proven to be highly effective in monitoring faculty. Although this model stands the risk of truancy of students who may rate faculty lowly just because they do not like them, it also gives a chance to really see faculty for what they are (Marzano, 2013). The actual reflection of faculty in classroom set up is best brought through student survey.
Faculty evaluation is necessary as it helps identify the weak areas and thereby help improve. It is necessary to point out that faculty evaluation through student survey ought to be backed up with others forms of assessment. Although student surveys have been found to be highly effective, it is necessary to have other sources of information that will back up the data gathered.
References
Buller, J. (2012). Best practices in faculty evaluation: a practical guide for academic leaders.New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Peterson, K. (2010). Teacher evaluation: a comprehensive guide to new directions and practices. New York: Pearson .
Marzano.R. (2013). Teacher evaluation that makes a difference: a new model for teacher growth and student evaluation. London: ASCD
Job satisfaction affects an employee’s quality of work in different ways. Several research methods can be adopted to shed light on the nature and effect that job satisfaction has on a company’s productivity. In this research, qualitative method has been preferred in order to find out the nature of relationship that exists between job satisfaction and productivity.
The qualitative research study will assist in the acquisition of the necessary information that would determine if a relationship between job satisfaction and productivity exists (Feldman, 2015). The effect of productivity and employee satisfaction would be investigated. The qualitative method adopted provides the foundation and the research methods that will be utilized to show if the relationship that exists can influence job satisfaction in other companies (Hair et al, 2015). The qualitative research methods to be adopted include observation research, focus groups, reflective journals, depth interviews and direct story telling.
The objective of the qualitative study identified relates to the provision of the best strategies to be adopted in order to ensure that employee productivity and the factors that affect job satisfaction are monitored. To measure the effects of promotions, remuneration perks, demotions, close relationships and bonuses on employee job satisfaction are critical in the qualitative study method. The study would also identify the greatest barrier to employee job satisfaction and the critical issues that must be addressed to improve productivity. The qualitative research study also seeks to identify the different ways and methods of enhancing employee satisfaction besides monetary gain and also ways of improving employee retention. Identification of different methods of enhancing extra job satisfaction that would ensure high employee retention in companies and adoption of effective company strategies. Employee attitudes towards high productivity at work would also be critical to the study. The research would also identify the most effective strategies to adopt and which has the strongest effect or increase in employee productivity.
The qualitative study chosen relates to the given topic necessitates an organized and well-planned survey. The qualitative study adopted methodology that’s well defined and since it’s a qualitative research survey only a few selected employees would be allowed to take part. But they would be selected from a wide range of firms each providing at least two employees from the lower cadre job positions while another two from the management level. The questions would be thorough and employee’s response would also include determination of employee reflections on the job, their feelings and general observation to ensure a thorough analysis of employee reactions. In this case only 250 respondents would take part in the exercise. Their responses would be compared with the hypothesis already formulated for the study. Both the employees and managers would be selected randomly. Observational research and depth interviews would be used to collect the required data for the study. In the qualitative study, the response was rated at 75% hence it would be good for the research (Feldman, 2015).
The summary of the results were carried out and later analyzed using the standard statistical correlation method. The qualitative method provides the empirical measurement and the levels of employee’s job satisfaction concerning the relationships at work. The responses clearly indicated that the closer and better the relationship between employers and employees the higher the levels of satisfaction and the more productive employees became (Hair et al, 2015). A good relationship between employers and employees results in improved performance among the employees. Innovation and autonomy provided more opportunities for workers to be more productive and the managers were also pleased to register good performance hence a spiral effect resulted in more production, improved working environment and better terms for the employees (Choudhury & Friedman, 2015). To improve productivity, employee training and mechanization of the production was recommended.
The major purpose of qualitative study adopted for more research on the topic is the test of hypothesis, studying effects and making predictions (Hair et al, 2015). Qualitative research helps to identify the real issues that underlie individual behavior. Most of the behaviors are difficult to recognize and they have to be observed closely to make final recommendations. The study provided deep insight into the relationship on employee job satisfaction and productivity.
References
Choudhury, S., & Friedman, M. (2015). A study of employee satisfaction with HMO services at a historically black university. In Proceedings of the 1996 Multicultural Marketing Conference (pp. 81-84). Springer International Publishing.
Feldman, K. J. (2015). A Quantitative Study on Faculty Workload, Compensation, Retention, and Job Satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation, NORTHCENTRAL UNIVERSITY).
Hair Jr, J. F., Wolfinbarger, M., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. J. (2015). Essentials of business research methods. Routledge.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
