Feasibility of the Implementation of Change in Practice

Feasibility of the Implementation of Change in Practice Step 3: Feasibility, Benefits, and Risks. This is very important as this is a continues paper that will continue to build upon the previous paper every week.

Feasibility of the Implementation of Change in Practice
Feasibility of the Implementation of Change in Practice

So the writer must be consistent with written the paper and referencing back to previous papers. It is also very important that the write use sources not older than 5 years as this is an evidence base paper which requires current research. The writer must also clearly response to all questions building upon previous paper with order # listed above. Below they are 6 critical questions to respond to and the writer must clearly respond to all questions supporting facts with pear review articles of not more than 5 years old. All examples must be based on U. S outpatient hospitals or clinics.
During this week’s paper, you will focus on the feasibility, benefits, and risks of making a practice change.
Building on work done in the clinical practicum setting and looking toward work with the EBP on Lack of proper education on patient with type 2 diabetes. address these questions:

1. What is the feasibility of implementing the practice change in your clinical setting?

2. What are potential barriers to making the change?

3. What risks are involved with making the practice change in your setting?

4. What are the benefits of making the practice change?

5. Does the time and cost justify change toward improving clinical outcomes?

6. Which governing entities will need to grant permission for you to make a practice change? Will your work need to be approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB)?

Sample Answer to Feasibility of the implementation of change in practice

Undeniably, several studies have reported on the dramatic increase of Diabetes type 2, especially among people below 30 years. This dramatic increase and complications associated with the disease are important public health issues that must be addressed amicably. Recent surveys have recommended that the application of education strategies facilitates changes in lifestyle among patients diagnosed with diabetes Type 2. This is specifically in subjects identified as high risk of developing diabetes type 2. Research indicates that integration of the proposed practice in the clinical setting will reduce approximately 60% risk of developing diabetes Type 2 within 3 years of intervention. Secondly, the effects of these interventions are long- term (Inzucchi, et al., 2012).

Potential barriers for the implementation  and Feasibility of the Implementation of Change in Practice

One of the major barriers for the implementation of the practice is inadequate resources. This will make it difficult for the healthcare providers to balance between their workloads and the demand of practicing proposed intervention- integrative patient education.  Other potential barriers are organizational cultural and policy barriers that could lead to staff resistance. Due to the low level of research in the clinical setting, most of the healthcare providers would be sceptical regarding the evidence based research.  Therefore, prior to the onset of the research, the healthcare providers will be trained to ensure they understand the concept and project outcomes (Inzucchi, et al., 2015).

Feasibility of the Implementation of Change in Practice and the Main Risks of the integration of the practice

The main risk involved in integration of the practice into the clinical setting is the concern that too much content about diabetes type 2 could result in confusion  and reduce its utility. Additionally, communication barriers could reduce the opportunity for the patient-physician interaction, which would make it difficult to realize the project’s objectives (Steinsbekk, et al., 2012).

Benefits for integration of the practice into the clinical setting

Integrative patient education is beneficial as it will increase the patient’s ability of understanding the disease pathophysiology, and in establishment of the relevant coping strategies. This is because it will facilitate the process of diagnosis and treatment alternatives, as well as the consequences of various patient activities. Additionally, it will help the patient to make appropriate decision, thereby reducing the readmission rates, length of hospitalization and slows the disease progression (Kayshap et al., 2013).

The intervention justifies the time as well as cost toward the improvement of the clinical outcomes.

The proposed study is an expensive study as it involves a lot or resources such as educating material, employment of additional nurse assistants and time. However, the outcome of the ontervention justifies these costs as it increases patients satisfaction, improve the patient compliance to the regulatory standards and improve the efficiency of care. Lastly, better informed patients are more alert and attentive, which minimizes the risk of malpractice.
Ethical concerns

The researcher will seek permission from ethical review board committee at the institution. The work will require to be approved by the IRB as it involves interaction with human beings. This is to ensure that the study is safe and does not pose potential dangers to the participants. Each of the participants will be required to fill in a consent form.

 

References for the Feasibility of the Implementation of Change in Practice

Inzucchi, S. E., Bergenstal, R. M., Buse, J. B., Diamant, M., Ferrannini, E., Nauck, M., … & Matthews, D. R. (2012). Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes care35(6), 1364-1379.

Inzucchi, S. E., Bergenstal, R. M., Buse, J. B., Diamant, M., Ferrannini, E., Nauck, M., … & Matthews, D. R. (2015). Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care38(1), 140-149.

Kashyap, S. R., Bhatt, D. L., Wolski, K., Watanabe, R. M., Abdul-Ghani, M., Abood, B., … & Kirwan, J. P. (2013). Metabolic Effects of Bariatric Surgery in Patients With Moderate Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Analysis of a randomized control trial comparing surgery with intensive medical treatment.Diabetes care36(8), 2175-2182.

Steinsbekk, A., Rygg, L., Lisulo, M., Rise, M. B., & Fretheim, A. (2012). Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC health services research12(1), 213.

Unlike most other websites we deliver what we promise;

  • Our Support Staff are online 24/7
  • Our Writers are available 24/7
  • Most Urgent order is delivered with 6 Hrs
  • 100% Original Assignment Plagiarism report can be sent to you upon request.

GET 15 % DISCOUNT TODAY use the discount code PAPER15 at the order form.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total: