Health Care Financial Reform Proposal Assignment
Order Instructions:
Due Date: Oct 30, 2016 23:59:59 Max Points: 105
Details:
Write a paper (1,000-2,000 words) on what you think should be included in a future reform of the health care system, focusing on financial operating changes that would improve efficiency and provide for improved transparency to the public. Include three to five research/references to support your position.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
60.0 % Essay on Future Health Care Reform Issue Focusing on Financial Operating Changes That Would Improve Efficiency and Provide for Transparency (Include reference material to support your position.)
Does not demonstrate an understanding of the business concepts involved in the issue, including the implications. Does not address a health care reform issue as specified in the assignment. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding of the business concepts involved in the issue. Only minimally addresses a health care reform issue as specified in the assignment. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale.
Demonstrates knowledge of the business concepts involved in the issue, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Satisfactorily addresses a health care reform issue from a financial focus as specified in the assignment. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the business concepts involved in the issue. Satisfactorily develops a health care reform issue from a financial focus as specified in the assignment. Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the business concepts involved in the issue, and their implications. Thoroughly develops a health care reform issue from a financial focus as specified in the assignment. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropriate examples.
20.0 % Integrates Information From Outside Resources into the Body of Paper
Does not use references, examples, or explanations.
Provides some supporting examples, but minimal explanations and no published references.
Supports main points with examples and explanations.
Supports main points with explanations and examples. Application and description is direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria.
Supports main points with references, examples, and full explanations of how they apply.
17.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
6.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
6.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
3.0 %Format
3.0 % Paper Format (1- inch margins; 12-point-font; double-spaced; Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier)
GCU template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
GCU template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
GCU template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
GCU template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
100 % Total Weightage
SAMPLE ANSWER
Health Care Financial Reform Proposal
Introduction
Financial issues and reforms are the most sophisticated subject in health care based on cost, flexibility, vulnerability, spur innovation and deteriorating federal budget. The financial health care reform ought to reduce projected fiscal deficits, ensure comprehensive insurance coverage at affordable and flexible cost. The analysis presented in this paper provides a set of policies and strategies that focus specifically on how health care financial reforms can be remodeled or modernized to deliver more quality services at affordable, flexible and inclusive coverage Niessen & Rutten, 2000). Alongside strategies and policy proposal, health care reforms budgetary neutrality options are provided to guarantee health care reform implementation. For a comprehensive and incremental reform, focusing on individual-market reform, tax credits and subsidies reform, universal vouchers and Medicare reforms proposal consideration would the main themes analyzed (Halfon & Rodgers, 2014).
Although financial health care reforms are being considered as a work in progress, clear health care reform outline is necessary is necessary to make the current health insurance more flexible and affordable. Financial health care reforms can be attained by combined reduction of current public program expenditures such as Medicare and new revenues. Dissatisfied with the current health care system, financing health care reforms can be obtained from traditional savings especially be reducing the excessive relative cost on public program expenditures. Traditional saving for health care financing reforms in public programs aims at reducing the cost paid to health care providers such as clinician during health care delivery (Cissé & Moatti, 2007). Traditional saving enables effective allocation of resources for productivity improvement and competitive bidding thereby reducing unnecessary health care expenditures. Similarly, obtaining additional revenues outside and within health care reforms can assist in financing health care reforms where additional funds are extracted from income-based organizations such as alcohol and tobacco. Modernizing the healthcare delivery system through Medicare reform, individual market reform and tax credits and subsidies promote effective health care reforms based on payment savings. Health care modernization allows long-term cost saving, improved quality of health care and shared savings based on administrative and operational efficiencies (Cissé & Moatti, 2007).
Health system transformation based on improved infrastructure such as comparative effective research and health information technology assist in the reduction of administrative and operation spending to support health care systems. The health information technology has to ensure payment reforms especially based on quality care and accountability. Besides, comparative effective research federal funding has to ensure dissemination and measure of health care information meet affordable and quality services (Cissé & Moatti, 2007). In this regard, empowering health care consumers and health professionals to implement appropriate healthcare decisions that repeal the current health care system filled with budget gimmicks, special interests handouts as well as increased tax. From the health care consumer’s perspective, financial health care reform involves provision of price and quality health care reform information that create cost-sharing adjustments to promote utilization of affordable and valuable health care services. Similarly, professional health empowerment can be achieved through loosening restrictions based on their scope of practice to promote full range utilization of skills and efficiency (Cissé & Moatti, 2007).
Comparatively, transforming the payment systems to reward health care values over the volume. Thus, the public will be provided with more heath choices at greater flexibility and affordable costs. Consequently, modernizing the financial health systems would change the nation health system from being too expensive and bureaucratic to provision more quality health options. Medicare reform through payment innovations would create more opportunities such as quality improvement and cost saving leading to raising more shares savings in the health sector (Niessen & Rutten, 2000). According to the health reforms experts, payment innovations achieved through the transformation of the payment system of health care based on rewards and values encourage coordination and collaboration among the health professionals resulting in regular public reporting, transparency, and accountability within the health care systems. Besides, the innovative arrangement enables organizational reforms where there is widely acceptance and adoption of a health Care financial reform proposal (Niessen & Rutten, 2000).
Protecting and preserving Medicare enable the majority of individuals living with disabilities to access affordable health care sustainably. Therefore, granting greater choices of health care for the future generation. Medicare services demand expansion at higher rates drag the health care security at significant risks as the future health care cost would more inflexible and unaffordable. Legislative implementation of Medicare Decision Accountability Act will ensure preservation and protection of the Medicare programs at minimum tax rates (Halfon & Rodgers, 2014). Besides, it’s necessary to repeal the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) decisions to cut down health care budget leading to political threats for the future generations. Alternatively, simplifying the traditional health care policies (Medicare Program) reduces administrative cost as well as promotes coordination of attention. Reducing the traditional health care complexities by combining the health care programs parts into a single deductible as well as uniform coinsurance enable preservation and protection of healthcare programs (Cissé & Moatti, 2007).
Retargeting health care credits and subsidies to individuals who need it most especially the poor generations’ increases health insurance coverage for the entire population. Consequently, the government must address the impacts of the current health care policies on the younger generations who save for their retirement benefits while raising their families based on their tax subsidies and spending Niessen & Rutten, 2000). For this reason, resetting health care(Medicare Program) eligibility age takes into account of demographic, social and economic consideration where the average life expectancy for the entire population changes with time. Resetting the health care programs based on eligibility age has to be accompanied by integration of competitive and traditional health care programs into a single workable program. Thus, health care financial reforms should be accompanied by an expansion of economic systems based on intensive innovation and competition for health care plans. Besides, regional competitive bidding would allow government contributions to roll or rebate funds to a health saving account thereby allowing risk-adjustment mechanisms (Niessen & Rutten, 2000; Niessen & Rutten, 2000).
Conclusion
The health care financial reform Proposal described above served as a turning point in transforming the current health care system into affordable, flexible and innovate health care reform. Therefore, adopting and implementing the proposed strategies and policies would be able to reduce government regulations and bureaucracy into competing for health plan with new benefits and opportunities. Besides, the proposed policies would stimulate progressive improvement and innovation achieved through administrative and operational payment manipulations. Lastly, the proposal would significantly eliminate special interest groups and micromanagement that would likely to hinder the health care financial reform strategies and policies.
References
Cissé, B., Luchini, S., & Moatti, J. P. (2007). Progressivity and horizontal equity in health care finance and delivery: What about Africa?. Health policy, 80(1), 51-68.
Halfon, N., Long, P., Chang, D. I., Hester, J., Inkelas, M., & Rodgers, A. (2014). Applying a 3.0 transformation framework to guide large-scale health system reform. Health Affairs, 33(11), 2003-2011.
Niessen, L. W., Grijseels, E. W., & Rutten, F. F. (2000). The evidence-based approach in health policy and health care delivery. Social science & medicine, 51(6), 859-869.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
