Leadership Self Assessment Quizzes The Leadership Self-Assessment Quizzes are an important component of the Written Exercise for this module. The quizzes are intended to reveal certain personality traits and leadership behaviors that you may not be fully aware of.
By no means are these quizzes regarded as “all knowing” of your leadership skills, and thus the results should not be taken as the end, but rather as the beginning, of the self-assessment process. You are expected to critically analyze the results and not just accept them at face value.
Take the following Leadership Self-Assessment Quizzes in the text:
- Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 15-1: The Interpersonal Skills Checklist
- Leadership Self-Assessment Quiz 15-2: My Attitudes Toward Mentoring
Written Exercise 8
Self-Assessment Report /Leadership Skill-Building Exercises
(Part 8 of Leadership Portfolio Project)
This is the final self-assessment component of your Final Project (Leadership Self-Reflection Portfolio). Complete Leadership Skill-Building Exercise 15-2 and then submit the written report discussing your interpersonal skills checklist and attitudes toward mentoring as viewed in quizzes 15-1 and 15-2.
Submit a written report (not to exceed 1,000 words) that covers both of the portfolio building leadership skill-building exercises. The report should also incorporate your findings and conclusions from the self- assessment quizzes in this module, and from personal reflection.
Leadership and Ethics
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to cause personal reflection by the author upon the characteristics associated with his personal leadership tendencies. The focus will be on the contingency, situational, and path-goal theories of leadership. Additionally, we will also examine the tendencies associated with ethical leadership and social responsibility. The author will share results of self-reflection exercises which provide him with personal awareness.
Keywords: contingency, ethical leadership, situational, path-goal, social responsibility
Leadership Self Assessment Quizzes Approaches in Leadership
Leadership is explained as influence over a group of followers. Leadership must be a characteristic which is fluid and responsive, for it is often swayed by a variety of factors including personal perspectives, group dynamics and/or the ebb and flow of a given situation. The characteristics of a situation frequently dictate the leadership approach required to produce the necessary result.
Additionally, leaders must possess and model ethical qualities that will inspire a team to follow his lead or take direction. The responsibility of a leader in terms of developing and promoting a climate of ethical behaviors simply cannot be overstated. Leaders should promote and acknowledge ethical behavior within the ranks of his subordinates to ensure social responsibility on behalf of the employees and the company. DuBrin (2013) points out “when corporate social responsibility generates a value for shareholders and stakeholders, it is regarded as good business” (p.184).
Leadership Self Assessment Quizzes and Contingency Theory of Leadership
The contingency theory leadership model was developed in the 1960s by Fred Fielder. In Fielder’s view, there was three distinct variables which influenced the best leader for a given situation. Fielder’s premise was that the situation determined the style required for the leader to be successful. However, the variables described in Fielder’s theory was based upon the leader-member relations, task structures, and position of power. The presumption in this model of management is that the demands of a given situation suggest which leader characteristic is most likely to be successful in that situation. Although Fielder’s theory has been criticized for being inflexible, the model did show how to size up a situation to gain control (DuBrin, 2013).
The Path-Goal Theory of Leadership
Dr. Robert House developed an analysis focusing on the relationships of leaders, subordinates and the task. In the path-goal approach to the leadership he emphasized that a leader “should choose among four leadership styles to achieve optimum results in a given situation” (DuBrin, 2013, p. 148). There are two distinguishing factors associated with determining the most effective leader in a given situation: first is the subordinates and secondly the task they must perform. The theory suggests once a leader analyzes the contingency factors associated with the group and task, then the leader can select the leadership style necessary to enhance subordinate’s motivation and performance (Gupta, 2009).
In light of Dr. House’s notable contributions in examining leadership styles and subordinate behaviors, there are inevitably noted strengths and weaknesses. The notable strengths associated with the path-goal theory can be described in House’s ability to first reflect on the factor of motivation and satisfaction from the subordinate’s perspective. Secondly, the theory was instrumental in providing a framework for combining factors associated with contingency, expectancy, and situational leadership theories. Lastly, it offered practical and clear roles for the leader in situations (Gupta, 2009). The weaknesses, associated with the path-goal theory, are described by Gupta (2009) chiefly in the overall complexity of the model which relies on the accurate assessments of multiple factors. Lastly, it places all of the responsibility on the leader and none upon the subordinates which would ultimately limit their professional development…
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
