Testing for Honesty
Order Instructions:
See the attached case 9.2 Testing for Honesty
SAMPLE ANSWER
Case 9.2: Testing for Honesty
- Describe how you’d feel if you had to take a psychological test or an honesty test either as an employee or as a precondition for employment. Under what conditions, if any, would you take such a test?
Every human being has personal privacy that he or she would not like exposed to any other party (Muchinsky, 2012). The questions asked during honesty test or a psychological test tends to infringe on private information of an individual. Take for example a question like “Are you strongly attracted to members of the same sex?” This is a very private information that I feel should not be disclosed to any other person. After all, it is none of his business to know whether I am or not. I would obviously feel beleaguered but then because it is a precondition for employment, I would assume my feelings and take the test to answer the question for the sake of the job.
- How useful or informative do you think such tests are? Is their use of a reasonable business policy? Assuming that tests like those described are valid and reliable, are they fair? Explain.
Honesty tests are very informative to the employer. There are some questions that would lead the employer to automatically detect whether his prospective employee is honest or dishonest with his answers. In a question like, “Do you always tell the truth?” the answer should be automatically “NO” because anybody who has attained the employment age has lied at any one given point in his lifetime. Should the respondent say yes, then the employer would be informed that he is likely to be a dishonest employee.
There is a business policy that states that personal privacy should remain confidential and they should only reveal them if they feel free to do so. In an honesty test, the employees or the prospective employees are compelled to answer questions regarding themselves, which under normal circumstances they would not reveal to anyone, not even their confidant, but because it is a matter of survival, employment for that matter, they are forced to take the tests and answer the questions as they come. This, therefore, implies that there is no use of a reasonable business policy.
The honesty tests described above are actually not fair. Even if they are valid and reliable, they are more of nagging to the employees and any other person would not want to take the tests if they had an alternative.
- Do you think tests like these invade privacy and, if so, is this invasion justified? Explain why or why not.
Tests of this kind actually invade privacy and the invasion is justified. Inasmuch as the privacy of the prospective employees is invaded, the invasion is necessary because it is not only important but also safe for the employee to know the real character of the individual he is employing. It has been in the public domain that some employees end up with some characters that would sabotage the organization and send it crumbling. Such characters like theft can be detected in a person through the tests and therefore the tests are justified.
- What ideals, obligations, and effects must be considered in using psychological tests as pre- employment screens? In your view, which is the most important consideration?
Previously, it was the person taking the honesty tests that felt nervous, riddled with angst or tensed (Shultz & Schultz, 2010). To this day, the employers administering the tests to the employers or the job seekers would also find themselves suffering from anxiety or feeling tensed too. This is because there have recently developed a number of obligations, ideals and effects that have to be considered when administering psychological tests (Shultz & Schultz, 2010). The legal hurdles and threats to employment testing have been quite significant. The employer have to consider whether or not he is infringing the employees’ or the applicant’s’ civil rights (Shultz & Schultz, 2010). He also has to take into consideration the psychological effect that the person undertaking the test would have after the completion of the test.
The most important consideration in this case is the consideration whether civil rights are being violated. It is a universal human rights requirement that everybody’s civil right is to be protected and from violation and anybody who violates it should be subjected to legal justice. The employer should try as much as possible to respect the civil rights of the employees or the job seekers as much as possible.
- If you were an employer, would you require either employees or job applicants to pass an honesty exam? Explain the moral principles that support your position.
I would require job applicants to or my employees to pass an honesty test. Any other employer would want to have honest employees to be certain that their organizations are safe from vandalism by dishonest workers (Fancher & Rutherford, 2012). As an employer, I would not expect anything less either. Even if not all the questions would enable the employer to identify honest workers, most of them will and, therefore, if they are passed, then the employer would be sure to have a very honest team that would deliver to the organization through honest means, thereby assuring the success of that organization.
References
Fancher, R. and Rutherford, A., (2012). Pioneers of psychology. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Muchinsky, P., (2012). Psychology applied to work. North Carolina: Hypergraphic Press.
Shultz, J. and Schultz, D., (2010). Psychology and work today. New York: Prentice Hall.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
