Approaches to the Management of Projects Order Instructions: The writer will use a minimum of 4 references as he compose this paper. Proper APA 6th edition must be use throughout the entire paper.
The writer must also read very carefully the instructions and writer the paper base on the instructions in the order form. the writer must also clearly identify the two projects chosen and also the others that where not chosen as indicated in the instructions below.
Approaches to the Management of Projects and the Right Fit
The one-size-fits-all concept may be fine in many situations, but there will inevitably be those in which it is woefully inadequate. Since the problems and circumstances that confront project managers can be limitless, the arsenal of solutions available must also be wide and varied.
In this paper, you evaluate the four approaches to the management of projects presented by Wysocki. You analyze concepts that can be employed to aid in choosing the most useful approach for a wide variety of projects. Managers are wise to seek every way possible to increase the likelihood of project success.
For this Approaches to the Management of Projects paper,
Bearing in mind goal clarity and solution clarity, choose two projects from the list below and determine the best approach for each. Explain why you believe the approach you have chosen is the best fit for each project and your reasoning for ruling out the other three approaches.
• Project examples
o Developing a computer game
o Building a satellite monitoring station
o Installing an inventory control software system
o Developing a marketing campaign for a medical hardware company
o Developing applications for a newly discovered technology
o Building a road in a remote part of Mongolia
Approaches to the Management of Projects Readings
• Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective project management: Traditional, agile, extreme (7th ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
o Chapter 2, “What Is Project Management?” (pp. 25–64)
The author defines project landscape, a definition that he believes encompasses all possible projects and can be used to base best-fit project management approaches.
o Review Chapter 4, “How to Scope a TPM Project” (pp. 103–140)
o Chapter 9, “Complexity and Uncertainty in the Project Management
Landscape” (pp. 311–326)
Complexity and uncertainty in traditional project management makes delivering business value to the client a moving target. More sophisticated approaches are often needed to meet client needs.
• Blackstone, J. H., Cox, J. F., & Schleier, J. G. (2009). A tutorial on project management from a theory of constraints perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 47(24), 7029–7046.
The authors note that project managers are often criticized in project management literature for the large number of projects that do not perform as expected. Researchers have recently identified underlying problems with project concepts. Types of failures are described and calculations for project completion are illustrated.
• Sommer, S. C., & Loch, C. H. (2004). Selectionism and learning in projects with complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty. Management Science, 50(10), 1334–1347.
This study addresses uncertainty and complexity in innovation. Two strategies are proposed, trial and error learning and selectionism, for managing innovation under these circumstances. Criteria are explained for choosing the appropriate strategy.
Hamel, G. (2012). What matters now: How to win in a world of relentless change, ferocious competition, and unstoppable innovation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. ?Section 3, “Adaptability Matters Now” (pp. 83–133)
•Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective project management: Traditional, agile, extreme (7th ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
?Chapter 10, “Agile Project Management” (pp. 327–349)
?Chapter 11, “Extreme Project Management” (pp. 351–358)
Approaches to the Management of Projects Sample Answer
Introduction
Before establishing project management approaches used in a planned project, it is essential for the project managers to evaluate the project requirements and the elements that are attached to bets management methods required in the completion of a project. As determined by Wysocki, there is a need to build a project landscape based in two variables that include the solution and the goal for a project(Wysocki, 2014). This paper seeks to evaluate the methodologies of managing projects as presented by Wysocki
Appropriate Approaches to Management of Projects
As determined, it is practicable for the project managers to evaluate the project requirements and the elements that are attached to best management methods required in the completion of a project. The four approaches to the management of projects include:
The Agile Project Management Approaches (APM)
The Agile Project Management approach is purely inclined on the determination of a well-defined goal that lacks the means for a solution. According to Wysocki (2014), the two types of Agile Project Management approaches are the Iterative and Adaptive approaches (pp. 302). The Iterative model provides a project with the solutions that are mostly known while the Adaptive approach, the solutions may not be determined.
The Traditional Project Management Approach (TPM)
The Traditional Project Management approach is based on determining both the goal of a project and its solutions. It has been established that this approach involves projects that are considered as repetitious in nature(Blackstone, Cox, & Schleier, 2009). Several fast food chains, big box retailers and pharmacies employ this prototype of management.
The Extreme Project Management Approach (XPM)
The Extreme Project Management approach of project management occurs when neither the goal nor the solution of a project is defined. This approach is mostly used on the development and research of projects with a type of project requiring that its clear goals and solutions are known(Blackstone, et.al.2009). Such projects are considered of high risk since they are basically managed on trials and errors.
The Emertxe Project Management Approach (MPx)
In this project management approach, the solution to the project is well defined with the goal of the project not clearly defined(Hamel, 2012). This process may be effective in the development of new projects on technology or systems that fail to have a well-known application.
Analysis of Two Projects in Line with the Approaches of Project Management
Developing a Computer Game
In the development of a computer game, it is essential to establish that there would be a possibility of information that determines the solution and that would miss the aspect of determining the goal of the project(Hamel, 2012). It is consequently essential to establish the fact that the managers handling such a project may have the solution on developing this project; but the lack of clearly defined goals may insinuate that the project may be operating under risks. This clearly depicts that the use of the Extreme Project Management (MPx)would be applicable in this scenario.
The Development of a Marketing Campaign for a Medical Hardware Company
The development of the medical company’s marketing campaign is directed towards a goal in which the project is focused for solutions of achieving the goal (Sommer, & Loch, 2004). The goal of the project would be to improve the company’s sales or delivery of services with the employment of a marketing campaigns directed towards the achievement of the goals of the project. Traditional Project Management (TPM) approach in this case remains an effective tool that would aid the managers of this project to effectively determine the goals and the solutions of this project.
Approaches to the Management of Projects Conclusion
It is consequently essential to consider that the choice of these approaches would clearly determine what the project managers need to consider when evaluating projects to determine an effective project Management approach that would suit the development of projects within a company.
Approaches to the Management of Projects References
Blackstone, J. H., Cox, J. F., & Schleier, J. G. (2009). A tutorial on project management from a theory of constraints perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 47(24),
Hamel, G. (2012). What matters now: How to win in a world of relentless change, ferocious competition, and unstoppable innovation? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sommer, S. C., & Loch, C. H. (2004). Selectionism and learning in projects with complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty. Management Science, 50(10),
Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective project management: Traditional, agile, extreme (7th ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
