Belief and Philosophy Ideological Conflict

Belief and Philosophy Ideological Conflict Ideological Conflict, Belief and Philosophy

Belief and Philosophy Ideological Conflict
Belief and Philosophy Ideological Conflict

Ideological Conflict, Belief and Philosophy

Belief and Philosophy Ideological Conflict Essay Question

In trying to help rival groups (e.g. Israelis and Palestinians) make peace, what is the best approach to take to their rival narratives of the conflict?

Belief and Philosophy Ideological Conflict Citation style

The Oxford University Standard for Citation Of Legal Authorities (OSCOLA) is to be used for footnotes and the bibliography.

II – Structure

  1. Introduction

Cut to the chase right off by saying what the specific problem of the essay is and why it is a problem.

“People call sexual practices perverse all the time, but it is hard to figure out what the criteria for perversion are and what difference it makes whether those practices are perverse or not.”

Avoid long-winded, flowery and vague introductions such as: “Philosophy has been studied for a long time….”

Give your thesis up front; saying in the first paragraph exactly what position you’re going to be arguing for.

Set out how you understand and will use the key terms in your essay, especially any that are used in the question itself.

  1. Argument. Go for a methodical, point-by-point presentation. The reader should know in each part of the essay what the essay is trying to prove, and how it is trying to prove it.

(The reader should be able to use all of his or her brain-power learning from the essay and assessing whether its arguments are plausible—and should be able to spend no brain-power trying to figure out what the essay is trying to prove.)

  1. All essays should include critical evaluation of the topic under discussion. It’s not enough just to describe what others have said. By the end, the readers should understand the arguments that have led you to your own conclusions about the topic.
  2. Conclusion. Avoid glib conclusions such as “this is a very difficult subject” and “there are arguments on both sides”. Your reader knows that, especially as you should have presented just those arguments. Your conclusion should be a considered response to the arguments you have given, challenged and evaluated.

At this point, don’t be afraid to give your own personal response to the question, so long as it is based on and follows from the material you have discussed. The examiner does want to see that you have engaged with the material rather than simply regurgitated it.

III – Style and economy

  1. Clarity is the main virtue of a philosophy essay. It’s better to write a clear boring essay than a muddled entertaining one.
  2. Simplicity: Simpler words and short sentences are often clearer. Don’t go for fancy terms or complex sentences unless you absolutely have to. (Note: One almost never has to.)
  3. Define the essay’s main terms with precision early on (you may have done this in the introduction).
  4. E.g. “Act utilitarianism is the thesis that an action is right if and only if it is the action that produces the most utility.”
  5. Focus: Don’t lay out more of a view than you need to. There are no marks for simply repeating everything you know about a subject. On the contrary, there are ‘higher skills marks’ available for knowing how to leave out irrelevant material.
  6. E.g. if your problem is that utilitarianism may be too demanding, you may not have to discuss in the essay the different interpretations of what utility is (whether there is a distinction between higher and lower pleasures, etc.).

Focusing appropriately on the question at hand is one of the best ways to get marks in philosophy. Meandering aimlessly is a very fast way of losing them.

  1. Depth: Go in-depth concerning the problem specified by the essay topic; you don’t need to say everything about everything. Better to explore one subject in detail than two subjects superficially.
  2. If you’re arguing against someone’s position, present your opponent’s arguments as sympathetically as possible. Your arguments are only as strong as the arguments they defeat.
  3. These essays may not need to use many (or even any) quotes from the readings.
  4. Very rarely will you need to discuss the work of more than two or three philosophers in any detail in an essay? It is better to pick representatives of the positions you are discussing and evaluating these in depth than to rattle off a dozen names that you barely mention again.
  5. Avoid starting sentences by ‘I feel’ or ‘I believe.’ The point of the essay is to convince others using good arguments, not simply to express oneself.
  6. Avoid sweeping and unsupported statements that may be controversial, e.g., “There are no right answers in morality”.

The unexamined life is not worth living for a human being

The unexamined life is not worth living for a human being
The unexamined life is not worth living for a human being

The unexamined life is not worth living for a human being

In a 1000-1500 word essay, please respond to ONE of the following three assignment prompts:

1) Explain and evaluate Socrates’ claim in the Apology that “the unexamined life is not worth living for a human being,” and briefly analyze and discuss the particular method he uses to discover the truth (i.e., dialectics or the Socratic Method), using at least two examples from Plato’s Euthyphro and/or Apology. Do you agree that a human being cannot live a fully satisfying life if he or she remains ignorant, like the slavish prisoners in Plato’s cave? Why or why not?

Finally, in support of your argument, please refer to specific passages in the video (Alain de Botton’s “Socrates on Self-Confidence—Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness,” available on YouTube via the link below) as well as to your own life experiences and observations

Socrates on Self-Confidence—Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness

2) Analyze and explain Epicurus’ famous proclamation: “Thanks be to blessed Nature because she has made what is necessary easy to supply, and what is not easy unnecessary…The right understanding of these facts enables us to refer all choice and avoidance to the health of the body and the soul’s freedom from disturbance, since this is the aim of the life of blessedness.” Do you agree or disagree with this assessment of the good life, and why?

In support of your argument, please refer to specific passages from the video (Alain de Botton’s “Epicurus on Happiness—Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness,” available on YouTube via the link below) as well as to the Epicurus reading assignment, and your own life experiences and observations.

Epicurus on Happiness—Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness

3) Nietzsche famously proclaims that any worthwhile achievements in life come from the experience of overcoming hardship. For him, a life of comfortableness and ease is a worthless, wretched, and wasted life. Do you agree or disagree with this assessment of the good life? Why or why not? In support of your argument, please refer to specific passages from the video (Alain de Botton’s “Nietzsche on Hardship—Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness,” available on YouTube via the link below) as well as to the Nietzsche reading assignment, and your own life experiences and observations.

Nietzsche on Hardship—Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness

To submit your paper, please click on the Applied Philosophy Paper link

with the pencil and ruler icon just above and attach a Word, PDF, RXT, or

TXT file of your paper.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Political Philosophers Research Assignment

Political Philosophers
Political Philosophers

Political Philosophers

Which of the philosophers, Locke, Hobbes, or More, do you judge most successful in grappling with the great problems of their age,and why? To explain your answer, compare and contrast their political philosophies and the strengths and weaknesses of all three approaches.

Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Socrates on Self-Confidence-Philosophy

Socrates on Self-Confidence-Philosophy
Socrates on Self-Confidence-Philosophy

Socrates on Self-Confidence-Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness

In a 1000-1500 word essay, please respond to ONE of the following three assignment prompts:

1) Explain and evaluate Socrates’ claim in the Apology that “the unexamined life is not worth living for a human being,” and briefly analyze and discuss the particular method he uses to discover the truth (i.e., dialectics or the Socratic Method), using at least two examples from Plato’s Euthyphro and/or Apology. Do you agree that a human being cannot live a fully satisfying life if he or she remains ignorant, like the slavish prisoners in Plato’s cave? Why or why not?

Finally, in support of your argument, please refer to specific passages in the video (Alain de Botton’s “Socrates on Self-Confidence—Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness,” available on YouTube via the link below) as well as to your own life experiences and observations.

Socrates on Self-Confidence—Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness

2) Analyze and explain Epicurus’ famous proclamation: “Thanks be to blessed Nature because she has made what is necessary easy to supply, and what is not easy unnecessary…The right understanding of these facts enables us to refer all choice and avoidance to the health of the body and the soul’s freedom from disturbance, since this is the aim of the life of blessedness.” Do you agree or disagree with this assessment of the good life, and why?

In support of your argument, please refer to specific passages from the video (Alain de Botton’s “Epicurus on Happiness—Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness,” available on YouTube via the link below) as well as to the Epicurus reading assignment, and your own life experiences and observations.

Epicurus on Happiness—Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness

3) Nietzsche famously proclaims that any worthwhile achievements in life come from the experience of overcoming hardship. For him, a life of comfortableness and ease is a worthless, wretched, and wasted life. Do you agree or disagree with this assessment of the good life? Why or why not? In support of your argument, please refer to specific passages from the video (Alain de Botton’s “Nietzsche on Hardship—Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness,” available on YouTube via the link below) as well as to the Nietzsche reading assignment, and your own life experiences and observations.

Nietzsche on Hardship—Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness

To submit your paper, please click on the Applied Philosophy Paper link
with the pencil and ruler icon just above and attach a Word, PDF, RXT, or  TXT file of your paper.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Philosophy of world religions Assignment

Philosophy of world religions
Philosophy of world religions

Philosophy of world religions

Welcome to the Religious News Station!
As the newest member of the organization, you will be exploring many different religions from varying viewpoints throughout this course. This ongoing travel will have you reporting on various religions around the world and will conclude with a final project for the news station.
For your first assignment, you will be packing your bags and traveling to India! It is there where you will find the major concentration of those practicing Hinduism.

As you begin traveling for Religious News, your boss wants you to embrace the Hindu culture as much as possible. Per his request, he has asked that you visit a temple, attend one festival of your choosing, and observe either an investiture, marriage, or funeral ceremony.

For your write-up, be sure to include the following components for your report:
summarize the impact samskaras have on Hindu society;
compare and contrast a selected Hindu ceremony (e.g., the investiture, marriage, or funeral ceremony) or festival to one that takes place within your culture; and compare and contrast social statuses within Hinduism to that of your culture.
Your reflection should be at least one page in length. You must include at least two outside sources,

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Organizational Power Influence and Persuasion

Organizational Power Influence and Persuasion Once you have finished your research, write a 4- to a 5-page paper addressing the following issues. Make sure to cite at least two of the required background readings in addition to articles about the Koch brothers in your paper:

Organizational Power Influence and Persuasion
Organizational Power Influence and Persuasion
  1. What were Charles and Bill Koch’s sources of power within Koch Industries? Did they have reward power, coercive power, legitimate power, or expert power? Any other sources of power? Refer to Bauer and Erdogan (2012) or Luthans et al. (2015) in your answer, as you should demonstrate a solid understanding of these readings as part of your answer.
  2. What influence tactics did each of them use in their battle for control? Refer to Bauer and Erdogan (2012) or Luthans et al. (2015) in your answer.
  3. Ultimately what do you think led to Charles Koch’s victory in this battle, and what do you think are the most important lessons on organizational power that you learned from reading about this power struggle?

Tao Te Ching (Daoism) Essay Assignment

Tao Te Ching (Daoism)
Tao Te Ching (Daoism)

Tao Te Ching (Daoism)

Write a 4 to 6-page paper typed and double spaced with standard font and margins. As needed for quotes, you may use endnotes, or footnotes. The paper should be written with a standard Introduction, Body, and Conclusion format as we’ve discussed in class. The intended audience should be someone who knows nothing about the topic. The paper should be submitted by the date and time listed in the re-revised schedule to Turn-it-in.com through the link on BlackBoard. I will grade the paper using Turn-it-in with brief comments and a rubric. You will be able to see these comments once I’ve finished grading. The numerical score for the paper is wholistic, and so not based on the rubric.

Choose five poems from the Tao Te Ching that you feel best illustrate a comprehensive range of Daoist attitudes/beliefs/concepts. As noted in class, you should present the poem, hopefully in your own words, although you can quote parts of it if you feel this is necessary (just be sure to interpret the quote after presenting it), explain what Daoist sentiments you see reflected in the poem, and why; and then explain how these sentiments fit into and support the Daoist goal of following the Way (Dao). Finally, what is your assessment of the world-view and way of life presented by Daoism, and why?

Include the 10,000 things and multiplicity.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Ideological Conflict on Belief and Philosophy

Ideological Conflict on Belief and Philosophy Essay Question: In trying to help rival groups

Ideological Conflict on Belief and Philosophy
Ideological Conflict on Belief and Philosophy

(e.g. Israelis and Palestinians) make peace, what is the best approach to take to their rival narratives of the conflict?

Ideological Conflict on Belief and Philosophy Citation style

The Oxford University Standard for Citation Of Legal Authorities (OSCOLA) is to be used for footnotes and the bibliography.

II – Structure

  1. Introduction

♣ Cut to the chase right off by saying what the specific problem of the essay is and why it is a problem.

“People call sexual practices perverse all the time, but it is hard to figure out what the criteria for perversion are and what difference it makes whether those practices are perverse or not.”

♣ Avoid long-winded, flowery and vague introductions such as: “Philosophy has been studied for a long time….”

♣ Give your thesis up front, saying in the first paragraph exactly what position you’re going to be arguing for.

♣ Set out how you understand and will use the key terms in your essay, especially any that are used in the question itself.

  1. Argument. Go for a methodical, point-by-point presentation. The reader should know in each part of the essay what the essay is trying to prove, and how it is trying to prove it.

(The reader should be able to use all of his or her brain-power learning from the essay and assessing whether its arguments are plausible—and should be able to spend no brain-power trying to figure out what the essay is trying to prove.)

  1. All essays should include critical evaluation of the topic under discussion. It’s not enough just to describe what others have said. By the end the readers should understand the arguments that have led you to your own conclusions about the topic.
  2. Conclusion. Avoid glib conclusions such as “this is a very difficult subject” and “there are arguments on both sides”. Your reader knows that, especially as you should have presented just those arguments. Your conclusion should be a considered response to the arguments you have given, challenged and evaluated.

Ideological Conflict on Belief and Philosophy

At this point, don’t be afraid to give your own personal response to the question, so long as it is based on and follows from the material you have discussed. The examiner does want to see that you have engaged with the material rather than simply regurgitated it.

III – Style and economy

  1. Clarity is the main virtue of a philosophy essay. It’s better to write a clear boring essay than a muddled entertaining one.
  2. Simplicity: Simpler words and short sentences are often clearer. Don’t go for fancy terms or complex sentences unless you absolutely have to. (Note: One almost never has to.)
  3. Define the essay’s main terms with precision early on (you may have done this in the introduction).
  4. E.g. “Act utilitarianism is the thesis that an action is right if and only if it is the action that produces the most utility.”
  5. Focus: Don’t lay out more of a view than you need to. There are no marks for simply repeating everything you know about a subject. On the contrary, there are ‘higher skills marks’ available for knowing how to leave out irrelevant material.
  6. E.g. if your problem is that utilitarianism may be too demanding, you may not have to discuss in the essay the different interpretations of what utility is (whether there is a distinction between higher and lower pleasures, etc.).

Ideological Conflict on Belief and Philosophy

Focusing appropriately on the question at hand is one of the best ways to get marks in philosophy. Meandering aimlessly is a very fast way of losing them.

  1. Depth: Go in-depth concerning the problem specified by the essay topic; you don’t need to say everything about everything. Better to explore one subject in detail than two subjects superficially.
  2. If you’re arguing against someone’s position, present your opponent’s arguments as sympathetically as possible. Your arguments are only as strong as the arguments they defeat.
  3. These essays may not need to use many (or even any) quotes from the readings.
  4. Very rarely will you need to discuss the work of more than two or three philosophers in any detail in an essay? It is better to pick representatives of the positions you are discussing and evaluating these in depth than to rattle off a dozen names that you barely mention again.
  5. Avoid starting sentences by ‘I feel’ or ‘I believe.’ The point of the essay is to convince others using good arguments, not simply to express oneself.
  6. Avoid sweeping and unsupported statements that may be controversial, e.g., “There are no right answers in morality”.

Applying Kant’s moral philosophy Paper

Applying Kant's moral philosophy
Applying Kant’s moral philosophy

Applying Kant’s moral philosophy

Read chapter 3, watch Week 6 Lectures, and watch the films “Gone Baby Gone” and “Sleepers”. Pick one movie and apply Kant’s moral philosophy to judge the MAIN FINAL action. For “Gone Baby Gone” judge Patrick’s final decision and for “Sleepers” judge the priest’s final decision. Judging any other action in the movie is an automatic zero. 500 words minimum in MLA format. Minimum 3 sources from LIRN Code: 24439 You must apply Kant’s 3 premises (course materials) for 50 points and Michael Sandel’s 3 contrasts (Week 6 Lecture “Mind your Motive”) for 50 points.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Philosophies of Religion and Religious News

Philosophies of Religion and Religious News Instructions Religious News is giving you the opportunity to give your readers a deeper glimpse into your thoughts.

Philosophies of Religion and Religious News
Philosophies of Religion and Religious News

Your boss has tasked you with creating a PowerPoint presentation detailing some things you have learned about the religious practices in Oceania. You recall the scenario below while creating your presentation. You discover that a religious group has begun on the other side of town in which you are staying. You begin attending some of their worship sessions and find that the people are quite welcoming.

Philosophies of Religion and Religious News

After attending a few sessions, they invite you to live within the community they have established. It sounds like a great opportunity, and you begin to consider the offer. While talking with your neighbor, who attends church regularly, about the new religious group, she informs you that this group is most likely a cult. She has witnessed the members beginning to build large walls around their compound and bring in supplies, specifically weapons, on regular accounts. She also points out that this group resembles a cult, based on her knowledge of previous incidents. She concludes by cautioning you against moving into the newly formed community, noting that cults tend to have to very drastic views and practices compared to other religions. You assure her you will take her cautions to heart while making your decision. In the end, though, will you join the cult? For your presentation, you must include the following components:  Create a chart to compare and contrast the view of sacred items, practices, or areas of Oceanic cults compared to that of one religion discussed so far in this course.  Create a bullet list of assessing why members of religious groups can be divided into new beliefs or topics.  Explain the values and practices surrounding cults.  Justify your chosen action based on the provided scenario.

Philosophies of Religion and Religious News Presentation

Your presentation must be a minimum of five slides, not counting the title slide and reference slide. Remember to title each slide and include an introductory sentence per slide. You do not need to utilize the notes section or audio for this presentation. Include at least one image in your presentation. Remember to review the rubric to compare it with your presentation before you submit it.