Philosophy of Religion and Scientism

Philosophy of Religion and Scientism Read Philip Kitcher’s “The Trouble with Scientism.”

Philosophy of Religion and Scientism
Philosophy of Religion and Scientism

Summarize the article in roughly 1 page, and then respond to it in roughly 1/2-page to 1 page with your own reflections, thoughts, and connections to course material. Advocates of the doctrine of scientism believe that the boundaries of science (that is, typically the natural sciences) could and should be expanded in such a way that something that has not previously been understood as science can now become a part of science. Thus a possible synonym to scientism is scientific expansionism. How exactly the boundaries of science should be expanded and what more precisely is to be included within science issue on which there is disagreement.

The Good Brahmin and French Philosopher Voltaire

The Good Brahmin and French Philosopher Voltaire Why study philosophy? In his short story, The Good Brahmin, the eighteenth-century French

The Good Brahmin and French Philosopher Voltaire
The Good Brahmin and French Philosopher Voltaire

philosopher Voltaire suggests that even though an ignorant person may be much happier than a learned philosopher, we nevertheless madly prefer the despair of philosophy to the happy contentment of ignorance. Is this true? And if it is, why do we prefer knowledge of happiness? Give specific arguments from your reading, videos, and references to substantiate your view.

Textbook: Manuel Velasquez’s Philosophy, A Text With Readings-13th edition. Voltaire (François-Marie Arouet) (November 21, 1694 – May 30, 1778) was a prolific writer, philosopher, poet and pamphlets, and the preeminent figure of the eighteenth-century French Enlightenment.

Argumentative Essay on Great Philosophers Aristotle

Argumentative Essay on Great Philosophers Aristotle 1) Introduce your paper.

Argumentative Essay on Great Philosophers Aristotle
Argumentative Essay on Great Philosophers Aristotle

We’re studying the great moral philosophers, and all of our philosophers have been included for very good reasons; your introduction should indicate your understanding of the main reason(s) for your philosopher’s inclusion, as well as what makes them worthy of our attention.

Argumentative Essay on Great Philosophers Aristotle

2) Summarize the key concepts (at least one; no more than three) posited and developed by that philosopher ñ this should include what their philosophy replaced and/or what has replaced it since, if applicable, and should show a well-rounded understanding of their work both in and of itself, as well as within the context of the overall academic study and applied practice of Ethics.

2A) Included in your summary of their work should be topically accurate citations of and quotations from their written work that support the focus of your summary of their main ideas.

Argumentative Essay on Great Philosophers Aristotle

3) Discuss the possibilities of practically applying your chosen philosopher’s work to a contentious issue within a personal, professional, or academic area of your own choosing, most often the one in which you are working in or toward currently, but it could also be an area or topic of merely casual interest to you.

3A) Included in your section on the practical application should be at least one example of a case study or hypothetical situation in your chosen field in which the philosopher’s work could be applied, as well as a discussion of the means by which it would be applied, and, if applicable, resolved.

4) You should wrap up your term paper by summarizing and tying together the salient points of what you’ve presented in terms of the philosopher’s key concepts and potential for practical application. In most cases, this will be something of a rehashing of your introduction; in other words, tell me what you’re going to do, do it, then tell me what you just did ñ this is a helpful way to stretch papers to the required length. Don’t think of it as being redundant ñ think of it as being thorough.

Argumentative Essay on Great Philosophers Aristotle

So very basically, you’re going to pick one moral philosopher we cover in the course of the semester (i.e., that’s on the reading schedule), present their contributions/ key concepts in your own words. Then you’re going to present both sides of a contentious issue, e.g., abortion, stem cell research, etc. – what each side says, and so forth. You’re then going to apply your philosopher’s thought to the issue – what questions would they ask, what steps they would take, what conclusions might they arrive at. You probably can’t do this well in fewer than four pages, and if you go over six you’re probably adding extraneous details.

Philosophy Descartes Essay Paper

Philosophy Descartes Essay Paper 1000 words minimum, composed in your own words. Quotations from the book are permitted (and they can help you make your paper better) but they do not count towards this 1000-word requirement.

Philosophy Descartes Essay Paper
Philosophy Descartes Essay Paper

Your paper must be single-spaced, 11 point font size, on a regular 8.5 x 11 paper size with 1î margin. Your name must be at the top, with this title: Paper Two for PHIL 101 Section __555.

Your paper must have two parts: First, explain how Descartes separates all reality into four basic kinds of reality in his philosophy. Be sure to provide examples of the sorts of things that exist within each kind of reality. Then explain why Descartes thinks that philosophy can know about the two intellectual kinds of reality above the dividing line. Second, explain how Descartes argues that philosophy can figure out that God really exists. In your answer, be sure to explain how Descartes shows that three of the four kinds of reality cannot explain why we have the idea of God in our minds.

WEB DuBois Booker T Washington and Marcus Garvey

WEB DuBois Booker T Washington and Marcus Garvey Directions: Answer in good essay format 5 of the following questions. You may answer the sixth question for extra credit.

WEB DuBois Booker T Washington and Marcus Garvey
WEB DuBois Booker T Washington and Marcus Garvey

Each essay is 20 points. You must submit to full pages for each essay. (Note if you submit less than two full pages your score will be reduced.)

Your essay should be in essay format. Introduction, Body, Conclusion. Your essay should be analytic not simply descriptive.

  1. Discuss the philosophical differences between W.E. B. DuBois, Booker T. Washington, and Marcus Garvey.
  2. Enumerate and discuss the factors that led to race riots in the U.S. between 1900-1923. How did these riots affect the socio-economic development of the African-American population?
  3. Analyze the competing strategies and effectiveness of African American organizations in the 1920ís.
  4. Identify the most significant people involved in the Harlem Renaissance and explain their lasting contributions.
  5. What role did Racism play in the Scottsboro Boys case and the Tuskegee Experiment?
  6. Describe the roles that African American actors and actresses were restricted to in early Hollywood movies. Who were some of the major Hollywood stars?

Orthodox Marxists from Kautsky to Lenin

Orthodox Marxists from Kautsky to Lenin failed to understand key ideas in Marx’s Capital, specifically on the role of the wage relation, work practices and the ‘alienation’ of the worker.

Orthodox Marxists from Kautsky to Lenin

TOPIC: Orthodox Marxists from Kautsky to Lenin failed to understand key ideas in Marx’s Capital, specifically on the role of the wage relation, work practices and the ‘alienation’ of the worker.

Orthodox Marxists from Kautsky to Lenin
Orthodox Marxists from Kautsky to Lenin

If this statement is true, what are its implications for studying Marx and Marxism?

INSTRUCTIONS: This question is really about the labour process, which was a central concern of Marx in Capital, whilst ‘state politics‘ only featured in the margins of his work. According to some (Colletti), much of what has passed as ‘Marxism’ (from the Soviet Union to Western Trotskyism) really took its impetus from Engels’ influence on 19th-century Russian philosophy (also see McLellan). Meanwhile, Cleaver argues that ‘orthodox’ Marxism lost touch with struggles against the imposition of work (and the commodification of the worker) and over the ‘labor process’, or how tasks are actually structured.

Orthodox Marxists from Kautsky to Lenin

‘Marxism’ subsequently became a social theory of power-grabbing ‘state’ politics and control over the distribution of surpluses, rather than a critique of how those surpluses are produced. However, from the 1970s, many researchers began to look at ‘the world of work’ again (Braverman), reading Capital in a new light. This question provides an opportunity to discuss the reassessment of Marx which has taken place due to scholarship since the 1960s.

Orthodox Marxists from Kautsky to Lenin Sources

Braverman, H., 1974, Labour and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York Monthly Review Press.

Cleaver, H., 1979, Reading Capital Politically Austin: University of Texas Press.

Colletti, M., 1979, ‘Introduction’, in Marx, K., Early Writings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

McLellan, D., 1979, Marxism After Marx: An Introduction. 2nd Edition. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Robins, K. & Webster, F., 1985, ‘Luddism: New Technology and the Critique of Political Economy’, in Levidow, L. & Young, B., eds., Science, Technology and the Labour Process. Volume 2. London: Free Association Books.

Aristotle Views on the Highest Good

Aristotle Views on the Highest Good IMPORTANT:

Do NOT include any cover sheet.

Aristotle Views on the Highest Good
Aristotle Views on the Highest Good

Do NOT include material from the essay prompt itself.

(These will falsely trigger the site’s plagiarism detection.)

Essay Prompt

Explain Aristotle’s views on the Highest Good. Why does Aristotle think there must be a Highest Good? What does he think the Highest Good is? Does Aristotle contradict himself about what the Highest Good is? How do we attain the Highest Good? Why would we want to attain what he calls the Highest Good? Aristotle regarded psychology as a part of natural philosophy, and he wrote much about the philosophy of mind. This material appears in his ethical writings, in a systematic treatise on the nature of the soul (De anima), and in a number of minor monographs on topics such as sense-perception, memory, sleep, and dreams.

African Philosophy Brief Summary and Literature Review

African Philosophy Brief Summary and Literature Review Introduction – Summarize the goal of your paper and the research question that you will be addressing. Include a brief summary of your paper and your major arguments.

African Philosophy Brief Summary and Literature Review
African Philosophy Brief Summary and Literature Review

Literature Review – Summarize the existing academic standpoint on the issue you are investigating and explain how your research fits within the literature.

Analysis– Integrating the findings from the literature with your own ideas, provide an analysis of the research problem.

Summary and Conclusion – summarize your paper and your major arguments. References –Use APA/MLA referencing format.

Appendix – If you decide to use news reports or any other published material, submit the copy of it in an Appendix.

Maersk Philosophy of Compensating Employees

Maersk Philosophy of Compensating Employees Overview: This milestone focuses on the topic of this week’s lessons: compensating employees. Using the material on compensation provided in this week’s lesson and the case study, write a short paper in which you:

Maersk Philosophy of Compensating Employees
Maersk Philosophy of Compensating Employees

Describe the compensation philosophy of Maersk and how the market influences this philosophy.

Determine the value of salary surveys to an organization.

Describe the advantages of discretionary benefits to Maersk.

Guidelines for Submission: Your submission should be two pages in length and double-spaced using 12-point Times New Roman font. Be sure to list your references at the end of your paper. Submit journal assignment as a Word document.

Philosophy Living Ethics by Russ Shafer Landau

Philosophy Living Ethics by Russ Shafer Landau MUST HAVE THE FOLLOWING BOOK: Living Ethics by Russ Shafer-Landau.

Philosophy Living Ethics by Russ Shafer Landau
Philosophy Living Ethics by Russ Shafer Landau

Oxford University Press, 2019. ISBN: 978019027219

Philosophy Living Ethics by Russ Shafer Landau

Instructions are in the attached file read carefully please before starting the essay thank you will have two options in the attached file for the essay but both ways you will need the book for citations and the essay itself

PHIL 1050 Ethics, Knowledge and Reality PAPER ASSIGNMENT III

This paper is worth 10 points, or 10% of your final grade.

PURPOSE: Over the past few weeks, we have read Chapter 4 from Robert Solomon’s The Big Questions and Chapter

2 from Kellenberger’s book on the philosophy of religion. The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with an opportunity to closely engage with some of the thinkers and ideas that we have covered, to hone your skills in summarizing and responding to philosophical arguments, to meaningfully juxtapose thinkers and ideas, and to articulate your own views about the questions raised in the material. Through this paper, you should come to a clearer understanding of the material and of your own views.

Philosophy Living Ethics by Russ Shafer Landau

Choose ONE of the following options to use as the prompt for your essay:

OPTION 1: REALITY & METAPHYSICS

To prepare to write the essay: Review Solomon’s quiz at the beginning of Chapter and the arguments put forward by various philosophers in the chapter. Then review Question 3 in the Closing Questions at the end of the chapter. Use the checklist of questions to review the chapter; the questions here will help you get clearer in your own mind about your own position on some of the ideas raised in this chapter.

Next: Choose two thinkers from the list on the right who are discussed in the chapter.

For example, you might choose two of the ancient Greek (pre-Socratic) thinkers such as Heraclitus and Democritus; alternatively, you might choose one of the ancient philosophers such as Aristotle and pair him with Hegel; or you might want to put two of the modern thinkers into conversation with each other, such as Spinoza and Leibniz.

Put some thought into the pairing, because it will determine what sorts of ideas you engage in your paper.

Philosophy Living Ethics by Russ Shafer Landau Prompt

Write an essay in which you engage and juxtapose the views of the two thinkers and articulate your own ideas in response. Your essay should make clear what philosophical question each thinker was addressing, the points of overlap and

differences between their views, and suggest possible implications of their views. It should convey your own ideas clearly, using the relevant philosophical vocabulary you have learned this semester.

OPTION 2: PROOFS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD

To prepare to write the essay: Review the chapter from Kellenberger’s Introduction to Philosophy of Religion on Proofs for the Existence of God, including the questions at the end of the chapter (on page 53). You will also want to look closely at the Keynote presentations used in class since they will include some additional details about the thinkers and arguments and some excerpts from the primary texts in which the arguments appeared.

Next: Choose two of the arguments to focus upon in your essay e.g. 1) the ontological argument, 2) the cosmological argument, and/or 3) the teleological argument (aka the design argument).

Prompt: Write an essay in which you engage and juxtapose the two arguments and articulate your own ideas in response. Your essay should make clear what type of argument each is and summarize some of the criticisms that have been put forward. Finally, it should convey your own ideas clearly, using the relevant philosophical vocabulary you have learned this semester.

Philosophy Living Ethics by Russ Shafer Landau REQUIREMENTS

The essay must be 3-4 pages in length (750-1000 words); use a standard, 12-point font; double-space the essay and use 1î margins. Your paper must be a minimum of 750 words in order to receive at least a D.

CITATION: Make sure in your essay to engage, in detail, the relevant course material. Make sure to thoroughly cite the source (both when you refer to something from the chapter indirectly and when you quote directly). Do this by putting the author’s name and the relevant page number in parenthesis at the end of the sentence, like this (Solomon 15) or (Kellenberger 15). You do not need to use other sources for this paper, but if you do you must include those citations in a list of Works Consulted at the end of your paper. Please use MLA bibliographic citation format.