Project Managers and Ethics, Leadership, and Technology
Project Managers and Ethics, Leadership, and Technology
1. Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center.
2. Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.
3. Draft Term Paper: Project Managers and Ethics, Leadership, and Technology
4. Due Week 7 and worth 75 points
5. Project managers do a lot more than calculations and reporting; they must keep the team on track, ensure ethical decisions are made, deal with conflict, and, depending on the type of organization, they may perform employee evaluations, issue bonuses, hire and lay off personnel, and other tasks. In this paper, you will discuss some of the key elements of the project management process.
6. Write a ten to twelve (10-12) page paper in which you:
Describe the different organizational structures as it relates to project management (i.e., functional, project-based, matrix).
Discuss at least two (two) different roles that project managers can play in organizational leadership.
Describe at least three (3) human resource factors that affect project management.
Recommend five (5) conflict resolution techniques that project managers can utilize to keep team members productive.
Explain at least three (3) leadership approaches and when they are best utilized.
Describe five (5) ethical situations or dilemmas that project managers might face in their role within an organization.
Summarize tools and techniques commonly used in project procurement.
Assess the role of technology in project management.
Provide your expectations for the development of the project management field aided by modern technologies.
Use at least four (4) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
7. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
8. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Describe and demonstrate ethical practices in project management.
Examine the human resource factors that can impact project management.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in IT project management.
Write clearly and concisely about issues in IT project management using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.
9. Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment.
10. By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Assignment Details:
Format: You will write a short paper, approximately 2-3 pages in length (650-800 words), based on a social psychological theory or concept and apply it to your life experiences. The paper must be typed, and double-spaced so I have room to make comments. The title of the document must include the letter (A or B) and/or the name of the topic you choose. You should type your name and topic on the first page of the paper
Content: The paper must incorporate three components: 1) description and explanation of the theory or concept, 2) relevant example from your life experiences, and 3) application of the concept to your example.
1) An explanation of a social psychological theory or concept discussed in lecture and text.
Your description should be clear and detailed enough that someone not taking this course would be able to understand your description and gain a clear understanding of the theory or concept. This is your opportunity to show how well you comprehend the course material. ? Text and lecture are the only sources you will use for these papers. Rules regarding correct referencing of sources must be followed. No direct quotes. You must paraphrase information from text and lecture, and reference or
cite the source. Do NOT use internet sources (e.g., Wikipedia, Changingminds.org). Using unauthorized sources or committing plagiarism will result in a grade reduction. See the attached tutorial for avoiding plagiarism. For this course, we will use a modified APA style citation: To cite the text include the author’s name and the page number (Franzoi, p. 95). To cite from lecture, use the word lecture followed by the chapter number and page number
2) A description of a personal experience or observation that illustrates or exemplifies the theory or research. Choose something from your own experience that relates to the social psychological theory or concept.
You may use your observations of other people (e.g., friends, family, acquaintances), but change identifying information. You cannot borrow experiences from our text, other texts or from the internet. It should be an example you or someone you know experienced. Do not use examples of
famous people or from the news, unless you clear it with me. Using such examples without prior permission will result in grade reduction. Both topics should have relevance for most people, so you should be able to find examples from your own life, or from the lives of people you know.
3) An application of the theory or concept to the personal experience or observation.
Explain how your personal example illustrates the theory or concept. Be specific about how all parts of the theory or concept apply to your example. If some parts of a theory or concept do not apply to your example, you should also discuss how it does not fit your experience. You must make explicit connections or links between the social psychological concepts and your example.
Plagiarism is misrepresenting someone else’s writing or ideas as your own. The defines plagiarism as:
“At one extreme end, plagiarism is the word-for-word copying of another’s writing without enclosing the copied passage in quotation marks and identifying the proper citation. At the other end of the spectrum, plagiarism is the casual inclusion of a particular idea or term which one has obtained from another’s writing or speaking, and which is presented as one’s own opinion or idea So plagiarism is not just copying information word for word from a source, it also includes using a source’s ideas without giving the source credit.
You are not allowed to use direct quotes for this paper. You must paraphrase the information and reference the source. Paraphrasing is rewording information from a source into your own words. A
good paraphrase communicates the ideas of the original, but uses your own language. Paraphrasing is not just a matter of substituting a few words into the original or merely rearranging words (Scott, Koch, Scott, & Garrison, 1999). A paraphrase, because it uses ideas from the source, must give the source credit (Dunn, 1999). Paraphrasing without citing the source is plagiarism (Scott, et al., 1999).
CHOOSE ONE: Both topics come from Chapter 3 and relate to the self. Notice that words that include self as a prefix use a hyphen, e.g., self-awareness, self-esteem, self-handicap, self-monitor. Text
Lecture Topic A: Private and public self-consciousness (self-awareness) – Self-consciousness and self-awareness are closely related concepts, so you must read about both in order to discuss this topic. Self-awareness describes a temporary state of awareness, whereas self-consciousness describes a habitual state, like a trait. ? The questionnaire on p. 73 in the text is designed as a measure of the levels of private and public self-consciousness. Complete the questionnaire, compute your score (instructions on p. 74), and report your score for both private and public self-consciousness. Compare yourself to the average scores for colleges students (private = 26, public = 19). Is your score above average, near the
average, or below average? The higher (or lower) your score is compared to these averages the more (or less) you have the trait. Compare and contrast private and public self-consciousness. Discuss what people high in private self-consciousness tend to think about and how this may affect their behavior. Do likewise for people high in public self-consciousness Identify possible consequences of having high levels of the two types of self-consciousness. Using yourself as an example, discuss whether you tend more toward high or low private and public self-consciousness (or fall near the average) Give examples of thinking and behavior that illustrate your level of private and public self-consciousness and clearly explain how they fit the concept of self-consciousness. This may include examples of situations that lead you to be more privately or publicly self-aware.
p. 72-75 Ch. 3
Topic B: Self-monitoring – The questionnaire on page 95 in the text is a measure of self-monitoring, and should help you better understand what high and low self-monitors are like. Complete the questionnaire, compute your score and report your score. Researchers often use a cut off score to
classify people into high and low categories. A score of 9 or below is low self-monitoring, 10 or above is high self-monitoring. If your score, however, is near that cutoff (e.g., 8-11) you are near the average on self-monitoring. ? Define and describe self-monitoring. Your description should include a comparison of high and low self-monitors, what their motives are, and give examples of typical behaviors for each.
Identify at least one advantage and one disadvantage for each extreme self-monitoring level (high and low). Using yourself as an example, discuss whether you tend more toward high or low self-monitoring
(or fall somewhere in between). Give examples of your attitudes and behavior that illustrate your level of self-monitoring, and clearly explain how they fit the concept of self-monitoring. This may include examples of when you are more or less likely to engage in self-monitoring attempts. p. 94-96 Ch. 3
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Please answer the following discussion questions. You will answer the questions in one post.
1. What are the stages of team development?
2. Give examples of better ways to become a better “sender” and “receiver” of information.
Make sure you cite the readings to support your answers using the APA format. Posts without supporting information from the text (including in-text citations and a references list), will lose points. I cannot gauge whether or not a student is learning the material if they are not citing it in their posts.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Teacher candidates will be asked to demonstrate understanding of core ideas related to STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) and plan effective instruction.
Part I: Research STEM-based careers.
What are the popular career choices now and in the near future? Describe the education and skill requirements necessary for a few key careers.
Next, look at who is underrepresented in STEM-based career fields. What recommendations are provided to help lessen this in the future? Explain.
Now apply what you’ve learned. Select a few key STEM-based careers. How might you utilize this information to plan activities that are a simulation of a real STEM work environment, thus allowing students to explore multiple STEM careers?
Finally, reflect on this question: What have you learned that might impact your use of STEM-based activities in your future classroom?
Type a brief report summarizing your findings.
Criteria: 2-3 pages; professional, scholarly level of work; no grammatical/spelling errors; cite sources in APA-style format.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Someones taste in music offer hints about their personality
Someones taste in music offer hints about their personality
You will be required to write a 10-12 page paper (Times New Roman, 12 point font, double spaced, 1” margins) that proposes a hypothetical research project of your choosing.
I need 2 peer review journal articles related to this topic.
These sources must be creditable!
This paper must be authentic!
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Create a list of five “rules” or ways of doing things that reflect this low power distance. These can come from what one might experience in school, at work, as part of family life, etc. If you come from a high power-distance culture, create a list of five rules or ways of doing things that reflect this high power distance.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Anatomy of a Research Article Paper Below is a general guideline you can use when dissecting a research article from an academic journal. Article format and style may vary, but you should be able to locate all the elements below.
Abstract – This is an abbreviated and general overview of what you will find in the article including a) statement justifying the reason for the study, b) methodology used, c) statement of hypothesis or expected findings, and d) results.
Introduction – This normally ranges from a few paragraphs to a full page, setting up what the article will cover based on a brief overview of the issues and possibly a brief overview of the methods.
Review of literature/Background section – In order to provide background information on what we already know about a topic and justify the need for additional research, the researcher begins by reviewing previous research or literature. Necessary terminology and definitions, relationships among variables, and general findings in previous research are laid out here. This provides a foundation on which to build the current research. Part of reviewing the literature of previous research is to also to indicate where the gaps or inconsistencies are so that others (e.g., you) may provide answers or corrections with their follow up research. Note that this section of the article may not be called “Review of Literature,” and may in fact be a number of sections, each with its own heading.
Anatomy of a Research Article Paper
This section brings together a body of research that is related to, but not necessarily on the exact same topic that you are examining. Important components of previous research that are often addressed here are:
a) Timing – How old is previous research? Is it dated? Does it need to be studied again in light of contemporary issues or conditions?
b) Variables – What variables have been considered in relation to one another on a topic of research? Should other variables be considered?
c) Theoretical perspective – What theoretical perspectives have been used in the past to interpret social phenomena? Would another perspective provide a different or more useful interpretation? How would a “macro” or “micro” perspective interpret the issue differently?
d) Methodology – How have previous studies collected and analyzed data? Are these procedures methodologically sound? Have important strategies for data collection or analysis and interpretation been overlooked? Have different sets of data yielded different results?
e) Emergent research question(s) – Summary statement(s) of testable propositions emerging from the authors’ literature review.
Theory – Sometimes there is a section explicitly labeled “theory” or something similar. Sometimes this is included in the review of the literature. Either way, you should be able to glean some idea of what kind of perspective previous research has used to interpret some phenomenon and how the current article follows or challenges such perspective.
Methods – An explanation of how data is gathered and analyzed. Not a very “sexy” section of the research article, but necessary to explain to readers where the answers or interpretations are coming from. This section should explain to the reader whether the study is based quantitative or qualitative research methods, or both. Sometimes researchers will gather their own data through surveys or interviews, sometimes they’ll use an existing data set (such as General Social Survey). The source of the “raw data” and methods used to analyze and interpret it should be made explicit here. This may be an important component in determining how good or sound a piece of research really is.
Quantitative Methods – These methods tend to use statistical analyses to examine trends and/or analyze numbers.
Qualitative Methods – These methods tend to focus on interviews with people, observations, or some combination of both. A long term, in-depth qualitative project, is often called an “ethnography.”
Results/Findings – Another sometimes dry portion of the research article is where the results from the data analyses are interpreted. Although this may be done largely through a table, chart, or graph containing statistics, it must also be interpreted in plain English. So a researcher discovers a statistically significant positive relationship between education and income at the .05 level? What does it mean? The research should spell out for you (and you should do the same in with your results) that an increase in education is related to an increase in income level.
Conclusions/Discussion – Although the last part of the research article, perhaps the most crucial as this is where we find out if the current research provides any important information. This is where the researcher interprets more than the statistics. This is the discussion of the overall meaning of the research. What do we learn from this? How does it add to or challenge existing research? Are there suggestions for future studies to increase knowledge on this or related topics? This is where the researcher’s voice should most clearly be heard as they tell you what they found and why it is important.
Bibliography/Works Cited – An important and often overlooked section of the research paper. Think of this as a legend to a map that directs readers to the research you have reviewed or incorporated in your work. Should you happen to review an important point made by another researcher, you need to provide explicit directions on how to find that same article, book, or another source to the reader. Styles may differ, but all works cited sections will contain: author(s) name, date of publication, title, source (journal, book, etc.), precise publication location (publisher and geographic location in the case of a book, journal volume, number, and page numbers for journal articles).
Anatomy of a Research Article*
Below is a general guideline you can use when dissecting a research article from an academic journal. Article format and style may vary, but you should be able to locate all the elements below.
Research Article Paper Assignment
Overview: The goal of this assignment is to help familiarize you with sociological research in terms of reading academic journal articles and dissecting each part of an academic article. Be sure you have read “The Anatomy of a Research Article” on eCourseware before you begin this assignment. Sociological research is published in academic journals specific to the discipline of sociology, but the process is similar for other academic areas of study. Many of these journals are free for us to access as members of the University of Memphis.
Directions:
Find a Research Article to Review
On eCourseware, there are a number of articles for you to choose from based on your area of interest. These articles vary in topic, methodology, theories, data, and findings. Choose just one of these articles to review. To find these, click on Content, then Articles for Review Assignment.
Read the Article
Using the “Anatomy of a Research Article” as a guide, read the article you chose from beginning to end. There may be parts that you do not fully understand, particularly in the methods and data section, especially if the article uses quantitative methods, and/or if you have not taken a statistics or research methods class yet. That is ok. Hopefully, the findings of the article are written in language that can be interpreted by anyone, even if you do not fully understand what logistic regression (or other complex statistical methods) means! I find that printing articles and making notes in the margins helps me to digest all of the information presented. Use a highlighter or pencil and underline things you found interesting, confusing, or otherwise important.
Then, using the guidelines below, take apart each piece of the article, from beginning to end. Requirements & Formatting
You should not copy and paste any part of the article to complete this assignment, nor should you use any direct quotes. The goal is to write up your review in your own words.
Write your responses to each question (1-15) in the space provided. You can add more space if needed.
Be sure to use proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Use complete sentences. Proofread your assignment before submitting it.
Save your assignment as a .doc, .docx, or .pdf and upload it to the Dropbox on eCourseware. Be sure you upload the correct file. Save it as something unique to this course/assignment.
This assignment should be your own, original work.
*This assignment was created in collaboration with Erin Anderson, Teaching with a Sociological Lens, and Stephanie Bradley, Florida State University.
Sociological Research Article Review Assignment
Full Title:
Authors and Affiliated Institutions:
Journal Name, Volume, and Edition (if applicable):
Year Published:
What is/are the authors’ research question(s)?
Timing – How old is previous research cited in the background/literature review section? Is it dated? Do the authors make the claim that this topic needs to be studied again in light of contemporary issues or conditions?
Variables – According to the background/literature review, what variables have been considered in relation to one another on a topic of research? Should other variables be considered?
Methodology – How have previous studies collected and analyzed data? Are these procedures methodologically sound? Have important strategies for data collection or analysis and interpretation been overlooked? Have different sets of data yielded different results?
What theoretical framework(s) does the article use? That is, do the authors deductively draw on theory in structuring their research and, if so, what is the theory (or theories) from which they draw? What is/are the justifications given for using this/these theory/theories?
Data – What type of data do the authors use? Is this an existing data set (i.e. General Social Survey; Census data) or something they collected themselves (i.e. interviews)? Be as specific as possible.
Methods/Analytic Strategy – What type of methodology do the authors employ? Describe these methods.
What are the key variables in this study? Describe them. (In qualitative studies, the variables may be called “themes” or “narratives.”)
What are the main results and findings? Provide examples and detail from the study.
From the conclusion/discussion, what can we learn from these findings? How does it add to or challenge existing research? What are the limitations for this particular study?
What suggestions for future research do the authors suggest?
School Gender Culture and Student Subjective Well-Being John R. Reynolds1 & Melissa J. Bamford2
Published online: 25 November 2015
# Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
Abstract This study explores the impact of school gender culture in the United States on boys’ and girls’ attachment to school and symptoms of depression. We consider multiple dimensions of school gender culture and hypothesize that student subjective well-being is lower in schools with a lower percentage of females, stronger orientations toward marriage, more prevalent contact sports, and a student body that engages more often in fighting and drinking. xThe hypotheses are derived from theories of gendered organizations, heteronormativity, and hypermasculinity. Analyses of a national sample of middle and high school students in the U.S. (5,847 girls, 5,347 boys) from the 1994–95 National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent
Health show considerable variation in school gender cultures, and regression analyses yield some support for the hypotheses.
A higher proportion of female students is associated with fewer depressive symptoms among girls as predicted, but weaker school attachment for boys. The results more consistently supported the hypotheses that student well-being suffers in schools where more classmates get into fights or get drunk. Finally, we find no evidence that student subjective well-being is affected by contexts in which marital plans are more prevalent or greater proportions of students play collision contact sports. We find some evidence that school gender composition and school contexts of fighting and drinking are consequential for student subjective well-being. We reject the hypothesis that school levels of marriage orientations and contact sports participation undermine student well-being. Overall, more work is needed in the conceptualization and measurement of school gender cultures.
Keywords of Gender culture. School attachment. Depressive symptoms.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Submit a profile of your chosen struggling company. (Toyota)This milestone will serve as a rough draft and must cover the three critical elements described .As part of your summary, explain briefly why the company is struggling.
Prompt: you will focus on a struggling company and make your recommendations in a management improvement plan. Your recommendations will show how management performance, employee perception, and organizational success intersect. Resources related specifically to the struggling company listed are provided.
List of Companies and resources:Toyota (specific to recalls over the last decade)
Case Study # 3 will focus on a current events article related to our long term care industry. This industry has many moving parts and is defined by change. Change is defined as improving the way in which we care for our residents. Change is further defined in legislation/ Change is defined in understanding best practices, high quality, with both outcomes and process in mind. Change is all around us. We go to work everyday, working on change. Lastly, change is defined as organizational success, and please remember financial organizational success is important (not just quality). I am purposely, leaving this assignment wide open. I am interested in how you define change.
Please choose an article that you wish to elaborate on. Please consider a 3 page summary, including your thoughts. As with other work, please include a title page and reference page (plus the 3 page body of your work)
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
