Communication discourses that apply to television journalism
Order Instructions:
What are the communication discourses that apply to television journalism? What are some of the power relationships surrounding the field? What are some of the discourses that surround a television news room?
SAMPLE ANSWER
Introduction
Media acts as a powerful medium, which connects the global world in the slightest of time, thus turning the worlds into one small global village. This clearly explains the reason why people hear more of the languages from the media than they do in a normal direct conversation(Hoskins, & O’Loughlin, 2007) This clearly explains the reason why people hear more of the languages from the media than they do in a normal direct conversation since people mainly talk about the things they see, read and hear through other platforms such as the internet and the mass media. It has been determined that these elements affect the manner in which people interact and learn different things about the world that surrounds them (Maier, & Potter, 2001).
It is however, essential to note that the manner in which the media presents the world and the events that surround it remains controversial. The manner in which the media covers certain issues in the society is considered subtle and can only be explained in various ways(Hoskins, & O’Loughlin, 2007). These media discourses can therefore be elaborated based on different perceptions since journalism has always been viewed as a critique that selectively represents groups, thus creating stereotypes that depict identifiable and unchanging negative characteristics (Segado, Grandío, & Fernandez Gomez, 2015). In addition to this, the media is also criticized for its approaches in portraying women, old and the young people including other minority groups in a derogatory way.
CommunicationDiscourses That Apply To Television Journalism
Giving discourses an illusion that they are social practices implies that there are relationships between a particular situation and event, structures and institutions which frame and shape a discursive event. A discourse socially constitutes the relationships between people and groups (Lorenzo-Dus, 2009). As persons are predisposedto the proponents of media, their opinions are also transformed, strengthened and exposed as well. It is therefore evident to ascertain that media affects the manner in which people interact and learn about the world and remains an important domain to which the communication discourses are applied.
The Media discourse remains a critical discourse among other discourses such as political discourse, inequality, gender, racism, and nationalism (Kovacic, &Erjavec, 2008). A media discourse therefore gives the totality of how reality may be presented and characterized within the print and the broadcast media, radio and newspapers (Lorenzo-Dus, 2009). Discourse therefore remains a medium that power and norms operate.
In the modern world, a scientific discourse that majorly covers the human sciences that reveal information through the television establishes norms within a people and approaches of conduct. This discourse also determines ways through which deviant subjects can be identified, understood and managed (Meinhof, & Smith, J. 2000). An instance of such a discourse is that of the advertisement discourse within a capitalist society. Through an advertisement, luxury products are portrayed that are naturalized to meet the needs of the people, a factor that depicts the manner in which a discourse reinforces a culture that is driven for consumption.
Power Relationships Surrounding the Field
Power remains an important element in a communication discourse. In this analogy, power defines the use of language by those in power through the media. Journalists have the capacity to control mass media discourses and access to various forms of shows and talks(Attallah, 2010). In many instances, communication discourses captures through its proponents in the analysis of language and the use of those who are in power who remain answerable for the inequalities that may exist since discourse can reproduce social domination, the abuse of power and manner through which the dominated groups may resist abuse caused through these platforms.
It is also vital to disclose that social power also have the capacity to influence the patterns of discourse. Ordinary people in a way have active access and control over social discourse genres since their everyday conversations revolve around the family, colleagues, friends, and in some cases the access of institutions through either a bureaucratic or media discourse (Haavisto, & Maasilta, 2015).The elites on the other hand may also have control and access to both the public and informal institutions through the media.
As indicated by the theoretic godfather of communication the media Phillips and Jorgensen, power has the capacity to hold good and what may make this accepted is the fact that it should not weigh on people but navigate and produce things(Thomson, & White, 2008). Power according to these thoughts can indulge pleasure, and inform individuals thus producing a discourse. Power in this case should therefore be treated as a productive network which runs through the media and the social body rather than act as a negative function represses the community (Masip, Guallar, Suau, Ruiz-Caballero, & Peralta, 2015)
Discourses That Surround a Television News Room
In determining the discourses that surround the television newsrooms, it is essencential to disclose that the use of visual imagery remains the central element of how organizations are represented through the media. Through the newsrooms, organizations are given the opportunity to represent themselves, communicate with the rest of the world and create their identities(Wodak, 2006). However, through a communication discourse through mainstream news websites remain an important element that is available in a newsroom. Nowadays there are mainstream news websites have provided online approaches of communicating with the aim of modifying the professionalized consumers aesthetic that has the capacity to attract a large audience. Visual communication in the newsrooms therefore remains vital in the discourses.
Conclusion
Media acts as a powerful medium, which connects the global world in the slightest of time, thus turning the worlds into one small community. However, the manner in which the media covers certain issues in the society is considered subtle and can only be explained in various ways (Cottle, & Matthews, 2013). In addition to this, the media is also criticized for its approaches in portraying women, the old and the young including other minority groups in a derogatory way.
In determining the impact of media in the society, it is essential to understand the communication discourses that embody a televised broadcast. A discourse socially constitutes the relationships between people and groups (Arno, 2009). As personalities are subjected to the media, their opinions are also changed, reinforced and exposed as well. Discourse therefore remains a medium that power and norms operate (Roy, 2013). On the other hand, power remains an important element in a communication discourse in that it defines the use of language by those in power through the media. Power should therefore be treated as a productive network which runs through the media and the social body rather than act as a negative function represses the community.
References
Arno, A. (2009). Alarming Reports. Communicating Conflict In The Daily News. New York: Berghahn Books. [[[B][Lg: Eng][Isbn: 9781845455798 (Alk. Paper)][Social Conflict In Mass Media][Discourse Analysis][Mass Media][Mass Media And Anthropology]]]
Attallah, P. (2010). Television Discourse And Situation Comedy. Canadian Review Of American Studies, 40(1), 1-24.
Cottle, S., & Matthews, J. (2013). U.S. TV News And Communicative Architecture: Between Manufacturing Consent And Mediating Democracy. Journal Of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,57(4), 562-578. Doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.845831
Haavisto, C., & Maasilta, M. (2015). Towards A Journalism Of Hope? Compassion And Locality In European Mediations Of Distant Suffering. Critical Arts: A South-North Journal Of Cultural & Media Studies, 29(3), 327-341. Doi:10.1080/02560046.2015.1059548
Harro-Loit, H., &Kõresaar, E. (2010). National Temporality And Journalistic Practice: Temporalising Anniversary Events In Estonian Television News.Trames: A Journal Of The Humanities & Social Sciences,14(4), 323-341. Doi:10.3176/Tr.2010.4.03
Herrmann, G. (2008). Documentary’s LaboursOf Law: The Television Journalism Of Montse Armengou And RicardBelis. Journal Of Spanish Cultural Studies, 9(2), 193-212. Doi:10.1080/14636200802283712
Hoskins, A., & O’loughlin, B. (2007). Television And Terror. Conflicting Times And The Crisis Of News Discourse. Houndmills, Basingstoke New York: Palgrave Macmillan. [[[B][Lg: Eng][Isbn: 0230002315 (Alk. Paper)][Terrorism][Television Broadcasting Of News][Journalism][National Security]]]
Kovacic, M. P., &Erjavec, K. (2008).Mobi Journalism In Slovenia. Journalism Studies, 9(6), 874-890. Doi:10.1080/14616700802227860
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2009). Television Discourse. Analysing Language In The Media. Basingstoke England New York: Palgrave Macmillan. [[[B][Lg: Eng][Isbn: 9781403934291 (Paperback)][Television Broadcasting][Television Talk Shows][Television Broadcasting Of News][Discourse Analysis]]]
Maier, S. R., & Potter, D. (2001). Public Journalism Through The Lens: How Television Broadcasters Covered Campaign ’96.Journal Of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(2), 320.
Masip, P., Guallar, J., Suau, J., Ruiz-Caballero, C., & Peralta, M. (2015). News And Social Networks: Audience Behavior. El Professional De La Information, 24(4), 363-370. Doi:10.3145/Epi.2015.Jul.02
Meinhof, U. H., & Smith, J. (Eds.). (2000). Intertextuality And The Media. From Genre To Everyday Life. Manchester: Manchester University Press. [[[B] [Media Discourse] [News Discourse]]]
Patrona, M. (2012). Journalists On The News: The Structured Panel Discussion As A Form Of Broadcast Talk. Discourse & Society,23(2), 145-162. Doi:10.1177/0957926511431505
Peterson, M. A. (2001). Getting To The Story: Unwriteable Discourse And Interpretive Practice In American Journalism. Anthropological Quarterly, 74(4), 201-211.
Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing Newspapers. An Approach From Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. [[[B][Lg: Eng][Isbn: 1403935653 (Pbk.)][Journalism][Newspapers][Discourse Analysis]]]
Rochester, S. (2011). Good News At Gerasa. Transformative Discourse And Theological Anthropology In Mark’s Gospel. Oxford: New York. [[[B][Lg: Eng][Isbn: 9783034302944 (Alk. Paper)][Theological Anthropology]]]
Roy, D. (2013). Juggling With Pronouns: Racist Discourse In Spoken Interaction On The Radio. Australian Aboriginal Studies,2013(1), 17-30.
Segado, F., Grandío, M., & Fernandez Gomez, E. (2015). Social Media And Television: A Bibliographic Review Based On The Web Of Science. El Professional De La Information, 24(3), 227-234. htps://www.doi:10.3145/Epi.2015.May.02
Thomson, E. A., & White, P. R. R. (Eds.). (2008). Communicating Conflict. Multilingual Case Studies Of The News Media. London New York: Continuum. [[[B][Lg: Eng][Isbn: 0826497829][Social Conflict In Mass Media][Discourse Analysis]]]
Wodak, R. (2006). Disorders Of Discourse. London: Longman. [[[B] [Bib] [Doctor-Patient Talk] [School Committee Hearing] [Educational Discourse] [News] [Text Understanding] [Sociolinguistics] [Therapeutic Discourse] [Cda]]]
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
