Constructive Criticism in Managing Behaviors Order Instructions: Respond with your own thoughts to the article in an edited 4-paragraph minimum, formal academic peer review.
At a minimum, be sure to include the following elements:
• Assess the conceptualization, analysis, and synthesis of key research concepts presented.
• Evaluate the extent to which the writer has addressed the elements from the Learning Objectives below.
• Does the presentation provide a cohesive summary of the assigned concepts with an effective evaluation of their implications for project management?
• Did the Presenter provide a meaningful academic argument or interpretation that demonstrated fluency with the material?
• Incorporate relevant scholarly resources in your posting.
Objectives
Students will:
• Analyze how systems generate organizational behavior
• Evaluate the effects of system archetypes on employee and organizational performance
• Analyze the impact of measurement and reward systems
• Apply project leadership principles
• Develop critical analysis and research skills toward building a knowledge base in business and management
Constructive Criticism in Managing Behaviors Sample Answer
Comments and Constructive Criticism
Managing Behaviors with Systems
Based on the article provided on the management of behaviors with systems, the writer clearly denotes the manner in which systems are structured to regulate processes across various mediums. In his thesis, the writer looks closely at how companies are establishing systems that can be used to manage employees and drive business (Amadieu, Salmerón, Cegarra, Paubel, Lemarié, & Chevalier, 2015). These systems, in other words, are developed to shape the behaviors of the employees, with the element of leadership considered integral. In my view, the writer clearly synthesizes his information by clearly explaining the concept of behavior management through the inclusion of systems, a factor that offers a well-grounded explanation of the concept. Additionally, the article incorporates the use of several pieces of research literature that are used to back the thesis. The article in this case clearly indicates the inclusion of several variables since the concept is based on a single dimension that demarcates one indicator of the use of systems in the management of behaviors. The author undertakes an integrative review as a primary method of presenting his findings. In this case, the purpose and the methods of the study are detailed within the article.
The writer provides a cohesive summary on some of the assigned concepts by illustrating how systems have the capacity to influence organizational behavior. The writer delves into other literature on the same subject and reviews the works of other authors that validate his thesis. In this, he or she describes the manner in which systems generate behavior that is viewed as either good or bad. The writer justifies and provides research evidence to validate his thesis by giving examples on archetypes that are inclusively incorporated in organizational and employee performance (Cordell, Grange, & Langdon, 2013). Additionally, the author denotes how behaviors are generated through the application of the required systems, an effective approach that can be applied in project management. However, the writer does not clearly give a depiction on how these systems may be applied in project management.
In viewing the writer’s academic argument and fluency in his writing, it is important to acknowledge that the writer incorporates some of the research concepts detailed in giving his audience an understanding on how systems impact organizational behavior. He incorporates another variable and views the essence of leadership within these systems and the outcomes that result from the development of such a cohesive relationship between the employees and the leaders who incorporate systems in changing behavior (Laufer, 2012). The writer interacts with different concepts to justify the essence of leadership within a system and relates the measurement systems used to determine the performance of employees.
The writer validates his views on how employees are considered to take ownership of different tasks within a system with the aim of motivating them towards success. Communication, in this case, is described as an essential ingredient in motivating the team (Luntz, 2011). In my view, the writer effectively uses the element of coherence in giving his paper an academic tone in as much as there is some room for improvement. One of the fundamental areas that the writer needs to include in the paper is the application of these systems within organizations and how they would impact the performance of organizations. Lastly, the writer would also blend his thoughts with project management principles.
Constructive Criticism in Managing Behaviors References
Amadieu, F., Salmerón, L., Cegarra, J., Paubel, P., Lemarié, J., & Chevalier, A. (2015). Learning from Concept Mapping and Hypertext: An Eye-Tracking Study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 100-112.
Cordell, D. M., Grange, E. V., & Langdon, T. P. (2013). Practical Planning Concepts from Academic Research. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 67(6), 58-68.
Laufer, A. (2012). Mastering the leadership role in project management: Practices that deliver remarkable results. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.
Luntz, F. I. (2011). Win: The key principles to take your business from ordinary to extraordinary. New York, NY: Hyperion
