Effects of China Growth to US Security in Asia Pacific Growth of China intimidates United States security in the Asia-Pacific Order Instructions: Essay Structure
Make sure the essay introduction has a thesis statement – one sentence that tells the reader the core argument of the essay. It is highly recommended that you start your essay as follows: “This essay argues that …” The introduction also needs to tell the reader the main points you will make in the body of your essay in support of your thesis.
Ensure that the body of the essay addresses each main point in the order listed in the introduction. Your argument is easier to follow if each paragraph deals with a single idea or aspect of the topic. Each paragraph should have a topic sentence that tells the reader what the paragraph is about – usually the first sentence. The rest of the paragraph must prove the claim made in the paragraph topic sentence using references and examples.
The essay conclusion re-states your thesis and summarises the main points referred to in the introduction and discussed in detail in the body of the essay. No new material should be included in the conclusion.
Direct quotes should not exceed 10% of the essay word allowance.
Do not use headings.
Ensure the full essay question is included in the essay document.
For presentation, use a 12-point font and 1.5 or double line spacing.
All documents must be submitted in Microsoft Word format. We are unable to electronically mark documents in other formats.
Include your name in the document name. To avoid problems submitting the assessment, keep the document name concise.
Effects of China Growth to US Security in Asia Pacific Referencing
A minimum of six sources must be included in the reference list. This is an academic essay so references should be from quality peer reviewed academic sources. I strongly recommend you use the Murdoch Library catalogue and databases to locate suitable online sources.
The required referencing style in this unit is the Chicago style of in-text (or author-date) referencing. Otherwise well-written and argued essays are often unnecessarily let down by a failure to adequately reference.
Effects of China Growth to US Security in Asia Pacific Sample Answer
Growth of China intimidates United States security in the Asia-Pacific
This essay argues that the ongoing rise of China’s economy and the present reconstruction and build up of its army has become a root of open challenge for the United States[1]. For reasons entrenched in history, presently, and future distribution of international power, the US places a superior priority on administering security issues in the Asia-Pacific region. Disagreement on the Korean neck of land would have long term and extensive impacts for the region and the US and its associates[2]. While disagreements in the South and East Seas seem to be controllable, tensions are liable to be component of the security backdrop for the near future. In spite of the multitude of multifaceted challenges, environmental, economic, institutional and so on, the security matter that is lurking on top of the security outline of regional powers if the rise of China and the possible role of the US in the Asia-Pacific[3].
The US presumed a heavy responsibility as the chief underwriters of peace and security in the region. American’s tactical approach to the Asia-Pacific expanse mirrored maritime Britain’s focal point on conserving a continental stability of power. After the Second World War and the end of the almost forty years of Chinese Civil War, the US legalized a strategy modeled to refute any power from controlling the huge Eurasian mainland[4]. In identifying prosperity and stability all through most of the Asian-Pacific region as a crucial American interest, the country helped in catalyzing the region’s ensuing impressive political and economic development. However, it was tactical self-interest that secured US policy.
The rising authority of China in global associations and a continuing move towards superior power rank have caused apprehension to the level that, how to handle China is the dilemma of this new century[5]. Just recently, a certain ‘China threat’ hypothesis appeared in world politics, and after many years, the debate is still going on. A number of predictions have been introduced about China, but till now, none of them has materialized. The communist heads are still administering the country, the Chinese economy is still rising, and no bordering nation has been attacked. The Asian-Pacific region has not been weakened by a forceful China[6]. All these immaterialized predictions stress the Instability of the best thinking in the arena of world politics, and the inevitability of their constant revision and the negation to get locked in unwavering truths. It is once again confirmed that the evaluation of international politics ought to be freed from system of belief.
The United States see’s the rise of Chinese economy as potential for a powerful nationalism that will advocate for aggression, xenophobia, and revenge. Without refuting the presence of a China threat, the global community has more to worry about for global and regional security from a fragile and disintegrating China, than from a tough and powerful one[7].
Other potential threats include China’s rural crisis, food crisis, environment crisis, population, and resources crisis. United States sees these numerous crises as a potential for making the China a huge burden to the whole world. The rationale is that Chinese economy should not rise otherwise the world will incur shortages of resources, food, and damage to the environment.
China facades a threat to the US at it differs hugely from it in life style, cultural traditions, and value concepts. War is inescapable between China and the US. China’s objective of accomplishing dominant status in Asia-Pacific region conflicts with a pre-determined American goal which is to prevent any country from attaining overpowering power in Asia. The US, after all, has been in main warfare’s in Asia in the last half century in attempt to safeguard a single country from attaining ascendancy even though it was at the expense of decreasing American military status.
Given the truth that over the next ten years or so China will become an overriding power in Asia, divergence with the United States could take place over numerous issues, headed by a Chinese effort to get hold of Taiwan forcefully or to resolve my martial means its regional claims in the South China Sea[8]. China’s political and technological help to the Islamic nations of North Africa and Central Asia, and its looming supremacy in East Asia put it at the core of a casual network of states, most of which have philosophies and goals inimical to the US, and most of which share China’s rationale of objection at the long international supremacy of the West.
Effects of China Growth to US Security in Asia Pacific Conclusion
The rise of China has posed a threat on United States in the Asian-Pacific. This is because the United States feels that the Chinese rise will make it become a global burden. Besides, Chinese rise will possibly bring about aggression and xenophobia against other powers. In addition, this rise will also promote scarcity of resources to the rest of the world.
Effects of China Growth to US Security in Asia Pacific Bibliography
Bisley, Nick. Asia’s transformation, international relations and public policy. Australian Journal of International Affairs. Published online: 15 Jan 2011.
DEREK, SCISSORS. The Great China Debate.Will Beijing Rule the World?
Ikenberry, G. John. American hegemony and East Asian order. Australian Journal of InternationalAffairs. Published online: 27 Sep 2010.
Jeffery, Renée. Evaluating the ‘China threat’: power transition theory, the successor-state image and the dangers of historical analogies. Australian Journal of International Affairs. Published online: 26 Jun 2009.
Power shift. Malcolm Turnbull on Hugh White’s The China Choice. The monthly — august 2012.
Tang, Xiaosong. The future role of the United States in the Asia-Pacific region: dead end or crossroads? Australian Journal of International Affairs. Published online: 06 Jul 2011.
White, Hugh. Power shift: rethinking Australia’s place in the Asian century. Australian Journal of International Affairs. Published online: 15 Jan 2011.
[1] Jeffery, Renée. Evaluating the ‘China threat’: power transition theory, the successor-state image and the dangers of historical analogies. Australian Journal of International
Affairs. Published online: 26 Jun 2009.
[2] Bisley, Nick. Asia’s transformation, international relations and public policy. Australian Journal of International Affairs. Published online: 15 Jan 2011.
[3] Tang, Xiaosong. The future role of the United States in the Asia-Pacific region: dead end or crossroads? Australian Journal of International Affairs. Published online: 06 Jul 2011.
[4] White, Hugh. Power shift: rethinking Australia’s place in the Asian century. Australian Journal of International Affairs. Published online: 15 Jan 2011.
[5] DEREK, SCISSORS. The Great China Debate.Will Beijing Rule the World?
[6] Ikenberry, G. John. American hegemony and East Asian order. Australian Journal of InternationalAffairs. Published online: 27 Sep 2010.
[7] Power shift. Malcolm Turnbull on Hugh White’s The China Choice. The monthly — august 2012.
[8] Power shift. Malcolm Turnbull on Hugh White’s The China Choice. The monthly — august 2012.
