Leadership styles and effectiveness
Order Instructions:
Dear Admin,
The purpose of the Final Project is to apply the concepts and techniques of the module to the analysis of real-world situations or problems. Students are expected to use diverse sources of information and to carry out an original analysis rather than summarise or rehash existing work. Students are encouraged to use situations and data from their own experience where possible.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Please follow the following instructions exactly one by one as each point is very important. And please don’t deviate from these points.
1) You are required to complete a course project that provides an investigation of outstanding examples of leadership, providing an analysis of the leaders’ styles and effectiveness.
2)In Week 5, you needed to choose two leaders (living or deceased) that you will research with regards to their leadership traits, styles, ability to inspire change, etc.( the file for week 5 is attached)
3)The analysis and evaluation of these leadership examples must be based on the concepts you have acquired throughout the module.
4)You should then provide an analysis and evaluation of the information and insights from your journal entries against the research you conducted on the two exemplary leaders.
5)The goal is to connect what you have learned through research to your everyday and professional life. The Final Project is due this week and should follow the given outline:
1.Analysis and evaluation of Leader #1 Sir Richard Branson, CEO of the Virgin Group
2.Analysis and evaluation of Leader #2 Sir Akbar Al Baker CEO of Qatar Airways.
3.Comparison of the leaders
4.Summary of significant findings and perspectives from journal entries
5.Analysis and evaluation of journal entries to chosen leaders
6.Conclusion
6)Your Final Project should also include a section on how and where you obtained the information sources.
7)This project should follow a structured approach and should be prepared and presented as a professional business report.
8)Completion of the Final Project will require a thorough understanding and application of business leadership concepts.
9)The experience of these two people must relates to your own insights.( I work as an airline pilot)
10)In the brief to summaries your journal entries in relation to both leaders which you have not done. Please take care to do this in the final project.
11)You need to justify comparison between both leaders in relation to your own situation. (I work as an airline pilot)
12)Leadership issues are presented in somewhat general terms and again there would need to be closer alignment with your own situation. (I work as an airline pilot)
13)Again, please bear your word limit in mind and please be careful not to reproduce material from (project outline) file that is attached below.
14) Please make sure the percentage mot to exceed 20 %
15)To prepare for this essay please read the required articles that is attached
16)The following sources MUST be used in the annotated outline PLUS to use extra sources:
The following are the data sources that I intend to use in this study.
Bass, BM 2009, From Transactional to Transformational Leadership. Albany, NY: Free Press.
Pasmore, W. (2014) Developing a Leadership Strategy: A Critical Ingredient for Organizational Success. White Paper, Centre for Creative Leadership
Marx, T 2013, ‘Teaching Leadership and Strategy’, Business Education Innovation Journal, Vol. 5 no. 2, pp. 12-19.
Lang, R, & Rybnikova, I. (2012). Leadership is Going Global.
Malcolm, G. (2002). The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston: Back Bay
Books.
SAMPLE ANSWER
Introduction
Leaders have different personalities and leadership philosophies that they use to drive growth. The leadership attributes from different leaders relate to certain theories in each and every phenomenon. The Freud’s Tripartite theory uses the id, the ego, and the superego to define the overall personality of an individual with the visible traits of an individual. Eyencks personality theory on the other hand uses the extroverted and introverted theories as a means of categorizing the various possible ways a leader behaves. The other theory that useful in analyzing the leadership traits is the Allport’s trait theory and it analyses an individual with respect to in-born traits that an individual represents. This paper uses three theories to analyze the leadership of Sir Richard Branson and Sir Akbar Al Baker.
Analysis of Sir Richard Branson
The CEO of the Virgin Group had outstanding leadership style at have made him a hero even up to date. The personalities of this leader are well explained in the Allport’s Trait Theory that brings out three components evident in the life of the CEO (Wang, 2012). The theory’s components are inclusive of the ego, superego and the id all developed at different rates. Despite having all these characteristics in his leadership, Richard had an outstanding personality of its kind. Challenges were part of his leadership life, but he never gave up, he kept trying and doing his best from time to time (Burns, 2010). He is known to have a health Psyche and on top of this, he made a record of using the balloon and the boat. A good leader will have to take risks in his leadership life like in the case of Sir Richard, who took life threatening risks that yielded to high returns at the end. When the Virgin shop Ran out of cash, this failure led to the success of the CEO despite him being charged in the courts of law for the crime of evading the paying of taxes. When he was in school, he was charged with the mistake of launching a student magazine, an act deemed illegal by the management whereby, a good lawyer saved him. He had a dirty name but he successfully cleaned his name and started a new life that was extroverted and introverted (Lang & Rybnikova, 2012). He used the venture capitalism business strategy, which enabled him to control many business without risking money; since he was so smart in his strategy that led to the creation of his empire.
Richard is well known to have employed the transformational leadership style in his reign by identifying the changes needed and created a clear vision of how it ought to have been implemented for the success of the organization. Richard was more concerned at improving the performance of every individual in his organization to their full potential of doing the best. He ensured that all committed themselves wholly in their work and identified all that was needed from them by the organization to makes things work out in accordance to set plans. Richard is a person who can adapt with a harsh business climate and very flexible in dealing with his employees who may show dissatisfaction at some point. He has given his employees a reason to be happy working under his leadership by ensuring that all their needs are well catered for and they have the opportunity to air their views in decision making process (Malcolm, 2002). This is to mean that, he really encouraged team work, where all people put their efforts together leading to encouragement to one another about the goal ahead. Whenever there is team leadership, leaders are in a better position of overcoming some weakness that might be evident in transformational leadership. Richard ensured that the task that was ahead of him was achieved, and that his team was well maintained
Analysis of Sir Akbar Baker
Sir Akbar Baker the current CEO of Qatar Airways is a leader who like Richard has shown tremendous outstanding personalities that have made him a strong leader to date. His leadership styles are well explained by the use of Freud’s Tripartite Theory of Personality that explains his ability to be detailed in all his actions. The CEO has the mandate of ensuring all work is well done, including inspection of all the planes leaving the airport at all given time of the year. He is one type of a leader who believes in doing the job himself instead of delegating it to other people to do it. The CEO has many significant qualities such that even the Eysenck’s personality theory explains how he does not let himself be held accountable for any damage done thus, ensures the job is well done. This is a man who is zealous about airline to an extent some people have related his life with the airline. The high passion of the airline is the reason for the success of the Qatar Airway under his leadership (Mital & Dorfman, 2012).
Comparison of the leaders
Richard and Akbar have similar characteristic because they are authoritative leaders who want to ensure that their juniors have done their required duties without fail. To ensure people attain a self-direction, Akbar ensures that people are very hardworking on making this happen. These two leaders are well determined to transform their organizations by launching aggressive strategies that guides their operations. This is because they are visionary and capable of steering growth in their organizations during the times of problems. Unlike Baker, Sir Branson is more controversial in his operations. He has a series of controversies that stems from childhood to the time he leads his organizations. In addition, Branson also seems more tough concerning the way he handled his employees are he wants them to performs diligently in the organization. On the other hand, Baker is a soft leader since he tends to incorporate his subordinates in making decisions regarding the management of his organization.
Summary of journal entries
Leadership has a broad perspective, whereby, good leaders are in a better position of succeeding as to poor leaders. In order the organization to move forward, the leader ought to have vision that will nature the organization. There is need of the organization to provide the leaders with the best leadership skills that are needed for success of the company. To meet the set goal of any given organization, the leader ought to work in close range with the people to achieve his goal by ensuring that he serves the interest of others not his own interest. The skills possessed by a leader with the style of approach will yield to good leadership characteristics that are highly needed in the leadership skills. A leader must be creative and innovative to better his leadership skills that are helpful in making him humble in understanding the direction he want the organization to take (Samnani, & Singh, 2013). Good decision making skills where they give other people opportunity of airing their views is as well very important. Others must participate in decision making to ensure they feel part and parcel of the organization. The contingency model is useful in the identification of the best applicable style of leadership in a certain situation. This model will be best suitable in identifying how a leader can be exhibit weakness ahead of him by use of leader-member relation. There are several styles employed by good leaders in their leadership to ensure they achieve the set organizational goals and ensure everyone benefits. A good leader will portray charismatic characteristics of leadership that will be of great benefit to him and the organization that he leads. A charismatic leader is the type of a leader who compels or draws other people to do what is right through use of their outstanding leadership qualities that impress their followers. A charismatic leader will be very smart in controlling the pressure that come as result of leadership through the use of his inborn intelligence. Such leaders make good use of their personal charms and their convincing power to make things work for the good of others not their own interest (Matthews, 2014).
Through the communication of the standard vision they have about the organization to their followers, they draw them closer and increase their capability to work hard toward achieving one goal. On the other side, transformational leaders as well have a smart strategy that they use to influence change in different groups of people they are in a better position of influencing organization to follow their vision, which they deem it most important than any other for that matter. The goals and the vision of transformations leaders are meant to work for the good of everyone (Hofstede Center, 2015). Good leaders will entice team work that is very useful in helping them and overcome some weakness that mighty be evident in their leadership. When people put all their efforts together they can be in a better position of going far than they even thought. Despite all these, some major acts ought to be performed to ensure effectiveness in their leadership is attained (Pasmore, 2014). The team leaders is a person who is good in the coordination of the team activities and smart in motivating all to give their contributions to the team. An authentic leader gives his followers a chance to exploit their potential so that they become more productive and self-independent in their work. Ethics must be employed for use by good leaders as this gives out good results. Leaders are required to understand the culture of people from different to make their interaction works much easier.
Analysis and evaluation of journal entries to the leaders
Richard had the characteristic traits of influencing change in groups of people of his organization whereby, he encouraged them to work hard towards achieving the organization goal. He had a good vision of taking his organization to higher levels and he did things to ensure he achieves the good of all in the whole organization. Richard played in facilitating of good pressure whereby, his outstanding qualities drew people new to him (Northouse, 2014).
Sir Akbar is an authentic leader because he gives his followers a good opportunity of exploiting their potential to become more productive and self-independent. Sir Akbar, trained his followers to an extent they work so well without his supervision in the running of their daily routine. Sir Akbar used to encourage his employees to participate in decision making process, a factor that made them to feel acknowledge as part of the company. Akbar has focused more on the servant leadership style that focuses on bettering the relationship between the leader and his followers. He is an ethical leader who employs the use of vital mechanisms that contribute positively to his organization. He encourages his follower to be honest in their duty to ensure that there is no complain from their customers whatsoever. When people are honest, they are in a better position of doing the right things to their customers and to other people (Bass, 2009). The target of the organization is well determined by the standards of ethic employed in the organization. All workers have to comply with the airline set ethics because this help in the building of the company’s reputation in globally. This is the reason as to why inspection of all planes has to be done to increase the accuracy of the flights taking off from Qatar Airline.
Conclusion
Leaders have different personalities and leadership philosophies that they use to drive growth. The leadership attributes from different leaders relate to certain theories in each and every phenomenon. The Freud’s Tripartite theory uses the id, the ego, and the superego to define the overall personality of an individual with the visible traits of an individual. Eyencks personality theory on the other hand uses the extroverted and introverted theories as a means of categorizing the various possible ways a leader behaves. The other theory that useful in analyzing the leadership traits is the Allport’s trait theory and it analyses an individual with respect to in-born traits that an individual represent. Both Baker and Branson have similarities and differences regarding the nature of their leadership styles.
References
Bass, B. M (2009), From Transactional to Transformational Leadership. Albany, NY: Free Press
Burns, J. M (2010), Leadership. New York City, NY: Harper & Row.
Lang, R, & Rybnikova, I. (2012). Leadership is Going Global. McGraw-Hill
Malcolm, G. (2002). The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston: Back Bay Books
Matthews, J, (2014). Eight Elements of an Ethical Organization. Retrieved from http://www.entrepreneurship.org/resource-center/eight-elements-of-an-ethical-organization.aspx
Mital, R., & Dorfman, PW (2012), Servant Leadership across Cultures. Journal of World Business, 47(4): 555–570
Northouse, P.G. (2014). Introduction to Leadership: Concepts and Practice, 3rd Edition. SAGE Publications
Pasmore, W. (2014) Developing a Leadership Strategy: A Critical Ingredient for Organizational Success. White Paper, Centre for Creative Leadership
Samnani, A., & Singh, P (2013). When leaders victimize: The role of charismatic leaders in facilitating group pressures, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 24, pp.189-202
The Hofstede Center (2015), Cultural tools: country comparison. Retrieved from http://geert-hofstede.com/saudi-arabia.html
Wang, V. C. X. (2012). Closing the Leadership Gaps between Theory and Practice. McGraw-Hill
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
