Position Statement and Information Assessment Critique Order Instructions: APA REFERENCES NOT OLDER THEN 5 YEARS OLD. PLEASE DONT USE WEBSITES AS REFERENCES. MUST BE VALID IN AUSTRALIA.
Student Information Assessment Task 2 (P
Position Statement Critique
This assessment requires students to demonstrate that they can critique and provide constructive feedback. Students are to provide a structured critique of the provided paper.
Framework (guide only)
1. Is the position statement structured? Does it have an introduction and a conclusion that clearly states the position?
2. Does the position statement relate to the topic?
3. Does the position statement demonstrate adequately the links to the National
Competency Standards for Registered Nurse?
4. Are the references used to support the position statement current and credible (i.e.
evidence), why or why not? (EG. – REF. OLDER THEN 5 YEAR OLD IS NOT RELIABLE )
5. Do you think the author eliminated any important information (i.e. evidence) in
stating their position? If so, please refer to these evidence sources in your critique.
6. Remember when giving feedback it must be constructive regardless of whether it is
positive or negative feedback.
Remember that your critique will be assessed against the criterion-referenced rubric in your unit outline. The above is merely a guide to help you with this assessment task.
Position Statement and Information Assessment Critique Sample Answer
The introduction of the article expresses concerns related to the fact that there has not been significant funding for research in the last few decades. The introduction begins with an introductory hook that introduces the need for recent data in nursing research. The author, however, laments that such research is not available due to the lack of commitment to support institutions that conduct such research. The article expresses concern over the lack of availability of resources to support research. This concern can be felt greatly by the number of points brought out to justify the need for research yet the funding for such research apparently being unavailable. The paper is very ethical in the presentation of findings as no names, institutions or parties are directly mentioned (Koonrungsesomboon, Laothavorn & Karbwang, 2016).
Analysis of Topic
The topic chosen for the article is inappropriately phrased. The phrasing should be more or less, ‘Resource pulling to fund nursing research in the next five years.’ The conciseness of the topic should enable it to tackle the message without appearing to be a topic sentence. However, the concept of the research is to justify funding for nursing research. The basis of the paper is thus satiable and justifiable.
Main points discussed
The writer brings out the points about 3.1 nurses being encouraged and to some extent are required to conduct further research in their fields. The author also brings out the point on nursing research requiring a lot of population samples to work with. There is also need for permissions to be granted and various permit documents to be acquired. It brings out the need as it exists from the nursing perspective. According to Wertheimer (2015), research ought to be representative of a particular scope or need that addresses a significant societal concern.
About References used
The author is also updated with the references used. The oldest of the references date to 2008 but there are ample references from 2013 and 2015. This makes the work recently researched and very relevant to the current situation on funding for nursing research. The referencing is however short of sufficient evidence from sources. The sources used may be enough for such a short essay but the in-text citing in the paper falls short of research of such a caliber. Chwang (2014) believes that the sources used in a research paper determine the credibility of the research to a great extent.
Position Statement and Information Assessment Critique Conclusion
The research will likely draw the attention of the audience and make the final presentation in the concluding note. The conclusion has to be well-placed and with ample hook-notes to capture the reader (Baker, McQuilling & King, 2016). The concluding note of this particular research is the encouragement for society to embrace, support and fund research. The author, however, seems to have eliminated a lot of information concerning research statistics and how they would have changed the scope of the research field of nursing. Credible journals and magazine sources make a research paper more viable than do website sources (Barker, Rattihalli & Field, 2016).
Position Statement and Information Assessment Critique References
Baker, H. B., McQuilling, J. P., & King, N. M. (2016). Ethical considerations in tissue engineering research: Case studies in translation. Methods, 99(Regenerative Medicine), 135-144. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.08.010
Barker, L., Rattihalli, R. R., & Field, D. (2016). Symposium: research: How to write a good research grant proposal. Paediatrics And Child Health, 26105-109. doi:10.1016/j.paed.2015.09.004
Chwang, E. (2014). Shared Vulnerabilities in Research. American Journal Of Bioethics, 14(12), 3-11. doi:10.1080/15265161.2014.964872
Koonrungsesomboon, N., Laothavorn, J., & Karbwang, J. (2016). Review Article: Ethical considerations and challenges in first-in-human research. Translational Research, doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2016.05.006
Wertheimer, A. (2015). The Social Value Requirement Reconsidered. Bioethics, 29(5), 301-308. doi:10.1111/bioe.12128