Proposal to Amend Section 2713
Proposal to Amend Section 2713 Essay Paper
Order Instructions:
This paper is a continuation of 111489, but I have revised the introductory paragraph that your writer wrote since he really did not understand what to do and by the time you send the revised version from the new writer, it was past due so I did not use it as you will see hear if you take time to read the paragraph below. The writer will have to take time read the entire assignment requirement and respond accordingly. It is a very easy paper if proper instructions are followed. The writer must take note of every aspect of this paper and respond to all the different sub headings using the template provided before. Note that every aspect of this paper is critical so the writer must pay attention , and also note that it is require that he write a summary at the end and not a conclusion because as I mentioned before this paper is a continues paper and we will put it together section by section each week.
3. Write the body of the proposal.
The public policy problem is that section 2713 requires organizations to provide their workers with birth control as part of their insurance coverage. The public policy question is: should the federal government mandate that organizations can choose whether or not to provide contraceptive services to employees as part of their insurance coverage? The public policy resolution is an amendment to section 2713(a) (4) of PL 111-148 that would say: organizations – both for-profit and non-profit organizations – have the option of either offering their employees birth control as part of their insurance coverage or not to offer contraceptive services (Cauchi, 2014).
After the introductory paragraph above, create headers for social, political, economic, legal, and ethical issues, as well as the stakeholders. Write one paragraph for each type of issue with citations and references for each describing how the issue would support or not support your proposed amendment.
Start each issue section like this example and write each section in 4 to 5 sentences with cites and references- you may use the links provided in the resources for cites and references:
The legal issue that would affect passage of the proposed amendment is that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the law constitutional and the payment mandate a tax because (you fill in this after reading about it).
Here are the topics to cover under each issue section. Be sure to say how the issues support passage of your proposed amendment and if the issue does not support passage of your proposed amendment, how you plan to get Congress to vote to pass the amendment into law anyway.
Legal Issues
Write about the 28 states that have filed suit against the federal government to repeal PL 111- 148 claiming the law is unconstitutional. Be sure to include the status of the lawsuit in the U.S. Supreme Court and the effect this would have on getting your proposed amendment passed if the law is ruled unconstitutional or constitutional
Political Issues
Write about the Senate and House bills in Congress to repeal PL 111-148 and the effect repealing the law would have on getting your proposed amendment passed.
Economic Issues
Write about the trillion dollar U.S. budget deficit, budget cuts to entitlement programs like the one you may propose, and spending cuts as well as increased taxes to balance the Congressional budget and the effect this would have on getting your proposed amendment passed.
Social Issues
Describe why the proposed amendment is good for all Americans and why Americans would support the amendment to Congressional stakeholders to vote for it.
The last issue is a little different so you will write it like this:
Ethical Issues
Choose one ethical principle and use it to convince stakeholders why your amendment should pass. Begin the paragraph like this instead of like the other issues:
The ethical principle that supports passage of the proposed amendment is (insert principle) because (insert why) (cite).
Stakeholders
Then list the stakeholders who have a stake in seeing your amendment pass or fail and in one sentence describe the role of each stakeholder- remember nurses would be an American voter.
You would use a numbered list for clarity.
Use these stakeholder groups
1. Politicians because a politician would vote to pass, not pass, or table the amendment.
2. The American voter who would support or not support the amendment to politicians.
3. Political Activists who demonstrate for or against the amendment.
4. Political Lobbyists who lobby for or against the amendment.
Next write a summary (not a conclusion): Summary
First write about what the section of your proposed amendment says. Then write how the amendment would change the section. This is a summary (not a conclusion) that describes the section of the law you chose and why the amendment is important to America from a social, economic, political, legal, and ethical point of view. In this section, you would “sell” the amendment to stakeholders. So talk about the social, legal, political, ethical, and economic issues that support passage of the amendment to the stakeholders.
On the last page list references in the most recent version of APA format and remember for every reference there needs to be at least one citation in the body of the paper.
References Note:
References will come from your class textbooks and reliable internet websites and be no older than 2010.
Resources to be use
Landmark: The inside story of America’s new health-care law and what it means for all of us
• Chapter 9: “On the Front Lines”
• Chapter 10: “Preventative Measures”
• Chapter 11: “In the Workplace”
• Chapter 12: “Medicaid’s Expansion”
• Chapter 13: “Paying for It”
• Chapter 14: “The Abortion Fight”
• Chapter 15: “The Rest of the Story”
• Conclusion: “Judging Success”
Mason et al.: Policy and politics in nursing and healthcare
• Unit 4: “Policy and Politics in the Workplace and Workforce” (Chapters 47–53)
• Unit 5: “Policy and Politics in the Government” (Chapters 68–73)
Articles
Surprise: Obamacare is helping not harming traditional healthcare
Yahoo Fianance < http://finance.yahoo.com/news/a-surprise-obamacare-development–the-old-system-gets-stronger-191500716.html?soc_src=copy > [8/22/2014]
New Obama birthcontrol fixes for religious groups
< http://finance.yahoo.com/news/obama-offers-accommodations-birth-control-172442035–finance.html?soc_src=copy > [8/22/2014]
Democrats reframe debate on health care
< http://news.yahoo.com/dems-reframe-election-debate-health-082837822.html?soc_src=copy > [8/22/2014]
State Laws and actions challenging certain health reforms Richard Cauchi (2014) < http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/state-laws-and-actions-challenging-ppaca.aspx > [8/31/2014]
SAMPLE ANSWER
Proposal to Amend Section 2713
The public policy problem is that section 2713 requires organizations to provide their workers with birth control as part of their insurance coverage. The public policy question is: should the federal government mandate that organizations can choose whether or not to provide contraceptive services to employees as part of their insurance coverage? The public policy resolution is an amendment to section 2713(a) (4) of PL 111-148 that would say: organizations – both for-profit and non-profit – have the option of either offering their employees birth control as part of their insurance coverage or not to offer contraceptive services (Cauchi, 2014).
Economical issues
The economic issue that would affect passage of the proposed amendment is the dollar-trillion budget deficits that are continuously witnessed in the U.S. According to the treasury department, the federal debt is over 16.7 trillion (Desilver, 2013). Despite coming with free packages such as preventive health care, the initiative, which offers tax credits to small employers that provide health insurance for workers who earn relatively low average wages has not seen major success in the recent past (Owcharenko & Nix, 2012). Currently, there are plans to inject over $14 billion into the scheme over the next ten years.
Political issues
The political issue that would affect passage of the proposed amendment is that the Act states that ‘The law creates a new nationwide requirement for health plans to cover essential health benefits and preventive services, but does not allow stakeholders to opt out of covering items or services to which they have a religious or moral objection, in violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (Public Law 103–141)” (Hass, 2012). Because the government has exempted faith-based organizations from the preventive health care, there is still an outcry from the same quarters over signing of Form 700, which requires the services to be provided by a third party.
Legal Issues
The legal issue that would affect passage of the proposed amendment is that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the law constitutional and the payment mandate a tax because the rising health care costs and its unpredictability had become burdensome for employers, thus, providing the same for employees at a minimum cost would have been welcome (Newman, 2014) . Later on, 28 states (out of which 26 were enjoined) filled a suit seeking nullification of the Act. The case was based on two main issues: the Act is undermining the sovereignty of the individual states and it also heaps unfair financial obligations to state governments. In 2014, the Supreme Court also allowed religious based organizations to opt out of the free birth directive in the ACA in the popular Hobby Lobby case (Kessenides, 2014).
Social Issues
The social issue that would affect passage of the proposed amendment that would allow the U.S. government to provide quality healthcare to women while at the same time respecting religious inclinations creates a lot of controversies. Religious groups do not seem satisfied by the government’s exemption because it requires third parties to offer contraceptive medication that they view as immoral (Lederman, 2014). The signing of Form 700 or writing of a special notification letter also brews tussles as most people view it as committing to immorality. Faith-based organizations have come out in arms against these provisions.
Ethical Issues
The ethical principle that supports passage of the proposed amendment is the principle of individualism because it emphasizes on individual consumer’s choice in any circumstance whether for education or health care services (Williams et al., 2011). The power of choice will enable women working in religious based organizations choose programs that suit them.
Stakeholders
- Politicians – because a politician would vote to pass, not pass, or
table the amendment. - The American voter, who would support or not support the amendment for politicians.
- Political Activists, who demonstrate for or against the amendment. An example would be Teamsters PAC, which deals with labor issues hence the welfare of employees.
- Political Lobbyists, who lobby for or against the amendment. An example would be the American Jewish Committee.
Summary
The public policy problem is that section 2713 requires organizations to provide their workers with birth control as part of their insurance coverage. The public policy question is: should the federal government mandate that organizations can choose whether or not to provide contraceptive services to employees as part of their insurance coverage? The public policy resolution is an amendment to section 2713(a) (4) of PL 111-148 that would say: organizations – both for-profit and non-profit – have the option of either offering their employees birth control as part of their insurance coverage or not to offer contraceptive services (Cauchi, 2014).
Amending section 2713 would mean that American women will have access to basic health care based on the options chosen. On the other hand, faith-based organizations will have the right to opt out of the preventive health care scheme for their female employees but continue to cover them for other services. This will also stop the politicking associated with the preventive health care service in that individuals will not have to sign Form 700, which most organizations view as committing an immorality.
Bibliography
Cassata, D. (2014, 8 22). Democrats reframe debate on health care. Retrieved from Yahoo! News: http://news.yahoo.com/dems-reframe-election-debate-health-082837822.html?soc_src=copy
Cauchi, R. (2014, 8 31). Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act PL 111-148. Retrieved from State Laws and actions challenging certain health reforms: http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/state-laws-and-actions-challenging-ppaca.aspx
Desilver, D. (2013). 5 facts about the national debt: What you need to know? Retrieved from
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/10/5-facts-about-the-national-debt-what-you-should-know/)
Iestyn Williams, S. R. (2011). Rationing in Health Care: The Theory and Practice of Priority Setting. Policy Press.
Kessenides, D. (2014, 6 30). Supreme Court Lets Religious Employers Limit Obamacare’s Free Birth Control. Retrieved from Bloomberg Business Week: http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-06-30/supreme-court-lets-religious-employers-limit-obamacares-free-birth-control
Lederman, J. (August 22, 2014). New Obama birth control fixes for religious groups. Retrieved from Yahoo News: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/obama-offers-accommodations-birth-control-172442035–finance.html?soc_src=copy
Newman, R. (August 22, 2014). Surprise: Obamacare is helping, not harming, traditional healthcare. Retrieved from Yahoo News: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/a-surprise-obamacare-development–the-old-system-gets-stronger-191500716.html?soc_src=copy
Nix, K. & Owchanrenko N. (2012, March 21). The Obamacare Two-Year Checkup: More Reasons for Repeal. Retrieved from The Heritage Foundation: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/03/the-obamacare-two-year-checkup-more-reasons-for-repeal
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act PL 111-148. (2010).
States, S. C. (2014). PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
