Scoring the Financial Criteria Against the Policy Change Options

Scoring the Financial Criteria Against the Policy Change Options

Order Instructions:

This paper is critical and it is a continuation of the policy change proposal paper that you have been written for me . Take a look at the details below and most importantly base on the two examples provided complete the paper. It is critical that it must be written in expository style , that’s part of the requirement of this paper and the writer must follow that . You will use chose one of the examples below and write the paper base on my propose amendment that is also included hear below. I will strongly advice that the writer read my previous paper with references below to fully understand the other parts of the paper. I will also send the instructions as a word document in the file section just if the table doesn’t come out when I copy and paste as it will be very important to also include the table in the completed paper since it is the scorecard.

I will send the details of the assignment as an attached file under the file upload instead of copying and pasting hear.

SAMPLE ANSWER

Scoring the Financial Criteria Against the Policy Change Options

Policy change option

These policy change options include, major changes, incremental changes and do-nothing change. Incremental changes are best when the issue is complex and takes place in stages (Mason, Lavitt & Chaffee, 2013). Do nothing  change is where things are left to run as usual while major changes happens ones as here is no re-evaluation stages.

Measurable goals

1. Public education in regard to use of the contraceptives as well their side effects and other benefits
2. Worker engagement to determine whether or not they understanding the implication of the amendments
3. Engagement of organizations opposed to the bill to enable them support the bill

 Financial Criteria

Instituting policy change requires financial support. Substantive funding stream is the funds available to support policy amendment.  For the federal government to amend section 5316 of PL 111-148, it will be obliged to fund the amending section through taxes, Medicaid and Medicare. Taxes will directly affect the middle class while other category of population will be indirectly affected through higher insurance premiums, increased cost of goods and low wages. Taxpayers and government agencies will continue to support the funding for section 5316 of PL 11-148 n to meet both current and future demands.  Political feasibility is a situation where a bill is sustainable after legislation to warrant its enactment. The bill must therefore have enough votes to pass a legislative body to be implemented within a certain period for it to be considered politically feasible (Sullivan, 2014).

Pros and Cons for Policy Change Options

Pros for Doing Nothing

1. If nothing is done, the plan cannot precede immediately, hence time to ponder about its viability again
2. If nothing is done, funding of the previous programs will go on as earlier planned

Cons for Doing Nothing

1. If nothing is done, there will be no funding, hence, status quo remains
2. If nothing is done, workers will shoulder the burden of paying for their birth control cover.
3. If nothing is done, birth control would not be provided to workers as part of their employment insurance cover.

Pros for Incremental Change

1. An incremental change will allow continuous evolution of the policy during the phases
2. An incremental change will increase the number of workers under insurance cover
3. An incremental change will maintain productivity hence impact positively on employment opportunities

Cons for Incremental Change

1. An incremental change means high expenses through evaluations and institutions of other changes.
2. This will require more time compared to major changes
3. With this kind of changes, policy makers have adequate time to repeal

Pros for Major Change

1. Major changes will makes it easier for the workers to take cover
2. Major changes will help the workers and the employee to agree on the modalities quickly
3. Major changes will ensure regulation of birth among workers

Cons for Major Change

1. Major changes may not be well thought ought to take longer to create.
2. Major changes may require long period to develop
3. Major change will result in increased employee deductions.

Policy Option Analysis Scorecard

(Mason, Leavit, & Chaffee, 2012)

Summary

As based on the scorecard analysis provided above and pros and cons analysis, the incremental change policy option will be used to implement the proposed amendment because the option totaled a plus four.  Implementing the policy through incremental change policy will ensure that all the stakeholders understand the process and appreciate the same. They will therefore render their support to the process.

Reference

American Nurses Association (ANA). (2012). The Supreme Court decision matters for registered                 nurses, their families, and their patients. Retrieved from                       http://www.anacalifornia.org/healthcarereform/SCOTUS-       ToplevelanalysisJune292012-FINALwtag.pdf

Cauchi, R. (2014). State laws and actions challenging certain health reforms. Retrieved from                      http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/state-laws-and-actions-challenging-ppaca.aspx

Govtrack.us. (2012). Text of the repeal of Obamacare act. Retrieved from                      https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr6079/text

Mason, D., Leavitt, J., & Chaffee, M. (2012). Policy & politics in nursing and health care. 6th      ed. St. Louis, Mo.: Elsevier/Saunders.

Sullivan, K.  (2014). Was the ACA politically feasible?  Retrieved from             http://pnhp.org/blog/2014/01/31/was-the-aca-politically-feasible/

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!