Social Psychology Final Research Paper I want 6 pages (complete the 6th page) research paper + abstract + outline. This is why I order 9 pages.
You can check the template for the final paper and outline before you offer your bid. You need to use lecture notes, so if you don’t have time to use them, please do not make an offer.
The written assignment requires that you are able to describe concepts from social psychology and use them to understand a “real world” phenomenon. Articles will be provided that describe one of three real-world phenomena. You must select one and read the article and identify concepts from the textbook that help us explain why the phenomenon occurs. (Topics are Academic Impostor Phenomenon, Online Incivility, or Climate Change Denial). Remember, this is not an opinion piece.
Social Psychology Final Research Paper Assignment
The first part of the assignment requires that you write a 250-word abstract about what you will talk about in your paper and provide a one-page outline (single-spaced, 12 point, Times New Roman font) — I will provide you the template and the detailed instructions.
Then, you will then submit a 6-page paper + abstract, including references that uses the material in the textbook to explain the phenomena discussed in the news article (double- spaced, 12 point, Times New Roman font.
Objective: Psychological research is more than the memorization of facts, dates, and names of researchers. As you progress through any area of psychology, you will need to learn how to read, understand, and summarize research articles. For this assignment, you will need to 1) analyze concepts and theories in your textbook and 2) use them to offer a plausible explanation of a real-world phenomenon: “Academic Impostor Syndrome”, “Online Incivility”, or “Disbelief in Climate Change”. The real-world phenomena will be provided to you in an article (select the one relevant to your topic). You do not need to address any or all points in the article. I’ve given it to you to give you a basic understanding of some of the features of the phenomenon. To that end, you also do not need to agree with it, e.g., you might love social media or reject anthropogenic (caused by humans) climate change. Remember: the objective of the paper is to demonstrate that you understand and can use social psychology concepts to understand the “real world”: this isn’t an opinion piece or about political analysis. As I noted in class, this is essentially an “essay question” on a final exam but it is given to you at the start of the course.
To assist you, I’d also recommend that you can consult one of the application module chapters that correspond to your topic (e.g., finance). These chapters could provide you more specific information about your topic or an idea of how to write about an applied topic. They are not mandatory readings but they might give you an idea of how to approach your social phenomenon.
Once you are done writing, a good litmus test is to present your abstract to a friend (or family member) that has no experience in this area. If they can get the gist without any further information, it’s likely that you’ve done a good job!
To write the abstract outline, you must consider the requirements of the final paper:
Final Paper: The final paper that you will describe in the abstract and outline must contain at least 4 unique concepts* taken from your textbook: 1) Concepts should be clearly described, 2) any theories used to explain them should be provided (i.e., how it is operationalized for testing), and 3) any methods and results used to demonstrate their existence should be stated (i.e., the evidence). The final paper can be seen as replacing an “essay question” on your final exam.
*e.g., confirmation bias and motivated confirmation bias count as 1 concept.
Format: A template is provided below. The assignment is worth 5% of your final grade and will help you think about the structure of your final paper (the final paper is worth 20% of your final grade).
Abstract: The mark assignment is as follows: Clear description of the motivation behind the study (1 mark), a clear summary of a relevant article (1 mark), clear description of methods (1.5 marks), clear summary of our findings (2.5 marks), and a clear conclusion about the relevance to the literature/research (2 marks). (8 marks total). The abstract should not exceed 250 words.
Outline: Clearly labeled section headings (generic, e.g., “Introduction”; and specific “Consumer Behaviour”, “Concepts of Self”; 2 mark), meaningful statements (i.e., the content discussed in each bullet point is relevant to the argument being made; 4 mark), accuracy of content (i.e., studies that are cited correctly reflect the material in the textbook and slides, definitions are appropriate; 3 mark), logic and order of content (i.e., general points first, followed by more specific points; 4 marks), clear transition between sections (i.e., does the reader understand why one section follows another?; 2 mark). (15 marks total)
Social Psychology Final Research Paper
Marks will be deducted for poor grammar (-1), spelling mistakes (-1), inclusion of the wrong information (-1), abstract exceeds 250 word limit (-1), outline exceeds one-page (single-spaced), not including any of the following running head, name, student number (-1), not using 12 point Times New Roman font (-1). Failure to provide references for arguments (-1/unreferenced statement). As with any assignment, plagiarism will result in a mark of 0 and you will be reported to the department. Plagiarism consists of any verbatim (word for word) copying, using an identical sentence/1paragraph structure, etc. See the Panter (2014) article on avoiding plagiarism.
Note: Although the template below refers to single sentences, more than one sentence can be used if necessary. Remember, however, that quality is more important than quantity.
Writing abstracts is not as easy as it may first seem. Allocate your time accordingly and refer to the online Strunk and White reference for quick writing tips.
Social Psychology Final Research Paper Outline
In general, an outline reflects an extended abstract but gives more detail. Full, intelligible sentences are required but 1) your argument is provided in more detail while 2) you leave some inferences to the reader. Below, I’ve provided a few general examples are provided along with some specific sentences. I’ve created them to get you thinking, so please provide your own. For inspiration, you can also look at the general structure of your textbook or specific chapters (again, they are not mandatory readings). It will give you some ideas for what directions you might want to take. A nice rough estimate is 4 section headings. In the final paper, you will at least have sections such as the Introduction, “Concepts and Theories”, “Phenomenon”, Discussion, and Conclusions (N.B., the quotation marks denote generic titles – you will want to make them more specific, e.g., “Theories of Self”, “Cooperation and Aggression Behaviour”, or “Heuristics and Biases” and “The Concept of Incivility” “Beliefs about Climate Change” “The Stereotype of the Student”).
There is some flexibility in what each one of these sections will contain. However, a general structure of the final paper would consist of:
1.0 Introduction (~1-3 paragraphs)
1) Why the reader should be interested in your paper? Is it a common phenomenon? Is it one that has grave consequences? Think of this as the “Big Picture”.
2) Do we know much about it? What kinds of concepts/theories/evidence do we have that are relevant
3) How will you discuss the topic? Consider a sentence or two that provides an overview of the paper as a whole, i.e., What concepts theories will you discuss? What phenomenon will you describe? Are there conflicting theories/interpretations of the phenomenon?
2.0 “Concepts and Theories” (~8-10 paragraphs)
1) First, think about what topic you have selected. Review your textbook for concepts and theories that help you understand it. Select 4 concepts as a starting point (i.e., you will likely need to include related concepts) that are relevant to the topic. For instance, “social proof” “conformity bias” “motivated confirmation bias” would be good starting points. Then describe some of the relevant theories.
2) Ensure you take a balanced approach – even if you prefer one theory/concept or have a conclusion in mind, play “Devil’s Advocate” and describe any alternative theories as well. Don’t oversimplify the position of other researchers.
3.0 “Phenomenon” (~2-4 paragraphs)
The primary source for this section should be the article. However, you can supplement this with other information you obtain online. As always, do not plagiarize.
1) Be as objective as possible and do not assume the reader knows anything about the phenomenon, e.g., “The growth of the Internet allows people to connect…” “Climate is a complex concept to understand…” Do not bring in the concepts and theories.
2) Try to identify discrete features of the situation, e.g., “Students find themselves in large groups working in relative anonymity in specific disciplines…”, or “Online communities are fluid and can consist of…”
4.0 Discussion and Conclusions (~8-10 paragraphs)
1) The discussion and conclusion section are quite flexible in terms of how long they are, i.e., you might spend 9/10 paragraphs discussing and have only 1 paragraph for conclusion. You might instead have an even split (5/10 paragraphs each).
2) The Discussion section must bring together your concept/theories and the phenomenon. This is why both of those previous sections must be described clearly otherwise the reader will not understand the discussion here. Every theories/concept should be “linked” with an aspect of the phenomenon. If they are not, they should either be included (i.e., it was missing) or a concept/theory should be eliminated (i.e., it is unnecessary).
3) The Conclusion section should reflect the “Big Picture” described in the Introduction. It can be quite brief if you have sufficiently described theories in the Discussion. It should not restate the Discussion. Here you would also include other theories/studies that can be done to investigate the phenomenon, i.e., what experiments could be conducted?
While these points reflect what should be in your final, you can use them and the following structural template to write your abstract and outline.
The “hour-glass” shape is a good model. Start each section with general statements, include specific statements in the middle, and general concluding point at the end. Your overall paper should work the same way: The Introduction and Conclusion will contain the most general information, the Methods and Results the most detailed information.
Use the template on the following page. It contains general information. You will fill it in based on the topic you have selected and the specific concepts. Do not plagiarize. Expect to have to re-write the definition of a concepts 3-4 times in your own terms before it “sounds right”.
Social Psychology Final Research Paper Abstract
This is a generic abstract. Use this template. Fill in the running head, student number and name in the location provided. The first sentence of an abstract should summarize the ‘why’ of the article in terms of a question that it’s trying to answer. The second sentence should suggest what inconsistencies (or questions) the author has observed in the literature that motivated the particulars of their study. The third sentence should give a general summary of their methods have typically been used (e.g., what task did they use? what dependent measures did they examine? what modification did they make, if any?). The fourth sentence should summarize the findings of the study/review. A fifth sentence should indicate the relevance of the present study/review to the broader literature.
1.0 Social Psychology Final Research Paper Introduction
- This sentence should reflect a reason why the reader should want to read your article, it should point to the “big picture” – e.g., “The media provides with considerable information that we must examine critically, in order to determine what is fact and what is fiction” or “Cognitive predisposition affect how we process information, often leading to unintentional biases…” or “Socialization into a collective identity…”,
- This sentence should contain a formal formulation of the problem you want to address. It should be referenced using the citation from the textbook or other sources that you find (don’t overboard, this is about quality, not quantity), i.e., “While studied extensively, decision-making is subject to a number of biases that result from innate predispositions or experience (Smith, 2020),”
- The next two sentences should give some empirical evidence to the reader or discuss some theoretical aspect of the problem that you want to address. Again, these should be referenced., i.e., “A number of dual-process models have attempted to describe the patterns of observed bias (Jones, 2020)…” or “Studies have found that participants often uses simple cues, or heuristics, to assess the quality of an argument. In the reasoning literature, these have been considered in terms of the belief-bias effect (Evans, 2020),”
- The final sentence should provide a meaningful transition to the next section. In the Introduction, this can entail a “sketch” of the structure of the paper, e.g., “In the present study, after controlling for cognitive predispositions, I used a reasoning task that examined the extent to which participants had prior beliefs about the role schema of scientists and lay people….” or “Following a discussion of dual-process accounts, I provide an overview of cognitive biases from the persuasive communication literature….” or “In the current paper, I will argue that the stereotype of “Student” can influence….”
2.0 Social Psychology Final Research Paper Concepts and Theory
- Dual-Process Accounts of Decision-Making an be understood as …
- Theories of Social Identity …
- Anonymity can be defined as …
- Racial biases assume that…
- In each of these cases, ensure you provide some empirical evidence (i.e., studies cited in the textbook) to back it up. Do not cite the lecture slides.
3.0 Social Psychology Final Research Paper Phenomenon / Method
- Clearly describe your phenomenon – don’t take anything for granted,
- When describing the phenomenon, make sure you start placing “links” to the concepts that you introduced above, e.g., if you are going to talk about social categories / stereotypes, describe what social categories / stereotypes people discuss in school, society, or online,
- Described any methods used to obtain the “data” from studies that you’ve read (i.e., has this phenomenon been studied using laboratory tasks / clinical cases (e.g., student self-reports) or observational techniques / archival methods (e.g., Online behaviour)),
- Include as much detail as possible, i.e., who are the participants (typically; e.g., Right-/Left-Wing pundits or voters, people with high/low SES, males/females in their 20-30s)?
4.0 Social Psychology Final Research Paper Discussion / Conclusion
- Here you will want to give the reader an idea of what you think all of the theory and evidence you provided means relative to your experiment. Just take your best shot (at this stage) as you thinking can (and should!) develop as you read more of the textbook. You should try to make 2-3 points. Again, quality is more important than quantity, e.g., “Given the claims of dual-process accounts, I assume that we will observe a difference between accuracy and confidence in my experiment that will be related to cognitive predispositions. Specifically, we should observe overconfidence that is related to belief-bias in that…”
- Here, you should write out some expected conclusions. Again, this will change but give it a try, e.g., “Our results should provide evidence for (at least) two separate decision-making processes and find a source credibility effect, thereby supporting…”
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!