Theoretical or Conceptual Framework Purpose Statement Per Instructor: Theoretical or Conceptual Framework needs editing/rewrite.

Please rewrite the Theoretical or Conceptual Framework per sample was given.

Theoretical or Conceptual Framework ñ Instructor Feedback

Theoretical or Conceptual Framework Purpose Statement Introduction

Model for Introducing Theory/Conceptual Framework:

ï Name or Identity of the Theory/Framework

ï Name the Theorist (if applicable)

ï List Key Concepts of the Theory/Framework

ï Identify Propositions/Hypotheses

ï Identify Application to your Study

Example of:

Qualitative Conceptual Framework

The conceptual framework that will be used is transformational leadership. The transformational leadership framework was developed by James McGregor Burns. Bass (1985) later elongated the works of Burns. This theory was used to offer an explanation for leadership based upon the premise that leaders are able to inspire followers to change expectations, perceptions, and motivations to work toward common goals. Key constructs/propositions underlying the theory are (a) individualized consideration, (b) intellectual stimulation, (c) inspirational motivation, and (d) idealized influences. As applied to this study, the transformational leadership theory holds that I would expect the propositions advanced by the theory to allow participants to effectively explore perceptions and experiences regarding leaders, transformational leadership characteristics as it pertains to job satisfaction.

Theoretical or Conceptual Framework (needs rewrite/editing)

The establishment of qualitative research is hinged on the need to explore the relationship between the various challenges and the overall impact on the startup entrepreneurs. The implication is that most of the factors that influence business are linked to the knowledge base of the entrepreneurs and as such, it is essential to define the critical approaches that will be essential in influencing the impact of the knowledge on the success or failure of the business.

Some of the approaches chosen in this study will include observation and interviews which will be the basis of the evaluation of the research problems in the various businesses. Observation remains one of the best approaches towards highlighting the relationships between awareness of the challenges and the impact of these challenges on the startups in the market. Wang et al. (2016) argue that qualitative approaches are integral as they will be relied upon in establishing the various relationships between the factors and the business.  Neuman (2013) who notes that observation increases the validity of the data considering the ability of the researcher to evaluate the different factors that influence the performance of the business enterprise explains the centrality of observation in the collection of data.

The implication is that qualitative approaches will be the most appropriate strategies for evaluating the relationship between knowledge and the performance of a business. Interviews and focus groups will also be integrated into the interrogation of the relationship between knowledge and startups (Neuman, 2013). The conceptual framework of this research is tied to the need to define the overall influence that knowledge has on the startup business while defining the most appropriate measures that would be essential in generating the best solutions to the challenges. Lewis (2015) argues that qualitative data collection and evaluation approaches will be significantly relied upon to outline the possible relationships in this study as well.

Theoretical or Conceptual Framework Purpose Statement References

Lewis, S. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Health promotion practice, 16(4), 473-475.

Neuman, W. L. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson education.

Wang, X., Edison, H., Bajwa, S. S., Giardino, C., & Abrahamsson, P. (2016, May). Key challenges in software startups across life cycle stages. In International Conference on Agile Software Development (pp. 169-182). Springer, Cham.