This book report needs to be around 5-6 pages (double spaced) 12 point font. It is about the book “The Age of Innocence” by Edith Wharton. The theme is ‘how society and class governed/impacted the lives of New Yorkers in the 1870s’. there needs to be an introduction (title, author, theme, brief overview of book), a summary of the book which is about a page – page and a half long, a paragraph on the theme in the book (with quotes from the book supporting evidence) which is about a page long, a character development paragraph also at least a page long (talking about how the main character Newland Archer changes throughout the book, with quotes from the book to support claims), and a concluding paragraph
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
This book report needs to be around 5-6 pages (double spaced) 12 point font. It is about the book “The Age of Innocence” by Edith Wharton. The theme is ‘how society and class governed/impacted the lives of New Yorkers in the 1870s’. there needs to be an introduction (title, author, theme, brief overview of book), a summary of the book which is about a page – page and a half long, a paragraph on the theme in the book (with quotes from the book supporting evidence) which is about a page long, a character development paragraph also at least a page long (talking about how the main character Newland Archer changes throughout the book, with quotes from the book to support claims), and a concluding paragraph.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Getlein Mark, Living with Art, 11th Ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, ISBN13: 978-0073379319
First Assignment
Imagine that you are in a debate with someone who asserts that, just as beauty is in the eye of the beholder, art is whatever the spectator thinks it is; there are no rules, no criteria, no universal boundaries delineating what is and what is not art, who is and who is not an artist. If something expresses or creates an aesthetic or emotional response, it is art.
Your task is to take the other side of the debate: How would you respond to and rebut this view? In the first chapter of Living with Art, Getlein lists six roles that artists fulfill; these may help you in coming up with your response. Come up with points and specific examples of art works to support of the other side of the debate, which is that not just anything can be art, not just anyone can be an artist: There are established and justifiable criteria to confer that status upon objects and individuals.
Second Assignment
In Chapter 5, Getlein covers the principles of design. For each term listed, identify an art work art included in the text, Living with Art, but NOT mentioned in either Chapter 4 or Chapter 5, that illustrates the principle in question and explain why you chose it.
Note: in some cases you will find both the contrasting principles in the same work, (i.e. a painting that has both emphasis and subordination). You will have a minimum of 5 art works selected, maximum of 9. A required part of this question is to explain WHY you chose each work. Make sure we can “see” what you are seeing. Please include both the page number and illustration number in your response.
1) unity and variety (describe an example of both terms here, either in the same work or in 2 different works)
2) symmetrical and asymmetrical balance (describe an example of both terms here, either in the same work or in 2 different works)
3) emphasis and subordination (describe an example of both terms here, either in the same work or in 2 different works)
4) scale and proportion (describe an example of both terms here, either in the same work or in 2 different works)
5) rhythm
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
For this course, you will be required to complete two 1000-1250 word (approximately 4-5 pages) book review papers. Each paper will analyze a book that focus on some aspect of American history up until 1816.
While you may choose any non-fiction works of history focusing on this period, I highly recommend that you send me the title and author of the book to have it approved before you write your essay. I will approve only college-level works of history. The easiest way to ensure that the book you choose meets this standard is to check it out from the library at Foothill College. The vast majority of books students choose are approved; I am simply trying to make sure that you do not accidentally choose a collection of primary sources or a book geared to a high school audience. If you do not send me your book information ahead of time and review an inappropriate book your paper grade will be penalized.
If you are having trouble choosing a book I am happy to offer a suggestion. Just send me a message saying what topics you are interested in (for example, women’s history or military history or Native American history) and I’ll come up with a couple of possible titles. Another good way to find a book is to look at the end of the chapters in the textbook. You will find a list of suggested “further reading” at the end of each chapter. All of these books would be good choices.
Once you have chosen a book to review, you will write a 1000-1250 word essay analyzing the text. Because many students may think of a “book report” as little more than a summary of a book’s contents, I have used the term “book review” to emphasize that something more is expected. The student is expected to go beyond merely outlining the contents. Although it is, of course, important to summarize the contents of the book as part of the review, the student should analyze it in some depth. In reading the book, the student should pay attention to the footnotes and bibliography, seek out information about the author, and consult the text and other books to gain a wider perspective on the book’s subject.
The most important aspect of the essays is to determine the thesis or main argument of the book and describe how this is presented and supported. Is the case convincing? Does the author seem to have approached the topic from a relatively objective point of view, or is a clear bias apparent? What sources did the author use? Is the author clearly arguing against another historian’s interpretation of the subject? What is your opinion about the argument the author is making?
All books of history have some argument in the material they are presenting. Try to identify what this argument is and give your opinion about the validity of this approach.
The main body of your reviews should be at 1000-1250 words in length (this is equivalent to at least 4 full pages in length, typed and double spaced, with margins no larger than 1 inch in width, using a standard word processing program). Every paper must have a full citation of the book being reviewed and a proper bibliography in the MLA style at the end if you have consulted any additional works.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Critical Synthesis Essay of “A Tale of Two Cities”
Critical Synthesis Essay
Critical Synthesis essay based on the novel “A Tale of Two Cities.” Analyse the novel through a “different lens.” In text citations must be included as well as an individual works cited page. Outside sources must be researched and connected to “a tail of two cities.” Unlimited number of sources can be used, the more the merrier.
With A Tale of Two Cities, Dickens asserts his belief in the possibility of resurrection and transformation, both on a personal level and on a societal level. The narrative suggests that Sydney Carton’s death secures a new, peaceful life for Lucie Manette, Charles Darnay, and even Carton himself. By delivering himself to the guillotine, Carton ascends to the plane of heroism, becoming a Christ-like figure whose death serves to save the lives of others. His own life thus gains meaning and value. Moreover, the final pages of the novel suggest that, like Christ, Carton will be resurrected—Carton is reborn in the hearts of those he has died to save. Similarly, the text implies that the death of the old regime in France prepares the way for the beautiful and renewed Paris that Carton supposedly envisions from the guillotine.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
• Summarize the Juergensmeyer reading (51-63), and answer the following four questions by giving examples from the text: How does he want the reader to feel? What images does he use to make the reader feel this way? How exactly does he match his examples up with his category of ‘religious violence’? Are the connections between his examples and his category clear?
• Both Karen Armstrong and William Cavanaugh critique the category of ‘religious violence.’ By using examples from their writing (Armstrong’s article online, Cavanaugh’s reading 65-76) describe how their arguments are similar and make special note of any differences you may encounter. Conclude by choosing a favorite and explaining your choice.
• Narrate an imaginary conversation between George Bataille and an animal of your choosing in which both try to answer the questions ‘what is religion?’ and ‘what is violence?’ Although you do not need to quote from the Bataille reading, you are required to footnote parts of the dialogue with reference to a page number and line number that connects to what Bataille and the animal are saying to each other (77-93).
• Summarize Girard’s theory of the scapegoat and, by referring to specific parts of his essay (95-127), show how it applies to a specific example from a film (ex. Shrek), a news media source (ex. fear of refugees), a play (ex. Matilda), or a novel (ex. Animal Farm). Be sure to summarize your example in detail, and be sure to note ways that Girard’s theory fails to explain your chosen example (i.e. What does the scapegoating theory miss in your chosen narrative?).
• What is an example of something violent that has become part of our habitus (‘common sense world’)? With substantial reference to either Martin Saar’s division of order-practice-subject or Grace Jantzen’s critique of the western obsession with death, analyze a violent aspect of the current habitus. Be sure to define violence and note any religious influence you observe.
• With reference to at least three news sources that cover the same violent event, describe and critique both the use of the term ‘terrorism’ in your news sources and in our reading (139-152). Answer the following questions about your news sources: How is the word ‘terrorist’ being used? For what purpose is it being used? What definition of the term is being used? How does religion play a role in the use of the term?
• Describe ten different critical thinking ‘tools’ that that you have picked up from this class and give examples of how you have used them. Take roughly one page to describe each item in your ‘toolbox’ and make direct reference to one course text on each page. Some tools to consider: the distinction between descriptive and normative statements, the two lenses of sympathy and suspicion, the concept of the habitus, the definition of violence as a violation of boundaries, the idea that we make our social world, Girard’s concept of the scapegoat, Jaeggi’s concept of alienation, Holmqvist’s definition of modern war, Therborn’s idea of inequality, and the problematic category of ‘religious violence.’ Feel free to use other examples from your course notes and readings.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Editors Whitney Strub and Carolyn Bronstein argue that pornographic revolution of the 1970s was intimately tied to the ravages of the late 1960s. Hardcore pornography was linked to the ghosts of youth counterculture, the Civil Rights Movement, and the Vietnam War.
Pick any 3 chapters from the book “Porno Chic” and use the chapters to explore this claim and offer a determination of what we can see in this genre as it emerged in a specific chronological, social, and political context. How much was pornography opening up new existential understandings? How much was it simply another anarchistic form turned into economic exchange? How did it change American society?
Do not use any other sources than the book “Porno Chic”.
Include at least six brief quotes and provide direct support to your argument.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Peer Response for Still Here by Bill T Jones Complete the following discussion and one peer response
OR go to QUIZZES/OPTIONAL ASSIGNMENTS/FINAL PROJECT and complete the Optional Alternate Assignment for chapter 5.
Peer Response for Still Here by Bill T Jones
The following work is considered Contemporary dance, specifically community dance, since the choreographer is collaborating with a community of people. Your chapter outlines Modern dance and its pioneers. This work is the descendant of the original modern dance.
Watch the Bill Moyers documentary video of the making of Still Here by Bill T. Jones:
Answer the following and then respond to one peer:
1. When this dance first was choreographed, one critic, who did NOT see the dance, accused Bill T. Jones of creating “victim” art and of exploiting and using the participants for his gain. After watching this documentary, what do you think? Do you think that the participants of this project were exploited or used for the benefit or gain of the choreographer? Please explain.
2. What about this resonates with you — what do you think this dance and process say about the power of dance? How do you think the pioneers of Modern dance would have responded to this work? How do you see this fitting with the ideology of Modern dance as described in your textbook?
Discussing one or more Characters in Everyday use Write 130 words by discussing one or more characters in“ Everyday use” by Alice Walker ; write 130 words on “ My papa’s Waltz” by Theodore Roethke by discussing the tone of the poem also tell if the poem can be read more than one way?
Discussing one or more Characters in Everyday use
In “Everyday Use,” Alice Walker tells a story of a mother’s conflicted relationship with her two daughters. On its surface, “Everyday Use” tells how a mother gradually rejects the superficial values of her older, successful daughter in favor of the practical values of her younger, less fortunate daughter.
Compare Achilles Apollonius and Beowulf “Compare and contrast at least three individuals that have been ‘idealized’ in the literature that we have read thus far in the semester.
Compare Achilles Apollonius and Beowulf
To what extent is it possible to say that in different cultural settings across the ancient and medieval period the ‘ideal individual’ is a ‘heroic’ individual?”
Compare Achilles Apollonius and Beowulf Essay Requirement
Write a 5-6 page essay on the topic described in the prompt above. For the purpose of this essay, you must compare/contrast:
Achilles from The Iliad by Homer
Apollonius from Life of Apollonius by Philostratus
Beowulf from Beowulf
Please note that this paper will require that you work very carefully within a specific definition of not only ‘heroic’ and ‘ideal’, but also any characteristics (such as ‘holiness’ or ‘leadership’) that you might ascribe to heroism or idealism. Similarly, you should note that within each group, characteristics that mark an individual as ‘ideal’ or ‘heroic’ may vary widely, or have subtle similarities (for example, as seen when comparing Achilles and Aeneas, or Apollonius and Antony). Similarly, note that some characters such as Achilles and Antony remained famous as exemplary individuals well beyond the period in which they initially appeared in literature, even when the exemplars produced by subsequent periods might have been vastly different. Here, the “To what extent” portion of the prompt has particular significance. Stronger papers will avoid gross generalizations that imply any given period (as represented by the groups) are static in terms of how they formulate the heroic or ideal.
Compare Achilles Apollonius and Beowulf Essay Paper Description
The essay should be typed, double-spaced, unjustified on the right-hand column, paginated and include in-text citations (parenthetical) of sources. Citations from primary sources may be given as page numbers (Beowulf, p. 45) or as chapter numbers (Life of Alfred the Great 30), although the citation format for each source should be consistent throughout the paper. The paper should be argumentative, having a clear thesis and being well-supported by your own analysis of evidence, rather than an expository survey of the material. Your analysis should draw as much as possible from the primary source readings, but quotations or paraphrase of narrative from the text should not overwhelm your own analysis; rather, analysis should explain how your quoted or paraphrased examples support your thesis.
