1) Many compensation professionals are faced with making choices about which discretionary benefits to drop because funds are limited and the costs of these benefits continually increase. Assume you must make such choices. Rank-order discretionary benefits from the ones you would most likely eliminate to the ones you would least likely eliminate. Explain your rationale.
2) Discuss your position on executive compensation. Is executive compensation universally excessive or appropriate? Should company profits and stock prices impact an executive’s pay? What about the wages of lower-level employees?
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Start with restating the purpose, hypothesis, and results (No stats! )
• H: Participants in the aloud condition will detect more spelling errors than those in the silent condition
• conducted in order to compare reading out loud vs reading silently. Participants in the aloud condition will detect more spelling errors than those in the silent condition. There were no substantial mean differences or error detections when proofreading aloud(M=10.89,SD=3.98) or silently(M=10.79,SD=4.04); t (254) =0.51 ,p=.61 ,ns.
Clearly state whether or not hypothesis was supported
-Hypothesis was not supported
Why did we get our results?
• What could have affected our results?
• Interpret our findings for your reader
You must give at least THREE separate reasons as to why we got that result
be sure to have literature to support it
Give me some possible explanations for our findings!
• Toward the end of your discussion be sure to include:
How does this add to the current body of knowledge?
Limitations of our study
No petty flaws or limitations
Questions for future research
Include explanation as to why this future research is important
Implications – ways in which this experiment will be beneficial to the outside world
In other words, how can this information be applied in real world settings?
• You must end your paper as you started it, in broad and general terms
• Sum things up and give a good concluding statement
ABSTRACT
• Brief but complete summary of the paper
• no more than 120 words
-Abstract Needs to include
Problem investigated (purpose)/Hypothesis
Reading out loud vs. reading silently Hypothesis
• Reading out loud vs. reading silently
• Which one is the effective proofreading strategy?
• Specifically, in detecting spelling errors –
Aloud > Silent
Methods & Results – only most important aspects
• Basic info about participants (N, sex, M age, etc.)
• Brief materials and procedures
Materials:
1.Informed Consent
2.Demographic information sheet
3.General instruction – what does this explain
4.Four passages
Procedure:
Participants were individually tested in a quiet setting.
Provided four testing passages
•Handed over debriefing statement
•Thanked/acknowledged
• Brief statement of results
• The implications/application of results (conclusion)
Results from research
Male partcipants:134
Female partcipants:122
Total:255
• N = 255
• Age (M= 30.09, SD = 11.83)
• Gender (Male = 134, Female = 121)
• Ethnicity (Hispanic or Lation,Caucasian,African American,Asian or Asian American,Other , ans Native American)
• English Proficiency (Native English Speaker,Speak English very fluently,Speak English fluently,Speak English but not fluently)
Articles to be referenced (I have provided 5 , need 5 more)
Part one is making an abstract that is exactly from 195-205 words, must write a proposal to give a class that will be giving to 4th graders. 1-2 sentences must be on what you want to do. 1-2 sentences on why you want to do that. 1-2 sentences on how you are going to do it.
The second part is to write an essay on “Is education a tool or a weapon or both?” the essay must have two in text citations from two books with pg number on the quote, the books are:
2) Explanation: write a short paragraph on how you expect to approach investigation of this topic, what you already know. about it, and what you expect to learn about it.
5) Conclusion: this can be a brief summary of your key points, a call for action, a proposed solution, a rhetorical question for reader to consider, a prediction, or a restatement of your thesis.
Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Critique the actions of organizations as they integrate diverse perspectives into their cultures.
Scenario Information
You have been hired as the Human Resources Director for a global organization that is headquartered in the United States. Your job is to evaluate and make recommendations in the area of diversity for your company. Each section will contain specific areas within diversity for you to focus on. You will be tasked with choosing from one of the diversity areas that are provided to you. Be sure to conduct research using the university library and other relevant sources.
Diversity Areas : ((ETHNICITY))
Instructions
Now that you have selected your area of diverse concentration, you are now tasked with designing a plan to aid your selected group in one of the following countries:
China
Japan
Brazil
India
The new organizational strategic initiative is to expand into the selected country. The executive leadership team has asked you for a report on the diversity area (the one you selected) and the country (selected above) expanding to. The report should address the following questions:
Introduce your diversity area and country.
What are some of the challenges your diversity area would face in the country culture you selected if a comparison is made with the United States?
Are there any ethical or legal implications that protect your diversity area in the selected country?
Discuss some techniques that, as the manager, you would use in order to ensure an inclusive work culture.
Conclude your diversity report.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
When we are talking about the main theories in psychology we are referring to the ones found here:
Psychological Theories
The treatment methods we use with clients are based on these theories. Which one(s) do you find the most appealing in terms of helping clients reduce psychological symptoms?
How do we decide which approach to use with clients?
Do we have to choose just one? Can we use more than one?
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Explain what it takes to have teamwork in health care
Assignment 4: Collaboration and Teamwork in Health Care
Overview: Explain the concept of true collaboration in health care and describe the benefits of effective interdisciplinary collaboration. Then, describe the characteristics required for effective collaboration, describe barriers to collaboration, and offer evidence-based strategies to overcome those barriers.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
• Competency 1: Explain the principles and practices of highly effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
o Explain the concept of collaboration in health care.
o Describe the characteristics and concepts required for effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
o Describe barriers to effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
o Identify evidence-based strategies to overcome barriers to effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
• Competency 3: Explain the internal and external factors that can affect the health of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
o Describe the benefits of effective collaboration and teamwork in health care for patients, organizations, and team members.
Context: Every day, in every patient setting, health care professionals must interact with other health care professionals, as well as with providers from other professions to share information, conduct safety and quality checks, and work with patients in a variety of ways to make sure they understand their health care needs and will be more likely to comply with treatment plans.
Research consistently shows that interdisciplinary collaboration and teamwork improves the quality and safety of patient care by recognizing the skills and experience of each team member, allowing the team to function more effectively and efficiently.
Library Resources
The following e-books or articles are linked directly in this course:
• Petri, L. (2010). Concept analysis of interdisciplinary collaboration. Nursing Forum, 45(2), 73–82.
• Bender, M., Connelly, C. D., & Brown, C. (2013). Interdisciplinary collaboration: The role of the clinical nurse leader. Journal of Nursing Management, 21(1), 165–174.
• Supper, I., Catalo, O., Lustman, M., Chemla, C., Bourgueil, Y., & Letrilliant, L. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration in primary healthcare: A review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors. Journal of Public Health, 37(4), 717–727.
• Youngwerth, J., & Twaddle, M. (2011). Cultures of interdisciplinary teams: How to foster good dynamics. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(5), 650–654.
• Perreault, K., & Careau, E. (2012). Interprofessional collaboration: One or multiple realities? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(4), 256–258.
Assessment Instructions: You are part of an interdisciplinary team that has been highly effective. Your supervisor asks you to write a short article about why the team has been so successful and submit it to the organizational newsletter for publication.
Directions include for you to write in the article for this assessment, the following:
• Explain the concept of true collaboration in health care.
• Describe the benefits of effective collaboration and teamwork in health care for the following groups:
o Patients.
o Organizations.
o Team members.
• Describe the characteristics and concepts required for effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
• Describe barriers to effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
• Identify evidence-based strategies to overcome barriers to effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
• Format this assessment according to current APA style and formatting guidelines.
Search the library and the Internet for peer-reviewed journal articles on collaboration and teamwork in health care.
Additional Requirements
• Include a title page and reference page.
• Ensure your assessment is 4 pages.
• You will need at least 3 articles to support your work on this assessment.
• Use double-spaced, 12-pt., Times New Roman font.
Collaboration and Teamwork in Health Care Scoring Guide
Explains the concept of collaboration in health care and describes the unique aspects of collaboration in health care. Describes the benefits of effective collaboration and teamwork in health care for patients, organizations, and team members and considers the consequences of ineffective collaboration and teamwork. Describes the characteristics and concepts required for effective interdisciplinary collaboration and explains how each contributes to more effective collaboration. Describes barriers to effective interdisciplinary collaboration and considers possible causes for the barriers. Identifies evidence-based strategies to overcome barriers to effective interdisciplinary collaboration and suggests methods for implementing the strategies.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
The Assignment
Over the course of the term you will be writing a 4-6-page (~1,000-1,500 word) argumentative paper with a standard, 12-point font, double-spaced lines, and 1” margins responding to the prompt.
For the purposes of Part 1 of the assignment, you will be composing TWO PARAGRAPHS of this larger paper: an introduction and one of your body paragraphs.
Your paper will provide an argument supporting a determinate position (your thesis or conclusion) in some controversial debate (topics below); to do so, you will draw upon at least two articles on the topic in contention, one from (roughly) each side of the issue.
Your own position (thesis/conclusion) may be more nuanced than simply for or against in a given debate: you can split-the-difference on the issue as long as you insightfully explain precisely how and why (e.g. “I am for stricter gun control in the following ways . . . and against these sorts of restrictions…”).
**PLEASE NOTE: this is not a “pro and con” paper.** The point of this paper is not simply to list the “pros” and “cons” or positives and negatives of both sides. You are to take a determinate stance on the issue at hand in a clear and precise thesis statement (your own view stated as the conclusion/thesis of your paper). You are not remaining neutral, and simply weighing the ups and downs of both sides on the issue: you are supposed to have a point of view and argue for it. This point of view may, for instance, be “Yes, the minimum wage should be raised, and here is why…” or “No, the minimum wage should not be raised because…” or even “the minimum wage should only be raised if certain economic preconditions in a given area are met; this is because…” or etc.
Topics
There are six argument/debate topics I have supplied (available on iCollege under “Content > Argumentative Paper Assignment > Paper Topics & Source Material”):
• Raising the Minimum Wage: For or Against
• “Police/Criminal Justice Reform” or “Black-on-Black Violence” — What is the main issue we should be focusing our time and resources on (at least when it comes to matters of Criminal Justice)?
• Public Transportation: Should it be free?
• Streetcar Renaissance: For or Against. Are Streetcars a wise choice for cities?
• Immigration to the United States: More Restrictions or More Immigrants?
• Is There a Right to Health Care?
Alternate Topics
If you would like to write a paper on another topic, I am quite open to it! I want you to write on something you are interested in. Still, to take this course you must do quite a bit more work upfront. First, you must find your own sources: you need to research and find at least two articles, one on either side (roughly) of the issue that your proposed paper topic addresses. Also, I must approve of your custom topic and the sources you propose, so you will need to get an early start. If you want to take this route, you will need to email me your paper proposal & sources and/or speak with me during (virtual) office hours ASAP to discuss.
Source Materials
For each of my pre-selected topics/issues (not for your self-selected alternate topics), I have clipped some blog posts, articles, and editorials from the web (again, available on iCollege under “Content > Argumentative Paper Assignment > Paper Topics & Source Material”).
• These articles and writings are to serve as a limited source of (sometimes biased) background, opinion, satire, and argumentation to serve as a springboard for writing longer argumentative passages. I’ve selected at least one piece of writing that falls either side of these selected debates.
• Sometimes, these articles’ arguments are all one-sided, and don’t concede an inch to the opposed position, making the issue seem to be a stark black or white choice. Sometimes the authors present more nuanced positions, conceding some to their opponents, or straddling the issues in various ways.
• You may want to supplement your understanding of these issues with your own research and turn up new papers/articles: just remember to evaluate these new sources for quality; and when in doubt, run them by me.
• You must incorporate at least two (2) sources into your own paper, one from each side of the issue (i.e. one that you will draw from in support of your position and one that you will argue against):
o In the paper, you will draw on some aspects of an article or editorial which you agree with in order to further support of your position.
o But you will also draw on elements in another author’s work that you disagree with, and argue against their claims and reasoning to further support your own opposing position.
o In other words, you will use at least one article as a positive foil to further support your own thesis and argument, and you will use at least one article as a negative foil to argue against in support of your view to the contrary.
o In both cases you will need to introduce the ideas and claims of these outside papers/articles sufficiently for your reader to be able to follow, and while you may quote, paraphrasing and putting matters in your own words (while still appropriately citing sources) demonstrates better understanding and mastery of the material which you are drawing upon.
General Suggestions for Writing Conceiving of Your Audience
When writing, address your paper to an imagined audience of unsympathetic, highly-critical, and uninterested readers: someone who isn’t knowledgeable, doesn’t care for you, is annoyed and judgmental, and doesn’t want to be there. If you can convince such an audience, or if you can at least get them to follow your argument and understand it as a plausible position, then you will be able to pitch your argument to anyone. Crafting your paper with such an imagined, “nightmare” audience in mind will ensure that your argument is as strong and well-crafted as it can be. Expecting your audience to be such “nightmare readers” is an exercise in preparing for the worst, while hoping for the best. Preparing for the worst possible audience will make your writing much easier to follow and your arguments much stronger for more typical, “non-nightmare” readers.
Originality
Your paper should show some level of independent, creative thought in how you present your thesis, the arguments your present for it, and/or the way you and explain/analyze the subject matter:
• You might seek to present an existing thesis/conclusion in a novel or illuminating way.
• You should seek to come up with original arguments, novel justifications, and new examples in support of your thesis (even if the thesis itself is not wholly original).
• Your explanation of relevant ideas/concepts and reconstruction of others’ views about the issues in contention can demonstrate originality.
• Originality might take the form of combining ideas from different sources in a creative or novel way.
• While demonstrating original, independent thinking, try to also be clear, precise, rigorous, and concise: those are true virtues of good argumentative writing.
Readability
• Make sure your writing is as easy to understand and comprehensible as it can be. Avoid overly-complex, ornate, or overly-technical phrasing when doing so would stand in the way of comprehensibility.
• Choose your words precisely.
• Be as clear as possible.
• Make your writing as concise as possible without sacrificing clarity or important detail & nuance.
• When you use technical vocabulary or concepts, make sure you define, explain, and employ them appropriately/accurately.
• Avoid overly complex sentences and phrases. Simplify and break these down into shorter pieces. Think about what each word is doing for you, and edit out words/phrases that are unnecessary for your point to come across.
Guidelines for Your Introduction
Please avoid fluffy, flowery introductions: nothing like “Since the dawn of time, mankind has wondered about…”. Nope: get to the point. What’s the issue, and what’s your view about it? In your introduction, just (briefly) introduce the topic, then tell me what you are going to argue about it (your thesis), and finally, tell me how you are going to argue for this position (your argumentative roadmap). That is, briefly introduce the subject-matter, state the thesis/conclusion you will argue for, and then give your roadmap or plan for arguing for this thesis in your paper: e.g. “First, I will explain … Next, I will argue … Then, I will engage … Finally, I will …”.
So, in brief, your Introduction should:
1. Briefly introduce the topic of the paper.
2. Contain a clear statement of what you’ll be arguing for (your precise, determinate thesis/conclusion).
3. Contain a clear statement of how you’ll argue for it (your argumentative plan or roadmap for the paper).
4. Be clearly and concisely on point (topic, thesis, plan) as possible.
Your introduction should not:
1. Contain excess fluff, filler, or frill.
2. Contain too much background information and detail: save that for body paragraphs.
3. Be challenging for a reader to easily follow.
4. Fail to contain a clear and precise thesis or argumentative plan.
Guidelines for Your Body Paragraphs
(Yes, you are only writing one body paragraph for the purpose of this assignment, but in general, here are some guidelines for the body of your paper.)
General Guidelines for the Body of the Paper
• The body of your paper should employ a number of helpful transitional/organization-guiding phrases (i.e. guidepost/signpost words like “first,” “next,” “last,” or etc.) throughout to let readers know they are in your argument plan/roadmap that you supplied in the introduction. Using such guides or signposting words/phrases (e.g. “in this section, I will argue that …” or “now I will explain how….”) will clue your readers in to where you are in your overall plan for the essay and thus help them better follow your argument.
• Also, as far as possible, your paper should clearly spell out the role of each paragraph and section of your paper, and simplify these as best you can. If the point of one paragraph is too convoluted and/or multifarious your readers will likely have difficulty following. • The Body of your Paper should:
1. Provide an explanation and analysis of the topic/issue and an exposition of the relevant background literature.
2. Present your own argument in a clear, precise, consistent way, avoiding mistakes and fallacies of argument.
Let’s look at these last two items (1 & 2 above) in turn.
(1.) Explaining Background Information on the Topic / Providing Exposition of Other Author’s Work
The exposition of other authors’ arguments—whether you are supporting them or arguing against them—should come in the body of your paper. Remember: don’t present a caricature of your argumentative opponents’ positions. Even views you disagree with should be articulated/reconstructed in their strongest possible terms—be as charitable as you can in laying them out. Only then proceed to criticize them. Affording your opponents this charity of interpretation helps make your own criticisms of them and their arguments stronger, thus strengthening your own contrary viewpoint. If you can show that your opponents and their arguments are mistaken, even when these opponents’ arguments are presented in their strongest possible terms, you will have strengthened your own, opposing argument and position. You will have positioned yourself into a better position vis-à-vis a more worthwhile opponent.
More generally you should, when providing background or exposition of others arguments:
• Paraphrase, or put matters in your own words, when possible; this is preferable to direct quote, because it demonstrates your comprehension of the other author’s points. (Still, remember to cite! You have to cite sources even when you don’t use their words, but just their ideas.)
• Explain the topic/issue being addressed and the ideas/concepts involved therein as clearly and precisely as you can. Analyze/break down the matter into their constituent parts and their relations.
• Provide a clear & charitable interpretation of the relevant sections of other authors’ work, including those you are arguing against. Do not present others’ views as straw men (a fallacy we discussed). Your own argument is improved and strengthened to the extent that you are able to argue against opposing views cached in their strongest possible terms.
(2.) Presenting your own argument in a clear, precise, consistent way
• Pitch your claims at an appropriate level of strength, avoiding overstatements—appropriately qualify or temper your premises and conclusions.
• Make the considerations or reasons you present in favor of your thesis (premises), as clear, precise, and concise as you possibly can.
• Make it clear how your arguments lead to your thesis/conclusion. The inferential/argumentative structure of your paper should not be a guessing game: it should be obvious to the reader how the pieces fit together in support of your thesis/conclusion.
• Use plenty of particular, tailored examples and specific pieces of evidence (or data) to support your contentions.
• Be sure to think about how to make each example or each consideration as strong as it can possibly be in support of your argument and thesis. Ask what each detail might do, and whether changing, removing, or adding it strengthens your argumentative point.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Update your portfolios from Phase 4 using feedback from faculty.
Part 2 Tasks (Objective from Week 5):
Append to this portfolio 1 last project that includes the design of an artificial intelligence agent. Specifically, your company has asked your team to design an app that will complete a Sudoku game, given any starting state of the game. See this Web site for the rules.
Part 2a: State Space
Describe how you plan to search for the Sudoku solution given a starting state.
Clearly define your state space here: What does a vertex in your state traversal tree represent?
Part 2b: Traversal Time Complexity
Assuming you were to naively traverse your state space, what is the upperbound time complexity (in terms of Big-O) of a brute force searching algorithm?
Present this result in terms of n and p where nxn is the size of the Sudoku board and p is the number of possible numbers (1–9) permitted in a square.
Part 2c: Heuristic Search
What type of heuristic search would you employ to search this state space in hopes to reduce the search time?
Think about the problem and how you might search this state-space tree.
Part 2d: Pseudocode
Create pseudocode that finds the solution to a Sudoku game using a brute force search or using your heuristic discussed above.
To simplify this task, assume that you have standard data structures available to you, such as stacks and queues.
Think of someone who, in the past, did an excellent job of motivating you. Describe how this was done. Which of the following approaches did that person use (either explicitly or implicitly)?
2. Discuss how behavior modification operates to motivate people. Why is it still important to understand people’s needs when using this approach?
3. Explain the differences between negative reinforcement and punishment?
4. The Piano Builder
Waverly Bird builds pianos from scratch and is also a consultant to a piano manufacturer. In the latter job, he is on call and works about one week a month, which sometimes includes traveling, to solve customers’ problems. He also rebuilds about a dozen grand pianos every year for special customers. However, according to Bird, the most satisfying part of his life is his hobby of building pianos from the beginning. “It’s the part that keeps a man alive,” he says. The challenge of the work is what lures Bird onward. He derives satisfaction from precision and quality, and he comments, “Details make the difference. When you cut a little corner here and a little corner there, you’ve cut a big hole. A piano is like the human body; all the parts are important.” Bird has a substantial challenge in making a whole piano. His work combines skills in cabinetmaking, metalworking, and engineering, with knowledge of acoustics and a keen ear for music. It requires great precision, because a tiny misalignment would ruin a piano’s tune. It also requires versatility: A keyboard must be balanced to respond to the touch of a finger; the pinblock, on the other hand, must withstand up to 20 tons of pressure. In addition, Bird had to make many of his own piano construction tools. Bird has built 40 pianos in his 34-year career. Though construction takes nearly a year, he sells his pianos at the modest price of a commercial piano. He is seeking not money but challenge and satisfaction. He says, “The whole business is a series of closed doors. You learn one thing, and there’s another closed door waiting to be opened.” Bird says his big dream is to build a grand piano: “It is the one thing I haven’t done yet and want to do.”
How could a manufacturer of pianos build the motivation Bird has now into its employees?
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
