Evaluating a Doctoral Study and Research Methodology Order Instructions: Evaluating a Doctoral Study— Research Methodology
The writer should reference back to #113400 for the Doctoral Rubric mention here as that was used for that paper and will be the same Rubric to be used for this paper.
A well-defined research problem points to a method of investigation. For each method, an appropriate data collection technique should be applied. This week you will begin an evaluation of the doctoral study you selected from ProQuest, using the doctoral study rubric from Walden University for comparison. Be sure you select a completed research study that includes data analysis and data collections sections, not an article. Consider the doctoral study problem and its relation to the research methodology and data collection methods employed in the study. Is there an appropriate relation between each element? Use appropriate references to the course readings about data collection methods to address the following questions:
• What were the data collection methods used for the study? Justify why they were or were not appropriate.
• Was the research design consistent with the methods chosen?
• What additional items could the author have said about the data collection strategies?
• Do you think the data needed to answer the research question(s) could have been collected differently—why or why not? What other methods would you recommend and why? If not, why not? This includes the data collection methods as well as how the methods were conducted or implemented.
• How does the information compare the criteria in the Walden DOC study rubric?
• Add any additional comments for evaluation not addressed above.
For all the questions above, remember to explain how you came to your conclusions. Support your answers with explanation or evidence drawn from the doctoral study and from course readings. Use the doctoral study rubric to grade the following elements:
• The background
• The problem statement
• The purpose statement of the study
Central research question
I will be sending the chosen article for this paper via email
Resources:
Evaluating a Doctoral Study and Research Methodology Readings
Course Texts
Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
•Chapter 5, “Five Different Qualitative Studies”
This chapter presents several examples of qualitative research that are models for the five approaches you learned about in Week 1.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
•Chapter 1, “Getting Started: How to Know Whether and When to Use the Case Study as a Research Method”
This chapter explains the criteria for determining whether or not a case study approach is an appropriate method for your research study.
•Chapter 2, “Designing Case Studies: Identifying Your Case(s) and Establishing the Logic of Your Case Study” (pp. 27-37)
By examining five components of research design, these pages provide the foundation necessary to successfully design a case study.
American Psychological Association, (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
(Note: You should have received this reference text for a previous course. The APA Publication Manual will be used as a resource throughout this program.)
•Chapters 4–-6
Evaluating a Doctoral Study and Research Methodology Sample Answer
Abstract
This study is based on the final presentation of Sheila Hadley Strider’s doctoral dissertation on Ethical Business Decision Making Considering Stakeholder interest at Walden University, College of Management and Technology. The study identifies individual values, experiences and believes as espoused from personal upbringing, peer influence and environment that naturally shape or influence ethical behavior in most people.
The background of the research explores individual attributes in decision-making processes and the ethical implications that affect stakeholders. The author extensively covers the ethical nature of decision making processes in most business organizations and the challenges that ethical managers face in an unethical society.
The author conducted a qualitative research by collecting data using semi structured interviews through the phone and which were later transcribed after being verified. Ethical behavior is an individual attribute that can only be revealed through skilled interviews and qualitative design features. The research design also allows an in-depth revelation of a leader’s ability or will to make ethical decisions (Yin, 2014). The author has also revealed the nature and how the processes of the research data collection methods were conducted and the procedures for withdrawal and data safeguards.
The research design was consistent with the qualitative nature of research that required utmost skills to depict the values and beliefs that are the leaders believed in and their propensity to make the right decisions and which are also ethical.
The author should have included some personal physical interview with a few respondents to make an overall judgment on the intensity and impact of ethical issues to individual persons in relation to the increasingly unethical behavior in public corporations especially with the constant financial crisis that occurs largely due to financial improprieties by the concerned managers.
The data would have been best collected through personal interviews but it would have been impractical in certain circumstances and it would have been more costly. However, the phone interviews provided the required information. The semi structured interview questions used to collect the data was appropriate but I would have preferred a questionnaire with a weighted answer that would allow the intensity of the answer to be revealed.
The problem statement clearly outlines the need for ethical evaluation in decision making processes in an evolving world where ethical standards are gradually being eroded due to short term gains for a few unscrupulous business leaders. These unethical behaviors have led to the collapse of giant corporations, economic crisis and environmental disasters globally (Yandle, 2010). The problem statement has both hook and anchor that draws attention to the need of the study. The research also reveals all the variables required and the specific problem under study.
The purpose of the study has been defined very well in the research sturdy as it seeks to provide more insights into what influences ethical behavior in our contemporary society. The purpose of the study is complete with the location of the study being the eastern half of the US.
To conclude, the doctoral research has included most of the requirements under the rubric and it has outlined and undertaken a comprehensive research on ethical business decision making and its impact to stakeholders. The research is very significant especially to policy researchers on human capital development, government officials and also to general businessmen.
Evaluating a Doctoral Study and Research Methodology Reference
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yandle, B. (2010). Lost trust, the real cause of the financial meltdown. The Independent
Review, 14(3), 341-361. Retrieved from http://www.independent.org/
