Evidence Based Practice Project on Diabetes Order Instructions: Details: Identify research or evidence-based article that focuses comprehensively on a specific intervention or new diagnostic tool for the treatment of diabetes in adults or children.
In a paper of 750-1,000 words, summarize the main idea of the research findings for a specific patient population. Research must include clinical findings that are current, thorough, and relevant to diabetes and the nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
Benchmark Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Research or Evidence-Based Article Identified. Article Focuses on a Specific Diabetic Intervention or New Diagnostic Tool.
Research or evidence-based article not identified.
Research or evidence-based article identified but does not address a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in general.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention and a diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in a comprehensive manner, allowing all criteria of assignment to be fully addressed.
50.0 %Summary of Article Includes the Following Content: Discussion of Research Performed Clinical Findings, and Significance to Nursing Practice.
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Does not demonstrate an understanding of the basic principles. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the overall program subject.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Demonstrates a shallow understanding of the basic principles only a surface level of evaluation is offered, methods are described but flawed or unrealistic and strategies are discussed, but incomplete.
Content is complete but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Demonstrates an adequate understanding of the basic principles. Reasonable but limited inferences and conclusions are drawn but lack development. Supporting research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or currentness.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Sections form a cohesive logical and justified whole. Shows careful planning and attention to details and illuminates relationships. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive. Presents ideas and information beyond that presented through the course, and substantiates their validity through solid, academic research where appropriate. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria. Final paper exhibits the process of creative thinking and the development of the proposal. Applies the framework of knowledge, practice and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; the purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. An organization is disjointed.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in the organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to the purpose.
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
The prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
A writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format
3.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. The writer appears to be unaware of the audience. Use of ‘primer prose’ indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
The writer is clearly aware of the audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
2.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
The reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
The reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
The reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage
Evidence Based Practice Project on Diabetes Sample Answer
Evidence-Based Practice on Diabetes
Considering that Diabetes is a health concern in America, it is important that the diseases if efficiently diagnosed through the use of appropriate tools in order to have a clear understanding of its control, a factor that can be achieved through the education of patients (Nathan, Kuenen, Borg, Zheng, Schoenfeld, & Heine, 2012). This point to the fact that is easier to determine the appropriate interventions that can be applied in the management of this disease.
According to sources from the Centre of Disease Control in America, diabetes is highly increasing in with the number of affected individuals swelling up to 18.2 million from the initial figures that stood at 5.6 million between 2000 and 2010 (Nathan, et.al. 2012). In addition to this, it is significant to determine that CDC has also reported approximately 7 million individuals who are undiagnosed with the disease.
In this case, it can be established that diabetes requires the incorporation of early interventions since it is caused by an increase in patients insulin levels of an insufficient supply of insulin. If this disease is not detected in its early stages, it can result in the destruction of an individual’s body system (Nathan, et.al. 2012). Through the inclusion of evidence-based diagnostic tool, the state of this disease is likely to be identified in its early stages, a factor that will result in the deployment of early interventions and the training of the patients in its management.
There are two primary types of diabetes in which type 1 is likely to be diagnosed among the adults and children since as a result of the body’s failure to produce its function in the production of insulin (Nathan, et.al. 2012). According to the findings of research conducted by the American Association of Diabetes, close to 5% of patients suffer from this type of diabetes. The treatment approach of this type of diabetes includes the use of insulin therapy and other treatment methods.
Diabetes 2, which is the most widespread, occurs as a result of inadequate insulin in the body as well as poor utilization of insulin available in the body by the cells. This leads to an increase in the quantity of glucose in the body which has diverse impacts like kidney damage, eyes, nerves and the heart which can have fatal consequences (Nathan, et.al. 2012). Considering the fact that diabetes type 2 is complex to handle, it is vital its management and intervention be done during the early stages in order to avoid negative impacts on the body cells.
An Evidence-Based Diabetes Diagnostic Tool
It is essential for patients diagnosed with diabetes to partake regular health checkups including laboratory testing in clearly analyzing the proper treatment methods for these patients. In line with this, a laboratory testing toll known as AIC is considered efficient in the diagnosis of this disease. Over the past, the AIC testing toll was used in checking and determining the average glucose levels in a diabetic patient for a period of three months (Nathan, et.al. 2012). Physicians would, therefore, include the fasting blood glucose to establish the levels of glucose in the body, a factor that would result in the acquisition of wrong results especially in instances where a patient had not eaten.
However, current research on this evidence-based diagnostic tool has established that this evidence-based diagnostic tool known as AIC would give the physicians an understanding of a patient’s blood glucose level. This can be achieved through an averaged approach that bases in the percentage system without encountering diagnostic errors when the use of the fasting patient’s blood glucose testing is included (Nathan, et.al. 2012). The AIC test approach has been considered essential since it does not require a diabetic patient to fast for a period of eight hours before the test. In as much as this testing approach is considered crucial, some medical practitioners have termed it as confusing since it incorporates the average system which may be a challenging concept to depict. Through an AIC derived average glucose study, the average system was established to be easier for the patients and well as the medical personnel to understand.
The rationale behind the average glucose study was to clearly identify whether the accumulated AIC results could be articulated through the same units utilized in monitoring the daily levels of glucose in a patient’s body. As established, ADAG has considered as effective considering that it provided a mathematical equation that would be utilized in converting the achieved results that would establish the average glucose level (Nathan, et.al. 2012). ADAG, therefore, proved that through the trials that were conducted on 507 patients within ten different international centers, the results of an AIC would be expressed through an estimated average level of glucose by using a mathematical equation. Additionally, this study also confirmed that there are assumptions that the AIC tool represents only the average glucose estimates.
The methodologies that were employed in this research were directed towards doing a comparison of the values of AIC on each and every patient. This, therefore, required a daily glucose reading for a period of two days within the time intervals of four hours (Nathan, et.al. 2012). The research study, therefore, utilized close to 2700 glucose measurements that were effectively analyzed through the use of a linear regressive concept to determine the relationship with the results which were obtained before the research. It is therefore essential to establish that the AIC evidence-based diagnostic tool is effective in the identification of several diabetic patients as opposed to the other methods.
Evidence Based Practice Project on Diabetes References
Nathan, D. M., Kuenen, J., Borg, R., Zheng, H., Schoenfeld, D., & Heine, R. J. (2012). Translating the A1C Assay Into Estimated Average Glucose Values. Diabetes Care, 31(8), 1473-1478. doi:10.2337/dc08-0545. Retrieved From: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=34075496&site=ehost-live
