Proposal in Healthcare Access Problem Order Instructions: Search for proposal(s) by your state(ARIZONA) governor to deal with a health care access problem and write a paper of 1,250?1,500 words that outline the elements of the current program and the governor’s proposals for improved access.
A minimum of three scholarly sources must be cited. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
80.0 % Content (80%)
Content is incomplete and omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are irrelevant to the assignment. No outside sources were used to support major points. Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are not clear and/or not persuasive. No outside sources were used to support major points. Content is adequate and meets most of the requirements stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are addressed. Research is evident. Content is comprehensive and accurate, definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are supported. Research is adequate, up to date, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria. At least two relevant academic sources were cited. Content is comprehensive and accurate; definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are well supported. Research is adequate, up to date, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria. Three or more relevant academic sources were cited.
17.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
6.0 % Paper Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; the purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
6.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. The organization is disjointed.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in the organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to the purpose.
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
The prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
3.0 %Format
1.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
GCU template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
GCU template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
GCU template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
GCU template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
2.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
The reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
The reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
The reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage
Proposal in Healthcare Access Problem Sample Answer
In recent times, it is essential to come up with effective strategies or proposals to improve the operations in the health sector. Adoption of these measures impacts the health sector positively by ensuring improved access to health care services to all people. The need to improve the type of health care received by the people has prompted the various states to come up with effective policies and proposals that lead to positive outcomes (Sommers et al, 2012). The health systems of different states have been designed to suit the best strategies and proposals forwarded and implemented in the best possible way. Arizona is among the many states that seek to modernize its Medicaid programs. In this case, the governor of Arizona State has taken that initiative to come up with the proposal and plans to enhance better access to healthcare. The governor gave a proposal of the AHCCCS care program that would revolutionize the health sector in Arizona. The major problem faced by the state is inadequate healthcare services that do not fit or attain the requirements of a modernized Medicaid program (Sommers et al, 2012). The plan unveiled by the proposal would, therefore, address the problems of health care access effectively.
The proposal by the Governor helped modernize and make major improvements to the AHCCCS Medicaid program of Arizona which has plans on addressing the issue of access to healthcare. During the proposal for the Medicaid program plan, various elements were identified to compose the care plan. The program focuses on various elements such as engagement, choice, responsibility, and accountability. The AHCCCS program resulting from the Governor’s proposal also focuses and aims to achieve some set objectives to revolutionize the healthcare sector (Jacobs & Callaghan.2013). Some of the issues focused on by the program include promoting quality of healthcare at subsidized costs, encouraging wellness, increasing individual responsibility and expansion of health technology. All these issues focus on ensuring better access to healthcare services in the Arizona state addressing the problems. The governor identified health costs as a major issue hindering the accessibility to health care services among the people in the state. In this case, the governor was of the opinion that the program should address the issue and ensure that the healthcare provider is quality and cost-effective in nature (Jacobs & Callaghan, 2013).
Through the program, people would be able to receive enhanced services not offered by the Medicaid program currently and allowing them to take charge of their individual health. The program also ensures the full protection of taxpayers in the state from fraud and rewarding individual responsibility with the aim of eliminating abuse in the health system (Jacobs & Callaghan, 2013). The steadfast commitment to focus on the vulnerable and provision of quality care for those in the state is essential when making plans for the program. Such measures are considered very innovative and help in solving the health care access problems experienced in the state by its residents. The Governor’s plan also helps promote access to health care services by allowing people to carry their savings from their account with them while moving from the Medicaid program (Blumberg et al, 2013). The strategies would help the easier transition of people in the state wanting to move to the private insurance companies from the Medicaid program. Individuals would thus be able to join the co-pays and deductibles world thus eliminating the possible problems and hindrances of health care access that are experienced in the Medicaid program.
The Governor would collaborate with the AHCCCS program in ensuring a modernized approach to communications is adopted in the health system of Arizona. The approach would be enhanced through innovative technology. The strategy would ensure patients get access to management tools for their chronic diseases and also manage aspects of urgent care online while interacting with primary care doctors (Blumberg et al, 2013). Such features of the proposal and plans for the program enhances better management of illness and accessibility to care, providers. The timely care is also made possible while patients in Arizona are protected from paying for appointments that are constantly missed while seeking healthcare services. Affordability of care and ensuring the quality of care is fundamental to improving the accessibility of healthcare and also its transformation in the Arizona state. The Governor proposes and implements the plan that encourages people to be proactive in nature while in the healthcare system of Arizona (Blumberg et al, 2013).
The Governor’s proposal to have a plan involving making changes on Arizona health system through cost containment would make it possible for the residents to access the services which were previously hindered by high costs (Sommers et al,2012). The Medicaid plans have ensured that residents of Arizona that live on a low-income would be covered as compared to previous times where they were left out. The proposal and plans have made it possible to cover even those below the poverty level through the elimination of spend-down category which cost the residents high medical bills thus limiting their access to healthcare services. The provision of care to those who need it most and having a responsible Medicaid program as proposed by the Governor would have positive impacts in the health sector (Sommers et al, 2012). In a nutshell, the effective implementation of plans would improve access to healthcare services for the residents of Arizona State.
Proposal in Healthcare Access Problem References
Blumberg, S. J., Ganesh, N., Luke, J. V., & Gonzales, G. (2013). Wireless substitution: state-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2012. National health statistics reports, (70).
Jacobs, L. R., & Callaghan, T. (2013). Why states expand Medicaid: Party, resources, and history. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law, 38(5), 1023-1050.
Sommers, B. D., Baicker, K., & Epstein, A. M. (2012). Mortality and access to care among adults after state Medicaid expansions. New England Journal of Medicine, 367(11), 1025-1034.
