Review of Qualitative Research Design Order Instructions: Review of qualitative research design
While neither quantitative nor qualitative approaches can be considered complete without bias, qualitative methodologies and methods are, by far, the more subjective of the two.
In all research, the presence of the researcher, their choices and their interpretations, have a bearing on the work undertaken and data collection methods are chosen. Qualitative researchers have a greater level of involvement drawing on their own backgrounds, experiences and perceptions in their interpretation of the data collected. Qualitative research, therefore, has a degree of ‘built-in’ bias which should be acknowledged in a research study.
Read the Required Learning Resources for Review of Qualitative Research Design
Return to your qualitative research designs from last week
Critically reflect on the types of qualitative data collection methods that you could use in your research, considering their benefits and limitations. Consider how you might overcome the challenges that you may encounter when implementing research using the qualitative methodology, including the management and analysis of data.
My research:
Interpretive Research
Aim: To identify and explore the human resource strategies that influence employee engagement within organizations in Qatar and to develop recommendations on how these human resource strategies can be changed in order to improve employee engagement.
Review of Qualitative Research Design and Research Questions
RQ 1: Which human resource strategies influence employee engagement within organizations in Qatar?
RQ 2: How do these human resource strategies influence employee engagement within organizations in Qatar?
RQ 3: How can these human resource strategies be changed in order to improve employee engagement within organizations in Qatar?
End Product:Objective: To develop recommendations on how human resource strategies can be changed in order to improve employee engagement within organizations in Qatar.
Review of Qualitative Research Design Sample Answer
Review of Qualitative Research Design
Introduction
This project will focus on identifying and exploring the human resource strategies that influence employee engagement within organizations in Qatar. In addition, the project will develop recommendations on how these human resource strategies can be changed in order to improve employee engagement. The project will embrace qualitative techniques due to their uniqueness and depend on texts as well as image information (Creswell, 2014). Besides, the qualitative methodology can present flexibility based on its structure that is largely anchored on the interpretive approach (Collis & Hussey, 2013). In other words, findings strongly reflect the subject being explored. In general, qualitative methodology is a collection of interpretive methods that not only seek to describe but also decode, translate and find the meaning of natural occurrences. (Van Maanen (1979). Therefore, the objectives of this study will be guided by a number of research questions.
Research Questions
- Which human resource strategies influence employee engagement within organizations in Qatar?
- How do these human resource strategies influence employee engagement within organizations in Qatar?
- How can these human resource strategies be changed in order to improve employee engagement within organizations in Qatar?
Objective
To develop recommendations on how human resource strategies can be changed in order to improve employee engagement within oorganizationsin Qatar.
Qualitative Research Methods
This study will use focus group discussion and structured interviews. Structured interviews are appropriate for this study because questions are standardized, hence participants views can be compared while allowing the researcher to observe trends. In addition, structured interviews can provide detailed views about the human resource strategies that influence employee engagement within organisations in Qatar (Cassell et al., 2009). However, the personality of the interviewer can affect the responses making the results unreliable. On the other hand, focus group discussions will be important in collecting detailed information on human resource strategies. Compared to interviews, focus group discussions are cheap and time efficient. Nevertheless, focus groups can be complex to analyse. Again, they can lead to disagreements and irrelevant views, thus distract the major objective of a research project.
Review of Qualitative Research Design Analysis Strategy
In a qualitative study, the main analytical strategies include computer software such as SPSS and Excel, data reduction, data representation and arriving at conclusions based on the data (Collis & Hussey, 2013). For this project, the appropriate analysis strategy is the use of computer software to code and reduce data while eliminating engaging tasks related to data collection (Collis & Hussey, 2013). In qualitative research, this strategy is useful when it comes to organising and managing the collected information and representing patterns within the information. However, a researcher should learn how to use this strategy before trying to implement it.
Validity Strategies
Validity refers to the degree by which sound measures help the researcher draw the conclusion. In qualitative research, validity is an important component because of its major strength in evaluating the accuracy of the findings from the researcher’s standpoint (Creswell, 2014). Various strategies will be used to determine the validity of the study. This will include the use of interviews and focus group discussions on measuring human resource strategies that influence employee engagement in various organisations in Qatar.
Review of Qualitative Research Design Conclusions
Qualitative research that is anchored on structured interviews is essential when it comes to interrogating a certain issue. In this case, the study set out to investigate the significance of human resource strategies in altering employee engagement within an organisation. This is largely because with the qualitative approach the researcher will be able to decode, translate and establish the essence of natural occurrences. However, certain factors may impact the outcome of any study.
Review of Qualitative Research Design References
Bryman, A. and Bell, E., 2015. Business research methods. Oxford University Press, USA.
Buchanan, D.A. and Bryman, A., 2007. Contextualizing methods choice in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 10(3), pp.483-501.
Cassell, C., Bishop, V., Symon, G., Johnson, P. and Buehring, A., 2009. Learning to be a qualitative management researcher. Management Learning, 40(5), pp.513-533.
Collis, J. and Hussey, R., 2013. Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students. Palgrave Macmillan.
Creswell, J.W., 2013. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage publications.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P and Thornhill, A. 2012. Research Methods for Business Students, 6th ed. Pearson Learning Solutions.
Van Maanen, J. (1979) ‘Reclaiming Qualitative Methods for Organizational Research: A Preface’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), pp.520-26.
