The Day the Cowboys Quit Book Analysis

The Day the Cowboys Quit

Order Instructions:

The four page typed book report over “The Day The Cowboys Quit“. The book report may be a general review of the material, a report on a particular topic of interest from the book, or the contributions of one or more significant characters from the story,
and must include at least two primary sources of information which are cited in the report.

Format Instructions:
1. Includes a cover/title page.
2. Begins with a standard introductory paragraph.
3. Typed/double spaced with a font no greater than 14.
4. One inch side margins, two inch top margin, one inch bottom margin.
5. Minimum of four pages excluding cover sheet and citation page.
6. Includes a minimum of two citations from primary sources.
7. No more than three direct quotations from the book (quotations must be cited).

SAMPLE ANSWER

The Day the Cowboys Quit

Introduction

The book ‘The Day the Cowboys Quit’ is a book written by Elmer Kelton that describes a strike that happened at Old Tascosa in the Texas Panhandle in 1883. The story is set against the background of the great Canadian River Cowboy strike of the 1883. This book is crucial to a reader by giving a benefit of thought of what was happening at this period. The book also brings forth the complexity and excitement of the main character in the story, Hugh Hitchcock. In addition, the book has an interest in describing a specific interest inside changing dynamic from the new West. The book represent on how cattle ranching was used by corporations and syndicates to make profits out of the cowboys. As reader goes through the book, elements of complexities in making both great and damaging choices will be seen mostly from the main character, Hitchcock. Therefore, the following discussion will engage in describing a general view of the book.

General review

The tale in ‘The day the Cowboys Quit’ is a true event that happened in the Texas Panhandle in 1883. The strike that is happening at this time by the cowboys was initially precipitated by activities that happened before in regarding the relationship between the rancher owners and the cowboys themselves. Elmer Kelton describes the cowboys as honest and true men who worked diligently to the ranch owners. Before even the strike was planned, the cowboys had the opportunity to own some cattle of which they had a huge turnover from them as they controlled cattle farming inside the American West. The rancher owners allowed cowboys to own cattle because they knew that cowboy’s job was a hard one, and there was a need to give bonuses to those who exemplified hard work and diligence (Kelton 54). In addition, the cowboys had the chance to own horses on their own. The cowboys also enjoyed the privileges of changing their owner’s brands to their own brand. However, these cowboys soon discovered that the ranch owners were not happy with the fact that they owned cattle. The source of the problem can be attributed to three men: the old time land rancher, the big rancher manager and Hitchcock who is seen trying to accumulate the most cattle. All these men have one thing in common: greed. The story goes that the ranch owners and managers were bitter with the cowboys as the cowboys managed more in the farming industry (Kelton 112). They therefore devised way of coming with laws to counteract this trend. . This is what made the cowboys angry and plotted a strike to deal with the cattle owners. The ranch owners started viewing the cowboys as pieces of larger puzzle of the ranch and not as people of worth and value. However, not all ranch owners were against the cowboys on owning the cattle. For instance, Charlie, a ranch owner, differed to Selkirk by arguing that the cowboys were good people, and there was no reason whatsoever to deny them these privileges. However, his position was changed immediately when Hitchcock informed him that Law, (hitch friend who is also a cowboy), stole his (hitch) cattle.

In the beginning, the cowboys were not very determined about the strike, but as time progressed, emotions and felling became increased in severity. Some cowboys were not interested in engaging in the strike, for instance, Hitch, working under Charlie, was against the strike. During all time, Hitchcock was an undercover to the other cowboys, and became its unofficial leader. As the leader of the group, Hitchcock proposed that the ranch owner (Charlie) to pay them fifty dollars a month and send each proposal to other rancher. However, this proposal was ignored as Serkik refused to receive the statement on payments (Kelton 145). This made the cowboys to become weaker and weaker as food issue became a problem. Problems were heightened when some strikers started leaving the group. In fact, Hitch himself decided to leave the group and become a small rancher. Later, Hitchcock was advised a fellow cowboy that Charlie was going to have the smaller brands declared illegal. Therefore, to act responsively on this statement, Hitch drove his cattle across the county line, but he was hit and his cattle were taken away. The spirit of rebellion was now rejuvenated in Hitch and as a result devised ways on how to get his herd of cattle back.

During this activities in searching his stolen cattle, Hitch was informed by a fellow cowboy that Law was about to be hanged by ranch owners for being found stealing cattle. He quickly sets to rescue his friend but found that Law had been already lynched by the time he arrived at the ranch. He opted to get assistance from sheriff who he found out that he had already quitted. The course of the strike changed by Hitch starting to campaign for the sheriff and as a matter of surprise he successfully won. He was now determined to avenge the death of Law, and consequently, he warranted for murder for person who hanged Law. However, his motive to punish the murderer was not meet as the jury listening to the murder case of Law had different opinion (Kelton 167). In the ‘court room’, one judge told Hitch that a retrial would of wasting time in getting justice to law, but reinforced Hitch’s statement that no vigilance justice would be tolerated. Revenge was manifested in the courtroom when Rascal (Serkirk’ cowboy) short Dodge, the new Sherriff, because his boss had not paid him what he owned him.

While Hitch is trying his best to evade new rules, the ranchers on the other hand are devising a strategic way to silence the strikers without using force. The officials of the ranchers started firing the cowboys on the spot. The rancher owners started luring the strikers to accept a slight increase in wages and fired those who declined the offer. To demonstrate that they were serious, the rancher owners continued with roundup plans by hiring replacement workers at temporarily increased wages (Kelton 234).The strike was now deeming to cease, as most of the replacement workers were actually the strikers who asked their respective bosses to resume work. In two months tome, the strike was much weakened due to many roundups occurred without incidents. Lack of enthusiasm and poor organization led the strike to finally fizzle out of its mission. It is observed that many cowboys went back to their actual stations while others drifted and got work at the less regulated outfits that still reigned farther to the south. The book ends dramatically with the workers left under the mercy of those who had earlier stripped their way of life

Works Cited

Kelton, Elmer. The Day the Cowboys Quit. New York: Forge, 2008. Print.

Kelton, E. The day the cowboys quit. New York: Tor. 2013. Print.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Summary of Adam Smith’s view in ‘The Wealth of Nations’

Order Instructions:

Please write at undergraduate level.

Summarise Adam Smith’s views in The Wealth of Nations. Your discussion should include an account of the notion of the “invisible hand” and Smith’s view of the appropriate role of government. Your essay may also include a summary of the alternatives to the free market that were explored in the twentieth century, and some of the difficulties they encountered.

Please gather information from the following readings:
Notes on Smith
Extract from The Wealth of Nations
Notes on History of Economics

They will be added as files to the order.

SAMPLE ANSWER

Smith was one of the writers of the 20^th century who were the pioneers in shedding light on how the economic system operates in wealth creation in any particular environment. By the 20^th century, the three main options that were available to for a country to organize themselves were communism, the free market, and the mixed market economies (Smith, 2014). Among these options, the free market was the most prevalent system. However, the great depression of 1930s, the two world wars, and the vast gulf between the rich and the poor are some of the factors that made people lose faith in the free market system. However, China and Russia decided to embrace communism as opposed to the free market and mixed market system. The shortcoming of communism is that it becomes too complicated, since it becomes hard to be organized by the central authority when it grows large (Allen, 2011). However, mixed market economy becomes attractive from the sense that it can easily be organized by the central authority and there is no limit by which the market can grow. In addition, the free market system makes it possible to process large volumes of information that can effectively be used by the central authority to manage and grow their economy from all the sectors. According to Smith (2011), the mixed economy developed in Britain was problematic in the sense that people could not easily innovate and create wealth. Therefore, the living standards deteriorated and people began to protest and demonstrate against the government. Similarly, the mixed economy practiced in the United States became complex and costly to implement due to high taxation and slow means of operations. Due to complexity and problems that came with the mixed economy and communism, most countries were left with no option but to practice free market system. However, the free market system has been accused of widening the gap between the rich and the poor as is suspected to be one of the causes of the great depression and the First World War.

In his book The Wealth of Nations, Smith disputes the common belief that natural resources are the common factor responsible for creating the wealth of a country. Smith argues his case by purporting that not all nations with abundant natural resources are rich and not all countries that lack natural resources are poor. Therefore, natural resources by themselves do not create wealth and neither are they necessary for sustainable wealth creation. Since natural resources are not responsible for wealth creation in a country, Smith argues that trade is responsible for wealth creation. According to Smith (2014), trade is responsible for wealth creation through voluntary buying and selling between two parties. Through this exchange, both sides benefit in that their welfare is increased. What hold good at the level of individuals also holds good at the level of the companies since trade increases the welfare of both participants, whether they are individuals or entire nation.

With regards to the highly adopted free market system, Smith asserts that there exists an invisible hand that determines how it operates. According to Smith, this invisible and is perhaps the hand of God. The Godly invisible hand of the free market system automatically tunes people to operate with the benefit of others. The visible market in the free system may be misleading but it gives some insights on how the system operates. In this case, a trader will employ the most appropriate resources to produce the goods and services needed by their customers (Smith, 2014). Therefore, all businesses tend to produce high quality goods and services needed by their clients as they attempt to increase their sales. In return, the buyers will be able to receive high quality services at competitive prices. Consequently, people will tend to buy more of what they need, leading to wealth creation at the individual level and national level. The public will thus be able to receive high quality goods and services motivated by their own self-interest. According to Smith, free market support free choices that are supported by an invisible hand to bring about the use of resources and natural skills with the aim of supporting the whole community. Free market also enables people to work in an area of natural advantage by choosing what suits his lifestyle. Smith is of the view that the invisible hand of the free market ensures that resource and talents are utilized in a manner that brings maximum at the individual level and national level. These choices that are freely made at a personal level through the invisible hand maximize the use of human skills and natural resources.

In his book, The Wealth of Nations, Smith highlights the critical role played by the government in developing its economy. The statesman, through his authority, would give directions that should be followed as they employ the capital in producing various goods and services. The government, through its bureaucratic channels controls the millions of free players in the market. However, the government is not in a position to make millions of decisions that affect individual businesses in different parts of the country. In a situation whereby the government is allowed to make decisions for millions of ingle businesses, the decision making would be slow and the quality of goods will be reduced. According to Smith (2014), the government is in charge of gathering all the relevant information and issue instructions in accordance with the gathered information. The role of the government in this case is to provide an enabling environment for all individuals and company to carry out their mandate. However, Smith was very much concerned that a government endowed with so much private responsibility in a free market would be unrealistic. He argues that it would be dangerous to the citizens of a state to hand so much power to the government, as it would derail their effectiveness. In order to provide enabling environment in a free market, Smith believed that the government should protect the country from external attack, provide and enforce the legal framework, and provide the necessary infrastructure for businesses to occur. In providing the legal framework for businesses, the government ought to pass necessary legislation that protects businesses from exploitation and to punish the wrongdoers. Such a government is expected to supply a judicial system of courts, magistrates, and prisons. With respect infrastructure, the government should consider building roads, provide water, public lightning, drainage, among other public essentials that cannot be provided by individuals (Smith, 2013). These necessities enable businesses to run their operations smoothly and to make maximum profits with minimal distraction.

References

Allen, R. (2011). Global Economic History: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press

Smith, A. (2014). The Wealth of Nations. Simon & Brown

Smith, A. (2013). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Liberty Fund

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

The Submission by Amy Waldman

What perspective does Waldman’s novel bring to the idea of a memorial, and specifically to a 9/11 memorial?

Please answer the following question using the excerpt I have uploaded. Make sure to be as clear as possible keeping the three page limit. Be sure to pull
out examples from the test that answer the question.
Please be as precise and concise as possible.
Make sure you really answer the question given what’s in the text and elaborate.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Book Review of John Lindsay-Poland’s Emperors in the Jungle.

Write a 4-5 page, double-spaced, and typed book review of John Lindsay-Poland’s Emperors in the Jungle. The essay is to be a minimum of 4 full pages and a maximum of 5 full pages. Use 12 point font. Start at the top of the first page without putting
information such as course number. I recommend that you use Time New Roman for your font.

Your review needs to address the following items.

[1] Inform the reader what the author’s central question is.

[2] Identify 3-4 central themes that the author deploys in answering the question.

[3] Explain what the author’s central argument is.

[4] Advance an argument about the significance of the book for understanding Modern Latin American history. These elements of the essay do not necessarily have to be addressed in the sequential order presented above.

Note that a book review essay is not a book report. The latter normally provides a descriptive summary of the book, while the former is an analytical essay. The best review interrogates the book using ideas, questions, themes, arguments, and debates at play within our consideration of Modern Latin American history. Use parenthetical citations for the material.

You do not need a sources cited list.
Put your name on the back of the last page along with the course number. Staple your essay. You are responsible for keeping an electronic copy of the essay in a secure place until you have received your assignment grade.

You are responsible for producing an essay free of typographical errors and grammatical flaws. Please consult the handouts on writing that have been provided throughout the semester as tools for revising your essays toward a quality product.

Grading criteria

substance and clarity of central question identified
substance and clarity of themes analyzed
clarity of presentation of the author’s argument
strength of argument about the book’s significance
errors of omission and commission
clarity and substance of the writing
quality of writing.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

What Makes Therese from At Fault Uniquely American

Order Instructions:

At Fault by Kate Chopin

Paper instructions:
The final project should show evidence of careful and thoughtful development of the subject with attention to appropriate depth and detail. The project should be clear, coherent, and well organized. It should be free of errors that hinder meaning and free of plagiarized material.

Course Project Description
3For your project, you should choose a character from the novel you have read. Explain what makes that character uniquely American. Please feel free to think outside the box. There are characters within these novels that may not be legally or technically American but are tremendous examples of the American spirit. This gives you a lot of opportunity to really explore a character that interests you.You will need to incorporate many aspects of the novel to prove your case. Be sure to look at issues such as imagery, dialect, social and cultural influences, and point of view, among others.

Submission Instructions:
Your essays should be in MLA Style and approximately 5-6 pages, not including the Work(s) Cited page. As with most academic writing, this essay should be written in third person. Please avoid both first person (I, we, our, etc.) and second person (you, your). In the upper left-hand corner of the paper, place your name, the professor’s name, the course name, and the due date for the assignment on consecutive lines. Double space your information from your name onward, and don’t forget a title. All papers should be in Times New Roman font with 12-point type with one-inch margins all the way around your paper. All paragraph indentations should be indented five spaces (use the tab key) from the left margin. All work is to be left justified. When quoting lines in literature, please research the proper way to cite short stories, plays, or poems.You should use the online APUS library to look for scholarly sources. Be careful that you don’t create a “cut and paste” paper of information from your various sources. Your ideas are to be new and freshly constructed. Also, take great care not to plagiarize.

SAMPLE ANSWER

What Makes Therese from At Fault Uniquely American

By taking a look at Kate Chopin’s novel At Fault, the reader is tempted to ask what the American spirit is. Despite the existence of several differences in the manner in which individuals speak or look, these people happen to share characteristics and traits that represent the aspect of Americanism in a perfect way. In the novel “At Fault” by Kate Chopin, there exist several great examples of characters or individuals who exhibit the spirit of American. By taking a look beyond the main lot and surface, Theresa Lafirme happens to be among the characters who display the American spirit in Chopin’s novel. In this novel, Theresa symbolizes and portrays what the American spirit encompasses. Besides, this character plays a vital role in revealing what the American spirit has transformed her into despite of her descent, which is Creole. Theresa displays a unique sense or aspect of women’s independence and entrepreneurship. Moreover, this character demonstrates a rare aspect of motivation to excel and the liberty to express her emotion and love. In the subsequent paragraphs, the American spirit of Theresa will be elaborated via literary elements, which are present throughout Chopin’s novel such as motivation, setting, and protagonist. In the 19^th century, the way of life of Americans in the South cannot be elaborated better than by focusing on the setting surrounding the life of Theresa Lafirme (Russell 11).

The setting occurs during the post-reconstruction America in the late 19^th century in Northwestern Louisiana that is featured as the old South. Theresa is shown to live on Place-du-Bois that is located beside Cane River, which nears the Natchitoches town. This town is located between Texas and Louisiana. The subsequent involves an excerpt from the novel that elaborates the old southern landscape’s setting with combination of modernization. This idea is evident in Chopin’s statement:

“These hills extended in a long line of gradual descent far back to the wooded borders of lac du Bois; and within the circuit which they formed on the one side, and the irregular half circle of a sluggish bayou on the other, lay the cultivated open ground of the plantation-rich in its exhaustless powers of reproduction,” (2).

In this novel, Theresa is seen to portray unique sense of independence. This character demonstrates a high level of liberty in terms of thinking. Chopin argues that Theresa had an independence of thought, which was exceptional when viewed from the perspective of her life alongside its surrounding conditions. This form of thinking is perfect reflection of the true American spirit as it allows an individual to make decisions that are based on personal views as opposed to ideas of others. Theresa’s independence of mind or through was evident in her reactions to life issues such as divorce. For instance, Chopin claims that Theresa could refuse to answer any question about divorces as it was beyond her level (Chopin 32). This statement provides a clear revelation that Theresa’s opinions were not meant to please any one as she spoke what she felt was right. In relation to this, Theresa portrays the American spirit, which is vital for one’s survival. Moreover, the aspect of Theresa’s independence is revealed in the author’s statement that Theresa perceived divorce as a blessing. This statement happens to contradict the thinking of many women who fear the issue of divorce. In several occasions, most of the divorced women always think of it as the end of their happy lives. On the other hand, Theresa happens to view divorce an opportunity for the woman to better her life. Therefore, the social and cultural influences seem to have not affected the thinking of Theresa. Besides, Theresa is depicted to be independent from social influence in the scene where she talks to Homer about catholic religion. In this scene, Theresa made it clear to Homer that religion did not influence her reasoning on being married to him (Russell 18). As a character with the American spirit, Theresa believes that a woman can make it in life despite being divorced from her husband. As such, this character reflects the American spirit, which is based on independence. Besides, it is striking to note that Theresa has developed this independence despite living in a harsh condition.

Theresa demonstrates the American Spirit by exhibiting the freedom to express her emotions and love. Despite being a woman who is strict in her views and principles, Theresa manages to display her other side, which is characterized by emotions and love. In chapter 1.7 of the novel, Theresa’s ability to express emotion and love is shown when she communicates to Mr. Homer about his past marriage life. At the start of their conversation, Theresa is seen to be strict and unable to listen to Mr. Homer’s opinion about marrying her. Theresa’s harshness was caused by her realization that Mr. Homer was divorced and eve condemned Mr. Homer’s action as cowardly. By challenging the actions of Mr. Homer, Theresa desires to ensure the absolute necessity of Mr. Homer’s divorce to his wife. However, as the two continued to talk, Theresa opened up to the discussion and even asked Mr. Homer to tell about his past. Her ability to express love and emotions is shown when she tells Mr. Homer that she could not judge him for telling her about his past marriage life (Chopin 43). Besides, Theresa’s caring nature is shown when pleads with Mr. Homer to correct his mistake by re-marrying his wife and attempting to reform her mistakes. In relation to this, most of Theresa’s reaction to Mr. Homer can be taken as her comprehension of what it could imply for their positions to be interchanged or reversed. Towards the end of their conversation Theresa is seen to fall in love with Mr. Homer. This observation also signifies irony as the readers does not expect Theresa to fall in love with Mr. Homer in relation to her reaction at the start of their conversation.

As a character with the American spirit, Theresa possesses a robust sense of motivation to excel in life. In the novel, Chopin proves this statement by claiming that Theresa had not attained the age of thirty-five without realizing the life presents several hindrances, which should be embraced whether with the heartlessness or of philosophy, the dignity of self-respect or the revolt of weakness. In relation to this, Theresa is revealed as a character that is prepared to face the challenges of life in many ways. This is the American spirit which is vital for one’s survival life. Theresa represents the American spirit, which is ready to face the hurdles of life as they come and emerge successful. Theresa’s willingness to overcome her life’s challenges is shown when she turns down Mr. Homer’s marriage proposal to her (Russell 13). She does this regardless of what might befall her as she is prepared to handle the outcomes of her actions. As such, Theresa demonstrates the American spirit of standing for what is right regardless of the outcomes of such a stand. It is ironical to see Theresa rejecting the marriage proposal of a person of Mr. Homer’s state. In the real sense, the reader expects Theresa to seize this opportunity and use it as means of excelling in life. However, Theresa fails to seize this chance and hopes to face life the hard way via her struggle. Chopin manages to reveal this by incorporating the aspect of imagery in that Theresa could not accept Mr. Homer’s proposal even at the price of happiness. Therefore, Theresa has an inborn motivation that an individual can excel in life without depending on other people. As such, this character succeeds in displaying the American spirit, which makes her uniquely American. Besides, Theresa manages to demonstrate the American spirit by being a successful entrepreneur (Russell 16). She succeeds in managing the plantation that she acquired from her husband.

In conclusion, in Kate Chopin’s novel “At Fault”, Theresa Lafirme acts as perfect representation of the unique American spirit. As one of the main characters in the novel, she manages to display the American spirit by being independent in her thoughts and actions, expressing her love and emotions freely, and demonstrating a high sense of motivation to excel in life despite facing several challenges. These aspects make this character uniquely American in the novel.

Works Cited

Chopin, Kate. At Fault. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, 2007. Print.

Russell, David. “A Vision of Reunion: Kate Chopin’s “At Fault’.” Southern Quarterly 46(2008): 8-25. Print.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

An Overview of why teenagers join gangs

Jumped in what gangs taught me about violence, drugs, love, and redemption. by Jorja Leap.. Title : An Overview of why teenagers join gangs

Introduction
Summary of the book
Critique of the book
Conclusion

INTRODUCTION

In a book review, the introduction may run to several paragraphs.

Establish context:
mention the title of the book and its author.

Establish focus:
mention the author’s purpose. In a book, it is usually stated in the preface or introduction, or on the back cover.
Comment on the appropriateness of the author’s purpose in terms of timeliness and importance of the subject.
Mention what authority or expertise the author has to write on the subject.

State thesis:
give your general response to the author’s work: whether you agree or disagree or partly agree with it. Remember, you have to support this view in your
critique and the structure of your critique depends on the overall impression of the reviewed material as given in your thesis statement.

Summary of the book:

The main purpose of the summary is to provide the reader with adequate information to understand the critical commentary that follows. The summary should be objective and should not include any personnel interpretation or discussion.

It is not possible to summarize an entire book so summarize the following:

Controlling idea/thesis
Main concepts that form the foundation for the controlling idea/thesis
Development of the controlling idea/presentation of evidence
Text structure, the topics covered and how they are organized and sequenced.

Critique of the book:

The purpose of the critique is to express your judgments and comments about the book you are reviewing. The purpose of this section is to support the personal opinion you have already expressed briefly in the Introduction. The critique consists of personal judgments, comments and opinions, it is
subjective, unlike the previous section, which is objective.

It may be easier to handle to critique of a book if you examine the different aspects of the book and pass your judgment on each aspect separately. Your
critical commentary should focus on the following aspects:

Subject matter: describe the range of topics in the book and determine whether it is adequate and relevant. This may also help you pass judgment on the length of the book. Examine the organization of the topics and determine whether the sequence is appropriate.
Style: determine whether the difficulty of words and sentence structure is appropriate for the intended audience. Determine whether the formality of the
style is appropriate, is it too formal/casual in terms of subject matter and readers.
Layout: express your opinion about the adequacy, suitability, and usefulness of the following:
contents and index pages
-headings
-typefaces
-graphics

Make sure you present valid reasons for your judgment each time you comment on the different aspects of the book.

CONCLUSION

The conclusion relates to both your introduction and critique because it restates the most important comments from the introduction and sums up the main critical points of your critique. In the conclusion you need to:

Restate the purpose of the book you have reviewed.
using your critique as a base, make a judgment about how successful the writer has been in achieving that purpose.
Restate the thesis you included in the introduction.
support your thesis by commenting on whether or not the reviewed material makes a useful contribution to the body of literature already published in the field.

Reference:

Arnaudet, M.L. and Barrett, M.E. 1984. Approaches to Academic Reading and Writing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Other tips: the review should give an account of the book’s arguments and structure as well as the author’s assumptions and presuppositions; it should
evaluate the arguments advanced and indicate the extent to which the author backs them up with evidence. It should draw a balance sheet of the weaknesses and strengths of the book.
Evaluate the arguments advanced. Are they consistent? Are they coherent? What theoretical or philosophical assumptions does the author make? What does the author use as evidence?
Read other reviews that have been written about the book. What do the other critics say? You may use their comments in your review, you may agree/disagree with them. Reading other reviews also gives you ideas on how your review should be structured.

Read biographical information about the author. This information may help you understand the book.

The position you take on the book is not as important as how you defend that position.
http://www.apastyle.org/elecref.html for information on citing electronic sources.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

The Simple Truth Book Review Assignment

The Simple Truth Book Review

The Simple Truth Book Review. Consider the ethical challenges posed in John Turley’s “The Simple Truth“. Only use the book stated above as a reference. Discuss in detail: one of the critical errors Barry committed; and how the bad choices compounded on one another. what his motivations were, or how you would propose handling it. Be sure to comment on how the mistake(s) you select contributed to the disaster.

Avoid grammatical errors in your essay to avoid deduction of marks. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Visit the coursework outline for the grading rubric to avoid being penalized.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!