Aristotelian Moral Virtue Response Prompt: Think about a skill that you have and reflect on how you acquired that skill. What habits did you need to cultivate in order to develop that skill? Was the skill something you were born with? What would happen if you stopped practicing it? Reflect on how you might apply that same basic process of skill development to the development of a specific moral virtue that you’d like to work on.
The journal grade will be based on clarity of writing and mastery of concepts. A good journal entry can be anywhere from half a page to two pages. What matters is not length but depth of engagement with the material and clarity of expression.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
You will be presented with three scenarios, each of which is followed by a writing assignment of at least 200 words. In your response, you can reply to the Points to Consider and/or provide your own reaction to the scenario. I have pasted the three scenarios below. The book for this class is: Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk About How To Do It Right, 7th Edition, Travino, L.K., and Nelson, K.A.
One of the objectives of this course is to: Clarify personal values and develop a personal code of managerial ethics.
This activity, in which you take a reading of your ethical compass, will help meet this objective by creating a journal for personal reflection. You will be assigned the activity three times as you move through the course:
Prior to beginning the course 2. Week 4 as part of the topic Finding Your Ethical Voice 3. Week 8 as a course-culmination exercise
Your assignment is to respond to all three scenarios with 200, or more, words per response.
Scenario 1
You are asked to work on an extra project at work. Your boss says that the project should take you 20 to 25 hours and that he/she will pay you $25/hour for getting it done over the upcoming three-day weekend. Your boss wants it done as quickly as possible since he needs to revise it before using it in a presentation Tuesday afternoon. You make a promise to hand it in ASAP, Tuesday morning at the latest. Once you start working on it you find a lot of useful content on the Internet and copy it into your project and since you have an event you want to attend Sunday and Monday you finish it early Sunday afternoon. However, you do not send it to your boss until Monday evening. In your e-mail you explain you worked very hard on it and that it took all weekend, 23 hours.
Points to Consider
You had told your boss weeks ago you had an event over the long weekend. With that in mind did you do anything wrong? What other things did you do right or wrong? Why do you feel they were right/wrong? If you think you did something wrong. What should you have done?
Suggested response length: 200 words
Scenario 2
Two young men, brothers, had gotten into serious trouble. They were secretly leaving town in a hurry and needed money. Karl, the older one, broke into a store and stole a thousand dollars. Bob, the younger one, went to a retired old man who was known to help people in town. He told the man that he was very sick and that he needed a thousand dollars to pay for an operation. Bob asked the old man to lend him the money and promised that he would pay him back when he recovered. Bob wasn’t sick at all, and he had no intention of paying the man back. Although the old man didn’t know Bob very well, he lent him the money. So Bob and Karl skipped town, each with a thousand dollars.
Points to Consider
Which is worse, stealing like Karl or cheating like Bob? Why is that worse? What do you think is the worst thing about cheating the old man? Why is that the worst thing? In general, why should a promise be kept? Is it important to keep a promise to someone you don’t know well or will never see again? Why or why not? Why shouldn’t someone steal from a store? What is the value or importance of property rights? Should people do everything they can to obey the law? Why or why not? Was the old man being irresponsible by lending Bob the money? Why or why not?
Suggested response length: 200 words
Scenario 3
You work for a company that manages caregivers for disabled adults and children that need assistance with daily living. You love your job because you get to help people. The people you manage work anywhere from 20 to 45 hours a week at $12/hr. Most of them are liked by your clients and are good workers. The funding for the services comes from the state and federal government via Medicaid. All of the clients qualify for Medicaid.
The state agency that manages the money is over budget and they are implementing policies that say workers can only work the hours that the client is entitled to as determined by a schedule. Workers and clients have no flexibility as to when and how they provide or get services. For example, you know some workers and clients coordinate hours so workers go to the job site four days instead of seven but work more hours on those days. It works better for both parties and no one is cheating on hours.
You know the new system will drive some of your best employees away and will cause many clients to lose services and others to get poorer quality services.
Points to Consider:
What do you do? What is wrong or right with the situation? Who, if anybody, is at fault? What would happen if you just ignore the new system? Are you tempted to find a way to cheat the system? What solution might you suggest?
Suggested response length: 200 words
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Compose a 2-page paper that describes a particular moral-ethical dilemma that you encountered and what the outcome of that dilemma was. Did you solve the dilemma? If so, how? If not, what were the repercussions or consequences? What would you do differently if faced with the same problem today? What is the importance of good ethics? Why should we be concerned about our actions? Use the learning and reading for this week as a basis for this paper. Regard the questions as prompts, not an ordering of your responses. Regard the questions as prompts, not an ordering of your responses. This is not a Q&A essay, but rather a graceful reflection regarding a difficult ethical dilemma you face.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
The Ford Pinto case is a well-known case that is often discussed in the context of business ethics. To summarize, Ford’s design of the Pinto’s fuel tank was defective, causing fires if the Pinto was involved in even minor rear-end collisions. Ford came to learn of the defect, but the company failed to correct it; Ford then predicted, based on a cost-benefit analysis, that it would cost more to repair the defect ($11 per vehicle, or $137 million total) than it would to pay for damages resulting from burn deaths, burn injuries, and burned vehicles ($47.5 million). Consider the Ford Pinto case in light of the who-how (WH) framework for business ethics.
Would Ford’s decision to forego repairing the defective design comply with these ethical guidelines? If so, why? If not, then what actions should Ford have taken to satisfy them? Explain your reasoning.
Your response to this question should be a minimum of 500 words.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Compensation of CEO’s unfair but not technically unethical
Compensation of CEO’s unfair but not technically unethical
Inclouds
see over compensation of CEO’s unfair but not technically unethical. I think major corporations should take a good look at what CEO’s make compared to other employees and even the playing ground. What makes one job so much more important than the other. I believe corporations do have ethical responsibilities to their customers to provide safe and reliable products but not necessarily what they choose to pay their CEO’s. I do believe you could probably reduce the price of goods you provide if you paid the CEO less. Ethics is can be such a gray area depending on an individual own views and values. I do believe society as a hold does have some ethical foundations that are the same.
Agree or disagree within 2-3 sentences
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Write a first draft of your research paper. The first draft should be 3,000-3,750 words (approximately 12-15 pages if the template is used correctly), not including the required bibliography and cover page. Be sure to include the following:
Affirm your thesis on the approved research topic you have selected.
Evaluate relevant and valid research that reflects the ethical standards in the discipline of history.
Demonstrate proper interpretation of historical sources.
Utilize research to validate your ideas and supporting claims.
The grading standards will be as rigorous as those set for the final research paper. Be careful to proofread and edit the first draft to the quality of a final draft.
The instructor will provide feedback; but continue to edit for clarity, coherence, argument, and historical interpretation throughout the duration of the topic.
Use only sources found at the GCU Library or those provided in Course and/or Topic Materials.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Prepare this assignment according to the Turabian guidelines found in the Turabian Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Answer the following 4 questions:
Bernard Mayo:
(a) Explain in detail Mayo’s distinction being “doing” and “being.”
(b) For Mayo what is the value of having saints and heroes?
(c) See p. 359, para. 2 Mayo’s explanation of Kant’s objection to the saints and heroes approach. Explain Kant’s objection in detail.
(d) Is it possible for a Kantian ethics to include virtues as part of the theory? Explain in detail.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Business ethics resources Wells Fargo banking scandal
Business ethics resources Wells Fargo banking scandal
Please give answers for 3-questions and please provide separate answers for each question
1.prepare 2-3 pages and complete the questions at the end of the case study. Click here https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/business-ethics/resources/wells-fargo-banking-scandal/
2. prepare 2-3 pages and Each student will select one of the key terms presented in the module and conduct a search of Campbellsville University’s online Library resources to find 1 recent peer-reviewed academic journal article (within the past 3 years) that closely relate to the concept.
3. Using the MLB steroids case as an example (research an article on this topic in CU library), explain how unethical choices by some players harms players who comply with the rules
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Specific areas: For this paper, chose ONE area, Interpersonal OR Organizational. Explain the ethical issues here generally, find an example, discuss the specific ethical implications, explain your evaluation, and support it. This one is really the state your case and proves its paper. Be sure you use academic sources and cite them using APA format both in the text and in the Works Cited list.
A position paper is an argument of sorts. What I am looking for is for you to explain your position on a topic, then support that position. What counts as support? Logic, academic scholarship, religious/faith-based documents, laws, professional codes; in short, there are lots of ways to support your position. I do expect at least two academic sources (your text does NOT count, but it certainly provides you with thorough bibliographies) in each paper. By academic research source, I mean an article in an academic journal (Journal of Applied Communication Research, Communication Theory, etc.). The journal does not have to be from the Communication field, but it must be academic. You will also cite sources for materials you use to explain/develop your topic (newspapers, magazines, internet). That’s appropriate, but those do NOT count in your two academic research sources.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Ethical Consideration on Human Subject Protections
Ethical Consideration on Human Subject Protections
I’m doing a research proposal and my research topic is What happens to children left within the system and what’s life like after they’ve aged out of the system?
For this particular assignment, I have to answer the following questions below in apa format.
What safeguards are in place in your study to protect human subjects? Consider both emotional and / or physical harm. Consider who the subjects are and if children or some other vulnerable population such as elderly or mentally ill.
What is your basic ethical approach? How will you protect the participants/subjects from any possible abuses? What steps are you taking to ensure informed consent? Provide a copy of any letter and consent forms in the appendix.
When and how will you submit for Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval (for this class you were not required to submit the proposal for IRB, but this is an important procedure which you need to be aware off)? You can indicate that you have completed the human subject training and pass the test with 80% or above which indicate that you do have an understanding of the importance of human subject protection in research etc., You can also state that as a social work student research you are aware of the importance of ethical consideration and make mention to the NASW Code of Ethics…by quoting what it said.
Bias
We all have biases; the most insidious are those of which we are unaware or unacknowledged. What makes you different from your subjects? Is it race, ethnicity, social class, education, work experience, physical or mental ability, gender identity, sexual orientation, etc.? How might these differences impede your investigation (invisibility, insensitivity, overgeneralization, or perhaps double standards)?
Limitations
Now that you have an idea
(from your literature review)
how broad your topic could be, tell the reader what it is that you are deliberately not going to study. What aspects of the problem are outside the scope of your
interests at this point (or at least for this paper)? Then, if you had 3 years and $1,000,000 what are some of the things you could or would improve about your design, sample, analysis, etc. for your research proposal.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
