Buck v. Bell Supreme Court Decision

Investigate the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Buck vs. Bell (1927). The case ruled that government- forced sterilization of “feeble minded” females was constitutional.

May 2, 1927 Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 is the United States Supreme Court ruling which upheld a Virginia law for sterilizing persons assessed as “socially inadequate” (Lombardo, 2008, p. 5). The case revolved around Carrie Buck, 18 at the time of the trial, who had been ordered sterilized after becoming pregnant illegitimately and institutionalized.

The court based its decision on expert testimony from Arthur Estabrook, a physician with experience at the eugenics records office in Cold Harbor Spring, New York. Estabrook did not re-apply the IQ test that Carrie had been given in the state home, stating instead that he had “talked to Carrie sufficiently” to arrive at his decision that she was feeble minded. (Lombardo, 2008, p. 5) The Court also heard that Carrie’s mother, who had been under government care for some time was also feeble minded and that Carrie’s child Vivian who was then six months old was likely feeble minded as well. Vivian’s school reports would later prove this assessment wrong. Not mentioned during the trial was the fact that Carrie’s pregnancy was the result of rape. Instead the court heard from her former teacher how Carrie would send notes to boys, implying her promiscuity (and that she was therefore responsible for her own pregnancy).

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

The US prison system Essay Assignment

The US prison system

Examine the efficiency , effectiveness and equity of the US prison system

a. Chronicle the progression of mass incarceration in the United States

b. Who has the most control over the implementation of prison reform?

c. Discuss the psychological effects incarceration for beyond the person incarcerated geared towards the people affected by the person incarcerated.

d. Examine at least 3 key questions that are at the heart of prison reform.

PART 2 HAS TO BE 2-3 PAGES! ANSWER EVERY QUESTION THOROUGHLY — CITE AND REFERENCE THE SOURCES ONLY THE ONES I PROVIDE!!!!

PART 2

2- Discuss morality policy and the assertion that it creates morality politics.

a- Describe the difference between mainstream politics and morality politics.

b – Examine 2 of the policies we have discussed in class in light of morality versus mainstream politics.

c – Make an argument for one of the policies and make an argument against that policy.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is a kind of administrative relief from deportation. The purpose of DACA is to protect eligible immigrant youth who came to the United States when they were children from deportation. DACA gives young undocumented immigrants: 1) protection from deportation, and 2) a work permit. The program expires after two years, subject to renewal.

How Effective is DACA?
How has DACA been a positive reform for undocumented youth?
Has DACA helped the work force in America?
Has DACA been a positive impact for education for undocumented students?

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Land Law Case Study Paper Assignment

Land Law

1. Ariane lives with her cousin, Barack, in a large house that Barack owns. Ariane is a baker and helps Barack to run his catering business from the premises. In exchange, she is allowed to occupy one wing of the property without payment. Barack wishes to retire, and one morning over coffee they discuss the possibility of Ariane buying the house from Barack and continuing to run the business. Barack promises that he will sell the house to Ariane if he can find a suitable home in Spain to retire to. Believing that she can rely on Barack’s word, Ariane sells her beloved jewelry to raise money to fund the purchase. She also spends money purchasing new equipment to improve the long-term prospects of the business. The following week, Ariane writes a formal letter to Barack offering to buy the property for £750 000. Barack writes a letter back saying that he accepts her offer but that he still needs to find an alternative property in Spain. Unfortunately, before any further progress can be made Barack and Ariane have a huge row. Barack tells Ariane to leave the house, and informs her that he will not go through with the sale.

Advise Ariane what rights, if any, she may have in the property.

2. “The existence of a category of rights which will bind a proprietor, despite not being noted on the register, is inimical to this goal [of making the register as accurate and reliable as possible”
M Thompson and M George, Thompson’s Modern Land Law (6th edn, 2017) 137

Is the protection afforded to overriding interests under the Land Registration Act 2002 justified? Discuss critically.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Public Law Advanced Blog Project

BLOG POST EXERCISE – FORMAL REQUIREMENTS

Write a 1000 word academic blog post commenting on the constitutional issues raised by any story appearing in the news since you started studying Public Law I (Advanced), i.e. after 26 September 2018.

The body of your blog post should (instead of references) make use of embedded hyperlinks to online sources. However, you should include a bibliography of up to five ‘works consulted’ at the end of your post, to indicate academic sources you have consulted as part of your research. The bibliography is not included in the word count.

URGENT ATTENTION !!!!!

To help you with the project, you will submit a ONE page summary of your intended blog post by Wednesday, 30 November 2018. This is not intended to be a draft, but rather an indication of the topic on which you want to write, the argument you want to make and the sources you intend to draw on.

If you see the attached file, that’s what I have to submit. It doesn’t count towards the essay. It’s you explain what you’ll be talking about, the name of the blog, and which resources you would use. That way, my teachers can give me further instruction and advice? It’s a blog so needs to be planned. It’s not an essay where you just write as you go along.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Legally Binding Contract English Law

Legally Binding Contract English Law Assignment question: “Judges have altogether too much input into the terms of legally binding contracts in English Law” critically discuss with statement 2000 words + footnotes

Contract law coursework
Contents of contract will be in the expressed terms
Sometime contracts need to be in the context of a particular social economic situation
Some terms can be implied by the courts
Hutton v Warren [1836]
Sagar v Ridehalgh [1931]
Terms may be implied into contracts by the courts on the basis of an intention imputed by the parties from the actual circumstances
As a rule, the courts tend not to imply terms in contracts because it would interfere in freedom of contract
The “business efficacy” test-various tests developed for implying terms
The Moorcock [1889]
The “officious bystander” test
Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1926]
Terms that are so obvious, that without it, the contract would not make any sense
Shell UK v Lostock Garages Ltd [1976]
Both the officious bystander test and business efficacy tests are subjective
Terms are not implied to make the cases fairer, it is only when necessary
Until recently it was seen that the courts would imply terms in some cases just to fill in the gaps of the expressed terms- a process of addition, of necessity
Lord Hoffman said that implied terms cannot be an addition as they have been there all along
Marks & Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust CO. (Jersey) Ltd [2015
Lord Neuberger “…the law governing the circumstances in which terms
Following Marks & Spencers plc, there is a two-stage approach to the interpretation of contractual terms and the implication of terms by the courts
1. The courts will first look at the express terms of the contract to identify the intentions of the parties through he interpretation of the words used

Legally Binding Contract English Law Assignment Questions

2. It must be
Assignment question: “Judges have altogether too much input into the terms of legally binding contracts in English Law” critically discuss with statement 2000 words + footnotes
Critical analysis: Look at the statement from different points of view
In the introduction you show the approaches that you’re going to take
First paragraph: “on the one hand”, “on the other hand”
Build into the assignment the civil justice system i.e. the role of the judge
How to include your own opinion without starting with “I”.
Refer to the legal significance of a case when mentioned in the assignment
What constitutes good sources
Judicial decision
“Substantial” textbooks- citations from judges should be from the case not textbook
Specialist monographs on a given legal topics
Broadsheet newspaper articles
Government reports and papers
Reports of parliamentary debates
Reports from officially recognize sources

Critical Analysis of OJ Simpson trial

The format is to include title page, abstract, body, and bibliography. References and citations are to be in APA format. If you have questions concerning APA, please refer to the link or contact the instructor for assistance. The length of the body of each paper is to be 1500 words, written in 12-point font and double-spaced. Papers are to be submitted through the course website.

Students can select a topic of their choice for each paper. For each paper, students must choose a criminal case that has been covered by the media. Besides using your textbooks (crime in media written by jewkes and linnemann) as a source, you must also use five other additional outside sources for your paper, two of these should be scholarly in nature. For example, you may use the internet, academic journal databases, books, encyclopedias, videos, newspapers, etc.

Both of the Research papers must consist of the following:
1. A description of the crime in its historical setting.

2. A theoretical analysis of the crime event.

3. A description of media involvement and coverage of the case from investigation to disposition.

4. A perspective concerning the media effect on case outcomes.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Maritime Law Group Assessment Task

Maritime Law Group Assessment Task This assignment is a group task. You will work in groups of four to address the task you have been given.

The collision
Two merchant vessels, the Panama-registered container ship the MSC Chitra and the St Kitts-registered bulk carrier the MV Khalijia III, collided at about 9.40 am on the 7th August 2010. The collision occurred in clear weather off Mumbai harbour.
The collision resulted in a severe list of the MSC Chitra, an estimated 900 tonnes of oil was lost which polluted the waters and beaches in the surrounding area. Over 200 containers were also lost overboard; these containers, floating in the water, posed a navigational hazard for ships entering and leaving the channel. As a result, operations at both Mumbai Port and the Jawaharlal Nehru Port were closed for a time.
In your group prepare a report within which you are required to consider the following:
• Analyse the main reasons behind the collision of the MSC Chitra and MV Khalijia III.
• Examine the issues that arose in the subsequent litigation.
1
Your work should evidence the following:
• It should demonstrate a clear understanding of the subject matter; the issues involved including the relevant law.
• It should evidence the planning and preparation your group have engaged in including the extensive background reading of relevant, level appropriate, literature.
• The work should be presented in a formal report format, referenced in accordance with the Harvard System of referencing, and spelling error free.

Undocumented How Immigration Became Illegal

Undocumented How Immigration Became Illegal 2. Discussion of the main message of the author 1pg minimum. What is the author’s theoretical frame/basis for the discussion?

What’s is the authors major thesis? Do you feel that the author is effective in support of her thesis? Why or why not?
3. Discussion of the most substantive value of the book? 3page min
4. Discussion and critical assessment of the book…include comments/opinions. In this illuminating work, immigrant rights activist Aviva Chomsky shows how “illegality” and “undocumentedness” are concepts that were created to exclude and exploit. With a focus on US policy, she probes how people, especially Mexican and Central Americans, have been assigned this status—and to what ends.

Community Emphasis on Restorative Justice

Community Emphasis on Restorative Justice Locate a program in the community that emphasizes restorative justice, (for example, an alternative dispute resolution program).

Describe the program and how it works to reintegrate offenders back into the community after they have been punished by the criminal justice system. Discuss the success/failure rate of the program.
(Paper must be 5 pages long, double spaced, 12 in. font with one inch top, bottom and side margins.) Throughout the United States the criminal justice system is in a state of crisis. The public is fearful and angry. Practitioners are weary and frustrated. Criminal justice policy is driven more by anecdote than systematic information.