For this assignment, you will review 3 scholarly journal articles related to the unified psychology perspective. The scholarly journal articles will be within the last 5 years.
Search the South University Online Library databases. Other sources, such as textbooks, Wikipedia, and other online sources will not be accepted. Read and analyze each of the articles and create a synopsis.
In your synopsis, make sure to include:
A summary of each of the journal articles.
Your thoughts and perspectives regarding the concepts covered in each of the journal articles.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Decision to Fire General McChrystal was controversial
The Decision to Fire General McChrystal was controversial
The decision to fire General McChrystal was controversial. One argument in favor of him being fired was captured by Eliot Cohen, a noted civil-military relations expert and Professor at Johns Hopkins, who wrote the following op-ed in the Wall Street Journal: “General McChrystal’s just-published interview in Rolling Stone magazine is an appalling violation of norms of civil-military relations. To read it is to wince, repeatedly—at the mockery of the vice president and president’s special representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan, at the sniping directed toward the U.S. ambassador . . . The quotes from General McChrystal’s underlings bespeak a staff so clueless, swaggering and out of control that a wholesale purge looks to be indicated.”1
On the other hand, Kori Schake, a West Point professor and former government official advised,“Anyone who thinks they can do a better job than General McChrystal at putting together a counter-insurgency strategy, persuading warfighters to adopt restraint while keeping them fighting, bringing the Karzai government into the fight and up to the standard, and keeping our allies contributing, ought to step forward. Until then, we ought to let him concentrate his efforts on winning the war we’re fighting.”2
Keeping this information in mind, read the following scenarios and choose one for your initial Group A discussion board posting.
Scenario 1
At a large planning conference held in Washington, DC, you start a conversation with two officers, one from Turkey and the other from Colombia. Both spoke about the difficulties of combatting terrorism in their countries and wonder how a recognized expert like General McChrystal could be fired. How do you explain the professional ethical issues at stake in the President’s decision to fire General McChrystal?
1 Eliot A. Cohen, “Why McChrystal Has to Go,” The Wall Street Journal, June 23, 1010.
2 Kori, Schake, “If You Can Do Better, Step Forward,” in “Should the Runaway General Be Fired?”, The New York Times, Room for Debate Blog, June 22, 2010.
Peer Response
I chose to answer scenario 1. I chose it because something similar did in fact occur. In my previous job (Executive Officer at the Inter-American Defense College), I had the honor and privilege of interacting with several foreign diplomats, high ranking senior officials, and Generals/Flag Officers. While General McChrystal was not the particular topic, we did have lengthy discussions regarding the differences in how our militaries conduct themselves and the expectations of a military officer.
In General McChrystal’s case, he was fired so we could continue to uphold the military’s culture of accountability. General McChrystal was held accountable for his disrespect and contempt of the chain of command. As a military officer, regardless of our rank and position, we are able to dialogue and voice our disagreements with our superiors behind closed doors. However, once we are given a lawful order, we have to carry them out as if the orders were of our own design.
In our oath of office, we state “that [we] take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion[1]”. We do so because our word is our bond, without integrity the moral pillar of our core values is lost[2]. In General McChrystal’s case, his integrity was lost. He was still a great man and a great general, but he betrayed the trust of his Commander and Chief. General McChrystal obliterated President Obama’s authority with the military, and undermined unity of effort through undermining the civilian control of the military[3].
Because of the aforementioned topics, I have discussed with various Latin American leaders that a US military officer is held to a higher standard. A military officer is not a 9 to 5 job. We are on 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days of the year. As such, we have to speak and conduct ourselves in a professional manner—because we are always on duty!
Provide a brief description of the leadership example you have selected and explain why you have done so (200 words). Provide your sources of evidence in an appendix to the TMA.
Analyse the leadership example in respect of identity and power using two concepts drawn from Block 4 (1400 words).
Using at least one concept from Block 4,
offer written advice to the leader(s) or related organisation within your leadership example in respect of practicing leadership, incorporating some of the knowledge you have learned about identity and power (400 words).
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Explain what it takes to have teamwork in health care
Assignment 4: Collaboration and Teamwork in Health Care
Overview: Explain the concept of true collaboration in health care and describe the benefits of effective interdisciplinary collaboration. Then, describe the characteristics required for effective collaboration, describe barriers to collaboration, and offer evidence-based strategies to overcome those barriers.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
• Competency 1: Explain the principles and practices of highly effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
o Explain the concept of collaboration in health care.
o Describe the characteristics and concepts required for effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
o Describe barriers to effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
o Identify evidence-based strategies to overcome barriers to effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
• Competency 3: Explain the internal and external factors that can affect the health of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
o Describe the benefits of effective collaboration and teamwork in health care for patients, organizations, and team members.
Context: Every day, in every patient setting, health care professionals must interact with other health care professionals, as well as with providers from other professions to share information, conduct safety and quality checks, and work with patients in a variety of ways to make sure they understand their health care needs and will be more likely to comply with treatment plans.
Research consistently shows that interdisciplinary collaboration and teamwork improves the quality and safety of patient care by recognizing the skills and experience of each team member, allowing the team to function more effectively and efficiently.
Library Resources
The following e-books or articles are linked directly in this course:
• Petri, L. (2010). Concept analysis of interdisciplinary collaboration. Nursing Forum, 45(2), 73–82.
• Bender, M., Connelly, C. D., & Brown, C. (2013). Interdisciplinary collaboration: The role of the clinical nurse leader. Journal of Nursing Management, 21(1), 165–174.
• Supper, I., Catalo, O., Lustman, M., Chemla, C., Bourgueil, Y., & Letrilliant, L. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration in primary healthcare: A review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors. Journal of Public Health, 37(4), 717–727.
• Youngwerth, J., & Twaddle, M. (2011). Cultures of interdisciplinary teams: How to foster good dynamics. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(5), 650–654.
• Perreault, K., & Careau, E. (2012). Interprofessional collaboration: One or multiple realities? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(4), 256–258.
Assessment Instructions: You are part of an interdisciplinary team that has been highly effective. Your supervisor asks you to write a short article about why the team has been so successful and submit it to the organizational newsletter for publication.
Directions include for you to write in the article for this assessment, the following:
• Explain the concept of true collaboration in health care.
• Describe the benefits of effective collaboration and teamwork in health care for the following groups:
o Patients.
o Organizations.
o Team members.
• Describe the characteristics and concepts required for effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
• Describe barriers to effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
• Identify evidence-based strategies to overcome barriers to effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
• Format this assessment according to current APA style and formatting guidelines.
Search the library and the Internet for peer-reviewed journal articles on collaboration and teamwork in health care.
Additional Requirements
• Include a title page and reference page.
• Ensure your assessment is 4 pages.
• You will need at least 3 articles to support your work on this assessment.
• Use double-spaced, 12-pt., Times New Roman font.
Collaboration and Teamwork in Health Care Scoring Guide
Explains the concept of collaboration in health care and describes the unique aspects of collaboration in health care. Describes the benefits of effective collaboration and teamwork in health care for patients, organizations, and team members and considers the consequences of ineffective collaboration and teamwork. Describes the characteristics and concepts required for effective interdisciplinary collaboration and explains how each contributes to more effective collaboration. Describes barriers to effective interdisciplinary collaboration and considers possible causes for the barriers. Identifies evidence-based strategies to overcome barriers to effective interdisciplinary collaboration and suggests methods for implementing the strategies.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Consumers are diverse and have different needs and wants. Marketing professionals use segmentation to divide the marketplace into groups of consumers who have similar needs and wants.
Please reflect on the company that markets your favorite beverage or the company that markets your preferred laundry detergent (select 1 specific company and 1 specific brand from this company).
If you were to market this product, what 3 different consumer segments would you market to, and why?
Econ:
Price elasticity of demand measures consumers’ responsiveness to changes in the price of a good. There are a number of variables that affect consumers’ decisions, among them the following:
The availability of substitutes
The specific nature of the good
The part of income spent on the good
The time consumers have to buy the good
Please draw on your experiences as a consumer and your Unit 2 readings to address the following 4 topics. Make sure you use economic concepts in your main contribution.
Choose a product that you have purchased in the past 1–3 months from a clothing or shoe store.
Describe how each of the 4 factors listed above contributed to the elasticity of the good.
Is the product considered elastic, inelastic, or unitary elastic?
What effect does the current supply and current demand have on this product?
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
The Assignment
Over the course of the term you will be writing a 4-6-page (~1,000-1,500 word) argumentative paper with a standard, 12-point font, double-spaced lines, and 1” margins responding to the prompt.
For the purposes of Part 1 of the assignment, you will be composing TWO PARAGRAPHS of this larger paper: an introduction and one of your body paragraphs.
Your paper will provide an argument supporting a determinate position (your thesis or conclusion) in some controversial debate (topics below); to do so, you will draw upon at least two articles on the topic in contention, one from (roughly) each side of the issue.
Your own position (thesis/conclusion) may be more nuanced than simply for or against in a given debate: you can split-the-difference on the issue as long as you insightfully explain precisely how and why (e.g. “I am for stricter gun control in the following ways . . . and against these sorts of restrictions…”).
**PLEASE NOTE: this is not a “pro and con” paper.** The point of this paper is not simply to list the “pros” and “cons” or positives and negatives of both sides. You are to take a determinate stance on the issue at hand in a clear and precise thesis statement (your own view stated as the conclusion/thesis of your paper). You are not remaining neutral, and simply weighing the ups and downs of both sides on the issue: you are supposed to have a point of view and argue for it. This point of view may, for instance, be “Yes, the minimum wage should be raised, and here is why…” or “No, the minimum wage should not be raised because…” or even “the minimum wage should only be raised if certain economic preconditions in a given area are met; this is because…” or etc.
Topics
There are six argument/debate topics I have supplied (available on iCollege under “Content > Argumentative Paper Assignment > Paper Topics & Source Material”):
• Raising the Minimum Wage: For or Against
• “Police/Criminal Justice Reform” or “Black-on-Black Violence” — What is the main issue we should be focusing our time and resources on (at least when it comes to matters of Criminal Justice)?
• Public Transportation: Should it be free?
• Streetcar Renaissance: For or Against. Are Streetcars a wise choice for cities?
• Immigration to the United States: More Restrictions or More Immigrants?
• Is There a Right to Health Care?
Alternate Topics
If you would like to write a paper on another topic, I am quite open to it! I want you to write on something you are interested in. Still, to take this course you must do quite a bit more work upfront. First, you must find your own sources: you need to research and find at least two articles, one on either side (roughly) of the issue that your proposed paper topic addresses. Also, I must approve of your custom topic and the sources you propose, so you will need to get an early start. If you want to take this route, you will need to email me your paper proposal & sources and/or speak with me during (virtual) office hours ASAP to discuss.
Source Materials
For each of my pre-selected topics/issues (not for your self-selected alternate topics), I have clipped some blog posts, articles, and editorials from the web (again, available on iCollege under “Content > Argumentative Paper Assignment > Paper Topics & Source Material”).
• These articles and writings are to serve as a limited source of (sometimes biased) background, opinion, satire, and argumentation to serve as a springboard for writing longer argumentative passages. I’ve selected at least one piece of writing that falls either side of these selected debates.
• Sometimes, these articles’ arguments are all one-sided, and don’t concede an inch to the opposed position, making the issue seem to be a stark black or white choice. Sometimes the authors present more nuanced positions, conceding some to their opponents, or straddling the issues in various ways.
• You may want to supplement your understanding of these issues with your own research and turn up new papers/articles: just remember to evaluate these new sources for quality; and when in doubt, run them by me.
• You must incorporate at least two (2) sources into your own paper, one from each side of the issue (i.e. one that you will draw from in support of your position and one that you will argue against):
o In the paper, you will draw on some aspects of an article or editorial which you agree with in order to further support of your position.
o But you will also draw on elements in another author’s work that you disagree with, and argue against their claims and reasoning to further support your own opposing position.
o In other words, you will use at least one article as a positive foil to further support your own thesis and argument, and you will use at least one article as a negative foil to argue against in support of your view to the contrary.
o In both cases you will need to introduce the ideas and claims of these outside papers/articles sufficiently for your reader to be able to follow, and while you may quote, paraphrasing and putting matters in your own words (while still appropriately citing sources) demonstrates better understanding and mastery of the material which you are drawing upon.
General Suggestions for Writing Conceiving of Your Audience
When writing, address your paper to an imagined audience of unsympathetic, highly-critical, and uninterested readers: someone who isn’t knowledgeable, doesn’t care for you, is annoyed and judgmental, and doesn’t want to be there. If you can convince such an audience, or if you can at least get them to follow your argument and understand it as a plausible position, then you will be able to pitch your argument to anyone. Crafting your paper with such an imagined, “nightmare” audience in mind will ensure that your argument is as strong and well-crafted as it can be. Expecting your audience to be such “nightmare readers” is an exercise in preparing for the worst, while hoping for the best. Preparing for the worst possible audience will make your writing much easier to follow and your arguments much stronger for more typical, “non-nightmare” readers.
Originality
Your paper should show some level of independent, creative thought in how you present your thesis, the arguments your present for it, and/or the way you and explain/analyze the subject matter:
• You might seek to present an existing thesis/conclusion in a novel or illuminating way.
• You should seek to come up with original arguments, novel justifications, and new examples in support of your thesis (even if the thesis itself is not wholly original).
• Your explanation of relevant ideas/concepts and reconstruction of others’ views about the issues in contention can demonstrate originality.
• Originality might take the form of combining ideas from different sources in a creative or novel way.
• While demonstrating original, independent thinking, try to also be clear, precise, rigorous, and concise: those are true virtues of good argumentative writing.
Readability
• Make sure your writing is as easy to understand and comprehensible as it can be. Avoid overly-complex, ornate, or overly-technical phrasing when doing so would stand in the way of comprehensibility.
• Choose your words precisely.
• Be as clear as possible.
• Make your writing as concise as possible without sacrificing clarity or important detail & nuance.
• When you use technical vocabulary or concepts, make sure you define, explain, and employ them appropriately/accurately.
• Avoid overly complex sentences and phrases. Simplify and break these down into shorter pieces. Think about what each word is doing for you, and edit out words/phrases that are unnecessary for your point to come across.
Guidelines for Your Introduction
Please avoid fluffy, flowery introductions: nothing like “Since the dawn of time, mankind has wondered about…”. Nope: get to the point. What’s the issue, and what’s your view about it? In your introduction, just (briefly) introduce the topic, then tell me what you are going to argue about it (your thesis), and finally, tell me how you are going to argue for this position (your argumentative roadmap). That is, briefly introduce the subject-matter, state the thesis/conclusion you will argue for, and then give your roadmap or plan for arguing for this thesis in your paper: e.g. “First, I will explain … Next, I will argue … Then, I will engage … Finally, I will …”.
So, in brief, your Introduction should:
1. Briefly introduce the topic of the paper.
2. Contain a clear statement of what you’ll be arguing for (your precise, determinate thesis/conclusion).
3. Contain a clear statement of how you’ll argue for it (your argumentative plan or roadmap for the paper).
4. Be clearly and concisely on point (topic, thesis, plan) as possible.
Your introduction should not:
1. Contain excess fluff, filler, or frill.
2. Contain too much background information and detail: save that for body paragraphs.
3. Be challenging for a reader to easily follow.
4. Fail to contain a clear and precise thesis or argumentative plan.
Guidelines for Your Body Paragraphs
(Yes, you are only writing one body paragraph for the purpose of this assignment, but in general, here are some guidelines for the body of your paper.)
General Guidelines for the Body of the Paper
• The body of your paper should employ a number of helpful transitional/organization-guiding phrases (i.e. guidepost/signpost words like “first,” “next,” “last,” or etc.) throughout to let readers know they are in your argument plan/roadmap that you supplied in the introduction. Using such guides or signposting words/phrases (e.g. “in this section, I will argue that …” or “now I will explain how….”) will clue your readers in to where you are in your overall plan for the essay and thus help them better follow your argument.
• Also, as far as possible, your paper should clearly spell out the role of each paragraph and section of your paper, and simplify these as best you can. If the point of one paragraph is too convoluted and/or multifarious your readers will likely have difficulty following. • The Body of your Paper should:
1. Provide an explanation and analysis of the topic/issue and an exposition of the relevant background literature.
2. Present your own argument in a clear, precise, consistent way, avoiding mistakes and fallacies of argument.
Let’s look at these last two items (1 & 2 above) in turn.
(1.) Explaining Background Information on the Topic / Providing Exposition of Other Author’s Work
The exposition of other authors’ arguments—whether you are supporting them or arguing against them—should come in the body of your paper. Remember: don’t present a caricature of your argumentative opponents’ positions. Even views you disagree with should be articulated/reconstructed in their strongest possible terms—be as charitable as you can in laying them out. Only then proceed to criticize them. Affording your opponents this charity of interpretation helps make your own criticisms of them and their arguments stronger, thus strengthening your own contrary viewpoint. If you can show that your opponents and their arguments are mistaken, even when these opponents’ arguments are presented in their strongest possible terms, you will have strengthened your own, opposing argument and position. You will have positioned yourself into a better position vis-à-vis a more worthwhile opponent.
More generally you should, when providing background or exposition of others arguments:
• Paraphrase, or put matters in your own words, when possible; this is preferable to direct quote, because it demonstrates your comprehension of the other author’s points. (Still, remember to cite! You have to cite sources even when you don’t use their words, but just their ideas.)
• Explain the topic/issue being addressed and the ideas/concepts involved therein as clearly and precisely as you can. Analyze/break down the matter into their constituent parts and their relations.
• Provide a clear & charitable interpretation of the relevant sections of other authors’ work, including those you are arguing against. Do not present others’ views as straw men (a fallacy we discussed). Your own argument is improved and strengthened to the extent that you are able to argue against opposing views cached in their strongest possible terms.
(2.) Presenting your own argument in a clear, precise, consistent way
• Pitch your claims at an appropriate level of strength, avoiding overstatements—appropriately qualify or temper your premises and conclusions.
• Make the considerations or reasons you present in favor of your thesis (premises), as clear, precise, and concise as you possibly can.
• Make it clear how your arguments lead to your thesis/conclusion. The inferential/argumentative structure of your paper should not be a guessing game: it should be obvious to the reader how the pieces fit together in support of your thesis/conclusion.
• Use plenty of particular, tailored examples and specific pieces of evidence (or data) to support your contentions.
• Be sure to think about how to make each example or each consideration as strong as it can possibly be in support of your argument and thesis. Ask what each detail might do, and whether changing, removing, or adding it strengthens your argumentative point.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
• A clear and coherent structure, including a clear standpoint of the student with regard how he/she will answer the essay question
• Depth of understanding of theoretical concepts and their application and interpretation in the discussion developed in the essay (i.e. you are encouraged to write about one or two examples)
• Engagement with the academic literature as a way to prove evidence on the argument that the student is aiming to develop
• Degree of creativity and insight in the approach answering the essay question
• Written expression of ideas that ensure clarity of points throughout sentences and paragraphs
• Consultation of a resource base that includes academic literature and practitioner reports
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Outline the major features of quantum mechanics and how they are applied to various fields.
Instructions
In a two-page paper, research three examples of technologies that use quantum mechanics. Explain, in your own words, how these applications impact society.
If you or someone you know has ever had an MRI scan for a medical diagnosis, you have experienced the result of quantum physics for measuring bodily structures. Finally, provide another specific example from your own life that could be influenced by these applications.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
INSTRUCTION:
1. This is an individual written assignment with 25% marks for the subject.
2. Candidates are required to choose only ONE (1) out of THREE (3) questions below and address it to the best of their ability.
3. The assignment must confirm to the general standard of academic writing.Plagiarism is strictly prohibited.
4. Candidates are advised to apply the following format in their writing:
a. Font style: Times New Roman
b. Font size: 12pt
c. Spacing: 1.5
d. Alignment: Justified
e. Pages: Max 20 pages (including table of content and references)
5. Submission must be made in both softcopy (hameedullah.asri@gmail.com) and hardcopy (by hand) no later than 2nd April 2019.
QUESTIONS:
1. “For a criminal law to be effective, it must contain elements of punishment, deterrence and rehabilitation.”
Discuss the above elements from the perspective of Islamic criminal law.
2. “The flexibility of Islamic criminal law can be seen through implementation of ta’zir punishment.”
Elaborate.
3. “The purpose of Islamic criminal law is to achieve Maqasid al-Shari’ah.”
Discuss.
Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
