THIS IS AN ESSAY OUTLINE… NOT AN ESSAY (I ATTACHED THE FORMAT TO BE USED). File should be called Lesson 5 Outline (Also this is worth 12% of my final mark). Thank you!
THESE ARE THE INSTRUCTIONS:
Choose one element that you notice in three of these four major texts (Agamemnon, Hamlet, The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, and John F. Kennedy’s Secret Society Speech).
I would like to use elements of Tragedy.
Must have:
a clear thesis statement
at least three body paragraphs outlined
supporting points in body paragraphs that are specific and detailed
supporting points in body paragraphs that are detailed, accurate and connected to the thesis
It should be a clearly organized outline
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
A rhetorical analysis to be precise is typically a four-sentence paragraph distilling the main ideas in the text assigned and a contextualized statement of their importance. You can use this format if you feel more comfortable following a template that ensures inclusion of key elements of the argument. This format is not required, however. If you prefer to freely chose your own framework to critically assess the work, feel free to do so. A rhetorical analysis o precis includes the following elements:
a) A single coherent sentence identifying:
-name of the author, title of the work, and date (in parenthesis) (you can also choose to add a description of the author something like professor of At, Pulitzer prize winning journalist etc.);
-a rhetorically accurate verb (such as “assert,” “argue,” “deny,” “refute,” “prove,” disprove,” “explain,” reveal challenge suggests etc.)this is important because authors usually don’t simply say things. Identifying what their rhetorical intentions are in crafting their arguments is critical in understanding the reading.
-a that clause containing the major claim (thesis statement) of the work.
b) A single coherent sentence that explains how the author develops and supports the major claim (thesis statement). (Does the author offer scientific evidence, or does she analyze underexamined aspects of a work or idea? What method, in short, does he/she use to make his/her point?)
c) A single coherent sentence stating the author’s likely purpose, followed by an “in order to” phrase.
d) A single coherent sentence describing the intended audience and/or the relationship the author establishes with the audience.
and then you can add your own comments to this!!
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
A positive sporting environment for junior athletes
The creation of a positive sporting environment for junior athletes.
1. The aim is to justify two topics that support the creation of a positive sporting environment for junior athletes. This will help to create two resources(infographics) for parent audience (not needed to create as already done). The first resource is based on Parent’s Optimum Zone Theory, the second is based on parent-initiated motivational Climate.
the aim is to justify the choice of content and offer links to the literature to support the rationale. How these can help create a positive sporting environment for junior athletes and why? Theories.
(Have already done half of this part, but needs to be improved)
2. Individually, you must present a 500 word rationale for the resources that offers a sound justification for your choice of content throughout the resources with clear links to the literature. You also need to talk about why parents are crucial in exposing their kids to sport and be able transport them so they have the opportunity to play more etc.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Analysis Requirements: You are to address the following questions in your paper, being sure to provide evidence from the video to support your claims.
I. Include your speech title and topic.
II. What was your specific speech purpose? How well do you feel you achieved that purpose?
III. Comment on your introduction: (support with evidence from the video)
A. Did your introduction attract the attention of the audience? How do you know? What type of attention getter did you use?
B. Was your thesis statement clear?
C. How did you try to establish credibility?
D. Did you include a preview? What did you preview?
IV. From an audience ës standpoint, was your speech organized effectively and appropriately? Why or why not?
A. What type of organizational pattern did you use?
B. Why did you choose this pattern?
C. How were you transitional statements?
D. How was your source citation?
V. What impact did your message have on your listeners? How did you reach this conclusion?
VI. How comfortable did you feel during the speech? Does the video show you as more or less comfortable and confident than you really were?
VII. How dynamic do you think your delivery was during the speech? What points about your delivery please you? How could your delivery have been improved?
A. Did you maintain eye contact with the audience?
B. How appropriate was your rate of speech?
C. How appropriate was your volume?
D. How appropriate was your pitch/tone?
E. How appropriate was your use of body movement?
VIII. Was your conclusion clear? Did you summarize your main points?
IX. Overall, what were your main strengths in your speech?
X. Overall, what were your main weaknesses in your speech?
XI. What do you wish you had done/said that you did not do/say?
XII. What three things will you try to improve on in your next speech?
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
The role of leadership competencies in innovation in the UAE last few years.
Research report should follow established research design principles, and support their proposal with a comprehensive and critical literature review clearly establishing the contribution of the proposed research, identifying data-sources and justifying methodological choices.
Individual Report Guideline
Research Title
Student must clearly mention the title (question) of the study.
Abstract
In a paragraph, student must provide a summary of the study, highlighting the topic, sample, data collection and analysis methods, and main finding of the study.
Introduction and Background of the Study
In this section, student must provide an introduction where a background of the study and how the research question was created with relation to existing theories in the field of the study. In addition, the introduction section must also illustrate the motives behind the study. Student must also highlight research philosophy and framework of the study. Finally, the introduction must explain the structure of the study.
Objectives, problem statement and importance of the study
In this part, student must state the research problem, which is a justification for conducting the research. This will help the student emphasize the objectives of the study, state what makes this study important, and the study’s contribution towards the existing literature.
Literature review
In this section, the student must review enough relevant literature, theoretical or empirical. This will demonstrate the student’s understanding of the research topic, and help in identifying the gap in the literature.
Hypotheses of the study
Student must clearly list the main hypotheses of the study. The null hypotheses are stated and put for testing.
Data and methodology
This section provides a discussion of the size of data, data collection, sampling procedure, and statistical tools used by the study to analyze the data.
Data analysis and results
In this part, student must explain the data analysis procedure, and present results clearly with the help of tables and graphs. The results must be then explained and discussed in the light of previous literature and hypotheses.
Conclusion and recommendations
In the conclusion part, student must summarize the results of the study, highlighting the main finding of the research and stating whether a positive or a negative relationship was found.
References
Student must list all the references cited in text in an alphabetical order using APA reference style.
Appendix
Attach a copy of the questionnaire
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
People over 50 years old may marry for different reasons than couples in their early 20s. When you are at a different stage in your life you have more life experiences and different motivations Think about people 50 years old and older. Conduct research online to locate at least two articles to help you better understand this population and their preferences for marriage. Summarize each article. Next, use the information you researched to respond to the questions here.
Most of us have had to participate in some type of training on our jobs, such as new employee orientation, lunch-and-learn workshops, Employee Assistance Program training, technical skill training, employee benefits update meetings, or management development workshops. Some of us have experienced on-the-job training. Others have participated in professional development workshops or skills-based continuing education classes. Think about the best and worst training experiences you have had. What made the best experiences excellent and what made the worst experiences terrible?
Assignment
Write a 10-page essay (not including cover and reference pages) analyzing one of your best training experiences and one of your worst training experiences. Be specific in discussing what made the experiences good or bad. Please review the content of Weeks 4-8 (uploaded files) on learning theories, the design of training, training methods, training evaluation, and transfer of learning. This material should be reflected in your essay.
Your essay should include brief descriptions of the training experiences:
The target audience
The objective(s) of the training (see Week 5 in The training site
Training methods used (see Weeks 7 and 8 uploaded files)
The major focus of your paper is your analysis.
Your analysis should include:
An assessment of the specific factors that contributed to the success or ineffectiveness of the training; for example, consider these questions:
o Did the training achieve its objective(s)?
o Was the training site conducive to learning?
o Were the methods chosen appropriate for the topic and the audience?
o Did you have opportunities to practice and receive feedback?
A discussion of the learning theory or theories that you believe guided the training (see Week 4).
A discussion of how your learning as well as the effectiveness of the training were evaluated (see Week 6).
An assessment of the competencies, knowledge, and/or skills demonstrated or not demonstrated by the trainer(s). The ATD competency model (see Week 1 uploaded files) is a good resource.
A discussion of whether or not you transferred what you learned to your job, and what contributed to your successful or unsuccessful transfer (see Week 4 uploaded files).
Your specific recommendations for improving the training, based on what you now know about effective training programs.
The information above should be included in your paper but you are free to organize your essay in whatever way makes sense to you. You may use the first person (I attended a program or the trainer told us) in discussing your experiences. Support your analysis with citations from the readings from this class or other HR courses, and additional resources posted in our classroom. Make sure you define all key terms and cite the source(s) of your definition. Since this is not primarily a research paper, no specific number of references is required. However, you must cite your sources.
Use APA format for all citations, quotations, and references. References should be listed on a separate page as required by APA style. Your paper should be double spaced with one inch margins and a font size of at least 11 points; do not include any spaces between paragraphs or sections.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
A 1-2 page paper answering these questions on Economist Jeremy Bentham. Paper should include an introduction and a conclusion with at least two references and all of these questions answered.
Describe the personality of your chosen economist.
What major contributions did this chosen economist contribute to the field of economics regarding:
Microeconomics
Macroeconomics
How does the works of your chosen economist have any relevance to our economy today?
How did your chosen economist further the field of economic study?
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
You will be required to write an 6-8 page (1500 – 2000 word) critical essay addressing one of the primary themes that we cover in the class. Possible subjects might be, for example, the establishment of company rule (early colonialism), the economics of high colonialism (the late nineteenth century), the development of nationalism in British India, communal politics in the lead up to partition ñ or other topics of your own choosing (and verified by me.).
Once you have chosen a specific topic for you essay, you should develop a concise argument. That is, you need to advance a specific angle of investigation that is yours. A term paper does need to summarize the arguments and information that you have researched, but it also must reflect your own, independent, analysis of the same. At least three scholarly sources (academic books and peer-reviewed journal articles ñ in print or online) should be used to substantiate your argument. Encyclopedias, textbooks, popular magazines and newspapers are not acceptable scholarly sources. Media outside of scholarly publications (internet sources, movies, etc.) are not acceptable unless approved in writing by the instructor at least three working days before the due date for the essay. An information sheet for citing reference will be posted on the course website. The essay will be graded by the coherency of its structure, the validity of its central premise (thesis), the depth of the research it demonstrates, as well as by its grammar and clarity of prose.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
