Identifying and Performing Rules for Assessing Students Order Instructions: Doctoral Study Rubric
As you know, rubrics are used in this program to evaluate each learner’s performance on course assignments. The doctoral study, and each element that constitutes it will also be assessed according to a rubric. Using a rubric allows for maximum transparency in what is expected of you and in the evaluation process itself.
By reviewing the rubric at the very outset of your doctoral study, you will be able to ensure you have a plan in place to systematically address each area on which you will be assessed. Beginning this week, we will examine rubrics from different institutions in the U.S to see how they differ from institution to institution.
For this paper, we will start by reviewing the Doctoral Study Rubric from an institution call Walden University of which many of you know of. After reviewing the entire Rubric of the above institution, address the following:
• Identify three challenges that might pose a problem on your project.
• Classify a plan of action for demonstrating competency in each area of assessment.
• Consider the characteristics of a successful student-doctoral study chair relationship.
I will email the Doc with the Rubric
Identifying and Performing Rules for Assessing Students Sample Answer
Doctoral Study Rubric
Identifying and implementing an effective method when assessing students is one of the challenges that educators often face. The faculty and students often ask questions about grading and assessment of their projects. Questions about assessment and grading appear when instructions are not clear, or the rationale for the awarding of grades is not well articulated (Howell, 2014).
Some of the challenges that I may face while working on my project include; Lack of the specific information about features of the performance that need attention. This is because of less performance level. Another challenge is describing the study validity and identifying the threats to external validity. Finally, I find it a bit challenging developing interview questions or focus group questions. The grading rubric has not provided explicit information to guide in developing interview questions.
A plan of action helps to address area needing improvement in order to satisfactorily complete a project. To effectively develop a plan of action, I will state all the problems in a list, Write SMART learning objectives and finally verify the achievement of the outcome measurement. This plan of action will help me to demonstrate competency in my area of study.
Some of the characteristics of a successful student-doctoral study chair relationship is accessibility. A chair must be accessible to other students through email, phone among other means of communication (Howell, 2014). A chair should also be understandable, to enable the students to understand him/her and also learn the preferred way of communicating on how to receive drafts of the doctoral study chapters and abstract of the project at hand. Finally, a chair should be creative and full of ideas so as to help students in providing guides, plans, and suggested readings to enable a student to conceptualize ideas about their projects.
In conclusion, a grading rubric is important in the education system as it provides both the student and the tutor a preset way of tackling their projects. However, some students may find challenges when using the grading rubric. But to be successful in following the rubric, it is important to develop a plan of action to help in solving the challenges. Finally, it is good that students have a good relationship with their student doctoral study chair.
Identifying and Performing Rules for Assessing Students References
Howell, R. J. (2014). Grading rubrics: hoopla or help?. Innovations in education and teaching international, 51(4), 400-410.
