Dental Product Report on Teeth Cleaning

Dental Product Report on Teeth Cleaning If a patient cannot clean his own teeth, no dentist can do it for him.
Sackett defines Critical Thinking as “Purposeful, self-regulatory judgment which results in interpretation, analysis, evaluation, and inference, as well as explanation of the evidential, conceptual, methodological, or contextual considerations
upon which judgment is based.”

Critical thinking skills development includes reflection on one’s own work. This assignment aims to provide opportunities for
demonstrating developing critical thinking skill sets.

Overall General Goals of Dental Product Report on Teeth Cleaning Assignment

this are to:
1) Apply concepts from EBDH to thoroughly investigate the merits of a dental product
2) Summarize analysis of selected evidence retrieved from scholarly dental literature
3) Make a recommendation to your peers about a given dental product
Special Notice: Students should review the rubric for assessment prior to beginning the project because strict adherence to the rubric
will be the basis of the evaluation by faculty and should be used as a guideline for the peer evaluation. REMEMBER: You are writing
this submission to your peers. As such you should use your best professional writing skills since this assignment is NOT intended for
laymen.
Dental Product Report: Final Draft Due Monday November 19th by 5 PM.
Students will be assigned a dental product or auxiliary aid.
Specific Objectives of the assignment and (content that MUST be included in the report) are to:
1) Complete a PICO worksheet for the product and conduct a search.
a. Complete the entire worksheet
b. Upload it to BB for the assignment
NOTE: Students may submit the PICO for formative feedback (no grade) to under the dental product
assignment icon in BlackBoard “Due Sept 10th 3PM
2) Database utilization for information retrieval: 2 databases must be included
a. Go to the TRIP database and conduct a basic search
i. Fill in the PICO tab to determine whether or not your PICO results in useful hits
ii. Rephrase PICO as needed
iii. Identify level of the evidence found (consider hierarchical evidence pyramid) and consider
usefulness in completing this assignment overall. Select those articles/sources most useful.
iv. Screenshot your results and attach them to the documents you turn in for grades
b. Mandatory: Students MUST go to PubMed and using keywords from successful searching in Trip or
1findr conduct another search
i. Once you have found useful peer-reviewed evidence, screenshot the PubMed page showing
useful hits.
ii. Students will attach the search history from PubMed to the assignment uploaded into BB
2) Search manufacturer’s website and general google searching from other reliable sources to explain
rationale for product’s use and how to effectively use the assigned dental product.
3) Description of the product: Include in your description the important features/active ingredients and
explain process/ importance /effectiveness of special features/active ingredients in the product,
4) From the manufacturer’s website, describe the manufacturer’s claims about the product (provide
pictures of advertisements if available) NOTE: The evidence selected (7 a-e below) MUST be DIRECTLY
related to the claims provided by the manufacturer.
EXAMPLE: If the claim is that it reduces caries, then the evidence (journal articles) selected
should be ONLY those that address caries reduction effectiveness and safety
OR if the claim is that it whitens teeth, the selected evidence should be focused on the whitening
properties, effectiveness & safety of the product
H316 Preventive I: Dental Product Report Instructions Fall
NOTE: Students may submit for formative feedback only the optional AMA style list of citations.
5) Purchase Locations: identify at least 3 places where the product may be purchased (2 local and 1 online
providing local and internet web addresses).
6) Provide price-points for each location identified
7) Analysis of Evidence:
a. For each source, you should follow suggestions from the DISCERN model template (see BB) and
write a summary paragraph explaining the usefulness of EACH of the sources (reliability/validity).
b. In addition, provide detailed analysis of the evidence by critically reviewing the empirical evidence for the dental product by completing ALL (1-6) of the following:
(NOTE: This will be the largest section of your dental product report! DO NOT CUT AND PASTE
THE ABSTRACT- You must describe the evidence in YOUR OWN WORDS)

Dental Product Report on Teeth Cleaning Assignment Instructions

1. In thinking about the EB pyramid, what level of evidence was found? Clinical practice
guideline/ Meta analysis systematic review/ systematic reviews/ RCT, etc. Identify the
level of evidence for each source you have selected to include in your assignment.
a) answer the question, “Is there a systematic review about your specific product or for a
similar or generic product that has the active ingredient/key feature of your product?”
Be EXPLICT in putting this in your report
b) Also include specifically your understanding of the level of evidence for EACH source
you use in the report – See DISCERN template
2. Of the sources selected, there MUST be a MINIMUM 2 peer-reviewed journal
publication sources (2 primary sources or 1 primary and 1 secondary peer reviewed
source minimum) which must be cited using the AMA style formatting. Students MUST
obtain the actual hard-copy of the entire journal articles selected
a) Answer the question: Was free-text available (Y/N) If yes, the article is free full
text, the you should print a separate PubMed screen shot to document that it was
and attach it with submission.
If free text is not available…
b) Attach interlibrary loan requesting the article
1) & you must ALSO provide ‘proof’ that you obtained the ENTIRE article not
just the abstract (screen shot the email you received when the article was
available to you)
2) See DTHY 327 PubMed Modules for how to request an interlibrary loan
3. You must include information in your report from a minimum of 1 textbook (as a
secondary source) which must be cited within the body of the submission and in the
bibliography using the AMA style formatting
4. Evidentiary summary: Use the literature critique template as a guide and address each
category in full (all 25 questions of the template should be covered within each of the
following categories as it applies to your product’s evidentiary sources):
a) author credentialing
b) funding of the studies
c) research design (methods and materials)
d) results
e) discussion and conclusions
NOTE: do the above for each article AND then compare and contrast the articles
? this list is an example not all inclusive. Use professional judgement in what else
might be important to include
5. Application of evidence to PICO: Remind your reader of what the manufacturer claimed
about the product and then summarize how your research questions (PICO) was
answered by the evidence you found: Ex: the manufacturer claimed the toothpaste
H316 Preventive I: Dental Product Report Instructions Fall
reduces cavities. Loe found a reduction by 57% over the 7 years of the experiment. Smith
also found a reduction of 35% in that 3 year study.
6. Recommendation: given a client in clinic make an evidenced-based decision on
recommending the product specifying best practices for its use. (Answer these 3
questions with justification)
1) Will you recommend the product?
2) Would you recommend the product but only for certain circumstances?
3) Would you NOT recommend the product?
NOTE: For ALL responses provide JUSTIFICATION for your professional opinion (see
Justification Essay tips for details in making a strong case for a professional opinion in
BlackBoard)
8). Formatting: correctly use the AMA style format in the references and in the body of the paper (See
example in BlackBoard Syllabus section)
9) Timeliness: post of the completed paper and references in the Discussion Board of DTHY 316
BlackBoard site
A grading rubric for this assignment is available in Blackboard™. Students should review the rubric PRIOR to
completing the assignment as it is criterion referenced to clearly state the outcomes expected for success on the
assignment. Late submissions for this project will result in a penalty of 10% deduction per day late (including weekends or
holidays). As this assignment is instrumental to achieving the goals and competencies of the program, students MUST
meet a minimum standard of 75% on this assignment to be considered successful. Failure to do so will result in an
incomplete in the course until successful remediation has been accomplished to the course director’s satisfaction
TIPS in organizing and presenting your argument in the dental product report:
The module will provide information on the content of the dental product report. MAKE SURE EACH ASPECT OF THE MODULE
GUIDELINES AND RUBRIC MEASUREMENT CRITERIA HAVE BEEN MET.
This segment is to help you organize and present your findings.
You don’t need to have a title page.
Create a header in your word document with your name and the name of the dental product on each page.
Create a footer in your word document with page numbers
Include the following within your submission: Attachments to accompany the dental product report submission:
1. PICO worksheets (include all pages).
2. Be sure to include the screenshots of your search pages in both PubMed and Trip or 1findr databases to show the articles you
located. Just attach these with the PICO worksheets for a single document.
3. If the article was full text, make sure that is on the screenshoted page above. If you needed to get an interlibrary loan, screenshot
the email that you sent AND the reply showing that you obtained access to the article.
The basic structure and organization of the dental product report is as follows:
1. Abstract: Write out this sentence relating to the purpose of the assignment: “The purpose of this assignment was to conduct a
review of the literature to assess safety and efficacy of the (fill in the blank name of product).
2. Introduction/Background: Write out this paragraph: The manufacturer’s claims are……. (Answer all questions about the product
itself, see module and answer Who-what-where- how – when – why- how much and other questions directly about the product)

Assessment of Eating Disorder Effects on Mind and Body

Assessment of Eating Disorder Effects on Mind and Body Discuss eating disorder and how it affects the mind and body.

Body awareness involves attentive focus on, and awareness of, internal body sensations, and this has been found low among persons with eating disorders

Assessment of Eating Disorder Effects on Mind and Body Discussion

Body unawareness can lead to the development of body dissatisfaction, the highest and most robust risk factor related to ED, and therefore, the promotion of body awareness is of particular importance in therapy. The results demonstrated favorable ED psychopathology outcomes for the yoga group over time. The persistence of the results 6 months after the intervention period is interesting and meaningful, given the extensiveness of the yoga intervention.

Patient complaint Consequences of unresolved conflict

Patient complaint Consequences of unresolved conflict Consequences of unresolved conflict

Provide definition and examples of the following 5 most common resolution method in power point format
1. Avoidance
2. Accommodation
3. Collaboration
4. Compromise
5.competition

Provide definition and examples of the following 5 most common resolution method in power point format. Avoidance, Accommodation, Collaboration, Compromise, competition Provide definition and examples of the following 5 most common resolution method in power point format. Avoidance, Accommodation, Collaboration, Compromise, competition Provide definition and examples of the following FIVE most common resolution method in power point format.Provide definition and examples of the following five most common resolution method in power point format

US Health Care Systems Current to History

US Health Care Systems Current to History Educate but not so much that it overwhelms the viewer.

It should include a strong thesis statement supported by research from at least 5 different sources.

US Health Care Systems Current to History Presentantion

Your presentation should include the following:
Title slide: title, your name, title of the course, date.
Body slides addressing: introduction, origin and history of U.S. health care system, today’s health care system, Affordable Care Act, and conclusion/summary. The body of the presentation should include multiple topics. Examples might include: medical advancements, health care spending, health care costs, health insurance, medical education, professions in health care, health care settings, regulations, former policies, and current policies/laws.
References slide: in APA format.

Critique Summarizing The Spanish Flu Epidemic

Critique Summarizing The Spanish Flu Epidemic The Spanish Flu Epidemic.

After writing the introduction, no more than half the page should be a critique summarizing the articles key themes and/ or narratives.

Critique Summarizing The Spanish Flu Epidemic

The articles strengths and weaknesses, larger historical context and contemporary implications should be analyzed. How and why the article enriches or revises our understandings about the Spanish Flu should he considered. The conclusion should mention your opinion of the article as a tool for teaching U.S History. Is it valuable? How and why the article enriches or revises our understandings about the Spanish Flu should he considered. The conclusion should mention your opinion of the article as a tool for teaching U.S History. Is it valuable?

The case of the Unhealthy Hospital

Health and Social Care Medicalisation Normality and Body

The case of the Unhealthy Hospital Analyze the current issues of the healthcare industry in the United States.

Analyzing The case of the Unhealthy Hospital

Identify and discuss current healthcare issues facing the US.

Analyze the changing healthcare environment impact on the organization.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of enrolling in government sponsored health care. Analyze the changing healthcare environment impact on the organization.

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of enrolling in government sponsored health care. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of enrolling in government sponsored health care. Analyze the changing healthcare environment impact on the organization.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of enrolling in government sponsored health care. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of enrolling in government sponsored health care. Analyze the changing healthcare environment impact on the organization.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of enrolling in government sponsored health care.

"<yoastmark

Respiratory Chest Infection Case Study

Respiratory Chest Infection Case Study A 57-year-old self-employed contractor makes an appointment for another “chest infection.”

He caught an upper respiratory tract infection from his grandchildren 10 days ago, and he now has a productive cough with green sputum, and his breathlessness and fatigue has forced him to take time off work.
As a nurse practitioner in a primary care practice, you have seen him with similar symptoms two or three times every year for the last several years. A diagnosis of COPD was confirmed 6 years ago, and he was started on a short-acting β2-agonist.

Respiratory Chest Infection Case Study and Disease Symptoms

This helped with his day-to-day symptoms, although recently the symptoms of breathlessness have been interfering with his work and he has to pace himself to get through the day. Recovering from exacerbations takes longer than it used to—it is often 2 weeks before he is able to get back to work—and he feels bad about letting down customers. He cannot afford to retire but is thinking about reducing his workload.
He quit smoking once for a short time but has otherwise smoked 1 ½ pack per day for 40 years. His last pulmonary function tests 6 months ago showed an FEV1 that was 52% of predicted. As a nurse practitioner in a primary care practice, you have seen him with similar symptoms two or three times every year for the last several years.

Respiratory Chest Infection Case Study and Recovery Duration

Recovering from exacerbations takes longer than it used to—it is often 2 weeks before he is able to get back to work—and he feels bad about letting down customers. He cannot afford to retire but is thinking about reducing his workload. As a nurse practitioner in a primary care practice, you have seen him with similar symptoms two or three times every year for the last several years. Case Study Questions
Based on this information, what are your treatment goals for this patient?
What medication would you prescribe for him?
What patient teaching would you provide for him?
Rubric
Drug Action and Use
Drug Absorption, Metabolism, Distribution, Excretion
Drug Adverse Effects, Contraindications, Precautions, Drug to Drug Interactions, and Drug to Food Interactions, and Drug to Herb Interactions
Drug Administration Guidelines
Clinical Drug Dosing
Patient Education
APA Format Respiratory Chest Infection Case Study

The National Health Interview Survey

Released In December Of 2008 From The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Were Findings That 38% Of Adults Use CAM [Complementary And Alternative Medical] Health Care Modalities.

Construct a professional paper that outlines how the use of the following CAM health care modalities impacts the cardiovascular system.
1.Ginseng
2.Hawthorn
3.L-Arginine
4.St. John’s Wort
For each of the modalities the discussion must include:
1.effect on the cardiovascular system
2.anticipated benefits
3.any identified risks or adverse effects
4.relative patient education
5.supporting reference from scholarly literature.
Instructions
•Prepare and submit a minimum of a 6 page paper pages [excluding title and reference pages].
•Format consistent with APA style without an abstract page.
•Answer all the questions above.
•Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.
•Submit the following documents to the Submit Assignments/Assessments area: ◦Assignment: Cardiac Impact

Current Canadian Public-Private Partnerships Health Policy

The final paper will be expected to be Current Canadian Public-Private Partnerships Health Policy and should demonstrate the ability to apply the material learned in this course plus the use of relevant secondary literature to analyze a topic related to health policy. Marks will be deducted if the paper is either shorter than 1850 words or longer than 2150 words. The word count is only for the text. It does include in text citations but it does not include the reference list. For each 50 words or part thereof outside this limit 5 marks (out of 100) will be deducted, e.g., if the essay is 2190 words 5 marks will be deducted, if the essay is 2230 words 10 marks will be deducted.
If you want to submit a copy of your essay in advance I will read it and give you detailed comments. You can then use those comments to make changes to your essay. However, in this case I will not give you comments on the final essay. You will only get the grade.

Current Canadian Public-Private Partnerships Health Policy; why are provincial drug plans structured differently from province to province.

Essay structure:
Analytic papers are not just a description of what is in a policy. They are an analysis of the reasons why a policy exists and its strengths and weaknesses.
HERE IS ONE EXAMPLE OF HOW TO STRUCTURE AN ESSAY:
• The essay has to deal with a current health policy question or a health policy issue and it has to be a Canadian question or issue.
• A health policy question could be something like what is the best way of ensuring that people are able to receive the medications that they need. A health policy issue could look at the same question from a different perspective, e.g., why are provincial drug plans structured differently from province to province.

Structure for a Current Canadian Public-Private Partnerships Health Policy question why are provincial drug plans structured differently from province to province essay

o Start off by stating what is the question that the essay will address, e.g., “This essay will look at whether Canada should have a national pharmacare plan.”
o The essay would then describe the policy or policies that have been developed about pharmacare, e.g., should everyone be covered for all drug costs by a national plan, what should we do about very expensive drugs, should such a plan pay for all drugs or just those that are life saving.
o Next would be a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the proposals or policies.
o Finally, in the conclusion you should give your assessment about whether or not the policy that has been developed has been successful, a failure, partly successful, etc. and why you have come to that conclusion or whether or not the proposals are likely to be successful, etc. and why you have come to that conclusion.

Current Canadian Public-Private Partnerships Health Policy, evaluate your writing style

If you use too many direct quotes, even if these quotes are properly attributed (see ACADEMIC HONESTY below) it will be hard to evaluate your writing style and whether or not you understand the material you are quoting. Too many direct quotes will therefore lead to a lower mark on your essay. In a 5 page essay there should not be more than a total of about one-half page of direct quotes.
Your essay MUST contain a minimum of 5 academic references. Newspaper and magazine articles may also be used but they are not considered academic material. Wikipedia is not considered an academic source.
Formatting requirements:
• Use subheadings
• All papers must be submitted to TURNITIN.

Instructions on how to do this will be given during the class for Current Canadian Public-Private Partnerships Health Policy

• Title page with the following 1) title of the paper; 2) your name; 3) my name; 4) course title; 5) date of submission; 6) word count
• Printed on 8.5 x 11 inch paper
• 12 point font
• Double spaced
• 1 inch margins
• Spell-checked

Marking System for essays:
1. Style (20 marks)
1. Writing style:
? Fluent writing, sentence structure, syntax
? Awkward writing, diction, idion
2. Grammar/spelling
? Good
? Weak
3. Length
? Suggested
? Under (more than 500 words less than required)
4. Readability
? Clear
? Difficult to follow
5. Reference style
? Correct use of APA or other recognized reference style
? Incorrect use of APA or other recognized reference style
2. Organization (20 marks)
1. Paragraph structure
? Coherent construction, logical progression
? Incoherent, doesn’t finish thoughts in paragraph
2. Development of argument
? Argument logically developed
? Lacks continuity, clarity, unity, flow
3. References
? References properly inserted in text to support points made
3. Originality of thinking (20 marks)
1. Overall analysis of issue
? Goes beyond simple presentation of material to synthesizing what has been presented
? Simply repeats conclusions of others
2. Integration of source material
? Integrates source material into coherent whole
? Source material presented as isolated facts
4. Content (40 marks)
1. Acknowledgement of sources
? Adequate acknowledgement of sources
? Inadequate acknowledgement of sources
2. Use of secondary sources
? Secondary material from multiple sources (books, journals, web sites)
? Secondary material from single source
3. Examination of topic
? Amount of content permits in depth examination of topic
? Amount of content permits superficial examination of topic.

Tips for Writing Current Canadian Public-Private Partnerships Health Policy Academic Essay

1. Start your essay by saying what the topic is.
2. Around the end of the first paragraph you should say what specific areas related to your topic that you want to cover in your essay.
3. If you are using non-Canadian material make sure you say why you think that it’s relevant to Canada.
4. If you are using older material (generally more than 10 years old) make sure you say why you think that it’s still relevant today.
5. If you are not confident in your writing ability then have a friend (or someone in your family) who you think is a good writer read over your essay before you hand it in.
6. If you don’t know anyone who is a good writer then use the writing centre. Remember it gets busy late in the term and you’ll need to make an appointment early.
7. Don’t write page long paragraphs. Each paragraph should be about one idea. If you switch ideas start a new paragraph.
8. Essays do NOT contain long bullet point lists. Essays are written in paragraph form.
9. In general no more than about 10% of your essay should be direct quotes. Too many direct quotes make it difficult to know if you understand the material and your writing style can’t be evaluated. Too many quotes will lose you marks.
10. If you are writing an essay about a policy issue then it’s not enough just to describe a problem. You need to critically assess why this is an important issue and what can be done about it.
11. If you are searching databases, phrases more than about 3 or 4 words are very unlikely to return many, if any, results. Instead of one long phrase break it up; e.g., instead of “the effects of public-private partnerships on hospitals costs” use “public-private partnerships” AND “hospital costs”. If this combination of terms doesn’t give you what you want then you can substitute something for “hospital costs”, e.g., “hospital expenditures”.
12. Be clear about what types of words and phrases need to start with a capital letter.
13. Word processing programs such as Microsoft Word don’t catch all types of spelling mistakes. For example, if you type “there” when you mean “their” Microsoft Word won’t identify this as a spelling mistake. READ OVER YOUR ESSAY FOR SPELLING.
14. Essays always look great right after you finish them. Put your essay aside for a couple of days and reread it to make sure it still looks great.
15. Make sure that you understand what an academic reference is. Academic references are generally academic books, chapters in academic books, journal articles and material from official web sites, e.g., the Health Canada web site. Newspaper and magazine articles are not academic references. Wikipedia is not an academic reference.
16. Use references for the points that you make. You don’t need a reference if you say something that is common knowledge, e.g., it is 4000 km from Toronto to Vancouver. However, if you say that 51% of the population in Toronto is female compared to 52% in Vancouver you’d need to cite a reference. Any ideas that you get from material you have read need to be referenced.
17. If you don’t know how to correctly cite references then look it up the correct style. Don’t make up your own style.

Pharmacological And Physiological Antagonism

Your initial discussion thread is on Pharmacological And Physiological Antagonism. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Refer to the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric under the Settings icon above for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.
Pharmacological and Physiological Antagonism
Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read the required chapters from the text and review the required articles for this week. Alcohol and caffeine have nearly opposite effects on behavior and the nervous system, yet these substances are not used to treat overdose or addiction to the other.

Why not use caffeine to treat alcohol addiction? Analyze the issues of pharmacological and physiological antagonism. Explain the receptor systems involved and the central nervous system structures effects with regard to this question. Frame your analysis in terms of drug action first and other consequences second.
Guided Response: Review several of your colleagues’ posts and respond to at least two of your peers by 11:59 p.m. on Day 7 of the week. You are encouraged to post your required replies earlier in the week to promote more meaningful interactive discourse in this discussion.
Evaluate your colleague’s analysis. To what extent was he or she accurate? Please use your research to support your assertions. Did the analysis take into consideration all the required elements? What might your colleague consider which was not already included in the analysis? Continue to monitor the discussion forum until 5:00 p.m. Mountain Standard Time (MST) on Day 7 of the week and respond to anyone who replies to your initial post.