Researching crime and justice Assignment

Researching crime and justice
Researching crime and justice

Researching crime and justice

Researching crime and justice

Critically review appropriate academic literature on a criminological topic of your choice
. You are required to stipulate how you identified the selected literature as well as
presenting the key themes identified through the critical review. This assessment is worth
50% of module mark. The pass mark is 40%. Submissions must be made before 12pm on Friday,
29 March 2019. Maximum word count: 2,500 words

Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

 

Types of Sentencing Mandatory Sentencing

Types of Sentencing Mandatory Sentencing Topic 1: Sentencing Of the three main types of sentencing; determinate, indeterminate, and mandatory sentencing, which do you find most effective, and why?

Types of Sentencing Mandatory Sentencing
Types of Sentencing Mandatory Sentencing

A mandatory sentence is one which must be imposed regardless of any other circumstances. In Ireland, murder carries a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment. The law lays down maximum sentences for all crimes. Generally, sentencing is left to the discretion of the judge. There are, however, are a number of laws which take this discretion away from the judge and they must impose at least a minimum sentence. A suspended sentence means the judge imposes a prison sentence but suspends it on certain conditions.

Supreme Court Case: Bush v. Schiavo- Right to Die

Supreme Court Case: Bush v. Schiavo- Right to Die
Supreme Court Case: Bush v. Schiavo- Right to Die

Supreme Court Case: Bush v. Schiavo- Right to Die

Research the case at Oyez (www.oyez .org) or FindLaw (www.findlaw.com) or any (www.gov). Write a brief summary of the facts of the case (in your own words).You can use other sources of information that you find on the internet as long as they are reputable. You cannot use Wikipedia, Encyclopedia Britannica

A good essay will include the following:
1) General Introduction thesis statement (the issue presented and background of case)
2) The Constitutional issue or questions (include amendment(s) involved,
3) Arguments supporting the issue and arguments against the issue,
4). The court’s ruling, and rationale behind the decision
5) your opinions… Do you agree with the ruling? Why or why not? How has this case helped/changed society today?

Format Instructions:
Your paper should be typed – 12 inch Times New Roman, Double Spaced, One-Inch margins
Include citations (endnotes or footnotes) and Works Cited page.
Three Page Minimum – 5 Page Maximum, does not include work cited page.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Social Responsibility Beyond Just Obeying the Law

Social Responsibility Beyond Just Obeying the Law Using what you’ve learned throughout this course, but especially in Lesson 7, write a well-developed argument essay on one of the following topics:

Social Responsibility Beyond Just Obeying the Law
Social Responsibility Beyond Just Obeying the Law

Do corporations have a social responsibility behind just obeying the law?
Privatization of government services
Minimum wage
National Healthcare
Workplace electronic surveillance and privacy issues
Distance education or traditional education
Internet privacy
PC or Mac
Should there be an Internet sales tax?
You may use outside sources if you document them using APA format, or you may write this
essay based entirely on your knowledge/experience.

Boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement

Boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement
  Boycott, divestment and     sanctions (BDS) movement

Boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement

In 2016 Parliament passed a motion rejecting” the Boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement, which promotes the demonization and delegitimization of the state of Israel“, and the government to “condemn any and all attempts by Canadian organizations,, groups or individuals to promote the BDS movement, both here at home and abroad.

The movement 2005 manifesto calls for boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel “until it complies with international law and universal principles of human rights.”

Specifically the movement calls for the non-violent punitive measures to be maintained until Israel ends “its occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and the wall” and recognizes “the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality,” and protects “the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties.

Essay Question: As a student of Middle Eastern history and a Canadian do you agree with the governments support of Israel’s policies in the region (between 1948-1987) and Israel’s continued occupation of territory acquired through war?

The question seeks to have you explore Israel and the Arab worlds conflict throughout the 20th century as means of forming your conclusion about the conflict. It demands you to take sides. (In the Essay please take Arab-palestinians side) In the conclusion discuss why you agree with the government policy and explain why, and if you disagree discuss what alternative policies you wish the government explore.

The essay is a historical essay. Please have a good thesis statement. Also please provide events, date, name, effective analysis and historical judgement to support thesis and content. Ie. Refugee problem, Six day war, Yom Kippur War, Camp David Accord, Oslo Accord.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Business Law and Ethics philosophy of economist Milton Friedman

Business Law and Ethics philosophy of economist Milton Friedman
Business Law and Ethics philosophy of economist Milton Friedman

Business Law and Ethics philosophy of economist Milton Friedman

Essay topic: Reflecting on the concepts you have studied in the course, research a company and discuss the legal and ethical issues surrounding it. You will need to research the company through the University library. Your essay should include the following four sections:

1) Identify and discuss two to three specific laws that apply to the company. For example, the laws mentioned in the EEOC readings.

2) Apply three general legal topics that were discussed in the required readings, i.e. Appendix B. Make sure you include in-text citations to the course materials, as failing to cite your sources will result in no credit in this section. The weekly lessons are not the required readings. The required readings are listed in the lessons section under “Required Readings.”

3) Discuss how the philosophy of economist Milton Friedman may have influenced the executives of the company.

4) Identify an ethical framework other than the shareholder theory that applies to this situation and discuss how it may have influenced the executives of the company.

Solyndra and British Petroleum may not be used as your company for this assignment.

Your essay should be 1800 – 2450 words and in APA format. Use at least seven credible sources for your essay, including at least two new sources from the University library (in addition to the course materials.) Submit this essay as a Microsoft Word attachment in the Assignment section of the class, no later than Sunday of week seven.

You must support your statements with materials from the required readings in the course, as well as outside research. Cite your sources in APA format. An abstract is not needed. A great source for those unfamiliar with APA formatting is http://www.apastyle.org/learn/tutorials/basics-tutorial.aspx. All material must be appropriately cited with an in-text citation (author, date) and a reference page listing.

The focus on this essay should be on the legal concepts. Your discussion of the history of the company should consist of no more than one page of the essay.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Analyze Capital Punishment Assignment

Analyze Capital Punishment 
Analyze Capital Punishment

Analyze Capital Punishment

Analyze Capital Punishment

Capital punishment, or the death penalty, can be analyzed from three different perspectives: the legal perspective; the philosophical, oral, and ethical perspective; and the analysis of empirical data on deterrence, public opinion, and so on. The constitutionality of the death penalty under Eighth Amendment continues to be a controversial legal issue. Some members of the court have felt that it is a barbaric punishment that has no place in a civilized society. Others have taken the view that the mention of capital crimes in the Fifth Amendment is sufficient evidence that the imposition of capital punishment is constitutionally permissible under appropriate circumstances.

In your main post, respond to the following from a criminal justice practitioner’s perspective, supported by legal reasoning:

Describe the capital crime or crimes in your jurisdiction.
Articulate your position as to whether capital punishment is an appropriate punishment for offenses other than murder.
Explain your perspective as to whether the manner in which capital punishment is imposed is a question of legality, morality, or emotion, considering public opinion.
Explore how the implementation and enforcement of capital punishment could affect the mindset, philosophy, and/or actions of a criminal justice practitioner in carrying out their duties

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

 

Constitutional Law IP and Court Rulings

Constitutional Law IP and Court Rulings Find a recent case (2011 to the present) dealing with the exclusionary rule. Address the following in 300–500 words:

Constitutional Law IP and Court Rulings
Constitutional Law IP and Court Rulings

The basic facts of the case including the state, city, and whether the original trial court was a state or federal court The legal issue(s) the court dealt with in the case The court’s ultimate legal ruling in the case Do you agree with the court’s ruling? Why or why not? All sources must be referenced using APA style. In general, court decisions are harder to locate than laws. English translations of court decisions are rare, but some are available (see below).

Liability of Negligence and Intentional Torts

Liability of Negligence and Intentional Torts 1. What level of intent is required for strict liability, negligence and intentional torts/ 2. Consent for treatment is presumed during

Liability of Negligence and Intentional Torts
Liability of Negligence and Intentional Torts

3. Describe vicarious liability and its potential application to a health care prover. 4. Damage that cannot be easily quantified, such as pain and suffering, are referred to as Non-Economic Damage 5. The duty of a hospital emergency department to evaluate all patients who enter is codified in what federal law? EMTALA 6. Describe the difference in proof required in civil and criminal cases 7. Programs promoting legal compliance and corporate integrity among health care entities are called 8. The prime advantage of incorporation is 9. Other than the anti-fraud provisions, what are the major components of HIPPA?

Liability of Negligence and Intentional Torts

10. Facilities that violate federal statues for emergency treatment can be banned from participating in the Medicare program. This consequences is called 11. Doctors who are independent contractors may still be considered employees of a hospital through the doctrine of 12. In Hill v. Ohio County, you reviewed the case of a plaintiff who has refused admission to the hospital and later died. Would this case be decided differently today? Why or why not? 13. The President of the United States represents which of the three branches of the federal government? 14. The federal agency responsible for promoting the welfare of wage earners and improving working conditions for employee is called the 15. List three differences between the Anti-Kickback Statue and the Stark Law 16. A method resolving disputes at a hearing before an impartial referee without involving the court system is called 17. True or False. As long as there is no private gain or profit, promotion of health is usually considered a valid charitable purpose in itself 18. State laws that shield first responders provider from liability for extending aid at an emergency scene are called 19. True or False.

Liability of Negligence and Intentional Torts Review Process

A court reviewing use of tying arrangements by a competitor is likely to apply the Rule of Reason analysis. 20. An offer to do something for free does not usually result in the formation of a contract because the offer lacks 21. To be effective, consent given by a patient for a medical procedure or surgical intervention must be 22. When a private whistle blower files a claim on behalf of the government for fraud or abuse, it is called a (n) 23. True or False. A single action cannot give rise to both a crime and a tort. USE THIS BOOK The Law of Healthcare Administration Book Jacket 24. List three things that should be included in an informed consent 25. True or False. Many states require hospitals to maintain emergency care facilities or arrange for such care as a condition of licensing. 26. As found in Tarasoff a doctor has a duty to use to protect persons threatened by a patient’s condition 27. A charitable corporation is a subset of a(n) corporation 28. The federal government’s primary statute in dealing with fraud and abuse is the 29. When a patient lacks capacity and no advance directive, doctors and family members try to make decision that the patient would have made if she/he able to make decisions. The doctrine is called 30. True or False. In a medical malpractice action based in negligence, a physician is held to a reasonable person standard, unless the mechanism of injury is commonly understood. 31. A ( n) is a court order directing that a certain act be performed or not performed.

Liability of Negligence and Intentional Torts Law

32. The model state law that addressed paternity support, genetic testing and related issues is the 33. The practice of health facility refusing to treat or transferring patients who are uninsured and unable to pay for medical care is called 34. Briefly describe the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and its potential relevance to medical liability 35. The two fundamental requirements for a Sec. (501)(3) federal tax exemption are charitable purpose and no 36. Most malpractice cases are based on the legal theory of 37. When the law disregards the corporate form and places liability on owners of the corporation, this is known as. USE THIS BOOK The Law of Healthcare Administration

Courts, Prosecution, and the Defense Essay

Courts, Prosecution, and the Defense
Courts, Prosecution, and the Defense

Courts, Prosecution, and the Defense

The courts have one of the most important roles in the criminal justice system. They are responsible for the interpretation and application of law when crimes are committed, They exert some of their greatest influence when it involves due process under the law. The due process model argues that the greatest concern of the justice system should be providing fair and equitable treatment to those accused of crime. This perspective is demonstrated through the courts’ involvement with the police in controlling search and seizure and interrogation, protecting the rights of the accused, in cases like Miranda v. Arizona and Weeks v. United States. Have concerns over due process and protecting the “allegedly” innocent led to the guilty also being spared, as the crime control model would argue?

Criminologist Herbert Packer’s assembly line concept finds that although there are many people who commit crime and are arrested and charged, only about 21 adults are incarcerated for every 1000 serious crimes committed. Additionally, 80 percent of all felony cases and over 90 percent of misdemeanors are settled without trial.

On the other hand, over time, the Supreme Court has been diminishing the scope of the exclusionary rule. This normally excludes improperly obtained evidence by permitting more exceptions, thus allowing more “improperly obtained evidence” into court. For example, evidence is now admissible in court if the police officers acted in good faith by first obtaining court approval for their search, even if the warrant they received was deficient or faulty. This has come to be known as the good faith exception.

Based on your understanding from the readings in chapters 6-8, and keeping in mind the due process and crime control models, write a 2- to 3-page paper in which you discuss:

PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING 3 QUESTIONS BASED OFF THE INFORMATION ABOVE!!!!

  1. Have criminals been given too many rights by the courts?
  2. Should courts be more concerned with the rights of victims or the rights of the offenders?
  3. Should illegally seized evidence be excluded from trial, even though it is conclusive proof of a person’s criminal acts?

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!