Category: Questions

Milgram’s Experiment and Lord of the Flies
Introduction
Milgram’s Experiment reveals that the majority of people are willing to obey the authority figure by following instructions to perform acts that conflict with their coincidence. Besides, the Lord of Flies is a real example of obeying authority. This is because the Lord of Flies shows that boys are willing to follow any chain of command. The connections show that there are less evil people than good. However, society acts as the foundation of a person’s wrongdoing or evil. Milgram’s Experiment assessed people’s reaction told to give a painful electric shock, while in the Lord of Flies by William Golding readers are introduced to actors of evil and good. The study shows that despite many individuals being useful in the world, only a few are great. The purpose of this study is to show how William Golding in the Lord of Flies connects with Milgram’s Experiment themes to demonstrate how people are willing to obey orders from an authority figure. The paper provides a clear analysis of the link between the Lord of Flies and Milgram’s Experiment and the implications it has on the modern day leadership style and how people are willing to obey a chain of command from an authority figure. Theoretical
Milgram’s Experiment was carried out to show how people obey authorities under all circumstances, especially people who instructed them to perform acts that conflict the coincidence of purposes. The purpose of Milgram’s Experiment was to give students electric shocks by separating them from the subject and establishing a tape recorder, which was integrated with electronic shocks. Therefore, if the answers were inaccurate, the teacher would administer a shock to the learner by an increasing voltage for each wrong answer, while for the correct answer, the teacher would go to the next word pair. Milgram’s Experiment was in a controlled setting such that the learner could not attempt to quit the experiment, which led to the establishment of status and authority (Batson and Daniel, 2016, 10). Milgram’s Experiment showed factors that affect obedience. For instance, the status of location showed that prestige of location increase obedience, while less personal responsibility increases obedience. Besides, individuals tend to obey others if they acknowledge their authority as legally based or/and morally right. Thus, the uniformity of the authority figure can provide people with status as well as peer support or presence of others disobeying the authority figure decreases the obedience level. Milgram’s Experiment showed that proximity to authority plays a significant role in obedience as people can easily resist orders from authority if they are not nearby (Haslam and Stephen, 2017, 63).
In Milgram’s Experiment, the teacher does not know that the shocks are not real, and the student behind the participation is in the experiment working with Milgram. Besides, the learner is getting words pairs incorrect on purpose, making the experiment fake despite showing the importance of obeying authority. Therefore, the actual experiment is on the teacher. Despite the increased yelling by participants, they continue to finish the experiment. As much as many participants wished to stop, Milgram used four phrases to entice them to finish the exercise. The motivating phrases were, “please continue, the experiment requires you to continue, it is necessary for you to continue and you have no other choice, you must go on (Haslam, Nick, Loughnan, and Perry, 2014).”
The Lord of Flies by William Golding introduced characters of evil and good. The study shows that despite many individuals being useful in the world, only a few are great. This is because people control how their environment influences their actions and behaviors. During the feast, Jack sat like a leader and idol as he issued commands such as who was going to join his tribe. Through his command and leadership authority, most of the boys accepted because they wanted meat and protection from Jack. Besides, despite Jack punishing Wilfred for no particular or apparent reason, Roger and the rest of the boys of the tribe felt nothing wrong about it. This is because none of the boys had the courage or confidence to stand up for Wilfred. Therefore, the Lord of Flies by William Golding showed that people have a fear of authority and quickly give up justice. Moreover, Jack and Roger tortured Eric and Sam, forcing them to submit to Jack’s command and join his tribe. This shows that authority forces the weak people to follow them using violent action and false use of authority. The failure of Jack to admit that he took too much power and authority shows that influential leaders are not willing and lack the courage to admit mistakes such as enslaving others. The analysis of the Lord of Flies shows that civilized officers are part of an adult world in which violence and war are associated with social order and civilization. People are expected to obey authority as influential leaders do things to destroy the peaceful world, similar to what Jack did to the boys and vice versa.
Connections
The comparison of Milgram’s Experiment and the novel of the Lord of Flies show that the boys feared the beast referred as the electronic shocks, while they allowed Jack to gain power and authority through obedience to his command. The review shows that it is easier to control people and persuade them to be savagery by obeying the experiments. This is because the boys followed the authority or command to get protection or avoid the electric shock. The connection between Milgram’s Experiment and the novel of the Lord of Flies is evident in that both boys follow the order to obtain protection or avoid electronic shocks. For instance, the boys are stranded and end up following the commands from Jack without comprehending the reasons for doing it. Besides, from both sets of experiments, it is evident that people follow orders without questioning the consequences or impacts on the other party.
William Golding in the Lord of Flies presents the obedience idea in Milgram’s Experiment through the connections of actors take as a leader, Jack, and Ralph, and the other actors who ideally obey the leader’s command or orders without questioning. This connection shows how people or kids are ready and willing to obey the authority figure that has leadership skills………………………………
References
Batson, Charles Daniel. What’s wrong with morality?: A social-psychological perspective. Oxford University Press, 2016: 2-25
Bègue, Laurent, et al. “Personality Predicts Obedience in a Milgram Paradigm.” Journal of Personality 83.3 (2015): 299-306.
Branson, Jane, and Peter Buckroyd. Lord of the Flies, William Golding: Workbook. Oxford University Press, 2017: 10-30
Gridley, Mark, and William J. Jenkins. Obedience to Authority. Macat Library, 2017: 20-27
Haslam, Nick, Steve Loughnan, and Gina Perry. “Meta-Milgram: An empirical synthesis of the obedience experiments.” PloS one 9.4 (2014): e93927.
Haslam, S. Alexander, and Stephen D. Reicher. “50 Years of “Obedience to Authority”: From Blind Conformity to Engaged Followership.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 13 (2017): 59-78.
Hollander, Matthew M. “The repertoire of resistance: Non‐compliance with directives in Milgram’s ‘obedience’experiments.” British Journal of Social Psychology54.3 (2015): 425-444.

Milgram’s Experiment and Lord of the Flies
Introduction
Milgram’s Experiment reveals that the majority of people are willing to obey the authority figure by following instructions to perform acts that conflict with their coincidence. Besides, the Lord of Flies is a real example of obeying authority. This is because the Lord of Flies shows that boys are willing to follow any chain of command. The connections show that there are less evil people than good. However, society acts as the foundation of a person’s wrongdoing or evil. Milgram’s Experiment assessed people’s reaction told to give a painful electric shock, while in the Lord of Flies by William Golding readers are introduced to actors of evil and good. The study shows that despite many individuals being useful in the world, only a few are great. The purpose of this study is to show how William Golding in the Lord of Flies connects with Milgram’s Experiment themes to demonstrate how people are willing to obey orders from an authority figure. The paper provides a clear analysis of the link between the Lord of Flies and Milgram’s Experiment and the implications it has on the modern day leadership style and how people are willing to obey a chain of command from an authority figure. Theoretical
Milgram’s Experiment was carried out to show how people obey authorities under all circumstances, especially people who instructed them to perform acts that conflict the coincidence of purposes. The purpose of Milgram’s Experiment was to give students electric shocks by separating them from the subject and establishing a tape recorder, which was integrated with electronic shocks. Therefore, if the answers were inaccurate, the teacher would administer a shock to the learner by an increasing voltage for each wrong answer, while for the correct answer, the teacher would go to the next word pair. Milgram’s Experiment was in a controlled setting such that the learner could not attempt to quit the experiment, which led to the establishment of status and authority (Batson and Daniel, 2016, 10). Milgram’s Experiment showed factors that affect obedience. For instance, the status of location showed that prestige of location increase obedience, while less personal responsibility increases obedience. Besides, individuals tend to obey others if they acknowledge their authority as legally based or/and morally right. Thus, the uniformity of the authority figure can provide people with status as well as peer support or presence of others disobeying the authority figure decreases the obedience level. Milgram’s Experiment showed that proximity to authority plays a significant role in obedience as people can easily resist orders from authority if they are not nearby (Haslam and Stephen, 2017, 63).
In Milgram’s Experiment, the teacher does not know that the shocks are not real, and the student behind the participation is in the experiment working with Milgram. Besides, the learner is getting words pairs incorrect on purpose, making the experiment fake despite showing the importance of obeying authority. Therefore, the actual experiment is on the teacher. Despite the increased yelling by participants, they continue to finish the experiment. As much as many participants wished to stop, Milgram used four phrases to entice them to finish the exercise. The motivating phrases were, “please continue, the experiment requires you to continue, it is necessary for you to continue and you have no other choice, you must go on (Haslam, Nick, Loughnan, and Perry, 2014).”
The Lord of Flies by William Golding introduced characters of evil and good. The study shows that despite many individuals being useful in the world, only a few are great. This is because people control how their environment influences their actions and behaviors. During the feast, Jack sat like a leader and idol as he issued commands such as who was going to join his tribe. Through his command and leadership authority, most of the boys accepted because they wanted meat and protection from Jack. Besides, despite Jack punishing Wilfred for no particular or apparent reason, Roger and the rest of the boys of the tribe felt nothing wrong about it. This is because none of the boys had the courage or confidence to stand up for Wilfred. Therefore, the Lord of Flies by William Golding showed that people have a fear of authority and quickly give up justice. Moreover, Jack and Roger tortured Eric and Sam, forcing them to submit to Jack’s command and join his tribe. This shows that authority forces the weak people to follow them using violent action and false use of authority. The failure of Jack to admit that he took too much power and authority shows that influential leaders are not willing and lack the courage to admit mistakes such as enslaving others. The analysis of the Lord of Flies shows that civilized officers are part of an adult world in which violence and war are associated with social order and civilization. People are expected to obey authority as influential leaders do things to destroy the peaceful world, similar to what Jack did to the boys and vice versa.
Connections
The comparison of Milgram’s Experiment and the novel of the Lord of Flies show that the boys feared the beast referred as the electronic shocks, while they allowed Jack to gain power and authority through obedience to his command. The review shows that it is easier to control people and persuade them to be savagery by obeying the experiments. This is because the boys followed the authority or command to get protection or avoid the electric shock. The connection between Milgram’s Experiment and the novel of the Lord of Flies is evident in that both boys follow the order to obtain protection or avoid electronic shocks. For instance, the boys are stranded and end up following the commands from Jack without comprehending the reasons for doing it. Besides, from both sets of experiments, it is evident that people follow orders without questioning the consequences or impacts on the other party.
William Golding in the Lord of Flies presents the obedience idea in Milgram’s Experiment through the connections of actors take as a leader, Jack, and Ralph, and the other actors who ideally obey the leader’s command or orders without questioning. This connection shows how people or kids are ready and willing to obey the authority figure that has leadership skills………………………………
References
Batson, Charles Daniel. What’s wrong with morality?: A social-psychological perspective. Oxford University Press, 2016: 2-25
Bègue, Laurent, et al. “Personality Predicts Obedience in a Milgram Paradigm.” Journal of Personality 83.3 (2015): 299-306.
Branson, Jane, and Peter Buckroyd. Lord of the Flies, William Golding: Workbook. Oxford University Press, 2017: 10-30
Gridley, Mark, and William J. Jenkins. Obedience to Authority. Macat Library, 2017: 20-27
Haslam, Nick, Steve Loughnan, and Gina Perry. “Meta-Milgram: An empirical synthesis of the obedience experiments.” PloS one 9.4 (2014): e93927.
Haslam, S. Alexander, and Stephen D. Reicher. “50 Years of “Obedience to Authority”: From Blind Conformity to Engaged Followership.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 13 (2017): 59-78.
Hollander, Matthew M. “The repertoire of resistance: Non‐compliance with directives in Milgram’s ‘obedience’experiments.” British Journal of Social Psychology54.3 (2015): 425-444.

Case Study:
1) You are the nurse manager for your unit. You have called a staff meeting and have encouraged the staff to bring concerns regarding staff satisfaction and care delivery. The focus of this meeting is to consider a new approach of self-scheduling. Before looking at how such an approach could actually be implemented, you want staff to consider the pros and cons of the current approach (managerial driven) versus the pros and cons of handing this over to the staff for self-scheduling. Construct a chart (4 sections: a pro section for each type and a con section for each type) to illustrate and clarify the dilemmas, challenges, benefits, issues, and problems associated with each. Please list at least 5 items in each of the sections. Be sure to look at this from in regards to the staff and the impact on care delivery.
2) Now assume that you and your group have decided to move forward with initiating self-scheduling for your unit on a trial basis. Before initiating this new approach, you will need to write some guidelines for self-scheduling that the staff must all follow. List at least 8 guidelines that all staff will follow.

Using the information that you gathered in looking at Hospital Compare, Hospital Cost Compare, and the CMS document covering Value-Based Purchasing provide a written reflection:
• Explaining your findings for your organization (or one in your area that you are able to locate on both resources)
• Can you see a link between the quality/safety information and cost/reimbursement
• Exploring your thoughts on how CMS links quality to payment

According to Michael Cremo, human existed over 150000 years ago or probably millions of years ago. According to his research, he used megalithic structures to show that human existed 150000 years ago. For instance, he used Hampi, India and Osaka walls in Japan. Michael also used Paleoliths, old stones to show human existence millions of years ago. He also uses the writings on walls to show that human life existed many years ago and a speech by Michael Faraday 150000 supports his analogy. Archeological evidence in Hueyatlaco, Mexico was discovered with human artifacts, of 250000 years ago. He believes that the footprints are for human showing that human existed 1.3 million years ago. Besides, he used Buenos Aires Skull to show that human pre-ensanadan formation existed 1.5 million years ago (Cremo 30). 

Cremo’s Methodology

Cremo used secondary data in order to obtain his evidence that human existed millions of years ago. Therefore, the methodology is an analysis of secondary data or findings from other archeologists. Cremo uses examples of archeological evidence such as the findings in Hueyatlaco, Mexico of human footprints and Buenos Aires Skull showing pre-ensanadan formation (Cremo 30). 

Primary and Secondary Literature

Primary literature is the physical object which was created or written during study time, which is a result of initial scientific research or observation such as footprints. Secondary literature is the analysis and interpretation of primary sources. The primary literature discusses the direct and firsthand evidence on history and existence of human life and includes artifact and pictures (Cremo 30). 

Secondary Texts

Cremo’s opinion about secondary texts do not contain evidence of extreme human antiquity because secondary texts lack the primary record immediacy and they include information is already analyzed, processed, interpreted and commented in such a manner to alter the originality of information (Cremo 30). 

Primary Texts

It is valid that primary texts both present and past provide evidence of extreme human antiquity. This is because they provide firsthand and direct evidence about work of art and events of human history. 

Historian of Science

I agree with Oldroyd claims. This is because there is a significant problem regarding the lack of assurance in scientific truth. It is evident that most of the claims are unfounded and present real assumption of human existence over the years, considering that Cremo uses other people’s archeological findings, which are scientifically not proven (Cremo, 2012, p.13). 

Virginia SteenMclntyre

The self-publishing by Virginia SteenMclntyre and his team findings of an archeological site near Pueblo, Mexico was rejected and job losses for going against the university rules. They independently published the findings and received a backlash from colleagues and lost a job and her career was finished. According to Cremo, the work was rejected because it contradicts the theory of the archaeologist that human never existed 250000 years ago (Cremo 30). 

Modern human Anatomic

According to Cremo’s research, the anatomically modern human beings’ presence can be traced in Europe. This is according to the traces of man in the Crag or shell of human face discovered by Henry Stopes in 1881.  The basis is that the red crag existed in Europe 2-3 million years ago. Jacques discovered a human skull in Abbeville, France. Critics argued that the information was not accurate and no traces of human existence at that time (Cremo 30). 

Pre-ensanadan formation

The pre-ensanadan formation is the formation that is beneath the volcanic rock that led to the discovery of human skull. At that time, the human skull was discovered.

Han Reck’s finding at the Olduvai Gorge

Reck skeleton was discovered in Olduvai with a variety of ape-men including the Homo habilis. He discovered a human skeleton between 1.15 and 1.77 million years old of human remains in the early 1930s. Reiner Protsch was a German scientist who used carbon 14 dating to determine the age of the skeleton. He believes the bone fragments’ samples were not authenticated and were on a third of the standard sample. The sample was probably contaminated by carbon 14. Protsch findings should be discredited due to his questionable character and competence (Cremo 30).  

Human Jaw

The fossil human jaw born was discovered at Suffolk by Robert. The findings were human jaw born found to exist 2-3 years old in Suffolk, Ipswich. This was significant evidence showing the existence of human live 2-3 million years ago (Cremo 30). 

Mary Leaky

In 1979, Mary Leaky announced footprints at Laetoli, Tanzania. She believes that the Laetoli footprints are indistinguishable from human footprints. Other scientists supported her discovery because the footprints resemble modern human footprints. Critics argue that the footprints were found by a volcanic hill 3.7 million years old and scientist and Leaky believe that no human existed approximately million years ago (Cremo 30). 

Italy and Human Skull

An anatomically modern human skull was discovered in Castenedolo, Italy in the late 19^th century, by Ragazzoni. It was a reasonably complete anatomically modern human skull, and the original place was relocated. Some scientists have found a rock over 4 million years old, and 400 years ago intrusive burial was made. He claims the layers above the skeleton were intact and was 4 million years old (Cremo 30). 

California Gold Mine

The California Gold Mines discovered human bones and human artifacts in the 19^th century. The findings were found to belong to the early years of EAC, 15 million years old. William Holmes was the anthropologist who discovered and analyzed these findings by a gold mine. The scientist believes that the findings should not have published if the facts do not fit the theory. This meant that the artifacts were wrong. Cremo aligns these findings by doing secondary analysis by getting pictures to support the evidence. The FCC was involved in publications and making the discovery more authentic (Cremo 30). 

Ape Man

There is archeological evidence consistent with many findings that humanity has existed in other many shapes. He believes that evidence does not show that anatomically modern humans of so-called ape-man. This view contradicts the academic mainstream of human evolution from ape to modern human. 

Vedic Perspective and Modern Scientific Perspective

In the Vedic perspective, an answer is given by a Vedic concept through creativity. Moreover, it uses an all-pervading field of intelligence, life force, and consciousness. Modern Scientific Perspective is a generative process that occurred to influence neurological or biological systems.

Overview: When you are considering responses to healthcare situations, it is important to be able to quickly identify the underlying ethical and bioethical
theories driving a proposed solution. While completing the worksheet, consider the core elements of the theory that must be addressed in the solution. Prompt: In this activity, you will utilize the main ethical and bioethical theories in solutions to a proposed scenario.
Part One: Propose a solution to the following scenario using each of the five ethical theories presented in this module. Explain how your solution aligns with the major ideas within each theory.
Scenario: There is a pandemic of a contagious disease. In the United States, there is only enough of a vaccine to cover 70% of the population. How do you determine who gets the vaccine?
Part Two: Consider the same scenarios, but explain what process you would need to add to your solution to protect the bioethics principles.

Primary Care of the Psychiatric Mental Health Client II Pediatric Case Study
Madeline is a 10-year-old girl of African American descent who was brought into the clinic by her parents, who report that she is constantly washing her hands at home and at her grandmother’s house. She spends about two hours at night preparing for bed and must complete sp routines every evening before going to sleep. Madeline brushes her teeth at least 10 times daily and her belongings all must be in the sam every night. She gets up from bed and repeatedly checks her belongings before she can lie down.
She lives with her parents and two older siblings in a two-family house where her grandmother lives upstairs. Her teacher is very worried a because she does not complete her school assignments and continually rewrites her schoolwork even when it appears perfect to her teach Madeline’s routines and insistence on perfection are interfering greatly with normal functioning. She’s late for school and cannot complete t and has no friends. She had a couple neighborhood friends until about a year ago. Her parents noticed these routines about two years ago they have become much worse over the last six months.
Madeline is a well-developed child of average height and weight, with hands that are red, chapped, and rough. She used to play soccer but longer stay out in the field for more than three minutes at a time. Madeline appears very anxious and asks to go to the bathroom frequently, she then washes her hands. Six months ago, Madeline’s father lost his job in the hotel industry and her mother had to increase her hours a as a certified nursing assistant.
Madeleine has been spending increased time with her grandmother, who mother describes as a “germophobe.” Madeleine is afraid her mot bring Covid-19 home and her grandmother will get sick. She screams and cries to stop mother from leaving to go to work. Madeleine says can’t “get these thoughts out of her head.”
Madeline’s parents are concerned about “drugging” her and are specifically concerned about side effects of any kind of medications.
ecific e place
bout her er. asks
, but
can no
where t work
her will she

Write 500 words identifying why you want to be a nurse in your chosen branch of nursing. Within the 500 words consider the strengths you bring to the course and what concerns you have about the next 3/4 years, if you have any.

Manifest Destiny Amy Greenberg’s book
What is the historical context which Amy Greenberg’s book is written?What is the historical evidence does Greenberg use to write her book ? Greenberg’s book addresses the major themesth that was was the ideology of Manifest Destiny, and the westward growth of the US stemming from that ideology. At what expense did we, as Americans, under the guise of our God-given right to Manifest Destiny, take control of the lands west of the Mississippi River? For the term paper, pick 2 of the themes and write the majority of the paper addressing those issues. Do you think the U.S. government was fair to other nations and native peoples in
our geographic growth. The paper should address should address Manifest Destiny and President Polk’s war with Mexico to to support my thesis in the introductory paragraph.

Importance of attachment Write a four page essay about the importance of attachment relating to the discoveries of Bowlby’s theory, Mary answay study, and Margaret Mahler’s study during development. please read attached material for body. Assignment. Write a four page essay about the importance of attachment relating to the discoveries of Bowlby’s theory, Mary answay study, and Margaret Mahler’s study during development. Danny is a Vietnamese an unattached child. Who was adopted by an American couple. He has murdered three family cats. Vandalized a neighbors house that cost his parents 6,000 to fix. Tried to drown a twelve year old girl. Draws pictures of devils ,demons while sitting in church. Stolen and terrified lied and bullied his parents. Threatened to kill family by setting the house on fire Body. a. Little biography about john Bowlby. And his upbringing. How is related to his studies Explain Bowlby’s theory. Importance to attachment. How Danny’s un attached behavior is explained in Bowlby theories. b. Little biography about Mary answay. And his upbringing. How is related to his studies Explain Mary Answay theory. The three perspectives. Importance to attachment How Danny’s un attached behavior is explained in Mary answay theories. c.Little biography about Margaret Mahler. And his upbringing. How is related to his studies Explain Mary answay theory. Importance to attachment. How Danny’s un attached behavior is explained in Margaret mahler theories.