Using the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis you did in Week 3, select an area of improvement in the healthcare setting. You will do an RCA for this area this week.
Find a question or topic that interests you. Ex. You may be a person who want to know about substance abuse treatment for Asian families. You formulate a question something like this: Are there cultural barriers in working with Asian families with substance abuse issues?
Once you formulate your question, you research the topic to find peer reviewed articles, scholar articles to talk about rather it is evidence base, evidenced informed, and ALL the information you can find regarding the model, technique or therapy they use.
Another Ex.: you may want to know more about teenage pregnancy in child welfare system. You can formulate a question that may say; How successful are African American teenager parents in the child welfare system and why or why not they parent successfully.
You may want to know more about Latinos and domestic violence, You can formulate a question that may say; How work with Latinos women in domestic violence relationship, what resources, and effective evidence-based therapeutic practices.
You can formulate a topic or questions pertaining to Native American families and barriers in working with through the child welfare system.
Ex. Formulate a question regrading program models for foster family that is evidence informed or evidenced based practice.
Ex. Evidenced based therapy for children with Autism, and are they effective for Latinos and African Americans, or does culture has an impact.
Listed below are some website to assist in finding peer reviewed articles and research:
While you are formulating your question, you give an introduced why this particular topic/question interest you. You can give an overview on the topic and then proceed to make sure the 6 points outlined is in the body of your paper:
1) formulate or select an answerable question,
2) conduct a search of the relevant literature, (this portion is researching your topic using peer review articles)
3) critically appraise the literature, this portion is researching your topic using peer review articles)
4) select an evidence-based or evidence-informed practice approach which he/she would implement as a BSW practitioner or to which he/she would refer a client (how you as the therapist/social worker would this technique, therapy, etc…)
5) describe the core components of the practice approach/program/model and (breakdown the model, or therapy technique)
6) explain the reasoning for his/her selection (why choose this topic and model/therapy)
It does not have to go in the order, but must have a follow and I should be able to read that you hit the all the main points.
Hiroshima Monograph Semester Writing Assignment Hiroshima
Relying only on material from the Hiroshima monograph, the textbook, and class notes and PowerPoints–thoroughly answer all of the following questions:
Hiroshima Monograph Semester Writing Assignment
Section One: According to the book, why was Hiroshima such an ideal target for American bombing?
Section Two:
a. Discuss the experiences of one of the central characters in this book.
b. Explain what you think the author’s purpose was in telling so many individual anecdotes about life before the bomb.
Section Three: List and describe some of the side effects of radiation sickness.
Section Four: Explain why the medical and rescue efforts had so little impact on the survivors’ behalf, immediately following the blast.
Include at least three direct, multi-sentence block quotes from Hiroshima to support your position. Be sure to cite these quotations in parentheses and in all caps. For example, your citation might look like this:
“Allied doctors who came in after the surrender found plasma and penicillin very effective.” (HERSEY, P. 99).
PLEASE NOTE: If you do not include the 3 direct quotations from the book, you will lose 15 points from your score.
Source link: https://ia601408.us.archive.org/35/items/hiroshima035082mbp/hiroshima035082mbp.pdf
Two Essays. Choose two topics below. Each essay should be about 4-5 paragraphs, plus at least one picture. Use specific information from the reading to develop your points.
Please write about 5-7 paragraphs on one of the themes below. Include at least two pictures. Use information and insights from various time periods in our course. You may also use information you learned in the unit on California politics.
-Government
-Foreign Policy
-Culture
-Reform
-Women
-Environment
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
The Final Research Paper will be based on the topic, “Modern sociocultural, environmental and genetic influences on human personality”. In this paper, the student will analyze current forces of either genetic influences, socio-cultural factors and/or environmental pressures on the personality as discussed by a theorist in the textbook. Your paper will integrate a classical personality theory of your choice (Freud, Jung, Horney, Sullivan, Adler etc.) with modern day influences on individuals’ personality and its evolution. The fundamental questions for this project are, “are the classical theories still relevant?”, “are personalities evolving from those discussed in the textbook?”, and finally, “if modern personalities are evolving, what is the impetus of this phenomenon?”.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
-All articles from a peer-reviewed and/or scholarly source
-20 or more articles used in literature review
-Correctly formatted with 1″ margins, 12 size font. Headings used appropriately. Body of paper and any cover pages and/or appendices numbered appropriately. Instructions for submission of digital and paper copy followed correctly.
-All claims, supporting literature, quotes, images etc are cited using APA format. All sources referenced on separate reference page using APA format.
-Well-written, active voice, objective terms, professional voice used. Words spelled correctly and sentences are grammatically correct. Logical flow from section to section, transitions used effectively. Evidence that paper has been proof-read and edited multiple times.
-Research purpose and research question clearly stated, using objective language, and appropriate terminology. Purpose is clearly communicated in introduction, and research question is clearly communicated at closure of introduction.
-Engages and “hooks” reader. Demonstrates merit/impact of research, gives succinct overview of paper topics, and guides reader to specific research purpose and question. Previews format and content of paper. Supporting literature cited appropriately and condensed into broad categories.
-Relevant and supporting academic literature is organized into broad categories, with specific sections and sub-sections if needed. Single-focused paragraphs. Supporting images/tables/figures used appropriately to effectively communicate theory/construct/concept/model. Key terms are defined using clear and objective language. Literature review guides reader to specific research purpose and question (start broad and narrow down).
-Appropriate quantitative and/or qualitative methodology selected, with supporting literature cited to provide background and reasoning for choosing method. Methodology is described using appropriate terminology, and is capable of measuring or answering research question. Variables are clearly stated and clearly defined. Target population, sample frame, and sampling method are clearly described. Reasoning for method clearly described.
–Succinctly and engagingly restates main points from literature review and methodology sections. Reflects introduction section, and states research purpose and question.
-Appropriate instrument selected for methodology and research question/hypothesis. Instrument will be able to collect data relevant to research question/hypothesis. Independent and dependent variables assessed logically and clearly. Instrument has little to no extraneous variables or data collected.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
After reading Robert McChesney’s Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism is Turning the Internet Against Democracy, write an argumentative essay that addresses the following questions. You should write about one paragraph per question—and two paragraphs for those that ask you to address two examples, as noted below.
What three topics does McChesney address in this book?
What is Political Economy? What is the most fundamentally important determinant in this theory?
Why is Political Economy a method better suited for his study than what the Skeptics and the Celebrants offer?
What is Political Economy of Communication? What is the relationship between communication, economic resources, and political power?
Summarize two examples, from Chapter 3, McChesney uses to explain the connection between communication, economic resources, and political power. You might consider selecting one historical and one contemporary example.
Summarize two examples, from Chapter 4, that address how the openness of the Internet was closed by powerful monopolistic interests from the pre-Internet age.
Summarize two examples, from Chapter 5, that address how the Internet has begat new emergent monopolistic interests in the digital age.
Why does the Internet, according to McChesney in Chapter 6, threaten the viability of valuable public debate in journalism and what effect does that have for political power?
Using two contemporary media industries we’ve studied in class, discuss how you would use political economy of communication to examine these media industries? What would your analysis tell us about the relationship of political power, economic resources, and contemporary media?
Conclude with a discussion of whether you agree or disagree with McChesney’s method and why you think his use of political economy works (or doesn’t work) for studying contemporary media.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
This assignment will measure your ability to analyze a social welfare proposal currently being considered at the federal level. Rely on information in text, information gained in class, and other resources found outside of class.
The paper should follow the outline below. It should be approximately 6-10 pages, following the rules for written work found in the syllabus. It should contain no less than 5 outside sources, 2 of which must be scholarly (peer-reviewed).
Statement of Policy Proposition/Provisions: approx. ½ page (5 pts)
Begin with a clear, uncluttered and brief statement of the law, rule, proposition or guideline that is being proposed: make it as uncomplicated as possible, stating the proposal in as few sentences as possible, free of jargon so that most people can understand it.
Identification of the Proposer(s): approx. ½ page (5 pts)
Clearly identify the person(s) and/or group(s) sponsoring the proposal, including their formal titles and (as appropriate) their organizational affiliations.
Identification of General Concepts: approx. 1 ½ – 2 pages (25 pts)
Clarify and enumerate the concepts that relate to the proposal. Include, as appropriate, a summary of the shape and nature of the problem that has led to this proposal; describe the proposal being offered in conceptual terms; bring out background factual information while focusing on central issues.
Intended and Possible Unintended Effects: approx. 1 ½ – 2 pages (25 pts)
Describe the intended and possible unintended effects of the proposal on the target, client, and service system indicating the potential impact on each. Attempt to shed light on any potential “ripple effects” of the proposal on existing administrative rules, guidelines, companion policies, etc.
