International Journal of Project Management Order Instructions: The writer will have to read each of these articles and react to them by commenting, analyzing and supporting with relevant peer review articles.
The writer will have to read carefully before giving constructive comments on the article. APA and in-text citation must be used as each respond to the 3 articles must have in-text citations with a peer review article to support your comments. The writer will provide a reference at the end of each comment. They will be a minimum of 1 reference for each response to the 3 articles. Please refrain from just using “ I agree or this is a good article”, but offer constructive and informative comments that can contribute to the articles.
International Journal of Project Management Sample Answer
Article 1
Wonderful article!!! Anyone who reads this article, the first thing he/she will acknowledge is that before any project is incorporated in any institution, it is paramount for certain governing entities to go through the project and approve it (Too & Weaver, 2014). This is a very important step in project implementation since the officials ensure that the project is in line with the set standards of the institution. From this article, it is has been brought out clearly that projects that entail private practice do not require large groups of governing entities for approval. For instance, the project in this case just requires a physician for approval prior to implementation.
The author suggests that projects which do not result in a drastic change in company policies do not require an IRB. Additionally, IRB is only required in research that has not been conducted before to ensure that the research is carried out in a manner that is in accordance with the set rules and regulations (Department of Health, 2014). Governing entities scrutinize any change before it is implemented. One of the most common issues that are questioned at this stage is who is going to be in charge of the project and will the individuals be committed enough to achieve the set objectives (Lawrence, 2013). The author fails to mention a thing or two about this.
Article 2
This is another wonderful article. The author suggests that pharmacogenetics is an important tool that can be used clinically in the diagnosis of elderly patients. The author highlights that IRB is only required for research projects that create new knowledge that generalizes other populations and involves human subjects. According to Booth et al, the major challenge that can hinder effective implementation of pharmacogenetics in health care institutions are ethical implications since it entails testing of an individual’s DNA before drug prescription (Booth et al., 2014).
Article 3
Just like the previous two articles, this article also indicates that it is imperative for governing entities to approve projects before they are implemented. According to this author, an IRB can approve or disapprove certain research projects depending on whether they follow FDA regulations or not. To enforce, IRBs make good use of review research protocols and related materials to make sure that the rights of human subjects that are involved in the research project are well protected and all HIPPA laws are followed. Lastly, the article informs that governing entity do not question follow up projects (Bell, 2014). However, the providers should question the reliability of the research method involved. Using phone calls is sometimes a challenge because of the possibility of the respondents having divided attention during the research and may end up giving inaccurate information.
International Journal of Project Management References
Bell, J. (2014). Doing Your Research Project: A guide for first-time researchers. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Booth, T. C., Jackson, A., Wardlaw, J. M., Taylor, S. A., & Waldman, A. D. (2014). Incidental findings found in “healthy” volunteers during imaging performed for research: current legal and ethical implications. The British journal of radiology.
Department of Health, E. (2014). The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. The Journal of the American College of Dentists, 81(3), 4.
Lawrence, D. P. (2013). Impact assessment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Too, E. G., & Weaver, P. (2014). The management of project management: A conceptual framework for project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1382-1394.
