Ethics Archives | Page 14 of 29

Mission Statements on Ethical Concerns or Problems

Mission Statements on Ethical Concerns or Problems Objectives: Write a short analytical paper that compares two mission statements in different companies or public institutions in your field. More specifically, your paper should address how these documents address ethical concerns or problems.

Essentially, you are investigating how the mission statements demonstrated or failed to represent the seriousness of ethical problems and audience needs in your field. Consider also how these mission statements contribute or ignore the ethical practices of the licensing bodies in your profession. Access the following links as possible resources to consider ethical practices and norms in your profession.
1. PRSA (Public Relations): https://www.prsa.org/ethics/code-of-ethics/
2. AoIR (Association of Internet Researchers): https://aoir.org/ethics/
3. ACM (Association for Computing Machinery): https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics
In your response, pay attention to how both documents represent or ignore the needs of their audience. These audience needs may include physical materials or resources, access to services, or appropriate representation in legal, political, or organizational spheres. In addition to mission statements, you may also look at legal cases, reports of organizational oversight, and company disbanding or merges as possible scenarios that display ethical problems. Be as specific as possible as you reference the documents’ audience demographics. You may find that you need to conduct more research on a company or organization to understand which demographics have or have not been historically impacted by these documents. Research citations may include company newsletters, academic journal searches, or public governmental data.
Composing Suggestions: You may reference the class mission statement guide in the Project 1 folder as a reference when deciding how you will read both documents. I would recommend that you annotate both documents before you write your response. Your paper may be written in the first person, but it must contain an introduction, body paragraphs with transitions, and a conclusion that sums up your analysis and introduces new insights about these ethical issues. Your introduction should be concise; avoid writing a generic introductory paragraph that proposes general claims about a topic. Instead, use the introductory paragraph to portray new perspectives on how these ethical issues emerge, and how audiences are influenced by these mission statements.
Length: 2-3 pages, single-spaced with MLA formatting and accompanying Works Cited page. Refer to the Purdue OWL page on citations for guidance.
Points: 10 Points
Due: February 1, by 11:59 PM on Blackboard

The Ethical and Intellectual Debts Discussion

The Ethical and Intellectual Debts Discussion 6. Statement of Gratitude Please read Book One of the Meditations of the Roman Emperor and Stoic philosopher Marcus Aurelius.

Then write a concise statement of gratitude (400 words or less) identifying the ethical and intellectual debts you owe to family members, teachers, friends, and the broader society as a whole. Fictitious names are permitted, but the statement of gratitude should be genuine. 7. A Good Life How is a good life defined, and what is your plan to achieve it? Please refer to themes from the assigned readings to support your answer. Important: Not making reference to the assigned themes or readings in your answer to this question may result in requiring revisions to your seminar answers.

Mission Statements Ethics Assignment

Mission Statements Ethics

Objectives: Write a short analytical paper that compares two mission statements in different companies or public institutions in your field. More specifically, your paper should address how these documents address ethical concerns or problems. Essentially, you are investigating how the mission statements demonstrated or failed to represent the seriousness of ethical problems and audience needs in your field. Consider also how these mission statements contribute or ignore the ethical practices of the licensing bodies in your profession. Access the following links as possible resources to consider ethical practices and norms in your profession.

PRSA (Public Relations): https://www.prsa.org/ethics/code-of-ethics/
AoIR (Association of Internet Researchers): https://aoir.org/ethics/
ACM (Association for Computing Machinery): https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics

In your response, pay attention to how both documents represent or ignore the needs of their audience. These audience needs may include physical materials or resources, access to services, or appropriate representation in legal, political, or organizational spheres. In addition to mission statements, you may also look at legal cases, reports of organizational oversight, and company disbanding or merges as possible scenarios that display ethical problems. Be as specific as possible as you reference the documents’ audience demographics. You may find that you need to conduct more research on a company or organization to understand which demographics have or have not been historically impacted by these documents. Research citations may include company newsletters, academic journal searches, or public governmental data.

Composing Suggestions: You may reference the class mission statement guide in the Project 1 folder as a reference when deciding how you will read both documents. I would recommend that you annotate both documents before you write your response. Your paper may be written in the first person, but it must contain an introduction, body paragraphs with transitions, and a conclusion that sums up your analysis and introduces new insights about these ethical issues. Your introduction should be concise; avoid writing a generic introductory paragraph that proposes general claims about a topic. Instead, use the introductory paragraph to portray new perspectives about how these ethical issues emerge, and how audiences are influenced by these mission statements.

Length: 2-3 pages, single spaced with MLA formatting and accompanying Works Cited page. Refer to the Purdue OWL page on citations for guidance.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Descriptive ethical essay Assignment Paper

Descriptive ethical essay

For this essay you will write a short descriptive ethical article. The goal of a descriptive article is to *describe* or explain in a non-biased way a particular ethical issue (it may be easier to do this if you pick a topic you have less strong feelings about, but then again you may gain more value from the assignment by working on a topic for which you do have a strong opinion). You should think of your goal as to establish the basic facts needed in order for us to have a debate in the first place.

You will find the four topics you may choose from listed below, once you have chosen your topic, your descriptive essay should have the following sections :

1) The first thing to start with is a clear definition or short explanation of what your topic is. Explain when, where, how and to whom your chosen topic is relevant.

2) Discuss the history for your topic

3) Discuss the contemporary social context related to the issue.

4) Discuss the proposed and enacted solutions that are currently part of the debate

Note: for this, you may discuss laws that are on the books if that is relevant, public polling, common ‘popular’ solutions to the issue, and this can also be a good place to briefly bring up politics or religion (if you choose to do so, try to present multiple views on the issue, and try not to bias your discussion towards any one particular political movement or religious tradition).

This is a lot to do, and you only have limited space: papers should be NO MORE THAN 3 Total Pages in length (Typed, double-spaced, font no smaller than 11, etc…i.e. don’t try to squeeze in a whole lot of extra content). You should include citations, however you do not need to include them as a separate page, instead, fit them into your three pages – also note, you’re not required to use all three pages, if you’re at two pages and happy with your work, don’t write an extra page just to take up space – you’ll be graded on the quality not the quantity of your work.

Also note, this essay will require you to do some outside research on your topic. Two things are key here. First, be sure to pick good, reliable sources, you can consider Wikipedia to be about as good as a normal textbook: which means it has flaws AND it should definitely not be your only source. Second, clearly identify your sources. To do this, you must at minimum include a works cited page (preferably with proper in-text citations following either MLA or APA formats).

The topics you may choose from for this assignment are as follows:

1 – Animal Rights

2 – Cyber Bullying

3 – Therapeutic Genetic Alteration

4 – Pay and fair compensation for college athletes

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Ethical Argumentative essay Paper

Ethical Argumentative essay

– Title is : Should education be free for Florida public universities?
– Thesis: I believe that education should be free for students in public universities located in Florida.
audience : government/people who deal with the education system
– THE PRIMARY ETHICAL PRINCIPAL BEING USED IS CONSEQUENTIAL. BUT THE ESSAY NEEDS TO HAVE THE THREE PRINCIPLES 1. CONSEQUENTIAL
2. VIRTUE BASED 3. DEONTOLOGICAL
– the introduction should have an overview of the controversy, bringing the audience up to speed up the issue in a brief, accurate fashion. it should establish the audience by directly naming it in a sentence and it should of course include the thesis statement (above )
– Only one short source should be used in the introduction as a background to the controversy being presented and the other 2 sources as evidence for body paragraphs. If possible the source most demonstrate how the topic is current.
– On one of the body paragraphs there should also be an opposing side to the controversy.
– The conclusion should restates the ethical argument as well as the thesis, strong concluding argument.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

The Application of Professional Ethics

The Application of Professional Ethics The Application of Professional Ethics in the Engineering Design Process If you research this topic on the web, you will find a good deal of information but no definitive guidelines.

From Jeannette Chou’s lecture we know the following:

“the practice of professional engineering” means any act of planning, designing, composing, evaluating, advising, reporting, directing or supervising that requires the application of engineering principles and concerns the safeguarding of life, health, property, economic interests, the public welfare or the environment, or the managing of any such act; (“exercise de la profession d’ingénieur”) PEO Act
A practitioner shall regard the practitioner’s duty to public welfare as paramount,
(Code of Ethics)

In this essay you should:
1) In the introduction state the above two points in your own words. Be sure to provide appropriate citations.
2) Follow this with a general discussion on the implications of these points in the engineering design process.
3) Finally, give one or more examples to reinforce what you have said in your general discussion.
4) Conclusion

Essay Format and Grading: See the Course Syllabus, Section 4, page 10, Essay #1.

Academic Integrity:
• Plagiarism is a violation of Academic Integrity.
• For a review of plagiarism and citation, view Lecture 4, Communication in Engineering, Part 3: How to get an A+.
• As a refresher on citation, Google “citation protocols” or “IEEE citation protocols” are particularly good sources.
• You are required to use a recognized referencing protocol consistently throughout the essay.
• The penalty for not citing a source:

Each student is required to write two essays. The purpose of the essays is to practice and demonstrate written communication skills. Examples of Summaries and Essays are available on the course web site.
Essay #1: The essay should be between 1500 and 2000 words, 12-point font size, 1.5 line spacing, and 2.54 cm margin all around. Paragraphs should be clearly identified either by indentation or by separation with an extra line. The cover page should identify the title, course number, student name, and student number.
Grading will be as follows:
Content (Knowledge of the subject, originality of interpretation, critical insight)…………..40% Organization (Logical and coherent arguments, always relevant to the topic)………………..20% Style (Unified coherent paragraphs; precise, forceful sentences)……………………………………20% Language (accurate, extensive vocabulary, grammar, punctuation, spelling)………………….20%
100%

Ethical and Cultural Issues in Group Work

As a human and social services professional, it is likely that you will often be called upon to work within a group. Whether in your organization or within your community, the ability to successfully work within a group setting and to navigate group dynamics is essential to providing services to your clients.

For this Assignment, you consider ethical and cultural issues that may present when working with groups, such as pre-existing relationships within the group, hierarchy or seniority of members, and traditional roles and expectations of inclusion in the process.

To Prepare:

Choose a specific group work scenario that you either encounter regularly or that is of particular professional interest to you (e.g., group social work within hospitals, youth groups in schools, substance abuse co-led groups in prisons).

Review Chapter 12, “Ethical Issues in Group Work,” in the Corey course text, and reflect on the guidelines related to your chosen scenario.

The Assignment (3 pages):

Briefly describe the group scenario that you are using for the Assignment.

Explain the skills necessary to be a successful group facilitator for this population and/or issue type and within your chosen setting.

Explain the ethical and cultural issues that must be addressed before you can begin a group in this scenario.

Identify the three most important guidelines for multicultural and social justice competence that would guide you professionally and ethically once the group was underway. Explain why you selected these guidelines in particular.

Of the three guidelines you described, explain which one(s) you believe you need to develop additional knowledge or experience with as part of your professional development and why.

Assignment should be delivered before deadline

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Business ethics Term Paper Available

Business ethics

Congratulations on all your hard work that has brought you to this Final Project for course completion. This project requires reflection on the journalling activities that you completed throughout the course.

The following questions relate to the course goals and learning outcomes for each module. They will guide your reflection. If you were attentive to the module activities, this project will be less time consuming than it will be if you weren’t. It requires reflection and commentary on key learning objectives as they relate to the activities.

Instructions

Read all of the following nine questions in Parts A, B, and C before beginning this project. Use the questions to reflect on the activities you completed in Modules 1 to 4.

Write a paper addressing the following questions and reflections. The paper should be no more than 20 pages double-spaced (approximately 5,000 words) and should include examples from your journalling activities.

Part A: Stakeholders and Interrelationships

Describe how the activities influenced your awareness and understanding of the interrelationship between business and society. Use examples from your activities in each of the modules to support this answer. (10 marks)

Using examples from your activities, describe the challenges of dealing with the conflicts and/or confluence of stakeholder needs, wants, expectations, and perspectives. Identify whose perspective you are representing in each of your examples. List examples of some of the ramifications of ignoring or improperly addressing stakeholder interests. (10 marks)

Comment on how the use of “circles of reflection” can affect your perspective of an issue or situation. Cite examples from your activities to demonstrate how use of the circles of reflection affected your analysis. (5 marks)

Part B: Forces and Influences

Comment on how ethics and social responsibility relate to some of the internal and external forces in business and society that we discussed in this course. Review activities in Modules 3 and 4, as well as Module 2, for examples. (10 marks)

Describe how the readings and journalling activities influenced your views on workplace ethics and corporate social responsibility. Did you have a shift in your perspective? Do you consider ethics and/or corporate social responsibility to be important to business and society today? Explain your answer, and use examples from the activities. (10 marks)

Comment on the interrelationship between external forces such as globalization, economics, technology, and the environment, and internal influences on business and society including governance and corporate citizenship (CSR), consumer protection, employee rights and responsibilities, and workplace diversity. Remember to support your argument with multiple examples such as sample journal entries, and readings. (20 marks)

Is the government an external force, an internal force, a stakeholder, or all of the above? Using examples from your activities, comment on the government’s role in business and society. (5 marks)

Part C: Final Reflection

Comment on how journalling activities helped you recognize the real or potential impact of stakeholder biases as well as your own biases. How do biases or differing perspectives influence the media, public opinion, and decision-making in business and society? Use examples from your activities to support your commentary. (15 marks)

Describe what was the most significant learning for you in this course and explain why. (15 marks).

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Ethical misconduct in the business world

Ethical misconduct

Students must discuss 4 distinct examples of ethical misconduct in the business world from the video sources given below. (You may not use more than two examples from any one source.) For each example, you must answer these and you write it down as bullet points for each example:

(a) Identify your source for the example.

(b) Briefly describe the relevant corporate or individual behavior, being careful to articulate how and why the behavior is ethically blameworthy or questionable, and doing so in terms of the principles discussed in the course.

c) Explain, in detail, to what extent the behavior in question was owed to bounded ethicality or ethical fading. Good reports will be specific about what cognitive biases or situational pressures led to bounded awareness on the part of the participants, using as many of the concepts employed by Bazerman and Tenbrunsel in Chs 3-5 as are applicable (e.g. organizational goals, incentive structures, decision framing, in-group favoritism, overclaiming, discounting the future, moral disengagement, ethical spinning, selective memory, the want self vs. the should self, etc.). If you feel that the sorts of considerations emphasized by our authors are minimal or secondary with respect to an example, feel free to make that point and suggest what other factors are more significant in explaining the dearth of ethicality (e.g. disdain for ethics generally, character flaws, overly high priority given to money, a narrow view of corporate responsibility, etc.).

(d) Consider how you could have avoided falling prey to the influences mentioned in (c). Notice two things: (i) This is not asking what you would have done instead in the situation. It’s about how you would have avoided the blind spots. (ii) This is the part of the assignment that students tend to slight. It will require some hard thought, but it is central to the motivation for assigning the project, which is to help prepare you for your future handling of similar situations).

Sources:
The Big Short Wall Street

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Ethical dilemmas in criminal justice

Ethical dilemmas permeate the criminal justice. At every level, in each segment of the system, people are exercising discretion that will influence the fate of an individual and/or the security of the community. Incongruous laws, regulations, policies and practices create conflicts and distort the basis upon which judgments are made. Very often these conflicts result in an ethical dilemma. Which is the appropriate course of action? What is the moral/ethical rational for the decisions that were made? What purposes or principles are served? This project will ask you to consider a sequence of decisions (do, or not do) all of which contribute, directly or indirectly the final scene.
For each of the three (3) scenarios, your assignment is to:

Examine each situation and describe the ethical and/or moral question,
Describe what you believe to be the motivation of the actor and the potential consequences of BOTH/EACH options,
Identify the decision you believe the actor SHOULD make, and
Provide the ethical basis for your decision.

Connect the ethical basis for your decision to ethical theories introduced at the beginning of the course and explain the rational for this connection.
Each decision must be considered separately and not be influenced by earlier decisions and/or actions.
This project is an opportunity for the student to demonstrate their understanding of ethics and value-based decisions. Most of these situations do not have a single correct answer. Grading is NOT based on solving the problem that is presented to the actor but in identifying the ethical dilemmas and determining and explaining the most ethical course of action.

1. The judge
Judge Jeffery Owens is very troubled by the felony case before him. The defendant, Woodrow Wilson, had been found guilty of armed robbery of a liquor store. The case alleged that Wilson had a handgun in plain sight when he entered the Sin-Yon liquor store, that he hit the owner in the head with the weapon and forced him to open the cash drawer. Fleeing the scene on foot, Woodrow only got a few blocks before responding police officers spotted him and made the arrest. The prosecutor, armed with the recovered cash, video surveillance and an eyewitness as evidence had an easy case. Now it is time for sentencing.
Jeffery saw the demonstration of business owners in the hallway when he entered the courthouse that morning. They were chanting “Justice for our victims” and were demanding a lengthy prison sentence. The Pre-Sentence Investigation report said Wilson was suffering from acute addiction and associated mental problems that had caused these violent (but not criminal) outbreaks in the past. There is no information in the file that Wilson has ever received treatment for his disorders. Jeffery knows that, due to budget cuts, the state prison system has very little in the way of addictive or behavioral disorder treatment programs. The prisons had reverted to merely warehousing inmates. However, he had read that the county jail had received a federal grant to establish exactly the kind of services that it appeared Wilson needed. Obviously, he had no way of knowing if this or any treatment would be successful for Wilson.
Sentencing guidelines were established to ensure that defendants convicted of similar offenses received similar punishments. According to the sentencing guidelines, Wilson should be sentenced to 5-7 years in the state correctional prison system. Jeffery knows that the business community was calling for the maximum sentence. The county jail only took inmates sentenced to eighteen months or less. What sentence should Judge Owens impose on Mr. Wilson?

2. The District Attorney
Jessica ran a successful campaign for district attorney on a very conservative platform generally critical of the incumbent’s inability or unwillingness to prosecute police misconduct with criminal charges. The city’s police chief did not support her campaign. He felt that administrative actions that could result is fines, suspensions, demotion or termination of employment were sufficient punishment. Additionally, victims could sue an officer in civil court if the officer acted outside the scope of their authority and immunity. The chief felt that these consequences should be sufficient for any police misconduct except, perhaps, a felony. Since her election Jessica has brought criminal charges of larceny against one officer for switching city tires off his patrol car on to his personal car. She also brought assault charges against an officer when she learned a suspect needed medical treatment for wrist abrasions due to her handcuffs being too tight. Recently several assistants have cautioned her that they are losing criminal cases, including serious felony cases, because police officers are either not appearing to testify at court or are having “difficulty remembering” critical details during their testimony. This started in traffic court but has also occurred in misdemeanor trials as well. The feeling is these officers are retaliating against the district attorney’s officer for the criminal charges being brought against members of the police force. The pattern is quite clear and getting worse. Prosecutors are complaining that police detectives are “too busy” to return their calls. Jessica understands she cannot successfully prosecute criminal cases without the cooperation of the police department. At the same time, she feels as though she is being bullied by an overly protective autocratic police chief. She feels she can and should prosecute police officer for any criminal offense …and feels that her election demonstrated that the community agrees with her. What should Jessica do?

3. The Officer
Scot is still on probation as a police department rookie. While on probation he can be dismissed at any time for any reason and would not be entitled to a trail board or hearing prior to dismissal.
During the course of his patrol duties Scot has cause to stop a car for a legitimate but minor traffic violation. The motorist was highly agitated at being stopped “for no reason” and, using a variety of obscene references and racial slurs, adamantly expressed how upset he was. Agitated, Scot told the man to exit the vehicle and place his hands on the hood of his car. Scot looked through the car interior, and then took the keys out of the ignition to open the trunk. Seeing what Scot was doing the driver told Scot to stop and that he could absolutely not search the trunk of the car. Ignoring this, Scot opened the trunk and discovered in plain view a large, clear plastic bag containing thousands of pharmaceutical-type capsules. Scot could hear the driver screaming, “That ain’t mine. That ain’t mine.” Scot suddenly realized he has committed an illegal search. What should Scot do?

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!