Watch Crash Movie 2005 and answer the Questions

Watch Crash Movie 2005 and answer the Questions You are to watch a movie on your own entitled: Crash (2005). There is an older movie called Crash.

Watch Crash Movie 2005 and answer the Questions
Watch Crash Movie 2005 and answer the Questions

Make sure you are watching the one which stars Matt Dillon, Sandra Bullock and Brendan Frasier. Think about the movie. Then answer the following questions BRIEFLY (one or two sentences).
Was there a character in the movie was an innocent victim? If so, who and why?
2. Who behaved in a way you would describe as bad? Please be specific about what was wrong about what that person did.
3. Which character surprised you the most? Why?
4. Which character did you like the most? Why?
5. As a result of the movie, did you become aware of any prejudices you have? If so, what are they?
6. Which of the characters could you identify with?
7. Have you ever been a victim of prejudice? If so, on what basis was someone prejudiced against you?
8. Have you ever been a victim of or perpetrated a hate crime? Describe the circumstances briefly?
9. What do you think is the main message in the movie?
10. What did you think of the movie? (hated it, liked it, seen it before, would watch it again, etc.)

Cinematography Term Paper Available

Cinematography
                          Cinematography

Cinematography

Cinematography Term Paper

With 1200-1600 words of analysis, compare the realist aesthetics of Koko: A Talking Gorilla (1978) to the formalist aesthetics of Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011). Using at least 4 elements from the provided lists (2 from each), explore precisely how the films use these aesthetics. Why does each film use these specific aesthetics? What meaning is offered?

1. Fiction film origins

A. Méliès and magic(al) film

a. Lie and trick people into seeing things that don’t actually exists

b. Allows us to hear and see things that don’t exist

B. Tom Gunning and “the Cinema of Attractions”

a. Definition of documentary

b. Different way to read film history: (Clip of train coming into station) appeal was simply movement

c. Described at cinema of attractions: visually attractive: simply movement

d. See stuff that they normally can’t see: seeing the beach or fantasy of a beach

(Clip Ghost Train 1903-special effects)

C. avant-garde films

a. Most films today are fiction films

b. Real legacy of movies of attraction (Clip of Mothlight)

i. Minority attraction

2. Tendencies of formalist films (compare to realist films)

A. foregrounding of subjectivity

a. Rather than showing the world as it is, shows us a world that doesn’t exist

b. Emphasize special effects (only one part)

B. form is as important (if not more important) than content

C. reflexivity (over transparency)

a. See through the aesthetics (relative)

b. Aesthetics are impossible to ignore, where the movie focuses only on the aesthetic

(Clip from Taylor Swift’s music video Bad Blood)

3. The aesthetics of formalism (Contrast last week’s notes/film)

A. subjective narration (“I”)

a. Subjectivity vs. objectivity

b. Restricts what a character sees or feels (one’s perspective)

(Clip from 1945 movie)

B. expressive mise-en-scene (stylized)

i. German Expressionism

a. Flat space, painted on

(Clip from Vampire movie)

ii. Melodrama (the subjective becomes objective)

a. The interior state of character’s moods are presented outward, on screen

b. Visual information from lighting (Human vs. Ghoul)

i. Sometimes unnatural light (obvious aesthetics)

(Clip from All That Heaven Allows)

iii. Animation

(Clip from Back Seat Bingo)

a. Deliberate stylization (shows the real people @ the end of the film)

(Clips from Simpsons)

C. expressive cinematography (clear view of mise-en-scene)

i. lighting

a. Environments that don’t make sense (horror movies)

b. Light doesn’t work, gives opinion about the space

ii. camera movement

a. Moves regardless of what’s moving in the frame (unmotivated)

i. Feelings about the situation

ii. Odd to move away from a main speaking character

(Clip from Taxi Driver)

iii. shallow depth of field and rack focus

a. faced with an image that lacks focus

b. Visualization for thought process

i. Reminder of watching a movie

(Clip from The Graduate)

(Clip from Poltergeist)

1. Mobile camera and mobile lens

a. Cinematography that reminds us that its cinematography

D. expressive editing (always in the right place to hear or see something)

i. collision

a. Thrown into the shot, have to figure out why the images are edited in this way

ii. Montage

a. Rapidly moving through time and space

b. Impossible to ignore

(Clip from Rock IV)

E. performance

a. performance capture and SFX

i. Actors, bodies that don’t or can’t exist

ii. Performance capture of Andy Serkis (turned in the precious)

1. Run through a computer

(Clip from Guardians of the Galaxy)-voice overs are acting

physical effects/performance is happening just with special effects work

F. expressive sound (sound is at the service of the image)

a. Mix and match sound, to match the scene’s mood

b. Nondiegetic sound (don’t exist in the natural environment)

c. Collision sound (compare difference information from difference senses)

(Clip from Singing in the Rain)

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Psychological perspective movie review

Psychological perspective movie review
Psychological perspective movie review

Psychological perspective movie review

Your task is to critically review a film from a psychological perspective. Use the information from lecture, recitation, and Chapters 14 & 15 of your text to answer the questions below about the film.

This is NOT a movie review!
It should be a thoughtful analysis of a psychological disorder(s) depicted in the movie.

Please type your answers to each question (double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font). Answers should be thoughtful and thorough. If you do not write in full sentences with proper grammar/spelling, this extra credit assignment will not be graded.

Responses must be in your own words – do not copy/paste things from any source. Doing so is a violation of the academic integrity expectations of this course.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Seeing Forward Succession Planning at 3M

Seeing Forward Succession Planning at 3M Watch the video “Seeing Forward: Succession Planning at 3M.”

Seeing Forward Succession Planning at 3M
Seeing Forward Succession Planning at 3M


Answer the following questions;
Why is development important at 3M?
How does 3M develop employees?
In addition to development activities, what else is necessary for effective employee development? Development is important at 3M because it helps to drive innovation and growth of the company.  Innovative employees often develop into strong leaders.   By placing an importance on development, management is providing the company with strong employees that will be able to lead and make good decisions and potentially be able to seamlessly step into any role in the company.

Gran Torino Movie Review Assignment

Gran Torino Movie Review
Gran Torino Movie Review

Gran Torino Movie Review

Watch the Gran Torino trailer (below) or the entire film. Watch Video Gran Torino – Trailer Duration: 2:31

Added by YouTube User: AlexTube95 – Added: 5/9/09 YouTube URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ecW-d-CBPc

  • Identify the types of intercultural conflict shown.
  • Discuss the types of intercultural and intergroup conflicts and cultural approaches to conflict resolution.
  • What is the difference between intercultural and intergroup conflict?
  • Identify a personal or current intercultural conflict you know about or have dealt with and detail how that conflict might be resolved.

You are welcome to view the complete film: Write at least one page but no more than two. The text should be double-spaced in 12 pt font. Include any sources in APA format. Sources may include the textbook or other references, personal communications. These can be outside of the two-page limit.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Watch the Movie the Founder I Ray Kroc

Watch the Movie the Founder I Ray Kroc 1. What can you say about the personal characteristics of Ray Kroc? List a few (at least 3) of the characteristics in bullet points and for each of them, briefly support your observation with evidence in a sentence or two.

Watch the Movie the Founder I Ray Kroc
Watch the Movie the Founder I Ray Kroc

2. Reflect on the prior business experience of Ray Kroc. List at least two things that strike as out of the ordinary.
3. What stands out in terms of the earliest business model of McDonald’s as devised by the brothers who founded the company? [3-5 sentences ]?
4. What was the shift in the business model that helped Ray Kroc and his team to earn more revenue and scale faster? [3-5 sentences]
5. Go to the Wikipedia page on Ray Kroc and do some preliminary biographical research on his life story. What surprised you the most in terms of how he/his story as an entrepreneur was portrayed in the movie (Give top 3, 2-3 sentences each)? For additional research, please check the following link after watching the movie: http://www.historyvshollywood.com/reelfaces/founder/.
6. If you met Ray Kroc what would be one question you would ask him? (2 sentences)
Definitely, include a reference section to cite your sources. This section is not counted for page limit.

Crazy Rich Asians Obstacles in the Movie Essay

Crazy Rich Asians Obstacles in the Movie Essay Teacher is a pretty easy grader, but the essay would have to be about this movie and about traditions of the Chinese, greatest obstacles in the movie, achievements or failures and basically what is the big difference in culture between the Chinese AMERICAN and the Chinese from Singapore.

Crazy Rich Asians Obstacles in the Movie Essay
Crazy Rich Asians Obstacles in the Movie Essay

Basically why the guy’s family hates Rachel? In October 2016, Kevin Kwan was on the most consequential conference call of his life. He’s the author of Crazy Rich Asians, the best-selling novel series, and two moviemaking giants were bidding to take his vision to the screen. A choice had to be made: Sell to Netflix or Warner Bros.? “I’d never been on a conference call with that many people ever,” says Kwan. There were lawyers. Agents. Film producers. And the clock was ticking. Warner Bros. had given them 15 minutes to make up their minds.

Dan Pink Video Motivation Theories

Dan Pink Video Motivation Theories View the Dan Pink video

Dan Pink Video Motivation Theories
Dan Pink Video Motivation Theories

Given the motivation theories discussed in chapters 5 and 6, Dan offers another viewpoint. Write 500 words contrasting his viewpoints to the theories covered in 5 and 6, and then take a side, what you believe? Many people work in environments that are dominated by “stick and carrot” motivation: do well and you’ll get a reward, but do badly and you’ll be punished. However, with this approach, the satisfaction of doing a job well can often get lost in the drive for praise and promotion.
Research on employee engagement suggests that people perform better when they are motivated. But there’s still widespread debate about whether traditional motivational strategies, like “stick and carrot,” really work.

Back to the Future of Cultural Artifacts 1985

Back to the Future of Cultural Artifacts 1985 The aim of this assignment is to identify and explain relationships between the cultural artifact itself (Back to the Future) and the general trends in American culture during the time in which it was created, displayed, or performed.

Back to the Future of Cultural Artifacts 1985
Back to the Future of Cultural Artifacts 1985

Students must clearly identify at least two (2) relevant and distinct examples of why their cultural artifact displayed perspectives that were in line with other trends in American culture during the time in which their cultural artifact was created, displayed, or performed.

Back to the Future of Cultural Artifacts 1985 Rubric

Student clearly identifies two distinct examples from the text. Student provides detailed and accurate descriptions of examples. Student explains clearly and step-by-step how these examples fit within the historical and cultural context of their respective place and time.
The essay
Back to the Future (only the first movie)/What does the movie relates with American culture during the 80s

Watch two Episodes Kids TV Analysis

Watch two Episodes Kids TV Analysis PART I: Watch two episodes* of a cartoon show featuring at least some human or “humanoid” (therefore, no Spongebob) characters on Saturday morning or a weekday afternoon and then analyze one. Note: Be sure this program is aimed at children 12 and under.

Watch two Episodes Kids TV Analysis
Watch two Episodes Kids TV Analysis

Neither The Simpsons nor Cartoon Network’s Adult Swim programs, for example, are aimed at children. Please attach this sheet to your paper.
(* Many half-hour children’s TV programs have two separate fifteen-minute segments with separate storylines. This would count as two episodes.)
CONTENT: (Please note channel and time and day you watched this program)

Watch two Episodes Kids TV Analysis and write a Brief Summary

Briefly summarize what happened during this episode (if your show had two episodes, summarize only one). What was the “plot”? Define the show’s regular plot structure. How close the show’s regular “formula” is this episode? Who are the main characters? Who does what to whom? How does it all come out? (200 words)
Content Analysis: count the number of acts of violence in this episode. Is anyone killed on the show? Is there “verbal violence”? Does this program teach any form of constructive engagement? Or does it only teach conflict and violence? Could it give a child an idea that certain types of people are victims and certain types of people are allowed to victimize? What do you think the significance of your data is? (150 words)
Quality and Quantity of representation are each worth analyzing. How stereotyped are the characters? Specifically, describe how the show handles class, race, ethnicity, and national stereotypes. What would Omi (“In Living Color” handout) say about this show’s ethnic representation (be sure to show you know the author’s key concepts and can apply them here)? What would Lemish (GR book, p. 423) think about the messages this show sends to other cultures around the world? Note: Pay attention to who’s missing as well as who’s present when considering representation and what early stereotyping is being taught to kids. What “stages of representation” do you see for different groups (if relevant)? (200 words)

Watch two Episodes Kids TV Analysis and Discussion on Gender Roles

Gender roles: Discuss how the show handles gender roles. Are women respected? Are the males? What would the creators of the “Consuming Kids” video say about the gender roles being taught here? What would Kilbourne (of the video “Killing Us Softly 4”) find praiseworthy or objectionable in this show? What would Lemish say about this program’s gender representation (GR book, p. 423)? (125 words)
If this episode portrays adults, are they competent, reliable, trustworthy, caring? What does this show tell kids about grownups? Do the kids in this show respect adults? Do the adults like the kids? If the adults are somehow unstable, could you read this show as a kids’ “empowerment fantasy,” or do you still see it as a sign of unhealthy neglect? Remember, if there are no adults in the show, you must still comment on the meaning of their absence. Finally, how well represented are older people in this program, if at all? (100 words)
How good is the show aesthetically—the animation or camerawork, the soundtrack? Graphically, would you say this show is “great,” “okay,” or “poor”? Explain briefly. (100 words)
Do you think the major appeal of this show is the characters and story or something else (the animation, the action, the noise, the graphics)? (150 words)
Dual Age Appeal: Some cartoons try to simultaneously appeal to adults (through the level of humor/dialogue/other content) and kids (via the quality of animation, wild slapstick action, toys, etc.). Does this show do that? If so, are the show’s more adult aspects appropriate for kids? Is this show part of the media’s “KGOY” attitude toward kids (kids getting older younger) as outlined by the Consuming Kids video or does this show let kids be kids? How do you feel about the “KGOY” marketing philosophy? (150 words)
2. SPONSORSHIP ISSUES
How many commercials were there and for what products? How healthy are the food products? In what ways do the ads try to appeal to kids? Are the toys worth having? What kind of “tricks” as discussed in the readings and the Consuming Kids video do the ads and the show itself use to market to kids? Explain. (150 words)
Is the program essentially a commercial for some product? That is, can you go to a toy store and buy products related to this show’s main characters (search on-line for this)? Does it bother you when the shows are linked to specific products? (100 words)
3. CRITICAL REACTIONS
Referring to the assigned readings, what might Winn (The Plug-In Drug) say about this show? Levin/Carlsson-Paige (“Mighty Morphin Power Rangers” handout)? Gerbner (of the video The Killing Screens)? Or Lemish (“The Future of Childhood,” on p. 423 in the big Gender, Race, Class in Media book)? (Write 100 words each on two of these critics.)
Critic Mary Ann Watson argues that television has “socialized the national personality” in some very negative ways in terms of manners, language, respect for others, and both social and sexual relationships. What might she say about this show? And what do you think of her overall critique of TV as one cause of a “decline in American standards of comportment”? (200 words minimum—note: take this quote at face value—there is no reading you need to know here.)
What is the content Rating of the Show (TV-Y, TV-Y7, etc; this should appear in the upper corner of the screen as the program starts)? Does the show’s rating seem to match its content? Why or why not? Does the content of the show’s ads also seem to correspond with its rating? Why or why not? (100 words)
A lot of kids watch programs that are not rated as acceptable for their age group. Would you let a five-year old watch this show? At what age would your child need to be before you would say “yes” to this show? Even if the show isn’t particularly bad for your child, would there be any good reason for this child to watch it? Would you let a child whose age matches the show’s rating watch this show? Why or why not? Explain in about 100 words.
PART II: Studies indicate that the majority of the time kids spend watching television is not spent watching programs specifically designed for kids (this is, in part, stems from deregulation during the Reagan administration in the 1980s during which the networks abandoned almost any pretense to a “family viewing hour”). Other deregulation has resulted in educational programs being aired at obscure times when kids may not be viewing. With this in mind, watch TV during the so-called “family-viewing hour” (7 to 9 p.m.). Be sure to channel surf so you get a sense of the options available to kids in the hours just before bedtime. Are you surprised by what you see (mention a few)? Do younger kids have many age-appropriate choices (list a couple)? Are there any choices that adults and kids could both enjoy? Do you see differences between major free “broadcast” networks (ABC, CBS, FOX, etc.) and cable? Do any cable channels dedicate themselves to kid-friendly programming at this time? If you had a five year-old, would you let him or her watch what’s on during these key hours? How would you regulate your child’s viewing? What other activities do you think you would prefer for your child? (200 words)