Implications or consequences of media concentration
Implications or consequences of media concentration
Discuss the implications or consequences of media concentration using some of the theoretical constructs from lecture 1.
Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Read the Global Marketing case study critically to answer the questions asked..!!
Research, critically analyse, discuss and synthesize the dynamics and key aspects of the international business environment and their affect on marketing
performance.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Role Leadership plays in a Christian community building
Role Leadership plays in a Christian community building
What are some of your insights you have learned regarding the role ?
Leadership plays in a Christian community building process and is working toward a Christian community? What aspects of leadership must be evident to build community in a school?
Connect your writing to some specific quotes and what you have learned from the textbook by Thomas Sergiovanni (Sergiovanni, Thomas J. Building Community in Schools. New York: Jossey-Bass Inc., 1994/1999)
Please use 2-3 quotes from the textbook
Chapters 1- 11 in the textbook
Building Community in Schools By Thomas J. Sergiovanni (Building Community in Schools)
Pages 1 – 213
Chapter 1- Changing our theory of Schooling
Chapter 2- Relationships in Communities
Chapter 3- Emerging School Communities
Chapter 4- Understanding Our Need for Community
Chapter 5- Becoming a Purposeful Community
Chapter 6- Using Curriculum to Build Community
Chapter 7- The classroom as Democratic Community
Chapter 8- Becoming a Professional Community
Chapter 9 -Becoming a Community of Learners
Chapter 10 – Becoming a Community of Leaders
Chapter 11 -The Challenge of Leadership
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Write a 3000 – 4000 word essay that focuses on “adaptations of Othello from 1908 to 2012, including Orson Welles’ 1952 and Oliver Parker’s 1995 versions
but also the films that are built on the Shakespearean plot but prefer not to use Shakespeare’s text, such as O, directed by Tim Blake Nelson in 2001. (You
may) also focus on less full-fledged versions of Othello… (and) references to the play on all kinds of screens (TV, cinema, computer).”
This description comes from Shakespeare on Screen: Othello, a conference of scholars that met in France in 2012, and your task is to write a paper that might be accepted to that conference. The conference announcement goes on to suggest several possible approaches:
how the play is (textually, aesthetically, ideologically, etc.) transformed when directed for the screen;
what each adaptation reveals about the culture in which it is set;
how Shakespeare’s playscript (or plot) interacts with national ideologies and representations
how the screen versions have been influenced and shaped by previous theatre productions;
how gender and racial issues are treated on screen.
Follow your own interests; there’s no one right way to write your paper as long as it includes an introduction, a review of literature, an argument that
supports your thesis, a conclusion, and a works cited page in MLA format. Just keep in mind that you’re writing to participate in a scholarly conversation;
your paper should address claims made by other scholars and make an attempt to contribute your own perspective to our conversation on Othello.
We watch some films about Othello, here is the list
Othello (1952 film) Orson Welles
A Double Life (1947) George Cukor
Othello (1995 film) Oliver Parker
O (2001 film) Tim Blake Nelson
I will upload my class packages, there are some essays talk about these films, my instructor let me according to these essasy and other scholars source u can find on website, library and so on.
There are two blog guides from my instructor can help u narrow the topics
Blog 8: Review of Literature
We’ve looked at hundreds of claims from eight different essays about film adaptations of Othello. Now it’s time to determine which critical conversation interests you. Identify a general discussion area that shows what several scholars have already said about an aspect of Othello that interests you. Write one or two paragraphs (at least 300 words) that lets us “listen” to that critical conversation. This is the first draft of a critical section of your research paper.
Hint: the Review of Literature in the sample research paper (“A Bogus Hero” by Nicholas Jones) is at the bottom of the second page.
Blog 7
Time to narrow your research project down to a topic! Look over the list of claims you posted for Blog 6, as well as the claims posted by others, and try to
identify three or four claims that speak to a topic that interests you. Write a few informal paragraphs today about that topic, the claims that relate to it,
and any additional claims relating to the topic that you can find through research. If you have an idea of what you’d like to say in response to these
claims, go ahead and include your thoughts. This is a rough draft for next week’s Review of Literature assignment; go ahead and do the hard, thinking work
now. Finally, make sure you include the MLA in-text citation for the sources you quote and paraphrase. (Note: If you find additional claims through research
and the sources aren’t yet posted on the site, post them. This is a good week to get caught up on your resource points.)
***Suggested comments: Look for other students who chose a similar topic as your own and challenge the assumptions they make or point out logical fallacy problems or questions raised by
their posts.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
My argument is “Social Networking sites does not threaten privacy rights.”
My opponent’s argument is “Social Networking sites threaten privacy rights.”
Please make a constructive speech where I will have the primary burden of refuting the other team’s argument by analyzing and explaining the flaws in the opponent’s position. I want you to identify my opponent’s key arguments and attack their legitimacy by turning the analysis to the other side by presenting evidence that destroys or reduces the opposing position; presenting alternate causes that are not accounted for by the opposition argument, exposing argument inconsistencies between the speakers and the opponents and their statements during crossfire. I want you to develop a full sentence speech case outline that includes:
(1) An introduction that links your second speech to your first speech, followed by an overview of the issue, which is frequently the opponents
argument.
(2) please write 3-4 reasons/evidence for why the opponent is wrong that are written out as contentions with claims, evidence, and impact.
(3) please write a conclusion that summarizes my position as well as illustrate what the clash (exchange of arguments) means for my position within the debate.
*Important: Please make 3-5 questions for me to ask my opponent, to clarify arguments and evidence presented by the other and demonstrate flaws in the
opponent’s arguments.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
1.first of all, I need an simple plan for this dissertation, which I need hand in to my tutor.
2.the other material will be attached in the following, I hope you could read carefully.
2.Criteria Supervisor comments: areas for improvement
Introduction – does this satisfactorily explain what the journal article is about and does it indicate why the particular topic was chosen?
Yes, in general, research idea is justified, however, a couple of references missing. You could spend a bit more discussion on comparative part of the
research.
Research Questions – are they clear, focused and feasible, do they meet the objectives of the overall issue? Do they demonstrate understanding of the issues?
I think you could make few changes in your research questions. Question one should explore what formal micro finance is available in China, question two
investigate the existence of informal microfinance, then question three could assess other approaches.
Critical Literature Review(3000 words) – is there evidence of appropriate selection and critical evaluation of reading from a suitable range of resources, are the concepts and ideas sufficiently understood? Has an initial conceptual framework been attempted? Have relevant models been included and applied correctly and? Is it referenced appropriately in the Harvard style? Literature review is presented as a laundry list, rather than critical and synthetic way.
Research Design and choice of relevant secondary/primary data – are the approach, methods and choice of data feasible?
This section is not very clear about whether only secondary source or both secondary and primary source of information is used. If only secondary sources are adopted, what they are?
Limitations – has awareness of any limitations to the research and research methods been demonstrated? Is it clear which ethics form will need to be
completed (has it already been correctly completed)?
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Cross-generational intimate and sexual relationships
Debunking whether and why cross-generational intimate and sexual relationships carry strong social stigma
This is my essay question: Gayle Rubin (1984) proposed that there are some forms of sexual and intimate expressions that are more respected and well-regarded in society, whereas other forms are seen as lower in the hierarchy and receive social sanctions. Exercise your sociological imagination (Mills 1959), critically analyze and debunk whether and why cross-generational intimate and sexual relationships carry strong social stigma in contemporary society.
Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
Use APA format when citing sources.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
1.What is the most significant challenge that society faces today? (50 word limit)
2.How did you spend your last two summers? (50 word limit)
3.What were your favorite events (e.g., performances, exhibits, sporting events, etc.) this past year? (50 word limit)
4.What historical moment or event do you wish you could have witnessed? (50 word limit)
5.What matters to you, and why? (250 word limit)
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Compare or contrast the idea of progress in science and religion. The paper should include specific historical examples and should include a paragraph of counterpoint. The paper must have a clear thesis statement that addresses at least one of the following questions:
-What factors(personal, historical, social, etc.) encourage inhibit change?
-How are ideas established or discredited?
-At what speed are changes made within the profession and in general understanding?
-What criteria are used to evaluate changes?
-What determines if a change is welcomed or resisted?
This is just an outline paper. So just write a thesis statement and 3 to 4 topic sentences for the supporting paragraphs.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
2. Why does John Duns Scotus hold that we can be certain with respect to knowledge of our own acts? Give a critical evaluation of his view.
Length: 800 words; do not submit essays that exceed 800 words. Bibliography and title page
do not count towards the word limit (footnotes do). By the way: No separate title page or
bibliography are required: simply put your name, student number, and utoronto email address
on the top of the first page
n? “Is personal criticism required?”: All philosophical writing should exhibit a critical
engagement with the relevant material, i.e. an essay should show that you have weighted for
you the pros and cons of a given position. The criticism is supposed to be personal, insofar as
you are expected to take a stand, i.e. to argue for an opinion.
n? (1) Make sure that your paper is written in acceptable English. Use correct spelling,
punctuation, and grammar. (2) Your references to primary texts should be exact. (3) Aim for
clarity in your writing! (4) Proofread your paper before you turn it in!
n? Submission of papers: Students have to submit your essay electronically via the Blackboard
course website. A submission tool has been created, which you should be able to find under
Course Materials. Submissions will be scanned by turnitin, a plagiarism detection software.
Please see the syllabus for the remark on turnitin! Make sure that you submit your essay to
the right TA.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
