From the required readings, identify four topics that relate to your personal interests or your future work. Explain why you selected these topics. Then highlight two or three current or controversial issues within each topic. Choose one of the topics for further research, and identify scholarly resources to help you address one of the issues you identified. List the complete citations in APA style and formatting. Submit your paper as a Word document in the assignment area.
The resources you identify should address the following elements:
Any topic in the course. Review future topics to determine if any are of interest to you.
The role that the anatomy and physiology of human sexuality may play regarding the issue you selected.
The potential impact of this issue on persons with disabilities. (This would include myths the general public holds regarding the sexuality of persons with disabilities and the cultural implications of disabilities.)
How victimization, consumerism, ethics, morality, cultural mores, and laws impact this issue.
In a discussion in this unit, you will also practice creating one or two PowerPoint slides with your topics, issues, and resources. To see an example, review the PowerPoint slides linked in the Resources.
This assignment and the related discussion help to build to the Annotated Bibliography assignment, due in Unit 4. See the course project description as well as the assignment instructions in Unit 4 for more information.
Assignment Requirements
References: Use a minimum of three recent (within the last six years) scholarly sources (peer-reviewed journal articles available from the Capella library databases or from online scholarly journals). Note: Textbooks (including your course textbook) cannot be used as primary sources and cannot be counted as part of the reference requirement. Textbooks may instead be listed in the references section as auxiliary sources, in addition to the three required references.
Format: Use current APA style and formatting guidelines to cite your sources.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
If you were a California state legislator, what would be your spending priority, and why? Break down your analysis in percentages (i.e. I would spend 40% on K-12 education 10% higher education, 10% on welfare, etc..) Please look at the budget section (chapter 8 of your California book) for guidance. In your answer, please analyze items from the 2018-2019 fiscal year budget
Mrs. Brown has been asked to join business team. When she arrived at the team meeting, she found that the team had been working on this project for several months. The team leader informed her that there was not enough time to give her a full orientation and she would have to jump into the project as fast as she could.
Mrs. Brown was asked to work on a section of the team project. Mrs. Brown studied and reviewed the project requirements but did not agree with some of the mandates that the leader has set forth.
In the second general meeting Mrs. Brown decided that she must speak up about how the team was not moving forward and according to her experience where making serious financial errors.
Mrs. Brown was very assertive and decided to tell each of the members of the team, what they needed to do to improve their section of the project in the coming weeks, and she found that the way the team were doing the project was not effective.
After the meeting, many of the team members approached the team leader and reported that they were not happy with Mrs. Brown presentation. They felt that she was not a team player, that she could not communicate in a professional manager and they wanted the Team Leader to ask her to leave the team. The Team leader was very surprised for he thought that the Mrs. Brown was providing some excellent suggestions for improvement.
Requirements:
Identify and write the main issues found discussed in the case (who, what, how, where and when (the critical facts in a case).
List all indicators (including stated “problems”) that something is not as expected or as desired
Briefly analyze the issue with theories found in your link or other academic materials.
Decide which ideas, models, and theories seem useful. Apply these conceptual tools to the situation.
Identify the areas that need improvement
Specify and prioritize the criteria used to choose action alternatives.
Discover or invent feasible action alternatives.
Examine the probable consequences of action alternatives.
Select a course of action.
Design and implementation plan/schedule. 6. Create a plan for assessing the action to be implemented.
Conclusion (every paper should end with a strong conclusion or summary
1. Can linear and nonlinear optimization problems use the same approach to find a solution? For example, if the GRG algorithm is used to solve a nonlinear optimization problem, will it work to solve a linear optimization problem? Discuss whether or not the GRG algorithm will always find a corner point similar to the feasible-region approach.
2. Nonlinear optimization problems can have multiple solutions, and a solution can be local or global. Can there be multiple local solutions? Explain your answer. Can there be multiple global solutions? Explain our answer.
Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
“Pets.com. Pets.com is one among many online retailers that failed as a business-to-consumer e-commerce entity.
The site was launched in November, 1998 about the same time as several other online firms offering pet products.
One problem with Pets.com’s business model was that it was not unique and did not offer consumers anything different from the other online pet supplies retailers.
Another problem that Pets.com faced was that it entered a market of selling low-margin food and supplies that are extremely costly to ship to consumers.
In June, 2000, Pets.com managers made the decision to purchase the assets of its rival Petstore.com.
Pets.com acquired the customer database, domain name, trademarks, live fish business, and several strategic supplier agreements from Petstore.com (Olsen, June, 2000).
Pets.com struggled with the fact that they were not making any profit.
In September of 2000, the decision was made to move part of its operations from San Francisco to a more affordable location in the Midwest to help decrease operating costs.
The new location had a lower cost of living and therefore, Pets.com could cut salaries to lower expenses. Pets.com had become the leading online pet store, but after months of trying everything possible to cut costs, recover dwindling stock prices, and attempt to gain some profits, the online retailer saw no better alternative than to shut down business”. Source: http://bit.ly/Rwaxx
Please Use This Strategy When You Analyze A Case:
Identify and write the main issues found discussed in the case (who, what, how, where and when (the critical facts in a case).
List all indicators (including stated “problems”) that something is not as expected or as desired
Briefly analyze the issue with theories found in your textbook or other academic materials. Decide which ideas, models, and theories seem useful. Apply these conceptual tools to the situation.
Identify the areas that need improvement (use theories from your textbook)
Specify and prioritize the criteria used to choose action alternatives.
Discover or invent feasible action alternatives.
Examine the probable consequences of action alternatives.
Select a course of action.
Design and implementation plan/schedule.
Create a plan for assessing the action to be implemented.
Conclusion (every paper should end with a strong conclusion or summary)
Writing Requirements
Provide a 3–5 pages in length (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
APA format, Use the APA template located in the Student Resource Center to complete the assignment.
Please use the Case Study Guide as a reference point for writing your case study.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Identify and write the main issues found discussed in the case (who, what, how, where and when (the critical facts in a case).
List all indicators (including stated “problems”) that something is not as expected or as desired
Briefly analyze the issue with theories found in your textbook or other academic materials. Decide which ideas, models, and theories seem useful. Apply these conceptual tools to the situation.
Identify the areas that need improvement (use theories from your textbook)
-Specify and prioritize the criteria used to choose action alternatives.
-Discover or invent feasible action alternatives.
Examine the probable consequences of action alternatives.
-Select a course of action.
-Design and implementation plan/schedule.
-Create a plan for assessing the action to be implemented.
Conclusion (every paper should end with a strong conclusion or summary)
* Writing Requirements:
-Provide a 3–5 pages in length (excluding cover page, abstract, and reference list)
-APA format, Use the APA template located in the Student Resource Center to complete the assignment.
-Please use the Case Study Guide as a reference point for writing your case study.
CASE of Family Opposition to Organ Donation: Despite First Person Consent
You are the Administrator of a 250 bed hospital. Upon arriving at work in the morning, the physician came to the
office and explained that we had a problem with a young man in the ICU.
“JD is a 25 year old patient who sustained massive head trauma and neurological injury in a motorcycle accident. He
is not brain dead, but after 4 weeks in ICU and several neuro consults, the prognosis for “meaningful recovery” is said to be less than 1%. JD has not regained consciousness, and is apt to remain permanently in a vegetative state.
His parents are attentive and religious. After consulting with their priest and their son’s doctors, including palliative care specialists and a hospital ethicist, they decide to withdraw ventilator support and tube feedings, and “to allow whatever happens to happen.” The parents say they are “placing JD in God’s hands now.” A decision is made to withdraw life support that very evening since the priest is there with them and extended family members have gathered, also, some from long distances.
With palliative care involved and since death is anticipated soon after extubation, the ICU nurse manager already had notified the regional organ procurement organization for assessment of donor potential. When the OPO representative arrives, she discovers that JD’s driver’s license has a little heart and “organ donor” stamped on the front. The backside is scuffed so as to make illegible any signature or date that might have been there. He had not signed up for the online state donor registry and has no healthcare directives on file. Yet on the basis of his driver’s license, it’s determined that JD had authorized donation, a “first person consent,” leaving no record of revocation or refusal of authorization.
Suggestions for Review: Updated Information.
The state’s recently revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act states that, “in the absence of an express, contrary indication by the donor, a person other than the donor is barred from making, amending, or revoking an anatomical gift of a donor’s body or a part if the donor made an anatomical gift . . . . [194.240. 1]
Although JD is not brain dead, he might qualify to be a donor under the hospital’s “Donation after Cardiac Death” protocol. Further evaluation of the potential donor may take several hours, including tissue testing, reviewing the medical record, external communications, and the medical history interview with next of kin. It is already close to 9:00 p.m. when the OPO approaches JD’s family about the donation evaluation that has been ramped up following the parents’ decision to withdraw life support. They had intended that the ventilator be withdrawn an hour ago, but were told by MICU staff that they need to wait for some other healthcare personnel to arrive. Per contractual agreement with the OPO, no one but their representative is allowed to discuss organ donation with families, and MICU staff have been compliant.
When the OPO representative, with a palliative care physician, ushers the parents into a small conference room, she asks if they are aware that JD’s wishes had been to donate organs and tissue to help others. His parents appear startled and say, “No, we never discussed such things as a family. And we don’t want to talk about it now. Please, ask us what you need to, but quickly. We need to go be with our son in his last moments on this earth. As to removing his organs, we will not permit that. He has suffered enough cuts and needle sticks and bruises. Please let us alone with him now.” Soon they get up and leave the room.
The OPO representative does not follow the parents back to the bedside, but goes immediately instead to the attending physician. She and the palliative care physician report what had happened with JDs parents, and review with staff the hospital’s policies on DCD and First Person Consent Opposition. She also cites state law: “When a hospital refers an individual at or near death to a procurement organization, the organization may conduct any reasonable examination necessary to ensure the medical suitability of a part . . . . During the examination period,measures necessary to ensure the medical suitability of the part may not be withdrawn unless the hospital or procurement organization knows a contrary intent had or has been expressed by the individual . . . .” [194.265. 3]
Meanwhile, JD’s family has come looking for the Administrator and the physician wondering why it is taking so long to proceed with their decision to remove all the machine” (Rosell, 2011, pp. 1-6)
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
For the Module 3 SLP you will be applying the concepts you learned in the background materials regarding conflict and negotiation to a situation from your own personal experiences. Carefully review the background materials regarding types of conflict, causes of conflict, negotiation stages, and conflict management styles. It is important to first understand these comments from the background readings before starting this assignment.
Once you have thoroughly reviewed the background materials, think of a situation in the workplace where a conflict erupted and management had to intervene and some type of negotiation was involved. Then write a three page paper addressing the following four questions, and make sure to cite at least one of the required background readings for each of your four answers :
Was this conflict functional or dysfunctional?
What was the cause of the conflict? Use the terms from the background materials in your answer—for example, was the conflict a result of interpersonal issues, a specific task involved, due to inter-organizational issues, etc.
Of the five approaches to conflict management outlined in Shearouse (2011) or Bauer and Erdogan (2011), which approach most closely describes the approach used by management to resolve this conflict?
Did the negotiations involve integrative or distributive bargaining? What stages of negotiation did management go through, and did these stages match the five stages discussed in Bauer and Erdogan (2011)?
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Background: Hypothetical: Hester Community Acute Hospital is a teaching hospital and is located in the Central Valley in the city of the Forever. The management company is Hexes Management Care Company.
The hospital is located in a very concentrated marketplace and shared approximately 50% of the market but does not have a good perception standpoint from the patients in the community. The hospital was dominated by a single managed care payer. The hospital has over 300 physicians that are contracted with the Hexes: managed care company. Many of the physicians belong to a group medical practice and make up 60% of the medical staff but are only accounted for 40% of the hospital revenue.
Issues: The Chief Financial Officer and the CEO does not feel that the hospital is bringing in adequate payment for its services.
Decision: The hospital wants to terminate their relationship with the Hexes Management Care Company.
Requirement: As a hospital administrator, what plan including solutions and activities would you present to the Board of Directors to increasing the reputation of the hospital in the community, keeping the physicians, bringing in more financial resources?
Select five goals that would be ethical, realistic, and successful and increase revue.
Please Use This Strategy When You Analyze A Case:
Identify and write the main issues who, what, how, where and when (the critical facts in a case).
List all indicators problems that something is not as expected or as desired.
Analyze the scenario with theories found in your textbook or other academic materials.
Decide which ideas and theories seem useful.
Conclusion:
References: Cite at reference at least five research sources in the final exam paper.
Writing Requirements
– The APA formatted paper is to be five to seven pages excluding title, abstract, and reference pages, include at least three sources per case found in the Potomac University Library properly cited and referenced.
-At least five cited sources
–APA format, Use the APA template located in the Student Resource Center to complete the assignment.
-Please use the Case Study Guide as a reference point for writing your case study.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Find two additional web articles published within the last five years that discuss cloud computing and information security.
In a two-page paper, answer the following questions:
1.In the case study, how did Pearson use cloud computing?
2.What benefits of cloud computing were shown in the case study?
How might information security concerns influence the Pearson cloud computing solution?
Your paper must use APA style. Include a title page and a reference page, which do not count toward the length requirement. Use two sources published within the last five years for this paper.
Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Choose one of the main topics with readings in our text from chapters seven through eleven and write an essay of at least 1200 words in length in which you compare and contrast at least two philosophical concepts found In the author’s writings on the topics found in chapter 7 to 10. This assignment will be due on Thursday, January 17. It will include a written essay and at least three sources such as the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and our textbooks for the class, Living Philosophy and Spirituality Science.
Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
