History of international relations versus theory of international relations; empiricism versus rationalism.
Essays should include a short introduction of the topic and motivation for its selection, main argument, explanation based on data, raising counterarguments, dealing with counterarguments and conclusion. The explanation part should follow the structure “what?” “How?” and “why?”
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Offenders commit crimes for different reasons. Criminological theories attempt to explain why crimes occur. For the Final Paper, you will evaluate the theoretical study of crime and crime causation by examining the crime of an offender and applying a criminological theory discussing why the offense occurred.
You must discuss both the offender and the crime in detail. Additionally, you must research the criminological theory to be used; discuss the theorist responsible for coining the theory, the year it was created, the premise of the theory, and how it is applicable.
Below is a list of offenders that were reported in the media as a result of the heinous nature of their offense. Select one of the offenders, and research their crime. You may only use scholarly sources when citing in your paper. Wikipedia is not an acceptable source.
First, select an offender from the list of offenders.
Offenders? Andrew Luster is the Offender i picked. So please write on him
Andrew Luster (Cosmetic fortune heir who was convicted of drugging, raping, and videotaping assault of young women)
Then, select one theory from the list.
Theories
Age-Graded Theory
Anomie Theory
Arousal Theory
Behavioral Theory
Biochemical Theory
Cognitive Theory
Control Balance Theory
Critical Criminology
Critical Feminist Criminology
Cultural Deviance Theory
Deviance Place Theory
Differential Association Theory
Differential Coercion Theory
Evolution Theory
General Strain Theory
Instrumental Theory
Integrated Cognitive Antisocial Potential (ICAP) Theory
Interactional Theory
Left Realism Theory
Lifestyle Theory
Rational Choice Theory
Theory of Crime and Genetic Theory
After you research the criminological theory and the case, your paper must Explain the theory in detail.
Discuss the theorist responsible for coining the theory including the year the theory was created.
Describe the premise of the theory.
Explain how it is applicable.
Discuss both the offender and the crime in detail.
Discuss how the theory explains the actions of the criminal selected from the list above.
The Final Paper
Must be 12 to 15 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must use at least five scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Your goal is to construct a critical response to something that we’ve read so far this semester.
To do that, I’d like you to find a claim/theory or argument from one of the texts we’ve read and give reasons for thinking that either the claim/theory is false or that the argument doesn’t work.
The reasons you give should be your own. You should not rely on others’ criticisms.
Relatedly, you should not do outside research for this paper.
You may respond to texts that we haven’t read in class provided that they pertain to phenomenal consciousness and you get them approved by me.
Your paper should consist of several elements, in roughly the following order:
a.Briefly introduce your topic (no more than 100 words)
Say which claim/theory/argument you are going to criticize,
concisely state your main criticism, and iii.give some sense of what your reasoning will be.
b.Explain the target (~250-500 words)
A thorough explanation of the claim/theory/argument you intend to criticize.
Make sure to use concrete examples if you can. iii.Make sure to explain how key terms are being used.
c
Explain your reasoning (~250-500 words)
A thorough explanation of you reasons for thinking the claim/theory is false or that the argument doesn’t work.
d
Consider and respond to one or two objections to your reasoning (~250-500 words)
Thoroughly explainone or two ways in which the proponent of the claim/theory/argument that you’re criticizing will respond to your criticisms.
Try to give some reasons for thinking their criticisms won’t succeed.
e.Summarize your results (~150 words)
Remind your reader of your main claim and your argument for it.
4.You’re aiming for somewhere around 1500 words. a.This is mean as a rough guideline. You can go under or over.
b.But, if you’re going significantly under, there’s a decent chance that your paper won’t be detailed enough.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Compare and contrast Mills and Gerth’s theory of society, theory of social order as a whole, and theory of social agent (chapter 1 and 2 of character and social structure) with Znaniecki’s theory of society (chapter 1 of Modern nationalities; chapter 2 and 3 of The Method of Sociology). Make sure you discuss how Mills and Gerth circumscribe and classify societies and how Znaniecki circumscribes and classifies societies.
Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Thomas Theorem of Key Factors Driving Social Change The study of sociology provides you with a tremendous body of knowledge. It also provides you with new ways of perceiving the world, from our individual lives to the global arena.
Thomas Theorem of Key Factors Driving Social Change
To wrap up the course, take a few minutes to reflect on the many topics, concepts, theories, and perspectives to which you’ve been exposed. Remember to notice the range of experiences had by all who participated in the course. Objectives: Discuss the key factors driving social change. Describe directions for future social change. Instructions: Step 1: Respond to the following: Share one issue or topic from the course that stuck with you because it was particularly challenging, confusing, unfamiliar, exciting, or inspiring. Describe the issue or topic and include why was it compelling and what needs to change about it. Issue topic: Thomas theorem
Choose any two texts from the final unit (Wyschogrod, Kaplan, Falk, or Daly) to write about.
This assignment is to be done in discrete sections.
Provide a brief overview of each reading. What are the major issues it deals with, and what is the central argument? You should include evidence from the text in the form of quotations (which need to be unpacked and explained in your own words).
Find one issue or topic on which the two authors could be seen to disagree. What is the source of the disagreement?
Which author is more compelling in your opinion with regard to this one issue? Explain your reasoning.
This paper is to be at least 3 pages double spaced in length (it can be longer).
Each section is worth 25% of your final grade. Each section should be at least one page in length but can be longer although the entire paper should not be more than 6 pages.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Researching public institution theory in the field of public administration. Below are the syllabus requirements:
Introduction (10 points)
Provides a concise summary of the entire paper, including how the paper is structured
Theory Description and Analysis (40 points)
Comprehensively discusses what the theory is and what it is meant to help explain
Identifies and discusses in detail the strengths of the theory
Identifies and discusses the weaknesses of the theory
Application of Theory to Practice (40 points)
Analyses of previous academic studies (minimum of 10) utilizing the theory within the realm of public administration and/or nonprofit management
—- For each study used:
o Provide a concise summary of the study
o Addresses key points that are made by the authors of each respective study clearly and accurately
o Discusses in detail the strengths of the study
o Identifies and discusses the weaknesses of the study
o Articulates how the findings of the study relate to our general understanding/knowledge of public administration and/or nonprofit management
Writing/Format (10 points)
Paper is at least 15 pages (excluding title and reference pages)
Paper is typed, 12 point font and APA style use for references
Grammar, punctuation and spelling are correct
Writing flow: logical progression of sentence and paragraph structure
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Consider the role of theory in research and the relationship between theory and philosophical orientations. You will also familiarize yourself with a theory in your field so that you may become more conversant in your discipline’s theoretical foundations.
WRITE: A one page paper with:
-An explanation of the role of theory in research.
-Next, identify a theory in your discipline of Early Childhood Education ( Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) by Lev Vygotsky) explain its basic tenets.
-Then, with this theory in mind, consider your answer to the following question posed by Dr. Burkholder: “What do I have to believe about the world and about human beings in order for me to accept or use this theory?”
-Finally, describe the extent to which the epistemological and ontological assumptions of your chosen theory align with the philosophical orientation that reflects your worldview.
Resources:
1- Babbie, E. (2017). Basics of social research (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
One’s interpretation and understanding of sexuality generally vacillate during his or her lifespan. These experiences are affected by diverse factors that include biopsychosocial, economic, cultural, religious, and spiritual factors. Various theories have come into play and have helped in understanding the concept of love, intimacy, and commitment.
Using the South University Online Library, the Internet, or the course readings, research about the concept of love, intimacy, and commitment. Based on your research, complete the following tasks:
Provide your understanding of love, commitment, and intimacy.
Describe the eight basic ways in which intimacy, passion, and commitment combine.
Describe the geometry of love. Assess the validity that you think these above-mentioned theories hold.
Explain the different types of love. Sit with your partner, examine Sternberg’s triangle and chalk out your own triangle. Ask your partner to do the same. Now, analyze thoroughly and look how they match or did not match. Compare the balance of your relationship with the readings provided in the textbook (if you are not in a relationship currently, you may use a previous relationship).
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
