Describe the tone the news story uses to present the findings and claims.
That is, does the story seem straightforward and reasonable, or perhaps ground-breaking and novel, or else counter-intuitive, sensational, or even shocking? (Give examples of how the story is reported to back this up). Is the story missing any information that could make the claims or conclusions more convincing (such as a control group, comparison condition, details, or evidence)?
When you first found the story, were you convinced that it was accurate, or were you skeptical? Why?
Next, track down the original scientific article behind the story. The news story may not completely cite the article, so you may need to do some detective work here. Use the Internet to find the name of the journal or conference, the name of the authors, and the title of the article. You can probably just google the last names of the scientist/authors and date associated with the finding, get the full citation and then look it up in the library’s electronic journal collection (or it may work to google the article’s title). If you need help tracking down the scientific report from a journal
Then, read the scientific article. You may be unfamiliar with some of the jargon or statistics, but do the best you can (you don’t need to read every word). Summarize what was varied within the experiment and what things were compared. Try to find the part of the article that the news story seems to be based on, then say how the scientist reported the finding, then identify and describe any differences between that and how the news story reported the finding.
In your opinion, does the news story simplify the scientific article appropriately, without being misleading? Or do the claims in the story go beyond those in the article, and if so, how? Are there important limitations discussed in the scientific article that didn’t make it into the news story?
Briefly comment on how much you trust the scientific article (how good the original study is).
Is the scientific journal or conference where it was presented a good one? Journals are rated by how much impact their articles have within a scientific field. This is called an “impact factor.” If your source is a journal, report the journal’s impact factor (just google the journal’s name and “impact factor”). If it’s a scientific conference, try to estimate whether it’s selective (= uses peer review) or else has loose or no standards (some conferences allow anyone to publish who can pay a fee; others allow members of a society to publish without going through peer-review).
Does the research finding seem to be completely novelóis this the only study that found this resultóor is it consistent with other studies? (We’re not asking you to do a lit search here, but to use your best judgment of based on how the article is presented.)
Provide a brief conclusion about what you’ve learned from this assignment.
Format: Address all of these questions and points in an organized fashion do all this in 2 well-written pages, 11-12 point font (double- or 1.5-spaced – your choice).
Topic : Bilingualism: How we turn on and off languages
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Prompt: The Market Revolution is the time period from 1800-1840 in which the American economy transformed from small, colonial markets to a bustling national one. This growth, however, occurred at the expense of several groups of people in American society. Name at least three distinct groups ad describe how they contributed – yet rarely benefitted – from the Market Revolution.
Source: Foner, Eric. Give Me Liberty!
Write a 5-paragraph essay to support a unique thesis.
Please use standard English, 1î margins, and an 11-o 12-point font. A healthy 5-paragraph essay is at least 25-30 sentences, or about 5-6 sentences per paragraph.
For the purposes of this assignment, you may cite your sources in the following matter. Please note the mechanics of citation.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Watch the following Ethics in Action video vignette and answer the questions. (Please note that some of the questions may be different than in the Ethics in Action workbook). Responses should demonstrate critical thinking and insight and should be of sufficient length to address each question completely
#19 Bartering: Manicuring for Therapy The client (LeAnne) states that she can no longer afford to pay for therapy. However, she really does not like to think about terminating. The counselor (Natalie) takes the initiative of suggesting a bartering arrangement, indicating she would be open to trading manicures and haircuts for therapy services.
What are the prominent ethical issues for the counselor Natalie in this vignette and what is your impression of how she handled the situation? Explain.
If you were Natalie, how would you have handled this situation? How would you have responded if the client LeAnne proposed a bartering arrangement? Explain.
Would you ever consider bartering if a client was unable to pay for therapy? If so, what considerations would you examine in deciding whether or not to engage in bartering?
What other options besides bartering might exist in this case?
in order to increase your knowledge and level of understanding of course topics and improve your critical thinking skills (and earn additional points), please consider including items in your discussion posts (and other assignments where appropriate) as follows:
thoughtful explanations;
examples that support your views and thoughts;
additional information;
counterpoints with explanations; and
valuable questions which may bring to light new perspectives or ideas
Resources use the 2014 ACA Code of Ethics As Approved by the ACA Governing Council book name – Issues & Ethics in the helping professions by: Gerald Corey, Marianne Scneider Corey, Cindy Corey.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Assess potential corporate level strategies for the organization.
Assess potential global strategies for the organization.
Recommend a strategy or combination of strategies the organization should implement, and include a rationale for that recommendation.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Imagine that you have been appointed as the Chief Compliance Officer of Uber. You must prepare a presentation for your suppliers regarding your Supplier Code of Conduct.
Create a four to six (5-7) slide PowerPoint presentation in which you:
2.In your own words, explain how each aspect of your Supplier Code of Conduct is committed to ethical business practices and society social responsibility.
3.Discuss your company’s stance on each of the following areas:
a. Empowering Workers
b. Labor and Human Rights
c. Health and Safety
d. The Environment
e. Accountability
4.Identify the key ways that your company’s Code of Conduct has changed in recent years (i.e. have there been any improvements made).
5.Examine the manner in which your company’s Supplier Code of Conduct helps the organization operate as a socially responsible organization.
6.Provide detailed speaker notes of what you would say if you were delivering the presentation.
7.Submit a reference page with at least two (2) quality references from the past 2 years that you have used for this presentation / paper. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as academic resources.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
This assignment has three parts, PLUS an introduction and conclusion.
Part 1: (about 250-300 words) the topic is below. This topic asks you to explain an important part of the author’s view. You must use at least 3 quotations from the primary text. Part 1 is basically the same thing as what you did in Skills Paper 1.
Part 2: (about 100-200 words) Formulate and explain one narrow counterargument to the claim you chose above. Do not try to discuss everything that might be wrong with the author’s view; focus on one specific point. Make your counterargument as strong as possible. This section can be short, just make sure you explain the counterargument thoroughly. Parts 2 & 3 are basically the same thing as what you did in Skills Paper 2.
Part 3: (about 250-300 words) Give a rebuttal to the counterargument on behalf of the author. In this part you should go beyond what the author actually said in their writings, and use your own philosophical thinking to generate a rebuttal that the author could or should have made if they had the chance to respond. Thus this response is consistent with what the author actually said, but is not something that appears in the primary text. Parts 2 & 3 are basically the same thing as what you did in Skills Paper 2.
AFTER you are finished with these three tasks, write a short introduction and conclusion to your paper (about 100 words each). The introduction and conclusion should each provide an overview of the entire body of the paper (i.e. Parts 1-3). The introduction provides an outline or abstract of your argument so the reader has some idea what is coming; the conclusion ties the entire paper together so the reader can review what he/she has just read. One way of putting this is: say what you’re going to say (introduction), say it (body), say what you said (conclusion). Another way you can think about doing the introduction and the conclusion is (in each) to write 1-2 sentences summarizing each section of the paper (Parts 1-3). Please see the sample paper on Canvas for an example of how to do the introduction and conclusion.
Here is the topics:
Explain Kant’s Formula of Universal Law, including contradiction in the conception and contradiction in the will.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Humanities Course – this is a power point presentation
Source: Susan Glaspell: “A Jury of Her Peers”
Transform a humanities argument into a visual and aural presentation.
Transform the short story into a visual presentation by using MS PowerPoint.
Use graphs, charts, pictures, links, sound effects, or whatever else you can think of to allow your audience to understand your presentation within a visual and aural format.
Be sure to cite your sources with a citation page (every image!)!
Give your audience a clear, organized, and focused summary of your interpretation, stating any relevant background information on your subject, your thesis, your major points, and the key examples which support your major points. Improve the argument!
Argue a clear and definite theory of the story.
The presentation is as long as it takes to present the argument. I do not have a slide or word quota, but the argument should be clear.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
One concept you have been introduced to is the concept of value-adding. Associated with value-adding is the concept of value proposition. How are both of these necessary for a firm to be successful in its marketing strategy? How might these lead to ethical situations within marketing practices?
Include in your discussion post, personal observations as well as concrete examples to support your views.
Initial posts should be at least two paragraphs and include direct references to the readings and/or additional articles
. Post should be within 375 words
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
