Live According to Virtue Ethics Essay Paper Description
A significant virtuous choice: the most significant (i.e. serious, consequential)ethical choice that you made in your attempt to be virtuous.
Live According to Virtue Ethics Essay Paper
• A problematic situation: a situation in which any of the following might apply: (1)
You could not carry out some virtuous act, or (2) you did something you thought
might be considered virtuous but felt conflicted about it, or (3) you could not figure out what the virtuous thing to do was.
After identifying these two case studies, write an essay about virtue ethics. Follow these instructions:
1. First, write an introduction explaining virtue ethics. Assume that the reader does not know anything about virtue ethics.
2. Next, use your significant virtuous choice as an example to illustrate what is
entailed in living by virtue ethics. Describe what happened in your specific
situation. What virtue(s) was/were relevant in the situation? What might the
relevant excesses and defects of character have been in the situation? How did you decide how a virtuous person would act/behave in the situation?
The Principles of Social Conflict Assignment Will be uploading the principles
The Principles of Social Conflict Assignment
In class, you each selected a partner and began to interview them about a conflict in their family of origin. You will now take what you’ve learned about your classmate’s conflict and apply Principles #2-6 of the 6 principles of theory at play in each conflict. As in your last assignment, feel free to incorporate the drama triangle and empowerment dynamic/triangle wherever helpful. As you analyze the rules animating the system you have identified (Rule 5), you might find it helpful to use points 1-6 on page 235 in the course textbook as your guide.
I want you to imagine that a friend has found out you’re taking a business ethics course and expressed an interest in one of the assigned topics, Two Concepts of Liberty, On Liberty, “When a Boss Asks for Something Unethical” which I will provide the articles, and they asked you about the things you’ve been reading about it in class and what do you think about the issue. Think of the critical essays as your thoughtful response to your friend’s inquiry.
The first thing you need to do is pick a topic for and decide what you’re going to say about it.
I tend to be a bit of a traditionalist so I always like so see a good beginning, middle and an end. I will now go through the basic structure I’m looking for.
The Beginning:
Your introduction should provide three important pieces of information:
1. What is the topic?
2. Why is it important/interesting?
3. What are you going to say about it?
The Middle:
Since your friend has not read the assigned readings on the topic you chose you are going to have to provide a summary of the issue and an account of what the assigned authors have so say about it. Provide a summary of the important points raised by they author(s) so your friend will be able to follow the discussion. Once you have provided this foundation I want to see you dig in and critically evaluate what the authors have to say about the topic. What did you like and/or dislike, did if find it convincing or not and, most importantly, I want to know your reasons for accepting/rejecting what they have to say.
What I basically want you to do is convince me that you understand the issue, what the authors have to say about it, that you have evaluated it critically and that you have a thoughtful position on the issue. I want you to try to convince me you’re right about the issue.
The End:
Provide a nice summary, tie up any loose ends, draw your conclusion and your done.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Moral Position regarding to Business Ethics Write a 7-8 page Case Study analysis and offer a moral position regarding any Business Ethics Topic found in the recent news (within the last 2 year
Moral Position regarding to Business Ethics
s) The format of the paper should be as follows:
7-10 pages, double spaced, in 11-12 point font, with one-inch margins. The title and your name should only take up two lines of space on the top margin.
Moral Position regarding to Business Ethics Grammar
Grammar and spelling count! This is an upper division course so I am assuming that you can write and college level essay at this point in your careers.
Regarding citations — you may use either the MLA or APA style for textual citations and bibliography.
Content: Each paper offers a formal ethical analysis of a case study. Where relevant, you should always address the following items when you examine a case:
Moral Agents: Who were the primary players? What did they do that was morally relevant? Players can be individual persons or companies.
Morally Relevant facts: What do we know about the case? What is alleged about the case v the facts pertaining to the case?
What moral theory do you think best addresses the case? Explain why by contrasting how each theory would approach the case.
What is your view and what moral principle(s) do you think are crucial to your argument?
At least 4 sources for your information.
Good Sources:
Government Regulatory Websites
Major Business Journals
The Wall Street Journal is especially good
Major Newspapers and News Magazines (These always have sections on Business Activities)
Briefly describe two ethics theories that run contrary to the Christian worldview
According to JP Moreland’s Chapter 5, he lists and describes 5 important groups of virtues important for developing the Christian mind. Briefly describe two virtues and why they are important
Describe the difference between believing in absolutes and being an absolutist
List and explain two important steps in the White & Rehberg Ethical Decision-Making Process
Briefly describe what Just War Theory (JWT) is in your own words and what it can be used for
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Post a brief description of the government organization you selected. Describe the ethical issue or violation you identified as it relates to finance or budgeting. Using the American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) Code of Ethics or the ethical guidelines within your organization and/or nation, explain why it is/was an ethical issue or violation. Then, explain how the organization is addressing or has addressed it. If a violation has not occurred, how would you recommend preventing one?
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Whether to Monitor Childs Internet or Not Internet can be a negative influence on children because they might be exposed to sex or violence; therefore, parents should monitor their child’s activity.
Whether to Monitor Childs Internet or Not
This essay will be an argument essay, so you need to write the opposite view and my view, but please focus in my view and write a little bit about the opposite view. Also, write it in point by point.
If you can write privacy it may be dangerous for a child…, trust is not enough …, and strangers who could blackmail or steal the child.
Also, i need at least 2 citations in each paragraph (intro-3 body-conclusion).
(USE VANCOUVER STYLE)
Deontological Decision and Criminal Law How can a deontological decision lead to moral behavior in law enforcement?
Deontological Decision and Criminal Law
Is ethical leadership and behavior a challenge to law enforcement officers? Explain your position. Deontology is an ethical theory that uses rules to distinguish right from wrong. Deontology is often associated with philosopher Immanuel Kant. Kant believed that ethical actions follow universal moral laws, such as “Don’t lie. Don’t steal. Don’t cheat.”
Deontology is simple to apply. It just requires that people follow the rules and do their duty. This approach tends to fit well with our natural intuition about what is or isn’t ethical.
Final Paper is a philosophical analysis of the same bioethical issue from your presentation, which is from the content of the second half of the semester (Levine’s book), based on ethical theories studied in class, 5-7 full pages, double space, font Times New Roman, 11 or 12, with 1” margin on all sides.
You can carry on your philosophical analysis of the side you chose in your presentation, either the YES or the NO side, but you cannot repeat the same thing that you had in your presentation. Final Papers should focus on philosophical analysis of arguments (of the side you chose) based on ethical theories we studied in class. Students should also choose an outside, scholarly source on their topic and integrate their findings in their paper. Please follow MLA. Deadline is December 2, Sunday, night.
You should upload your Final Paper on Turnitin the way you did for all other course work. All files should be MS Word and file name should have your full name and the course work. If I were to submit it, my file name would be YunusTuncel-FinalPaper.do
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Critical Thinking Concept Ethics Journal Purpose:
To apply critical thinking concepts as well as ethical concepts, principles and theories to current events.
Instructions:
Identify three news articles throughout the semester that relate to ethics in some way.
Critical Thinking Concept Ethics Journal
It is your responsibility to identify relevant articles for the assignment. Major newspapers such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Wall Street Journal are a few suggested sources that regularly publish articles relating to ethics in some way.
Note: The articles you have selected MUST be published during the semester you are enrolled in the class. No credit will be given for any journal entries based on an article published prior to the first day of class for the section in which you are registered.
For each article, complete the following:
1) Summarize the main point of the article, being sure to explain how the article relates to ethics.
2) Analyze the article by applying at least two of the elements of thought to the article.
3) Identify the central ethical concepts and/or principles that the article addresses, either explicitly or implicitly.
4) Attempt to identify what normative theory the article relies on, if any. Be sure to explain your reasoning. If you do not see any theory as relevant to the issue, explain why you have come to this conclusion.
5) On a scale of 1-10, explain how significant the article is for the general public to read. Explain the basis of your analysis.
6) Personal response/evaluation: what is your personal response to the article? Does your response rely on any aspects of ethical theories we have covered in the class?
7) Source. Be sure to provide a weblink to the source of your article as well as proper bibliographic information in APA or MLA formatting.
Note: If you utilize a print source, you will need to scan and upload a copy of the article so that I am able to evaluate your work.
Example:
1) The recent article “Human-Animal Chimeras Are Gestating on U.S. Research Farms” addresses the controversial attempt to use pigs and sheep as incubators to grow human organs for transplant. This issue is relevant to ethics because it inserts human cells into animals, which could “blur the line between species,” (Regalado, 2016) which in itself has implications for whom or what is morally considerable, or for whom we believe is a member of the moral community.
2) Two elements of thought that pertain to this topic are implications/consequences and concepts. The topic is controversial because the consequences of introducing human DNA and cells into animals are difficult to predict. Many people are concerned about genetically modified foods, and this practice seems to take GMOs to a whole new level. The term ‘concept’ also applies to this article because the concept of what it means to be human becomes challenged—if I have an organ grown inside a pig transplanted into me, does that me less human in some way? If a pig has a human heart, does the pig become in some way human?
3) Some of the ethical concepts that pertain to this article include human nature and safety. In our chapter on natural law, we explored different conceptions of human nature. It was difficult to determine what human nature consists of, and this new technology further complicates the matter. Another ethical concept is safety, which itself relates to the concept of well-being. Will the artificially grown organs be safe for humans? If part of ethics is to improve well-being, and the organs are safe, then this seems like a good idea. But, if undetermined risks come to light in the future, this would be ethically problematic.
4) The attempt to grow human organs inside of non-human animals seems utilitarian in nature. By sacrificing some animals as vessels for human organs, a greater amount of good can theoretically be achieved. Whether the greater good is actually achieved, and whether it would justify the amount of pain caused to animals seems to be something that only the test of time will show us.
5) I would rank this as a 7 on a scale of 10 in terms of level of importance. This is an example of a technological advance that can have considerable effects on the way we see animals and the way we think of the problems surrounding organ shortages for transplants. At the same time, this technology seems somewhat far off, and so is not as important as other more immediate concerns. I suppose that if I or a loved one needed an organ, or if I were an animal rights activist, I would rank this article as even more important.
6) I’m somewhat torn about this idea. I’m concerned about tinkering with nature without really appreciating the long term effects of doing so. Humans seem to have a track record of acting first and thinking later. For instance, I saw a documentary about the dust bowl. New technology (tractors) allowed the sod in the Great Plains to be tilled for agriculture. But, when a drought came, much of the tilled soil was blown away in the great dust storms. I can appreciate the use of science to make medical advances. So, I would say that this kind of action is OK based on utilitarian reasoning, provided that it starts very slowly and does not get adapted on a wide scale basis until we have a reasonable sense that the benefits truly outweigh the risks.
7) Regalado, A. (2016, January 6). Human-Animal Chimeras Are Gestating on U.S. Research Farms. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved on September 13, 2016 from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/545106/human-animal-chimeras-are-gestating-on-us-research-farms/
Critical Thinking Concept Ethics Journal Grading
Point value: each individual journal entry is worth fifty points. The assignment on the whole is worth 150 points.
Late work: Late work is penalized 15 points per day, and will not be accepted once the week of the final exam begins.
Grading rubric: Please see the rubric below to determine how each of your journal entries will be graded.
Question
Possible Points
Do you clearly identify the main point of the article and explain how the article pertains to ethics?
5
Do you clearly apply two elements of thought to the article and explain their relevance to the issue?
8
Do you clearly identify at least two ethical concepts relevant to the article and explain their role in the issue?
8
Do you attempt to identify a normative theory that the article relies upon? Is the identification correct and well-reasoned? If no theory is determined relevant, do you explain the basis of your judgement?
8
Do you clearly evaluate the significance of the issue to the general public and provide an explanation of your evaluation?
8
Do you clearly explain the basis of your personal response to the issue and support your response with ethical reasoning?
8
Is your work well written? Do you avoid grammar and spelling errors? Do you use proper vocabulary for a college paper? Is your source cited appropriately in APA or MLA format?
5
