Researched Industry Standards and Best Practices

Researched Industry Standards and Best Practices IFSM 432 Phase 2 Draft Plan (Group) Assignment

This is the second assignment of the phased group activity. The objective is to develop a draft BC/DR Plan according to researched industry standards and best practices.

Please use the detailed template provided as a separate attachment as an outline. Each group will complete all components of the assignment by the due date indicated in the syllabus schedule. Since this is a draft, you may only have some preliminary data in several sections. This is fine with the expectations that you will be maturing these sections. However, please strive to arrive at some preliminary information for each section.

Researched Industry Standards and Best Practices Rubric

There are five primary (or high level) sections to this draft plan that is detailed in the rubric:

1) Section 12-16 Communications

Please complete all areas of the plan realizing that you will be maturing these sections as you proceed through the course. Always keep in mind the business scenario (OptiPress) and your group risk assessment exercise to complete the sections of the plan. You can tailor each of the sections as you deem appropriate.

Important: Because this is a draft plan, you need not provide graphics (i.e., charts, measures) or references. However, you do need to provide at least a preliminary outline of your flow diagrams for Section 14. These are not expected to be mature at this point, but there should be a basic set of diagrams provided. Any additional graphics, charts or measures you wish to provide should be included with your final product in phase 4.

Weekly conference discussions will highlight concepts related to incident-response handing, disaster-recovery planning, and business continuity planning and processes.

Please stay aligned to the sections. However, you may include a discussion of later technologies that may reside in the template. One example is section 11 – Emergency management standards. The Tape retention policies may be dated (or still appropriate for use). You can refresh this section as appropriate to address how OptiPress would address this policy.

Researched Industry Standards and Best Practices Assignment Consideration

Please ensure that the draft plan incorporates the key elements identified in Phase 1 (except for graphs and references), complete with mitigation strategies demonstrating an understanding of course concepts, analysis, and critical thinking.
Ensure that the draft plan contains response scenarios that align well with identified risks.
Ensure that your paper is well organized and presented in a professional format.

Grading Rubric:

The following grading rubric applies:

BC – DR Plan Scenarios

Use the following scenarios (both) to evaluate the assigned BC-DR plan. Your assignment is to create a document that identifies the weaknesses and strengths of the plan and provides recommendations based on best practices (provide references). The document should have a cover page with the group names, the result of the exercise, and references, as appropriate.

Over the last three months, Anita Diamond has worked diligently to get BC and DR plans into place. The HQ plan is finished but not all the details are worked out for the operational data centers. Anita has decided to conduct a tabletop exercise designed to assess the effectiveness of what has been accomplished thus far. She chooses two scenarios to work through simultaneously.

Please perform a tabletop exercise on both scenarios as follows:

Scenario 1: In Philadelphia, PA – the data center has been partially damaged as a result of a flood that has breached the building and entered the main data center floor. No one was injured, but the water continues to pool into one corner of the mainframe room and, due to the weather forecast, threatens the entire floor housing the equipment. More flooding is expected over the next several days. Does the BC-DR Plan cover this scenario and address all aspects of what is necessary to contain and recovery operations?

Scenario 2: In Annapolis, MD – the manager for the server farm calls for assistance, when audit logs indicate there has been a breach of customer personally identifiable data (PII) on the server that holds the information for promotional products ordered through the Internet. Not knowing what else to do to ensure no additional data was breached, the manager yanked the power supply on the servers that supported this process and now the whole OptiPress Intranet/LAN seems down. Does the BC-DR plan address what to do if internal communications are lost? Does the BC-DRP address how to handle sensitive information during an event that may require investigative support as well as cause a full blown DR process to begin?

Response Scenarios

Instructor note: Please refer to your group risk assessment assignment as a guide for completing this section.

In the event of a fill in with risk or the process area Note – keep it simple. For example. In the event of a fire….. or, In the event of a flood…..

In the event of a major catastrophe affecting facility, immediately notify the .

Procedure STEP ACTION

In the event of risk area

Procedure STEP ACTION

In the event of a risk area

In the event of a network service provider outage to any location, the guidelines and procedures in this section are to be followed.

Procedure STEP ACTION

In the event of a [risk area]

In the event of a flood or broken water pipe within any computing facilities, the guidelines and procedures in this section are to be followed.

Procedure STEP ACTION

In the event of a [risk area]

In the event of a flood or broken water pipe within any computing facilities, the guidelines and procedures in this section are to be followed.

Procedure STEP ACTION

Plan review and maintenance

This plan must be reviewed semiannually and exercised on an annual basis. The test may be in the form of a walk-through, mock disaster, or component testing. Additionally, with the dynamic environment present within , it is important to review the listing of personnel and phone numbers contained within the plan regularly.

Instructor note: Please provide additional insights on the testing of this plan. Often scenarios are defined to be reviewed and tested.

The hard-copy version of the plan will be stored in a common location where it can be viewed by site personnel and the EMT and DRT. Electronic versions will be available via network resources as provided by IT. Each recovery team will have its own directory with change management limited to the recovery plan coordinator.

Alert/Verification/Declaration phase (x-x hours)

Researched Industry Standards and Best Practices Flow Diagrams

Create a workflow diagram for each risk area based on the identified steps in your procedures and based on what needs to be done within the first X-X hours, including decision points in the workflow.

Instructor note: For the draft plan (phase 2), please provide a high-level set of flow diagrams, realizing that these diagrams will be matured (and may change) when you submit the final plan (phase 4). You will want these to match your risks identified in your group risk assessment assignment.

Plan checklists

Instructor Note: Develop a list of what you would need to have available to you in order to address each risk area. For example, if you are addressing a natural disaster, you would need floor diagrams for a building.

Risk or process area

Step Required data, forms, or other tools or information

Risk or process area

Step Required data, forms, or other tools or information

Risk or process area

Step Required data, forms, or other tools or information

Notification of incident affecting the site

On-duty personnel responsibilities

If in-hours:

Upon observation or notification of a potentially serious situation during working hours at a system/facility, ensure that personnel on site have enacted standard emergency and evacuation procedures if appropriate and notify the EMT and DRT.

If outside hours:

IT personnel should contact the EMT and DRT.

Provide status to EMT and DRT

Contact EMT and/or DRT and provide the following information when any of the following conditions exist:

Instructor note: Please provide a list of information for contact purposes

Any problem at any system or location that would cause the above condition to be present or there is a certain indication that the above condition is about to occur.

The EMT will provide the following information:

Instructor note: The plan defaults to EMT and/or DRT but you can tailor this as you have defined your teams. If not change, that is fine.

Location of disaster
Type of disaster (e.g., fire, hurricane, flood)
Summarize the damage (e.g., minimal, heavy, total destruction)
Meeting location that is a safe distance from the disaster scene
An estimated time frame of when a damage assessment group can enter the facility (if possible)
The EMT will contact the respective market team leader and report that a disaster involving voice communications has taken place.

The EMT and/or DRT will contact the respective team leader and report that a disaster has taken place.

Decide the course of action

Based on the information obtained, the EMT and/or DRT need to decide how to respond to the event: mobilize IT, repair/rebuild existing site (s) with location staff, or relocate to a new facility.

The Viet Museum in San Jose Research Paper

The Viet Museum in San Jose

For your reflection essay – visit the Viet Museum in San Jose (on Senter Road) and reflect on your visit.
https://www.sanjose.org/listings/viet-museum
(No more information I can provide. You can search by yourself)

Things I will be looking out for in your essays are as follows:

1)What are the presences and silences in the Museum?

2) What is the history behind the making of the Viet Museum? Focus on the How and Why – questions – that is – how and why was it set up? What were the struggles the founder/s faced in setting it up?

3) Does it remember Vietnam history or Vietnamese history? Explain your opinion.

4) Were you aware of the Viet museum before this class? reflect on why and how you came to know about the Viet Museum

5) Reflect on the spatial location of the Viet museum- why was it set up where it is set up?

*for those who want “brownie points” – please visit the Vietnamese Garden in San Jose and reflect on the above questions – but reframe them to additionally focus on the Garden too

Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

How Marijuana Affects Memory & Attention

The written report should address the biological study of a specific behavioral or mental phenomenon (normal or pathological) covered in your assigned readings and/or videos. You should select a behavioral or mental phenomenon (e.g., language, schizophrenia) and then select a biological strategy (e.g., hormones, neurotransmitters, physiology, imaging).
As an example, the theme of your report might be imaging approaches to the study of schizophrenia. Your paper should summarize fundamental issues, questions, and controversies and provide a general overview of the topic. It should also elaborate on your understanding of the brain processes that are revealed through imaging research in schizophrenia. To accomplish this, you will have to use research articles to illustrate relevant points. You may use any of a number of resources to find research articles that deal with your topic, including the library and the Internet.
This paper is not a “commentary” or “editorial” style paper, but rather a formal research paper using scientific references as the basis for your topic. Personal experience, while sometimes relevant, should not be included for this assignment unless these experiences are linked to course concepts and the brain. Also, you should avoid using personal pronouns such as “I” or “myself” in this type of paper.
The requirement for the research articles that you select is that they must have appeared in a peer-reviewed (i.e., refereed) scientific journal. (Please contact your instructor to confirm whether a particular journal is peer-reviewed.)
You must use at minimum two peer-reviewed scientific articles and they must be recent, i.e., have appeared in the literature no earlier than 2006. You might use the online databases from MEDLINE and PSYCH ABSTRACTS as a source of full-text articles from refereed journals. Newspaper or magazine articles should not be used as your major reference, but can be useful if they lead you to the appropriate research article. You should avoid simply repeating the articles in summary form; rather, use them within the text of your paper to illustrate important points.
To ensure that you are on the right track, you will need to post your paper topic in the Paper Topic Discussion area during Week 2; this discussion area should be used as a place to brainstorm your topic, so ideas, but not full topics, are allowed to be submitted and we will work together to formulate them into a topic. Post early in the week so we have enough time to work through and secure your topic. Your topic must be approved by me by the end of Week 2 for you to be able to submit your paper. Any student without an approved paper topic will not be allowed to submit the final paper.
Your paper is to be 6 to 9 pages, or about 1,800 words in length (abstract and body of paper), excluding the title page and references.
It must be typed (12 pt font), double-spaced, with one-inch margins, and fully referenced in APA format (see http://www.apa.org).
Check the course schedule for your due date. Late papers submitted without written notice to me will not be accepted. If you have an issue meeting the deadline for the paper, you need to email me first before submitting the paper late. After you are approved to submit the paper late, a 5-point deduction will be applied for every day the paper is late. NO papers will be accepted (regardless of emails about late submissions) after 11:59PM eastern on the final day of the semester.
In the event of an emergency or illness, please contact me to determine a new submission date for your paper; appropriate documentation, such as a doctor’s note, etc. is required.
APA format general guidelines
Four main paper sections:
Title page: is required and a page header (or running head) is required to appear on each page in the header section. Do not place the header in top portion of the text of your paper, it must be in the header section in the word document.
Abstract: The text of your paper should be preceded by an abstract (about 100-200 words) that summarizes the key points in the paper (i.e., statement of problem, major findings, conclusion). All abstracts will be posted in a discussion during the final week of class for all students to review. You should respond to these abstracts to stimulate discussion. Your responses will be evaluated and will constitute part of your grade for online conference participation during Week 8.
Body: is the text of your paper that should include an introduction and conclusion. Properly formatted in-text citations are REQUIRED. Papers without properly formatted in-text citations will receive a grade of zero.
**No quoted material is allowed in the final paper. All references must be paraphrased. The inclusion of quoted material will result in a 30 point deduction from your final paper grade.**
References: appear on the final page(s) of the document. The list needs to be in alphabetical order and indented according to APA standards. Further, all pertinent information must be included for each reference, including volume numbers, issue numbers, authors, etc. Any reference that appears in this list MUST also be cited in-text and any reference cited in-text MUST also appear in the reference list. The lack of APA formatting for the reference list will result in the grade of zero for the paper. If you are unsure of how to format references in APA, please consult the latest edition of the APA manual, the UMUC library and/or Effective Writing Center, or the Purdue Online Writing lab (https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/).
The paper will be graded on (1) content and understanding, (2) how effectively you have communicated your ideas in writing, (3) you adherence to APA standards, (4) and the proper use of primary source material. You will receive a separate grade for each of these elements, weighted equally. Content and understanding are evaluated on the basis of whether the paper (a) identified important issues, questions, and controversies; (b) used recent and relevant research literature to illustrate the issues; and (c) demonstrated an understanding of brain processes and how brain research revealed an understanding of the behavior in question. Effective communication is evaluated on the basis of (a) organization and structure that help communicate the ideas (e.g., headings throughout the text), (b) use of your own language and style (no cutting and pasting), (c) connecting ideas in the text with research papers, and (d) correct usage of APA format in the text and references.
If you would like to view an example paper formatted in APA, please see this page on the Purdue Online Writing Laboratory’s website.
Your paper is to be submitted in Microsoft Word format (e.g., .doc, .docx file) and formatted in APA style (please consult the APA Style Manual, sixth edition, for proper format). Additional resources for APA style include the UMUC library and/or the UMUC Effective Writing Center and the Purdue Online Writing lab.

Papers not in Word file format and APA style will not be accepted for a grade; in this case, a grade of “zero” will be assigned for the paper.
You can download Open Office for free to type your paper. Save your Open Office document as .doc or .docx. Here are instructions for how to save an Open Office document as a Word file. Files saved as .odt will not be accepted – please follow the instructions above to save your .odt file as a Word doc (e.g., .doc, .docx).
It is highly advised that you take care to use proper APA style. If you have technical issues related to Word, please notify me immediately so that an appropriate solution can be found.
You are highly encouraged to submit a draft of your complete or near complete paper to the Effective Writing Center (EWC) (located on the drop-down menu on the left side of the screen; under “Course Content,” click on “Writing Resources”) for review and comment, prior to the due date of the paper. This should be submitted well in advance of the due date, in order for the EWC to respond and for you to make the necessary corrections. Once you receive feedback from the EWC, you can copy and paste it into a Word Document, then post it in your assignment folder with your final paper by the due date, for your instructor to view as necessary. The EWC can help address questions regarding format, structure, writing style, and appropriateness of references.
**No quoted material is allowed in the final paper. All references must be paraphrased. The inclusion of quoted material will result in a 30 point deduction from your final paper grade.**

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Ancient Rome Research Assignment Paper

Ancient Rome

Seminar #3: Ancient Rome

Directions

Respond to the questions below based on both class lecture and outside research from the sources provided. Your responses must answer all questions that are asked and included at least one properly cited quote. Your seminar assignment should be 3-pages double-spaced.

Academic Sources

Gardner’s Art through the Ages That’s your textbook
KhanAcademy – www.khanacademy.org
MET Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History – www.metmuseum.org/toah
Smarthistory – www.smarthistory.org

What is the function of a Roman forum? Describe the plan of the Forum of Trajan including the courtyard, basilica, temples and column. What purpose does the apse serve in a basilica?
What is Pax Romana/ Pax Augusta? How does Ara Pacis Augustae (Altar of the Augustan Peace) display the Pax Romana or Pax Augusta? Describe the relief sculpture of the altar to support your argument.
What is the function of a triumphal arch? How does the Arch of Titus promote imperial virtues of the Empire and the Emperor? What is the significance of the Apotheosis of Titus in the interior vault of the arch?
How did the political situation in third century CE Rome differ from that of the first century CE, and what effect did that have on art? Discuss the two statues, Portrait of Augustus as general, from Primaporta (Augustus Prima Porta) and The Tetrarchs in regards to what has happened to the tradition of Roman Imperial Portraiture.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Research Proposal Writing Services

Research Proposal

The written research proposal will be created based on a narrowly defined aspect of the topic selected in Week One. A research proposal is a detailed plan for a specific study to be conducted at a future time. It is the document which potential researchers typically submit to an institutional review board (IRB) for ethical review and approval, and/or to funding agencies to secure financial support for a research effort. Because it is a plan for research which has not yet been conducted, the Methods section should be written in the future tense and should not contain any hypothetical results. The paper must address all of the components required in the Methods section of a research proposal. The following actions must be completed.

State the research question and/or hypothesis.

Briefly compare the characteristics of the major research paradigms used in previous studies on the chosen topic. Introduce the specific approach (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods), research design, sampling strategy, data collection procedures, and data analysis techniques to be used in this study. Provide a short explanation as to why the selected procedures are more feasible than other alternatives for the research topic.

Describe any relevant variables, measures, and statistical tests.

Apply ethical principles and professional standards to the proposed psychological research. Provide an analysis of any ethical issues that may arise and explain how these issues will be resolved.

The following headings for the required sections and subsections must appear in the paper. In accordance with APA style, all references listed must be cited in the text of the paper.

Introduction

Introduce the research topic, explain why it is important, and present an appropriately and narrowly defined research question and/or hypothesis.

Literature Review

Evaluate the published research on the chosen topic including a minimum of three peer-reviewed articles. Summarize the current state of knowledge on the topic, making reference to the findings of previous research studies. Briefly mention the research methods that have previously been used to study the topic. State whether the proposed study is a replication of a previous study or a new approach employing methods that have not been used before. Be sure to properly cite all sources in APA style.

Methods

Design – Create a feasible research design that incorporates appropriate methods to address the topic. Indicate whether the approach of the proposed study is qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. Identify the specific research design, and indicate whether it is experimental or non-experimental. Evaluate the chosen design and explain why this design is feasible and appropriate for the topic and how it will provide the information needed to answer the research question. Cite sources on research methodology to support these choices. Include a minimum of two peer-reviewed sources.

Participants – Identify and describe the sampling strategy to be used to recruit participants for the study. Estimate the number of participants needed, and explain why this sampling method is appropriate for the research design and approach.

Procedure/Measures – Apply the scientific method by describing the steps to be taken in carrying out the study. Identify any test, questionnaire, or measurement instrument to be utilized. If an existing published instrument will be employed, briefly describe it and cite the source. If an original questionnaire, survey, or test will be created for the project, describe the types of information that will be collected with it and explain how the validity and reliability of the instrument will be established. If such an instrument will not be used, describe how the data will be collected for the study.

Data Analysis – Describe the statistical techniques (if quantitative) or the analysis procedure (if qualitative) to be used to analyze the data. Cite at least one peer-reviewed source on the chosen analysis technique.

Ethical Issues – Analyze the impact of ethical concerns on the proposed study, such as confidentiality, deception, informed consent, potential harm to participants, conflict of interest, IRB approval, etc. After analyzing the ethical issues that apply to the project, indicate what will be done to handle these concerns.

Conclusion

Briefly summarize the major points of the paper and reiterate why the proposed study is needed.

Attention Students: The Masters of Arts in Psychology program is utilizing the Pathbrite portfolio tool as a repository for student scholarly work in the form of signature assignments completed within the program. After receiving feedback for this Research Proposal, please implement any changes recommended by the instructor, go to Pathbrite, and upload the revised Research Proposal to the portfolio. Use the Pathbrite Quick-Start Guide to create an account if you do not already have one. The upload of signature assignments will take place after completing each course. Be certain to upload revised signature assignments throughout the program as the portfolio and its contents will be used in other courses and may be used by individual students as a professional resource tool. See the Pathbrite website for information and further instructions on using this portfolio tool.

The Research Proposal

Must be five to seven double-spaced pages (excluding title page and references page) in length and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Must include a title page with the following:

Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted

Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought and provide a thorough explanation of all required issues.

Must utilize a minimum of six peer-reviewed sources from the Ashford University Library.

Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

The Problems of philosophy Essay Paper

The Problems of philosophy

Questions:

What philosophical problem or question is Russell addressing in this chapter?

What is Russell’s main thesis in the chapter?
What is Russell’s argument for this thesis?
What are the strongest objections to this argument?
Do these objections succeed?Some guidelines:
You should clearly state each of the premises and the conclusion of the argument you discuss.

Each premise should be at least somewhat plausible, and the conclusion should be supported by the premises (i.e., if the premises are all true then the conclusion is either definitely, or probably, true).

The argument you present may include one or more implicit premises (an assumption that Russell seems to rely on, and that is required in order to establish the conclusion, but that Russell does not explicitly state).

This is an essay. Don’t just answer each of the questions above and consider the job done. At a minimum, you need to include an introductory paragraph and smooth transitions between paragraphs.

A good objection to an argument must identify a specific weakness in then argument. Typically the objection will be that a specific premise is either false or not supported by the evidence.

In considering whether the objections to the argument succeed, you should think about how Russell might reply to the objections, and whether such a reply would be effective. For example, if the objection is that a specific premise is not adequately supported by the evidence, you should consider what additional evidence Russell might produce in support of this premise.

PHIL 1010 (online) Paper Assignment

This paper does not require outside research. Please avoid trying to find outside resources discussing this piece. If you must bring in outside research, cite it appropriately.

Plagiarism is using somebody else’s words or ideas without crediting the source. Students found to have plagiarized will receive an F in the course.

The quality of the writing (grammar, spelling, style, organization) counts towards your grade, but far more important to me in assessing the paper are clarity and precision (saying exactly what you mean to say and effectively communicating this to your audience), relevance and completeness (saying what needs to be said and no more), accuracy (not making any major factual or logical errors), and creativity (exhibiting independent, original thinking).

The paper must be a minimum of 500 words not including notes and citations. It should be double spaced and submitted in .rtf, .docx, or .pdf format.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Criminal act and the criminal intent element

This is a multi-part question. The total answer to this final question should contain at least 350 words. Please remember to list your references in Bluebook format, even if your only reference is the ebook.

Define the criminal act and the criminal intent element required for rape and how much resistance a victim must demonstrate to evidence lack of consent.
What is are the rape shield laws and why are they used?
How are domestic violence statutes different than standard assault, battery, sex offenses, or criminal homicide statutes?

Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Supply chain Blue Ocean Strategy approach

Question 1:

Apply the Blue Ocean Strategy approach to assess the content and format of the 91‐201 course. Identify a few general course characteristics which you think all courses of value should have. You may start with a list of a few things which you think have worked well in this class, and other that perhaps did not. Was there anything that has surprised you (either positively or negatively)? Is there anything that needs to be changed in the course? Either because there should be MORE of something or LESS of something else, or something should be ADDED because it was not covered at all?

Compare this course with 2‐3 courses of your choice that you may have taken this term or in the past.

Question 2:

Use the Strategy Canvas we have used in class (T10) for your comparison and provide summary of your analysis

Answer the following questions:

[5 pts.] What did you learn in this course (about the subject matters, yourself and your teammates)?
[2.5 pts.] How do you know that you learned what you claim you learned?
[2.5 pts] How do you plan to use/apply what you have learned? Is anything you learned of immediate value (e.g., you can start using it right away)?

[10 pts.] Write a short essay (up to 250 words, but no less than 220). The essay should take a form of a letter addressed to the future student(s) of the Engineering Management & Globalization class. In a letter to a future fellow student, who may follow in your footsteps next time the course is offered, explain briefly what you are studying, and what you value most of things you have learned in this class that may be useful in pursuing your studies (be specific). Provide also any useful tips in terms of studying strategies, work on assignments, etc.

Anything you wish had known before taking the class (e.g., things to do or to avoid).

Hint: Use the rephrased questions as the headings of the corresponding sub‐sections

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Selecting Strategy Essay Assignment

Selecting Strategy

Your first task is to post a detailed outline of your Unit 5 IP to the discussion area so that other students will be able to review your work.

For this assignment, select a real company in the fast food industry.

You have just been hired by (your selected company) as its new vice president of strategic planning. The corporation’s performance in recent years as well as the changes with business and economic conditions will be a central focus of your new job.

Given the size of the corporation and the fact that it is in a highly competitive industry, the chief executive officer (CEO) to whom you report has already given you permission to hire a staff of recent Master of Business Administration (MBA) graduates to assist you in your efforts. You recently completed the interviewing and hired four people with minimal real business experience.

In coming months, you and your team will be creating a completely new—and, presumably, more effective—strategic plan. You plan to begin by holding a kick-off meeting with your team.

To feel confident that all of the employees in your strategic planning team understand all that you have taught them, you require each to prepare a streamlined version of the key elements of a strategic plan. You require each employee to prepare the following sections of a strategic plan for the corporation’s next 3-5 years:

Mission and Vision Statements (Simply copying from an existing real company is unacceptable.)

Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Time-Bound (SMART) Goals and Objectives

Industry Analysis

Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats, and Trends (SWOTT) Analysis

A Perceptual Map

Choose any criteria that you think are important to plot.

Explain why you picked the criteria.

Your task is to create a plan, following the same parameters, which will be the sample standard that your employees’ submissions should match.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

How to write Book Précis Assignment

How to write Book Précis

Book Précis – For this assignment, you’ll write a précis on the required readings (book and articles) used in this course. A précis is a summary and critical evaluation of scholarly works (In this case a book and at minimum three articles). It will typically take the following form:

Full bibliographic citation in Chicago of Style Manual format of the book.
First paragraph: an objective summary or abstract of the publication. This paragraph should present the information as objectively as possible. You’ll have a chance to critique the argument in the second part of your précis. You should not use the abstract published for the book. The first paragraph should contain the following information:

The overall argument that the author is making, including the author’s thesis, the logical thread of the argument, the kinds of support provided, and so forth. If the author invents or uses special terms to argue the case, mention and define them.

The context for the argument. What critics or points of view is the author attempting to refute? Where does the author’s argument fit into the larger critical discussion of the issue? Is the author attempting to overturn certain assumptions about the work, and, if so, what are those assumptions.
Second and third paragraphs: a critical analysis of the publication. In this paragraph, you’ll assess the strengths and weaknesses of the article and discuss the implications of its reasoning for future study of the work.

These questions may help you get started:

What parts of the book/articles were especially strong or insightful, and why?
In what parts of the scholarly works (if any) did the author make claims that were not supported by the evidence? Were there any flaws in the logic of the piece?

In what ways is this book useful for understanding the historical topic covered? How significant is it?

You may use more paragraphs if you need to, but you should follow this basic format.
Length: Approximately 2 typed, double-spaced pages
Late submitting will be penalized a letter grade or more.

Chicago Manual of Style Format:

http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!